[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 39 KB, 640x480, mathemagician.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855634 No.9855634 [Reply] [Original]

Prove to me EXPERIMENTALLY that 10/0=0 as you claim.

>> No.9855640

>>9855634
>have 10 apples
>give them to nobody
>no apples wasted
QED

>> No.9855642
File: 94 KB, 940x960, Science corruption of.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855642

>>9855640
Exactly. Did the apples disappear magically because the magic numbers say so?
Nope.
There still are 10 apples.

>> No.9855645

>>9855642
agnostics are atheists
Most of the time at least

>> No.9855649

>>9855645
Are you american? That's a really shallow way to think of the world.

>> No.9855658

>>9855640
>have 10 apples
>give them to nobody
>but you can give them to nobody an infinite amount of times.
>Infinite loop detected.
>--ERR--

>> No.9855660

>>9855649
That's just how it works m8
People that 'don't know' do not Believe there 'is' ergo they're not theists

>> No.9855664

And in turn, most atheists are happy to admit they don't know, making them agnostics

>> No.9855669

>>9855658
Why's that an error?

>> No.9855670
File: 100 KB, 850x400, Nikola Tesla on Collective Consciousness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855670

>>9855660
So can you call Nikola Tesla an atheist since he didn't believe in Jesus?
Nope.
There is more Esoteric stuff to this than the american black and white system.

>> No.9855671

>>9855642
>>9855645
Agnosticism and atheism are independent assumptions: you can be a gnostic theist, gnostic atheist, agnostic theist or agnostic atheist.

>> No.9855672

>>9855669
Because he's a dumbass american parroting base d black man and american sitcoms.
He doesn't know and he can't even fathom that there is a problem with his way of thinking.

>> No.9855674

>>9855670
Did he believe in a god or gods?

>> No.9855675

>>9855671
>We must categorize
Yeah nah.

>> No.9855679
File: 115 KB, 658x396, nikola tesla.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855679

>>9855674
Why must it be a bearded man in the sky or a "spirit" to you?
It was a concept of divine order and purpose, or maybe the knowledge that information comes from outside living body.
It doesn't have to be concrete american white or black.

>> No.9855680

>>9855679
because this is what the words you use mean

>> No.9855691

>>9855680
So what combination of "gnostic, agnostick, theist" stands for Collective Consciousness?

>> No.9855692

>>9855634
The localization of any ring by a multiplicative subset containing 0 is the trivial ring. QED

>> No.9855694

>>9855691
Spiritual atheist very likely agnostic
Not far off pantheism

>> No.9855697

>>9855672
10/0 = n
9/0 = n
10/0 = 9/0
10 = 9
Contradiction therefore original statement is error

>> No.9855700

>>9855697
30 = n
849 = n
30 = 849
?

>> No.9855701

>>9855697
12/2= n
20/5= n
12/2 = 20/5
6= 4
I can pretend to be retarded too.

>> No.9855702

>>9855634
(10/5)*5=10
(10/2)*2=10
>(10/x)*x=10

> x = 0
(10/0)*0
>Anything multiplied by 0 equals 0
>>0 =/= 10 for x=0 in (10/x)*x

>> No.9855706
File: 16 KB, 480x333, dumbass.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855706

>>9855702
So what's your point? You posted some completely unrelated gibberish besides the numbers that I used.
Prove to me by experiment with real tangible objects not by trying to find loopholes in maths.
that's the entire point of this thread.

>> No.9855727

>>9855700
>>9855701
Its clear that n is the same number if you think n exists. 30 849 are not the same number? You are both brainlets. Why does this need to be explained. The state of sci

>> No.9855729

>>9855727
>sci
Also this is math-magics in an "Prove by experiment" thread. you're the real brainlett here.

>> No.9855738

>>9855727
>30 849 are not the same number?
But it's clear that n is the same number if you think n exists

>> No.9855746

>>9855634
I don't? seriously, the fuck?
>>9855642
Ironically both are just 2 sides of the same coin

>> No.9855747

>>9855738
What does that even mean.

>> No.9855750
File: 53 KB, 571x618, reddit cancer.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855750

>>9855746
>Ironically both are just 2 sides of the same coin
So deep.
You might want to visit /r Intellectual

>> No.9855751

>>9855747
How should I know, he said it

>> No.9855756

>>9855751
You said This:
>But it's clear that n is the same number if you think n exists
No quote, no question mark.
You state it as a fact, now explain what it means.

