[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 1.98 MB, 2550x3300, FieldsOfDestiny.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9891211 No.9891211 [Reply] [Original]

For background if you have not been following along.
https://mythandreality.imgur.com/
https://steemit.com/@roosterred

>> No.9891407

>>9891211
Is this wildberger is like off his meds?

>> No.9891410

>>9891211
if you are going to post your shitty essays please write them out in a latex document or even just type it in 2-3 posts here, because your handwriting makes it impossible for someone to begin to approach what the fuck you are rambling on about in the image

>> No.9891427

>>9891211
Poor guy, it's like believing Natural numbers aren't natural because they don't grow on trees.

I also like how you can 'topologically produce' sqrt(2) but you can't produce pi

>> No.9891426

>>9891211
>the field of dreams
are real numbers 1 to 1 functions or do you mean something else?

>> No.9891564

>Poor guy, it's like believing Natural numbers aren't natural because they don't grow on trees.
They grow trees. Maybe you should read.

>> No.9891596

>>9891211
“We can topologically produce the square root of 2 which computers can’t even right down [sic].”
The absolute state of YouTube education.

>> No.9891611

>>9891596
>>9891427
>>9891410
Comments like these make me ANGRY. They are meaningfullly ignorant. IF YOU DON'T READ MY WORK THEN DON'T COMMENT BULLSHIT! FUCK YOU! YOU DON'T KNOW HOW HARD IT IS HASBEEN TO CREATE THIS NARRATIVE!!!!!!!

ALL OF THESE ARE WELL DEFINED TERMS: LAPLACE, SINE, ETC.

Fucking PHd losers who will never NEVER DO ANYTHING OF SIGNIFICANCE.

FUCK YOU! IF YOU CAN'T TAKE TEN MINUTES TO LEARN THE TERMS DON'T FUCKING COMMENT!!!!!!

>> No.9891622

>>9891611
Nice try, the real RoosterRed would reply on paper

>> No.9891625

>>9891622
<3

>> No.9891627

>>9891622
I'm not cursing people just yet, friend. Little drops of poison.

>> No.9893137

Lot of nonsince in this thread.

>> No.9893179

Lots of schizos in /sci/ lately

>> No.9894190

>>9891211
what the fuck

>> No.9894194

>>9891211
Words aren't real.
Neither are letters.

>> No.9894399

>>9894194
false
true

>> No.9894401

>>9891211
Some Complex Numbers are Real
All Real Numbers are Complex

>> No.9894407

>>9894401
Yes.

>> No.9894596

>>9894401
>Some Complex Numbers are Real
>All Real Numbers are Complex
Wrong!
Because (a,0)+(b,0)=(a+b,0) and (a,0)*(b,0)=(ab,0) in C, we can analogize the complex (a,0) to the real a, but the reader should not be tempted to say that the complex numbers "contain" the real ones!

>> No.9894604

>>9894596
Zero doesn't exist, bugman.

>> No.9895063

>>9894399
Words are just an attempt to transfer concepts between individuals. How do you know for sure that I am interpreting your words the way you intended? How do you know?
Words are not real. They're just made up constructs that attempt transfer meaning. They're not perfect at this, mistakes happen.

>> No.9895739

>>9894604
>>9894194
> He hasn't read Plato's Cratylus
> He is probably some sort of eliminative materialist

>> No.9895882

>>9891211
Are you saying the algebraic closure of Q in R is real, but pi isn't because you can also choose -pi in stead of pi (the 'orientation' thing) ?

>> No.9895886

>>9894596

Nah, bro. (a,0) = a

All real numbers a are complex, and correspond to (a,0).

>> No.9897357

>>9891211
I wish to bring this to your attention: 'Building A Universe Competition' #BAUniC
Numbers and maths being not only real, but the base of reality as we know it. Particles being structures on top of numbers, for example.

>> No.9897738
File: 1.91 MB, 2550x3300, MiroredAssymetry.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9897738

>>9895882
I'm saying we can't create pi through algebraic operations on and between mobius strips which are the natural numbers. We can create looped lengths like root 2. So it isn't real. And the witch way nature of nature of these modular spaces is the reason why.

>> No.9897747

>>9897738
Quality schizophrenia right here.

>> No.9898163
File: 33 KB, 480x360, 875326aaa2b31a28d61860d7e6ccc3563285dbaf5100b4588fa0af50f36b5113.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9898163

>>9891211
This is like Timecube-level shit right here.

>> No.9898541

>>9897738
What is "mod 16 in i". What are the yellow and orange triangles? What is "length of sine" and "sine orientation"?

>> No.9898557

>>9898541
Either of the two links in the OP answer all your questions.

>> No.9898563

>>9897738
We can't even create pi through the orientation from the mobius strip because of the witch way nature of them. We can, kinda, if we supper impose it on some 3d structure (unnatural), but even then the circle is close from orientation and left and right rotations, a basic symmetry of what we think of as a circle, are impossible. I know this isn't rigorous though, as I have just explained why I am dead certain it is impossible. Some things are very easy to prove in this space. Some things need a contraction. We need to be able to say making a circle is impossible because possible disproves the space itself. But I haven't drawn it out yet.

I am not crazy. I am crzy. I went a little made when I figured this out because it all seemed so spookey but that is natural, and calling me crazy is like calling any religious person crazy for simply being religious.

>> No.9898565

>>9898563
left right of a supperimposed mobius strip on a 3d structure to yield something that "looks" exactly like a circle still leads an object that twists left/right and not left or right.

>> No.9898567
File: 1.88 MB, 2550x3300, TheNaturalNumber16.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9898567

>>9898565
This explains the red footnote, which I hoped would be trivial for non-bugmen.

>> No.9898666

>>9898567
You are still not as crazy as Tooker, keep trying.

>> No.9898671

>>9898666
You will never achieve anything. You will fill all my pain.

I just cursed you. Do you see how this works now?

Have someone who is talented in math look at this! They will see everything is coherent. And then I will reveal A B C. And no one will be the same again. And accept any death that comes to me. Because you aren't playing the game. You are a pawn.

>> No.9898677

>>9898671
Ok, this is getting near the level of Tooker, but you will have to threaten children to reach him.

>> No.9898684

>>9898666
By the way, the person who posted this confirmed there were no contradictions. I know him. I curse. He just saw everything wasn't crazy, it was crzy, and CHOSE to align himself with "well everything works but it seems so fucking crazy I have to say it is crazy even though I understand why the SET OF S AND S IS 2S but THE SET OF 8 and 8 ins't 16"

Nazi Nazi Nazi

"I am too fundamentally stupid to crack primes in an unorientably environment"

I work THROUGH time. And no one can see this but me, because IQ is a lie, even though mine is high as fuck, and bugmen will never listen to the SINES.

>> No.9898898

>>9898684
>the SET OF S AND S IS 2S but THE SET OF 8 and 8 ins't 16"
{S,S}={S}
{8,8}={8}
read a fucking book

>> No.9899600

>>9898898
No you fucking book reading retard.