[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 62 KB, 320x371, 1515356720845.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9960290 No.9960290 [Reply] [Original]

>It's physically impossible...

>> No.9960291

>The absence of evidence is evidence of absence.

>> No.9960297

>the globe is warming

>> No.9960298

>>9960290
>science says...

>> No.9960299

>>9960297
It is, conspiracy theorist retard.

>> No.9960300

>there's no such thing as "the scientific method"

>> No.9960301

>>9960299
It isn't, doomsday cult alarmist retard.

>> No.9960303

>>9960301
It is, sorry. You are wrong.
https://climate.nasa.gov/

Nothing you rant will change reality. Bye, Mr. Tinfoil.

>> No.9960305

>>9960303
>sorry
You should be. Promoting pseudoscience should be a crime.

>> No.9960306

>>9960305
No, Little Timmy. Climate change is established fact. Run along, now.

>> No.9960312

>the science is settled

>> No.9960314

>>9960290
>string theory is the correct theory of everything

>> No.9960321

>>9960314
*String hypothesis

>> No.9960340

>amen

>> No.9960427

>>9960290
>It's just a theory retard, they can't prove nothing

>> No.9960432

>your brain...
FUCK YOU, don't you ever talk to me or my brain again.

>> No.9960436

>>9960290
>the scientific method says that we must ...

>> No.9960465

>I believe in science

>> No.9960474

> it isn't approved for use in humans
> The FDA rejected it so its ineffective.
>Its a drug meant for horses are you fucking serious?
>You can't do that you don't know its long term effects

Oh normies....

>> No.9960487

>>9960290
>why should I believe in evolution, there's no proof that animals change into other animals

>> No.9960488

>>9960299
I really want to crush your head with a rock

>> No.9960519
File: 238 KB, 720x452, evidenceofabsence.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9960519

>>9960291
Except this is actually true from a Bayesian perspective.

>> No.9960525

>>9960487
Dude, i hope you're joking...
it takes time and it makes small changes
/\
In case you aren't

>> No.9960531
File: 498 KB, 494x493, complimentinsult.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9960531

>>9960525
he's quoting brainlets, you fucking idiot.

here's my addition to the thread:
>Dude, i hope you're joking...
>it takes time and it makes small changes
>/\
>In case you aren't

>> No.9960548

>of course god exists!

>> No.9960577

>>9960303
> quotes nasa as a source

lol i thought sci was the smart board? fucking idiots.

>> No.9960597

>>9960577
yeah, you're too smart for us, clearly. probably the geniuses on /x/ or /pol/ or /b/ are more at your intellectual level, so if i were you i'd leave /sci/ and go there forever

>> No.9960618
File: 7 KB, 250x245, 1534822908083.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9960618

>>9960548
>there is no such thing as God! Everything came out of literally nothing! Nothing was nowhere, until suddenly everything was here!

>> No.9960630

>>9960488
>Dur u r not convinced of giant conspiracies like I am so I want to hurt you


Thanks for further establishing my victory.

>> No.9960632

>>9960618
Are you retarded? “Nothing” doesn’t exist in physics and can never exist.

>> No.9960637

>>9960519
>The absence of evidence that there’s a tardigrade in this room is evidence of its absence.
No.

>> No.9960638

>>9960474
Clenbuterol?

>> No.9960646

>>9960632
>“Nothing” doesn’t exist in physics and can never exist.
[citation needed]

>> No.9960681

>>9960618
a wild brainlet appears

the burden of proof lies with the one making the claim, not the one opposing it. if everything started with nothing, then there is nothing to prove until the status quo leans towards something with objective proof. if everything started with God/whatever deity you follow, then you have to prove that deity's existence.

>> No.9960742

>traps are gay

>> No.9960745

>>9960290
>(((Einstein)))

>> No.9960751
File: 317 KB, 600x600, cover pole.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9960751

>>9960742
>traps are not gay
ftfy

>> No.9960779

>time is the 4th dimension

>> No.9960785

>>9960577
Evidently not, seeing how it has actual honest-to-god climate deniar tards

>> No.9960791

>>9960297
It objectively is. Mean global temperatures have already increased by 0.9°C.
Even most climate deniers have already abandoned the "EVERYTHING IS FINE" line and switched to "IT'S NOT THE HUMANS' FAULT" some twenty years ago.
I honestly don't understand people like you.

