[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 80 KB, 949x678, pennywise.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9919577 No.9919577 [Reply] [Original]

if 1gram of water = 1 ml of water why use a beaker and eyeball 150 ml of water instead of taring a scale and weighing up 150 grams of water?

>> No.9919580

1 gram of water is not 1 ml

>> No.9919581

>>9919577
>Atmospheric pressure
>Gravity at current level
>Other chemicals present in water

I guess because they aren't lazy and retarded, like you.

>> No.9919582

>>9919580
put a ml of water on a scale that a drug dealer would use and tell me how many grams it is

>> No.9919585

>https://study.com/academy/answer/what-is-the-mass-of-1-ml-of-water.html
???

>> No.9919589

why use a liquid container and a scale when you can use a liquid container that comes with markings

>> No.9919594

>>9919582
I got .95, I live at 3500 elevation.

>> No.9919596

>>9919582
That depends on temperature and atmospheric pressure.

>> No.9919648

>>9919581
>>9919596

>> No.9919652
File: 327 KB, 780x439, sodium.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9919652

>>9919648

>> No.9919656

>>9919577
It's 1 cubic cm of water equals 1 mL of water

>> No.9919818
File: 7 KB, 225x225, duuurhuhuhurrr.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9919818

>>9919656

>> No.9919828

>>9919818
>i have no argument

>> No.9919839

>>9919594
Water weighs less up there though it it evens out.

>> No.9919843

>>9919656
>>9919828
Lol what a retard

>> No.9919855 [DELETED] 

>>9919843
the retard in the one who thinks liters measure weight or mass
american educarion, folks

>> No.9919859

>>9919843
the only retard here is the one who thinks liters measure weight or mass
american education, folks

>> No.9919865

>>9919656
A cubic cm of anything is 1 mL, they both measure volume. That's not what OP was referencing.

>> No.9919868

>>9919859
No one's confusing mass and volume here, retard

>> No.9919876

>>9919868
evidence of your comments shows otherwise

>> No.9919888
File: 18 KB, 632x125, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9919888

>>9919656
>>9919828
>>9919859
>>9919876
Stop embarrassing yourself. You bring shame to your country when you carry on like this and then insult others for calling you on your retardation.

>> No.9919894

>>9919888
sigh

"an SI accepted metric system unit of volume"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litre

ask mommy to tie your shoe laces, then go to a library to read a book for once in your life

>> No.9919899

>>9919894
No one's saying a mL itself is equal to 1 gram, they're saying a mL of water is.
How much longer are you going to continue to pretend to be retarded so you don't have to admit you made an actual mistake?

>> No.9919912
File: 25 KB, 353x417, images (85).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9919912

>>9919894

>> No.9919926

>>9919894
What country are you from?

>> No.9919942

>>9919899

gram is weight, mL is volume you absolute retard

>> No.9919950

>>9919942
Everyone here is well aware of that fact, retard

>> No.9919955

>>9919942
Also, gram isn't a unit of weight, it's a unit of mass

>> No.9919958

>>9919950

1 ml of water is still not 1 gram in every condition you ape

>> No.9919960

>>9919958
You're right

>> No.9919962

>>9919926
found the pol/tard

>> No.9919966

>>9919962
How old are you?

>> No.9919970

>>9919899
cut and paste the word 'gram'
from >>9919656 into your reply

if you can't, kys

>> No.9919971

>>9919966
how hairy is your ass?

>> No.9919973

>>9919970
>>9919971
Cringe

>> No.9919974

>>9919973
>>9919828

>> No.9919979

>>9919958
Which is what most of the thread was saying until you derailed it with your ESL retardation.

>> No.9920119

>>9919581
>>9919839
>>9919942
>gravity affecting mass
>mass is weight
This fucking board. Why do I come here?

>> No.9920135

>>9919950
>i have nothing to say
>i will just acknoledge him and also call him a retard so that i look like i did a thing
fucking retard

>> No.9920138

>>9919839
Reeetard

>> No.9920143

>>9920135
He replied to someone thinking they didn't know the difference between volume and mass

>> No.9920145

>>9919577
Well it's not illegal thus nobody forbids you of doing it that way.
I mean who cares as long as you're not trying to do something precise (e.g. you're cooking a salt cake for the other posters of this thread) ? You can technically use the approximation 1g of water [math] \approx [/math] 1ml of it. The few ml of difference caused by this approx will be of the same order of magnitude as using a cheap cooking beaker that is not exactly graduated properly ...

>> No.9920582

100ml of water = X grams of water
Find X
Hint (its practically the same as 100)

>> No.9920593

>>9919577
stp issues aside, because you almost certainly don't need the precision of weighing 150 grams and your scale probably hasn't been calibrated in years anyway. eyeballing 150 mLs in a graduated cylinder or beaker is easier and quicker and just as good for 99% of applications

>> No.9920595

>>9920582
not in space it isn't

>> No.9920596

>>9920119
gravity differs at different locations on earth nigger

>> No.9920606

>>9920596
weight != mass nigger

>> No.9920626

>>9920595
ok retard

>> No.9920628

>>9920626
Not in the freezer it isn't

>> No.9920644
File: 3 KB, 340x195, 1=1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9920644

>1 milliliter (ml) of water weighs 1 gram (g).
http://mathcentral.uregina.ca/QQ/database/QQ.09.06/s/shian1.html

>Convert ml to gram [water]
>The answer is 1
https://www.convertunits.com/from/ml/to/gram+[water]

On and on.

>>9919577
That works fine, but just eyeball it after to see if it equals out.

>> No.9920659

>>9919581
doesnt temperature also factor in?

>> No.9920676

>>9920606
i wonder how you think a scale works

>> No.9920679

>>9920659
it does

>> No.9920681

>>9920676
well you tell us oh wise one, do it in space just to amuse us

>> No.9920687

>>9920676
Newtons is a unit of weight
Grams is a unit of mass

weight != mass

>> No.9920699

>>9920687
do you have some kind of a mental disability?

>>9920681
>not understanding how weight is used to determine mass
ok so you DON'T know. glad we cleared that up.

>> No.9920718

>>9920699
well he's technically right. weight is used to determine mass by assuming a given constant of gravity. any time you move to a different gravitational context your reported mass is inaccurate

>> No.9921106

>>9920699
Do you think weight and mass are the same thing?

a 100 gram mass has the same mass on the earth and the moon but they weigh different

>> No.9922391

>>9919594
>Implying different strengths of gravity wouldn't slightly increase or decrease the density of the water anyway, hence manipulating the volume
He's right, measuring weight is superior because it eliminates human error, and we know how to calculate the mass if we have the information, so we can remove the variation of weight in different locations.

But it's just too fucking gay and nobody needs that level of precision and accuracy. I bet the majority of people in the lab don't even measure from the miniscus anyway, so who fucking cares.

>> No.9922395

>>9920699
[math] \displaystyle
\color{red}{\mathsf{\text{(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)}}}
[/math]