[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 24 KB, 400x400, 9d0Pv90H_400x400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9912861 No.9912861[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

how does one differentiate science from pseudoscience
scientists BTFO

>> No.9912960

>>9912861
https://scienceornot.net/science-red-flags/ there you go

>> No.9912966

>>9912861
Same way you discern traps from women.

>> No.9912974

>>9912966
You can observe the adam's apple, the facial structure, the voice; or just collapse the wave function and grab the cotch

>> No.9912982

>>9912861
If it
>mentions atheism
>mentions skepticism
>mentions rationalism
>mentions the "scientific method"
>mentions enlightenment
>mentions parallel universes
>mentions collectivism
>mentions diversity or wamyns
>mentions LGBTTQQIP2SAA+
>mentions progressive values
>mentions quantum theory without math
>mentions string theory without math
then it is pseudoscience.

>> No.9912983

>>9912861
>how does one differentiate science from pseudoscience
Science comes from the scientific method, while pseudoscience does not.

>> No.9912986

>>9912982
>>mentions skepticism
>>mentions rationalism
>>mentions enlightenment
>>mentions collectivism
You realise just because something's not scientific, that doesn't make it pseudoscience, right? Pseudoscience has to portray itself as science, it's not just a codeword for things that trigger you.

>> No.9912987

>>9912983
>t. pseud

>> No.9913005
File: 93 KB, 549x413, dabdude.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9913005

>>9912861
I dab every time my code compiles successfully. I spend a large portion of my day waving my hands in the air

>dab it up dabdudes

>> No.9913009

>>9912861
I think it's called the scientific method.

>> No.9913022

Depends on the issue at hand.

>> No.9913029

>>9912983
No. Science comes from authority. Scientific method gives a lot of wrong results, just look at parapsychology studies.

>> No.9913034

>>9913029
>parapsychology studies
>scientific method
what did he/she mean by this?

>> No.9913048

>>9912986
>Pseudoscience has to portray itself as science
Which all of the above try to do.

>> No.9913334

>>9912861
If a theory can't be proven wrong by any observation or logic, it isn't science.

>> No.9913337

>>9912861
Base your truths only on the smallest possible base particle you can observe stable that makes up the sources "facts".
If the fact can be built from these base particles, it is possible.

>> No.9913342

>>9912982
>Mentions diversity
Most of the subfields of ecology, biogeography, systematics and evolution deal exstenivley with diversity.
Go watch ben stiler RAPE an sjw with LOGIC and FACTS instead of larping like someone who knows about science.

>> No.9913681

>>9913034
Exactly. They use the scientific method, and get replicable results that can not be explained by the materialist paradigm. Therefore the scietific method must be wrong, and we must rely on authorities to tell us what is true.

>> No.9913690

>>9912982
>>9913342
Low-quality b8

>> No.9913700

>>9913048
No they don't. Those are ideologies you retard.

>> No.9913708
File: 44 KB, 434x600, Scientific-Method-Experiment-Write-Up0002-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9913708

pseudo-science is what you get when you make conclusions without using the scientific method

>> No.9913715

>>9912861
By being smart

>> No.9914355

>>9913700

Yeah and their followers claim skepticism/rationalism/enlightenment/collectivism is scientific or the harbinger of science.

>> No.9914357

>>9913708
The scientific method only exists in pseudoscience. Real scientists don't work that way.

>> No.9914535
File: 68 KB, 751x600, 1521310520757.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9914535

>>9912861
ask them if there is any experiment that confirms their strings of buzzwords (pic related)

>> No.9914537

>>9912983

/thread and saged. Stupid fucking thread

>> No.9914541

>>9912974
>or just collapse the wave function
under-rated, all before me are psueds

>> No.9914630

>>9914535
The Bogs have transcended the scientific method.

>> No.9914854
File: 72 KB, 636x640, Edward-Witten.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9914854

>>9914630
but Witten is OK, amirite?

>> No.9914857
File: 18 KB, 640x360, 606453465_640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9914857

>>9914630
>>9914854
wait no i meant Juan. or--Juan and Witten. yeah, juan and witten

>> No.9914858
File: 11 KB, 450x251, methods.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9914858

>>9913708

>> No.9914859
File: 18 KB, 108x116, bestpostsever.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9914859

>>9914858

>> No.9914860

>>9912861
One word:
>Modeling

>> No.9914864

Intelligence.

It is in the eye of the beholder. There are many things considered 'science' today that are actually 'pesudoscience' i.e incorrect because humans are not smart enough to deal with certain topics.