[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 868 KB, 1280x1920, wildberger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Fri Jul 13 02:15:00 2018 No.9865078 [Reply] [Original]

if there is such a number as "Pi" as you claim, could you please write it down ?

Thank You

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 02:22:01 2018 No.9865087 >>9865078 >if... could You're incorrectly implying numbers can only be numbers if you can write them down. Please post your proof of this claim. Thank you.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 02:24:26 2018 No.9865091 >>9865078 Depends. What's the acceptable uncertainty in the problem you're presenting?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 02:24:56 2018 No.9865092 >>9865078 3.2

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 02:45:08 2018 No.9865116 >>9865078 finitists are cancer

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 02:50:41 2018 No.9865127 >>9865078 I can write down pi in many ways: The Greek letter arctan(1)*4 arccos(-1)

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 02:53:24 2018 No.9865134 10

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 02:59:13 2018 No.9865142 There’s no such thing as “numbers”

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 03:06:34 2018 No.9865149 >>9865092 4*

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 03:09:43 2018 No.9865154 >>9865078 can you claim "any" "number" "exists?"

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 03:21:00 2018 No.9865180 >>9865078 >if there is such a number as "Pi" as you claim, could you please write it down ? [eqn] \sqrt{\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{6}{n^2}} [/eqn] >>9865116 >finitists are cancer Indeed.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 03:26:34 2018 No.9865193 >>9865134 In base pi

Anonymous Fri Jul 13 04:14:01 2018 No.9865268

>>9865087
infinity is not a number fool

>>9865091
i just want a concrete solid number thats all im asking not an infinite fucking decimal representation that is a representation of infinity

>>9865142
see natural numbers

>>9865154
if it can be represented in this physical world then its a number. You cant have 3.14159.... as the area of an oval office space

>>9865180
keep believing in your fairytale concepts . lmao e^pi x an imaginary number + 1 = 0 lmao what kind of bullshit is this. Why do u think they are called "imaginary" and "irrational" numbers ? bc they are bullshit only used to satisfy certain equations that dont have any significance in the real work. fucking brainlet

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 04:36:45 2018 No.9865295 >>9865078 4chan has limits on post length and image size, so I'm sorry but pi is too big for 4chan.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 05:03:41 2018 No.9865332 >>9865295 then its not a number

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 05:05:55 2018 No.9865336 >>9865332 So? It's a mathematical representation of a concept that is only as accurate as we need it to be Elaborate on why using this abstraction seemingly destroys your precious maths

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 05:07:43 2018 No.9865337 File: 4 KB, 220x213, 220px-Pi-symbol.svg[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9865078

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 05:56:50 2018 No.9865381 >>9865268 define the physical world

Anonymous Fri Jul 13 06:20:26 2018 No.9865408

>>9865268
>bc they are bullshit only used to satisfy certain equations that dont have any significance in the real work.
Hurr, durr, what is the ratio between the perimeter or a circle and its diameter? What is the hypotenuse of a right triangle with both catheti of length one?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 06:28:20 2018 No.9865418 >>9865268 t. a fucking retard Euler's work is sublime

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 06:34:52 2018 No.9865429 >>9865408 please prove to me that a 'perfect circle ' exists. And dont say the finite points equidistant from a center because there cannot be a set of finite points to construct a circle. Get fucked brainlet

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 06:39:58 2018 No.9865436 >>9865418 fucking brainlet with no critical thinking. Just swallow all the bullshit modern mathematics deep throats you.Hey dude rad19 ^ e + rad 2 x pi + 1 = 0 FUCKKKKKK FIELDS MEDAL BTW

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 06:42:16 2018 No.9865438 >>9865436 You're not making any arguments. Just an appeal to absurdity without an explanation on why your system is superior

Anonymous Fri Jul 13 06:42:25 2018 No.9865439

>>9865429
>please prove to me that a 'perfect circle ' exists. And dont say the finite points equidistant from a center because there cannot be a set of finite points to construct a circle. Get fucked brainlet
As the electron is a point particle, the electric potential it generates define perfect spheres.