>> No.9855758

>>9855756
Are you retarded?
>>9855727
"Its clear that n is the same number if you think n exists"

>> No.9855762

>>9855758
What is this post?
I'm asking you a simple question and you're avoiding it by posting cryptic shit.
If you fucked up and can't dig yourself out of your bullshit it's okay we get it, you're retarded. It's ok to be a fuckin retard.

>> No.9855763

>>9855751
Holy shit it is so clear. It is trivial. Thats what he meant
2*0=0
2/0 = (0/0)/0
Divide by zero twice
10*0 =0
10/0 = (0/0)/0
Divise by zero twice


There it was shown it was the same number. You can manipulate it alot of ways to get different contradictions because the asumption is wrong. So it is undefined. I guess maybe someday like how root -1 became i, there will be a number system that makes no contradictoins but now it is just undefined

>> No.9855765

>>9855763
If his assumption is wrong why should I care what it means

>> No.9855768

>>9855765
because the thread says 10/0 =0
It does not is the point

>> No.9855770

>>9855763
Ok mate i'm not maths student like you seem to be, real useful degree by the good job retard.
So explain to me why exactly are you dividing by 0 twice and what does that achieve?
How is multiplying by 0 the same as diving by 0?
What assumption?

>> No.9855771

>>9855768
This shit needs IDs, I don't think you've foilowed who I am in this

>> No.9855772

>>9855771
Nor I you

>> No.9855774

>>9855634

which idiot ever claimed 10 / 0 = 0?

>> No.9855778

>>9855697
who the fuck said that that they're both n?

>> No.9855780

>>9855774
0 or n/a or error or answer is not valid is the same exact thing.
Just because you call it a different name does not make you smarter, big bang theory fan.

>> No.9855786

>>9855770
I am a hobbyist.
The point of the equation (=) is saying it is the same number on both sides. The thread states 10/0 = 0. So to prove it is wrong and that something else, the begining is obviously true. 10*0 = 0. Zero groups of any amount is zero.

So back to the equation. Dividing both sides by zero twice should yield the same thing if the number is the same as the equation says. So once this is done the equation is in the form that the op wanted. But this can be shown to be in the contradiction because the rhs of both equations equal the same thing. And then back to the 10 = 2

This isnt a perfect proof because maybe one of the other steps was wrong. But it isnt

>> No.9855791

>>9855786
The step thats wrong is dividing by zero*

>> No.9855796

>>9855778
See
>>9855763

>> No.9855797

>>9855786
No no.
Thread states that 10/0 = 0 is wrong
What I'm saying is that 10/0 = 10
This aligns with your way of explaining and with reality.

>> No.9855798
File: 1.95 MB, 237x240, reddit trashed.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855798

>>9855791
>Le you can't do that XD because Big band theory said SO!!

>> No.9855812

>>9855798
Read the rest my dude. I am just explained perfectly that 10 = 2. So either thats correct or one of the steps was wrong. Now if you can show me which step was wrong then you cant divide by zero. The asterisk was me extending my explanation

>> No.9855816

>>9855812
Sorry I meant *if you cant show me which of the other steps was wrong then you cant divide by zero*

>> No.9855819

>>9855812
Didn't do any maths more complex than counting my dosh since highschool so you will have to simplify that whole mess up there. I could only pull some assumptions out of my ass.
Good science is always easy to digest even for the lowest of plebs.
If you can't explain to a rice farmer then your whole work is amount to nothing.

>> No.9855820

Lol but experimentally doesnt matter in pure maths fggt.

>> No.9855823

>>9855820
So what's the point of maths then, other than to entertain the dull mind of a delusional retard?
Might as well delve into Saturn worship.

>> No.9855830

>>9855820
Perhaps pure maths doesn't matter

>> No.9855834

>>9855830
It really doesn't. But it used to create stupid shit like black holes and dark matter.
It has to be ridiculed and questioned everywhere and all the time.
Black holes/ dark matter is the new flat earth (the 1200 version).

