Definitive Guide

[Anonymous No.9861174]

I'll just leave this here

[Anonymous No.9861211]

>>9861174
kys

[Anonymous No.9861220]

>Tesla
>low tier
excuse me what

[Anonymous No.9861228]

>>9861220
*tips fedora*

[Anonymous No.9861235]

>>9861174

Put Elon Musk on "God Tier" and it's good.

[Anonymous No.9861253]

>>9861174
>makes a chart
>doesn't label what the chart measures
I am dissapoint OP.

[Anonymous No.9861255]

>>9861174
>Newton
>meh

kys

[Anonymous No.9861368]

>>9861174
Da Vinci should have his own tier

[Anonymous No.9861373]

>The Grass above Einstein
>Hawking in Low Tier
this pic was made just to troll and for no other reason

[Sage No.9861374]

>>9861174
Worst classification ever. Kys

[Anonymous No.9861380]

>>9861373
>>>/pol/178281566

[Anonymous No.9861479]

Obvious troll. But still I wanna say where the fuck is the mathematicians?

[Anonymous No.9861501]

>>9861174
Bill Maher is low tier at worst

[Anonymous No.9861549]

>>9861174
It seems to me this list is totally randomized, cannot figure out what metric you're going by.
It's like it's specifically designed to trigger /sci/.

[Anonymous No.9861613]

>>9861174
The thing is, even though this is a troll image, imbeciles with no knowledge of who most of these people are will now be convinced that somehow Neil Degrasse Tyson, James Clerk Maxwell, and Sam Harris can be in any remote way compared to one another, and then judge them in that respect. As a mathematician, Maxwell is a god among men. In making science popular among the American populace, only Tyson can be mentioned. And in regards to epistemology, every single other person on this list would stand aside to let Harris say what he has to say.

And c'mon, Maher is literally just a talk show host, not an intellectual.

[Anonymous No.9861619]

>>9861174
>being this underaged memelord

[Anonymous No.9861643]

>>9861174
It's actually believable that some retard might think this. Nice job.
>>9861380
>/pol/ as a source
Kek

[Anonymous No.9861711]

>>9861174
How come no one mentioned that tyson is in top tier? That's just bullshit

[Anonymous No.9861911]

>>9861220
hello pleddit

[Anonymous No.9862053]

>>9861174
>The Science Guy and Black Science Man above Richard Dawkins
nice meme

[Anonymous No.9862062]

>>9861174
Nice bait.

Why is Dawkins shit on so much here though?
The Selfish Gene is an excellent book.

[Anonymous No.9862080]

>>9861174

Tesla > Sagan

[Anonymous No.9862124]

>>9862062
Christians are probably the most easily offended group of people. Almost worse than feminists and jews.
inb4 fedora

[Anonymous No.9862149]

>>9861253
important

[Anonymous No.9862193]

>>9861174
>Dirac, Newton, and Einstein below Neil Degrasse Tyson

[Anonymous No.9862195]

>>9861174
It's in reverse order

[Anonymous No.9862203]

>>9861174
There are awful picks for every ranking except the shit tier, are you smoking crack?

[Anonymous No.9862208]

>>9861373
This.
>Sagan that high
>Hawking that low
>Bill Nye not in shit tier
inb4 gender memes. I don't give a fuck, but honestly he's never actually taken part in actual science.

[Anonymous No.9862326]

this chart is bullshit but at least you've got the shit tier right

[Anonymous No.9862335]

>>9861174
>Bill Maher as a scientist

We should make a tier chart of tier charts. This one is easily shit tier.

[Anonymous No.9862643]

>>9861174
Swap Tyson with Hawking and you've got a decent image, even though I'm not sure exactly what this is measuring.

[Anonymous No.9862678]

>>9861174
>Neil deGrasse Tyson
>top tier

[Anonymous No.9864022]

>>9861174
Forgetting the best

[Anonymous No.9864042]

>>9862678
oh god, /pol/ was right, there are no smart black person

[Anonymous No.9864138]

>>9861174
>make a new tier above god
>put Bill Nye in it
fixed your chart

(Sarcasm)

[Anonymous No.9864202]

You put the greatest mind ever born, Nikola Tesla in "low tier"? Wtf man???

[Anonymous No.9864209]

Real Definitive Guide

[Anonymous No.9864214]

>>9864209
>Darwin so low
automatic shit list, he singlehandedly created a paradigm shift for biology which is still followed

[Anonymous No.9864221]

>>9861174
>>9864209
These lists would be better to read and understand if someone actually put what the fuck they were based on. For example, is this list ranking people based on creative output, technical skills, or cultural impact? I have no clue, because under each of these approaches there are picks that clearly don't belong where they are in the context of how they are being ranked

[Anonymous No.9864226]

Kaku > Tyson

[Anonymous No.9864229]

>>9861174
>sagan top tier
>dawkins below nye
>tyson above low tier

[Anonymous No.9864256]

>>9861174
>Paul Dirac before Neil Tyson
Are you looking to get punched faggot

[Anonymous No.9864273]

>>9864221
it's just a ranking of the author's most respected to least respected, stop being so autistic

[Anonymous No.9864281]

>>9864209
this i can agree with, idk why it's a mixture of scientists, mathematicians, writers and musicians tho

[Anonymous No.9864284]

>>9861380
>linking a pol thread
ehuehuehuehuehuehue

[Anonymous No.9864291]

>>9861174
>Tesla and Hawking that low
>Cox even being on there
>le Grass Tyson that high

[Anonymous No.9864367]

>>9864138
were you being serious anon? were you trolling? I can't tell

[Anonymous No.9864505]

>>9864256

Black Science man >>>> White Science man

[Anonymous No.9864511]

>>9861220
>>9862080
>>9864202
>>9864291
It's an obvious troll pic, but I'm glad we now have a way to quickly and easily identify Electric Universe cult members to assist with board quality.

[Anonymous No.9864518]

>>9864209
Descartes, Darwin Mozart, Kant, Da Vinci and Feynman should go up. Also Edison if you are rating him as a businessman.
Heinsenberg, Rutherford, Lavoisier, Dalton, Joule, Volta, and many others are missing in this chart

[Anonymous No.9864565]

>>9861380
Part of the reason why people love Hawking is because of his disability though, it's inspirational to a lot of people because despite his physical appearance of being a spacko he's actually intelligent