>> No.9960792

>>9960298
this is the only accurate one

>> No.9961181

>>9960646
>What is virtual particles

>> No.9961199

>>9960290
>as an engineer...

>> No.9961202

>>9960791
My favorite, DUR VOLCANOS MAKE WAY MORE CO2 DAN HOOMANS, which is completely untrue. We outstripped volcanos in CO2 production over half a century ago and now individual U.S States outproduce all volcanos on earth

>> No.9961231

>>9960291

It is true though.

> hypothesis predicts experimental outcome
> experimental outcome not supportive
> hypothesis incorrect

>> No.9961778

>>9960488
> Ug grug, disagreeing with non-backed up > wild claims make caveman angry, want
> SMASH WITH ROCK

>> No.9961781

>>9960618
>Physics is wrong cause I don't understand it, physicists say that everything came from nothing, my belief is superior in that I say everything came from a higher power, and where that higher power came from you ask? (Insert hypocrisy here)

>> No.9961786

>>9960290
>Cosmos

>> No.9961799

>>9961231
Lmao, no.. hypothesis not supported, not hypothesis incorrect. Unless you've found evidence that directly suggests the hypothesis is incorrect.

> Hypothesis: I hypothesize that intelligent extraterrestrial life does not exist in our universe.
> Experiment: I will observe incoming radio and electromagnetic waves to our planet for 3 days.
> Outcome: I did not observe anything that suggests the existence of extraterrestrial life.
> Conclusion: intelligent extraterrestrial life does not exist in our universe.

Hopefully I don't need to explain to you why the conclusion is incorrect, and you might say the experiment is flawed; I'd say to you, give me an experiment that doesn't make any assumptions.

>> No.9961812

>>9960291
Wow, very first post is a brainlet in the flesh, saying a thing

>> No.9961813

>>9960618
>d-did he just imply that me believing in god means i am a brainlet?!
>y-yea well brainlets say the opposite thing *posts frog cartoon meme*
>hehe xD *switches tab to reddit*

>> No.9961827

>>9960290
Surprisingly good thread, OP. I really enjoy how half the posts are making fun of brainlets and the other half are actual brainlets creating OC shit brainlets say.

>> No.9961832

>>9961827
list the posts making fun of brainlets and the ones that are actually brainlets

>> No.9961904

>>9960637
Learn the difference between evidence and proof, idiot.

>> No.9962142

>>9960297
>>9960618

The work of one /b/-poster has unhinged /sci/ to the point of pots-and-pans-clanging offendedness. How easy is it to get under your skin, anons? No wonder this man is double-dipping in bait posts.

Truly -- I am in the company of enlightened individuals.

>> No.9962235
File: 38 KB, 460x574, ayXnePM_460s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9962235

>vaccines cause autism
>humans are done evolving
>we
>the sun is made of fire
>people will live on Mars

>> No.9962395

>>9962142
that second post was a response to another post offending his belief in the fiction of God, its clear that /pol/ posters have infested this board pretending to be 140+ IQ while their posts expose them for being the brainlets they (You) are

>> No.9962437

>>9960618
With god you are actually saying the exact same thing.
only God in this context is your nothing

>> No.9962448

>>9960290
>Go back to /pol/
-brainlet redditors using ad hominem tactics

>> No.9962479

>>9961231
>absence of evidence
>experimental outcome

>> No.9962483

>>9960303
>criticize climate change science for being politicized
>linking to a government funded agency

>> No.9962505

>>9962448
Go back to /pol/

>> No.9962562

>>9960290
evolutionarily speaking

>> No.9962570

>>9960300
There isn’t

>> No.9962573

>>9960474
Lmao he just wants to push shitty drugs

>> No.9962580

Non-meme ones:
>>9960290
>>9960291
>>9960298
>>9960312
>>9960314
>>9960427
>>9960436
>>9960465
>>9960474
>>9960487
>>9960779
>>9961786

>> No.9962590

>>9960290
>vaccines cause no harm and essential to administer to your children

>> No.9962593

>>9962590
*it’s essential to administer it to your children

>> No.9962595

>>9960291
Complete and total absence of evidence is evidence of absence when you think about it
By that I mean "there is no evidence, ever. At all." Not "I didn't find any"

