[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 151 KB, 400x267, 1472268494109.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9876422 No.9876422 [Reply] [Original]

Can space colonization be profitable?

>> No.9876424

>>9876422
no kek
i wish

>> No.9876430

>>9876422
Economically, maybe.
Existentially, yes.
It literally allows the human race to exist for a longer period of time without the threat of sudden extinction.

>> No.9876450

>>9876422
Not yet. Some critical technologies need to exist for it to be, namely fusion power.

>> No.9876453

>>9876450
what about protecting against radiation and the degradation of the body in low gravity situation?

>> No.9876457

>>9876453
Spin the habitats?

>> No.9876462

>>9876453
You can protect against radiation (on planet) by building underground.

You can alleviate the effects of low gravity in multiple ways, some of which already exist. My personal favorite coincides with fusion via use of VASIMR thrusters (provided they're actually not a meme) they could potentially be used to accelerate and decelerate a ship at a constant acceleration of 1g provided fusion can supply them with enough energy (and waste heat isn't a massive problem).

Use of centrifuges and workout machines are more realistic goals however.

The effects of say Mars vs Earth gravity over the long term remains to be seen however.

>> No.9876469

>>9876462
>The effects of say Mars vs Earth gravity over the long term remains to be seen however.
Just spend the majority of your time inside centrifuge habitats.

>> No.9876474

>>9876469
While I'm sure machines to simulate 1g would be built, what I mean is we don't really know yet how necessary they will be.
We know 0g is bad, but 0.4g on Mars might be enough that there will be no ill effects.

>> No.9876480

>>9876474
Wouldn't it be better to be on the safe side?

>> No.9876492

>>9876480
Like I said, I'm sure they will be built to be on the safe side, but if we're looking for long-term viability and profitability as per this thread then investigations will have to be made on permanent low gravity habitation.

Some of it may happen naturally in a large enough colony, people don't bother to go to the centrifuges, others get pregnant etc.

>> No.9876495

>>9876492
That's how you end up with bitter belters!

>> No.9876633

>>9876422
Otto Von Bismarck thought colonialism was a waste of time, as you could form alliances and trades with friends for the same costs at the end of the day.

Unless you can find special substances in spaces, then it's an economic waste of time.

>> No.9876637

>>9876422
Not even earth colonization is profitable. There is a reason the chinese never did it. The colonies ruined the europeans economically, and the only reason they were kept around were prestige or geopolitical.

>> No.9876639

We always find a way to make a profit off of land. I don’t see why someone can’t privatize mining for resources in spess

>> No.9876659

Yes, but the upfront cost is too high for any group to successfully undertake it. We are too short term thinking to ever pay the cost of bootrapping up to a space economy. I suspect we will run out of food, factionalize, and go extinct.

>> No.9876671

>>9876430
But who's gonna pay for it? You?

>> No.9876675

>>9876659
>We are too short term thinking
We are too short lived. When people live for millions of years, you'll find a lot more support for space exploration.

>> No.9876685

>>9876637
this must be bait

>> No.9878003
File: 22 KB, 158x214, OnEil.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9878003

>>9876422
According to this guy, yes it can. The initial investment will be a painful experience though but one that will be worth it in the long run.

>> No.9878005

Sadly, yes

>> No.9878035

>>9876671
If my plan works out, yeah.

>> No.9878120

>>9878035
So no

>> No.9878127

>>9878120
It will, don't you worry. Within a decade, I'll be a very wealthy anon.

>> No.9878128

>>9876422
Does it need to be profitable?
If it can become self-sustaining, who needs profit?

>> No.9878160

>>9876633
The moon is rich in gold & platinum

>> No.9878211

>>9876450
Fusion is about to be solved (google SPARC), launch costs are about to drop to essentially nothing, this is it bro, we made it to the space age.

Feels fucking good man.

>> No.9878225

>>9876430
>It literally allows the human race to exist for a longer period of time
No one cares about the fucking human race. I care about myself and my descendants, and so does everyone else. The human race is a fucking abstraction. Random tribes in the Amazon rainforest can go extinct for all I care. Any colony established to "perpetuate the human race" is going to face the threat of extinction quite expediently because no one really buys that as a goal. I suspect that future space colonists will be extremely religious, for the same reasons. Facing the abyss of space is hard.

>> No.9878226

>>9876633
>Otto Von Bismarck thought colonialism was a waste of time
And he was right. The first space colonists will probably be religious zealots, either ones escaping from persecution on Earth, or some sectarians for whom space itself has a special spiritual significance.

>> No.9878238
File: 12 KB, 275x183, 5345234232.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9878238

>>9878226
Yeah there will be religious groups of all sorts, but most of people who go to space will do so exactly because pic related. Much like the colonial days, people are sick of the same old shit and want new frontiers to push and don't give a shit about the risks.

>> No.9878239

>>9878225
Fine then, see the human race as your descendants, because that's what they are.

>> No.9878242

>>9878238
Yes, except the original Europeans who colonized North America didn't all die horribly.

>> No.9878246

>>9878239
No, that's not what they are at all. Why are you faggots so bad with abstraction? I'd expect it from the average Joe but you're supposed to know better. Getting away from brainlets like you might be one good reason to start a space colony.

>> No.9878251

>>9878242
>Implying everyone who tries to colonise space will all die horribly

Cool meme bro.

>> No.9878254

>>9878251
The only people who think colonizing space is possible are basically science illiterate/retarded, so yes if they do attempt it they will likely die horribly.

>> No.9878255

>>9878246
I don't think you know how generations work, friend.
I'm almost certainly related to you, that's what I mean.

>> No.9878257

>>9878254
2/10

>> No.9878264

>>9878254
Work on cryogenics, which could be successful if concurrent with nanomachines to repair the microfactures that occur from the flash cooling process.

>> No.9878271

>>9876685
He is right though. Colonisation on Earth was a net economic drain on the European states that endeavoured in it. Why do you think Germany (together with weak allies) was able to fight both France and England (and their allies) which were massive, global Empires at the time of WW1 and almost win? The only colony that was profitable for the British Empire was India. All of its African colonies were a complete dead weight for example. Colonies like Canada and Australia were neutral economically (the Empire spending just as much as it got out of them).

The English and the French didn't start empires because it was profitable, but because it was in their blood. The English ruling class is descended from the Normans, vikings that hated work and liked to rape, pillage, and conquer. The only colonial powers that managed to profit from it were Spain and Portugal, and it didn't help them in the long run at all, since all the silver and gold they got out of there ended up in China in the end, and they stagnated compared to other European powers (like the Dutch, whom they had once ruled). Intensive development is all that matters in the long run. Gains in efficiency. Technological development.

>> No.9878273

>>9878255
We're also both related to amoebas, if you go down that route. It's meaningless.

>> No.9878283

>>9878273
All life is precious, anon. That's exactly what I mean. We're all family on this rock.

>> No.9878285

>>9878283
No.

>> No.9878294

>>9878285
It is. Whilst there probably is other life, considering the scale of the universe, however we can only say for certain that Earth houses life. Considering just how rare life might be, it is precious to me and everyone who isn't a brain-dead vogue misanthropic nihilistic piece of so-called egoist.

>> No.9878303

>>9878294
No.

>> No.9878308

>>9878285
>>9878303
Your insolence will not go unpunished.

>> No.9878312

>>9878303
Yes.

>> No.9878314
File: 867 KB, 890x1162, angrey.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9878314

>>9878312
NO!

>> No.9878334
File: 98 KB, 1280x720, yes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9878334

>>9878314
YES!