>> No.9855835

>>9855812
10 + 2 = n
HeREs a SePERaTe EquAtion
10 + 3 = n
n = n
12 = 13

>> No.9855838

>>9855819
Okay hmmm. I guess to the point of the thread to begin with. If you have zero friends and 10 cookies. Then you divide 10 cookies between zero friends how many cookies does each friend get? Undefined/ nonesensical. Mathamatically it basically this just says that it cant be true because of the contradictions. Basically if there was any answer to that question then any logic would be useless. Thats what my gay math was showing but you can think about it how you like and still get the contradictions. As long as your other steps are correct

>> No.9855842

>>9855835
See
>>9855763

>> No.9855846

>>9855842
Can you stop pointing to your fuckin 0/0/0 shit since nobody fuckin gets it besides you.
>>9855838
That's if you look at it in the purely mathematically way, In reality the cookies never went anywhere, there are still 10 cookies and you still have no friends.
> Basically if there was any answer to that question then any logic would be useless
This is pseudo-intellectual dribble, stop writing like that.

>> No.9855848

>>9855634
You have a pizza and divide it so that no trace of pizza is left anywhere in existence.

...Fucking how?

>> No.9855851

>>9855848
This is what i'm asking YOU.
I never claimed that.

>> No.9855857

>>9855842
2*0=0 (why is this relevant)
2/0 = ((0/0)/0 (wtf even is this))

HeREs a SePERaTe EquAtion

10*0 =0 (why is this relevant)
10/0 = ((0/0)/0 (wtf even is this))(why is there not 10 zeros) (why 2?)

>> No.9855858

>>9855846
How would you phrase it dude? I said it like that because i dont any better words. I never claimed to be perfect. I sorta just tried to say you cant think its true and not have trouble later on. Idk. But can you address my point then?

>> No.9855859

>>9855858
If the trouble presents itself in pure maths then no one really cares desu

>> No.9855862

>>9855857
I got in the form the op wanted to show contradiction without starting with a conteadiction. The (0/0)/0 looks messy but its the same thing in both which is showing n in the two equations are the same. So its not seperate anymore.

>> No.9855863

>>9855858
>Basically if there was any answer to that question then any logic would be useless
This? This doesn't mean anything. It's just random "smart" sounding words stuck together. Stop that.

>> No.9855864

>>9855862
I literally said "DO NOT DO THAT".
I don't want your maths I want you to prove in physical world how you divide an object by 0 and make the object disappear from existence.

>> No.9855868

>>9855862
3/20 = (here's some hoodoo no one understands the point of)
4/20 = (here's some hoodoo no one understands the point of)
n = n
12 = 19

>> No.9855869

>>9855857
Its just a thing in math? "If you start with a contradiction you can prove anything" - big bang theory

>> No.9855871

>>9855869
explain your maths thing
what's the magic of 3 zeros

>> No.9855882

>>9855864
You can prove something thats wrong

>> No.9855883

>>9855882
Cryptic posting again?
Just admit that you have no clue what you're in here son.

>> No.9855886

>>9855883
Can you prove that you are me?

>> No.9855890

>>9855886
Cryptic post. Discarded.

>> No.9855891

>>9855890
I think he's saying 10/0 = 10

>> No.9855893

>>9855891
Pretty sure he isn't.
He claimed in his 0/0/0 post that "10/0 = bing bong theory it's illogical XD"

>> No.9855894

>>9855890
The point is it cant have an answer because spliting something between zero things doesnt make sense.

>> No.9855895

>>9855669
Windows wants to update.

>>9855634
Use E=mc2 to convert 10 apples into energy. No apples left over. Convert energy into better healthier apples. Now I have apples++

>> No.9855897

>>9855890
Kekistan.

>> No.9855899

>>9855634
It doesn't equal 0, it doesn't equal anything.
[math] 10/0 = x [/math]
[math] 10 = 0*x [/math]
[math] x \in \R [/math]

See, its just gibberish, there is no number that can multiply by zero to get any nonzero number.

>> No.9855902

>>9855895
How did you know I'm using XP

>> No.9855905

>>9855899
Lol you put it better than me. But its more complicated now in different ways. OP wont like it

>> No.9855906

>>9855905
Actually it makes more sense than anything you've said

>> No.9855908

>>9855906
Well sorry i am sorta bad. It makes sense it my head and i hope i am not wrong. I hope you understand now :)

>> No.9855909

>>9855908
I still have no idea what your magic divide twice by 0 does

>> No.9855911

>>9855899
I'm not a local so I have no idea what x \in \R is.
>>9855905
Wrong answer. Wrong opinion.
Good science is simple and easy to understand.
>>9855894
You have a pie. You are tasked into slicing it into 0 pieces.
Did the pie disappear? How is that nonsensical.
If you consider that nonsensical then you cant switch over division to multiplication just as well.