>> No.9962601

>>9962590
>>9962593
Well me'med

>> No.9962606

>>9962601
I was being unironic tho

>> No.9962615
File: 30 KB, 225x350, 203557.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9962615

>(intending to make emphasis)
>literaly [insert here any figurative phrase]

>> No.9962627

>>9962606
Hahaha nice

>> No.9962717

>nothing is 100% sure so I will keep believing in religion

>> No.9962734

>Jesus is the way, the truth and the life

>> No.9962737

>economics isn't real science
>t. mathematically illiterate political "scientist"

>> No.9962740

>shit brainlet say

>> No.9962755

>>9961904
Explain, brainlet.

>> No.9962757

>>9960618
This

>> No.9962764
File: 14 KB, 478x523, you.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9962764

>>9961181
>virtual particles are nothing

>> No.9962765

>>9961904
I know the difference, retard

>> No.9962777

>>9961181
Virtual particles are just a calculational tool, brainlet.
https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/147152/35699

>> No.9962794

>>9962615
one time this faggot pseudointellectual argued to me that you can say it like that to express that it's not sarcasm

>> No.9962798
File: 38 KB, 600x568, 1535396084349.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9962798

>>9962717
>>9962734

>> No.9962816

>There is only one race, the human race.

>I am fit equality and diversity

>the world is overpopulated, don't have kids. Our population is ageing, we need to import migrants from Africa and the Middle East

>I am for multiculturalism, but they need to integrate into our culture

>you bigot should be put in prison!

>> No.9962830

>>9961231
>>9962595
the fact that evidence doesn't currently exist doesn't mean that it cannot exist you brainlet subhumans

>> No.9962946

>>9960637
Yes, it is. If there's a tardigrade in your room you should be able to find evidence of it. Maybe it shits all over the place, maybe it lays eggs, maybe you can find it's DNA by swabbing in particular places a tardigrade would hang out. If you fail to find the kinds of evidence a tardigrade is expected to leave behind, then that is evidence against the hypothesis that a tardigrade is in the room. It isn't unsassailable proof, but evidence nonetheless.

>> No.9962958
File: 44 KB, 549x591, 1532546501582.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9962958

>brainfog
>micromanaging micronutrient intake matters

>> No.9962963

>>9960618
Based and redpilled

>> No.9962964

>>9962946
>attacking the metaphor
maybe in this scenario it's 500 years ago and he doesn't know any of those methods. you're a limited scientist if you don't consider the existence of the unknown

>> No.9963071

>Assume

>> No.9963075

>correlation does not equal causation
when talking about something completely unrelated

>> No.9963169
File: 37 KB, 1084x846, graphs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9963169

>>9960597

>> No.9963183

>>9960299
>>9960488
If he's right, you'll get your chance when so iety collapses because it was going to happen no matter what! But at least you can claim credit for it and he'll believe it like the gullible idiot he is.

>> No.9963188

>>9960637
As >>9962946 says, a tardigrade in the room would leave some kind of evidence. It seems like you're suggesting that the lack of immediately obvious evidence, such as "I can see a tardigrade in the room", can't be considered evidence against the tardigrade. That's only true because the hypothesis "there's a tardigrade in the room" doesn't predict that a naked human eye would be able to see it: that event is completely independent from the hypothesis.

>> No.9963397

>>9962798
ded meme son

>> No.9963433
File: 23 KB, 409x437, 1535083759507.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9963433

>"six million jews died in WW2"
>"the speed of light is known"
>"obama was a good president"
>"i know what infinity is"
>"0.999... = 1"
>"Humans are the smartest creature on the planet"

>> No.9963619

>>9962964
>have you heard of the grarditade? it's a tiny creature that leeches off your life energy and causes cancer
>why should I believe you? that sounds made up
>absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, brainlet

>> No.9963639
File: 15 KB, 480x480, 1535294908801.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9963639

>>9963433
(You)

>> No.9963715
File: 2.15 MB, 1280x544, manlets.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9963715

>>9963639
(Me)

>> No.9963964

>>9962580
meme ones:
>>9962580

>> No.9964351

>IFLS is a well-informed Facebook page with relevant and interesting research news that isn't at all sensationalized or exaggerated.