/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.9931720]

Maths emerged in animals/humans as survival necessity interacting with the environment on a classical-physics level and is therefore misleading and obsolete for non-classical physics.

[Anonymous No.9931724]

>Maths emerged in animals/humans as survival necessity interacting with the environment on a classical-physics level
So far so good
>and is therefore misleading and obsolete for non-classical physics.
Actually it seems to work just as well with relativity and QM
Unless you define math as explicitly only working for classical mechanics
Wich is dum

[Anonymous No.9931726]

Maths isn't one thing your imbecile. Pick different axioms of set theory etc, get different maths, use the appropriate kind of maths to describe your non-classical hypothesis.

Also, maths isn't an evolved phenomena any more than writing is. Written maths hasn't existed for the majority of human history. You really think mathematics is encoded in alleles?

[Anonymous No.9931756]

>>9931724
>Actually it seems to work just as well with relativity and QM
Quantum mechanics is incomplete

[Anonymous No.9932186]

>>9931720
Miss me with your reductionist bullshit, FAGGOT

[Anonymous No.9933933]

>>9932186
>articulating yourself like a nigger on a science forum.

[Anonymous No.9935716]

>>9933933
>He can't handle the banter

[Anonymous No.9937230]

>>9932186
>reductionist
Never implied that all of maths or non-classical physics is flawed

[Anonymous No.9939086]

bump

[Anonymous No.9939465]

>>9933933
>implying this is a forum for serious discussion

lol