>>9865418
>Euler's work is sublime
Indeed

>>9865429
>>9865436
You are the true brainlet.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 07:09:27 2018 No.9865462 >>9865439 prove to me electrons even exist

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 07:11:09 2018 No.9865463 >>9865462 prove to me you're not a troll

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 07:39:24 2018 No.9865489 >>9865463 so you cant prove it ?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 07:41:16 2018 No.9865491 >>9865489 No, I can't prove that you're a troll. Can you?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 08:38:16 2018 No.9865551 >>9865462 >prove to me electrons even exist You are indeed a troll.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 08:43:53 2018 No.9865555 Sure, just take pi to 15 decimal points. Now for all practical reasons ( thats the only reason pi exists) everything remains the same. QED

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 09:16:00 2018 No.9865582 >>9865078 Please teach me first. Would you claim that there is a number represented as "1"? If so, then please write it down. Not some representation or symbol, but the number itself. Thank you!

Anonymous Fri Jul 13 09:26:06 2018 No.9865594

>>9865462
>prove to me electrons even exist
http://web.lemoyne.edu/~GIUNTA/thomson1897.html
Thats the original paper from 1897 that is considered to be the first conclusive proof of the existence of electron. Everything here is easily understandable if you understand basic physics and everything is naturally reproducible if you own the necessary equipment.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 09:27:36 2018 No.9865596 >>9865078 If there is such a number as "Largest Number" as you claim, could you please write it down? Thank you.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 14:35:51 2018 No.9866168 >>9865078 Sure. While I do this if you could write down the square root of negative one and we'll compare.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 15:34:16 2018 No.9866296 >>9865268 >if it can be represented in this physical world then its a number But not necessarily the converse. You are saying >if it cannot be represented in the physical universe, it is not a number which is nonsense.

Anonymous Fri Jul 13 15:37:20 2018 No.9866302

>>9865268
>lmao e^pi x an imaginary number + 1 = 0 lmao what kind of bullshit is this.
I'm sorry you're never taken a class on ODEs
>Why do u think they are called "imaginary" and "irrational" numbers ?
When will you realize these are just arbitrary names that we picked so other mathematicians know what you're talking about? I think I've explained this to you a few times now. The people who first explored these concepts could have called them anything: zany numbers, ridiculous numbers, retarded numbers but that doesnt make then less "real", stupid nigger

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 15:38:10 2018 No.9866303 >>9865078 WOULD YOU PLEASE JUST FUCK OFF ALREADY YOU FUCKING RETARD. That is all.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 15:58:39 2018 No.9866351 >>9865078 In fairness, not all of the retards that post math-hate are the same as Wildberger, probably it is just a fraction.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 16:01:36 2018 No.9866358 If you unironically think using imaginary numbers is ever justified you are a masturbatory brainlet with no real world value.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 16:02:26 2018 No.9866361 sure [math]\pi[/math]

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 16:03:32 2018 No.9866363 >>9866358 >what is FFT

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 16:23:10 2018 No.9866386 >>9866361 fucking madman really clever

Anonymous Fri Jul 13 16:26:53 2018 No.9866392
File: 19 KB, 320x224, SpinballShowdownBoss.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9865268
>infinity is not a number
Please post your proof for this claim.
Also still waiting on your proof that all numbers must have finite decimal representations.
If you genuinely care about a lack of rigor in mathematics then you should be happy to show your formal proofs for these claims.
If not you can kindly fuck off.
Thank you.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 16:33:22 2018 No.9866399 >>9866392 By definition >:^)

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 16:51:09 2018 No.9866418 >>9866399 Great, then you accept your definition isn't any more rigorous than the definition everyone else uses. Goodbye.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 17:01:24 2018 No.9866429 >>9866358 >imaginary numbers have no practical value Hahahah AHAHAHAHA

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 17:03:42 2018 No.9866433 >>9866429 t. brainlet

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 13 17:04:48 2018 No.9866434 >>9866433 "I have no argument"

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]