>> No.9855915

>>9855909
I divided both sides by zero. It doesnt do anything but change the form that is true into the contradiction. I could explain it in person but just ignore it

>> No.9855916

>>9855634
Who claimed that 10/0 = 0?

>> No.9855917

>>9855658
>but you can give them to nobody an infinite amount of times.

No, apples rot eventually.

>> No.9855921

>>9855911
How do you cut a whole into a 0? It doesnt make sense cause your wording hides the meaning

>> No.9855922
File: 19 KB, 681x426, division by zero.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855922

>>9855916
Also it's a common "I fuckin love science" crowd saying.
>>9855917
That's also wrong because you can just gives the apple to each other infinite amount of times. It's pretty much an angry kids argument.

>> No.9855923

>>9855911
I think he's saying it's a useless function and wouldn't hold up even if it were used
If 10/2 = x
Then 10 = 2*x
Given that x*0 = 0 you can never reform 10
The 10 is still there tho
Idk what the x \in \R is

>> No.9855924

>>9855921
My wording is as simple as it gets and it has no ulterior motive behind it.
Take your pills.

>> No.9855929

>>9855923
>Given that x*0 = 0 you can never reform 10
How exactly is this related to this:
>10/2 = x

>> No.9855934

>>9855924
You have a 1 litre of milk. I am saying your wording connects to the math wrong. You need to divide its contents into zero cups. How many times can you do it

>> No.9855936

>>9855929
10/2 = x
10 = 2*x
is an example of how shit should function
10/0 = x (10) ((The division is useless))
10 = x*0 = 0 ((The maths doesn't fit in))

>> No.9855937
File: 31 KB, 500x405, Getting_real_tired_of_your_bullshit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855937

>>9855697
>>9855702
>>9855763
>>9855899
>it's another "brainlets think 0/0=1" episode

>> No.9855941

>>9855937
I never implied it equaled 1. I kept it in the ugly form for exactly that reason

>> No.9855942

But does 10.999... = 11

>> No.9855953

>>9855934
Now you're making sense.

>> No.9855960

100th

>> No.9855961

>>9855953
Good thread But messy
/th

>> No.9855968

Why can't we just pretend that we're too stupid to find the value of [math]\frac{1}{0}[/math] and pull an [math]\sqrt{-1} = i[/math] on it, i.e [math]\frac{1}{0} = n[/math] for an example?
In which case [math]\frac{10}{0}=10*\frac{1}{0}=10n[/math]
Then I guess that if it meets itself in a division it cancels out to 0 following [math]\frac{n}{n}=\frac{\frac{1}{0}}{\frac{1}{0}}=\frac{1}{0}*\frac{0}{1}=0*\frac{1}{0}=0n=0[/math] or some shit like that? The whole debate about "le what le value is le division by le zero XDDDDD" seems like a massive waste of time that can be solved quite easily in the same way we solved the debate of negative number square roots by slapping a random letter and calling it a day

>> No.9855970

>>9855968
Can I slap a random letter on 0.00...03?

>> No.9855986

>>9855968
There would have to be a consistent system after the letter slapping. Complex numbers follow a consistent set of axioms. Maybe there is a consist thing after slapping on dividing by zero but we dont have it yet

>> No.9855991

>>9855968
For some reason your [/] shit doesn't convert into anything so all i'm seeing is that you're trying math magic your way out of this.
Which is wrong and all.
Pure maths does not apply to the real world so how can your solution be correct.

>> No.9856001

>>9855675
>Posts image supporting strict logical positism.
>Says "Yeah nah." to categorization of distinct idea structures.
Maybe you should stop being such a SCIENTIST!(TM)

>> No.9856002

>>9856001
I have been busted.
But then there's a difference between science and religion/ beliefs.

>> No.9856027

>>9855937
>>it's another "brainlets think 0/0=1" episode

>> No.9856032

>>9856027
Is /sci/ actually retarded? What the fuck is the point of this post.

>> No.9856037

>>9855772
>>9855771

>> No.9856039

>>9855780
>0 or n/a or error or answer is not valid is the same exact thing.

Oh, wait, you're serious, let me laugh even harder!

>> No.9856043

>>9855791
>dividing by zero

Oh SH-

>> No.9856045

>>9855797
Corollary of that would be 1 = 0.

I'm not sure one actually equals zero, so I think you are wrong.

>> No.9856048

>>9856002
>You're right.
>but
>non sequitur
There's also a difference between economics and religion/beliefs. But that doesn't mean you can't describe the difference between religion and belief through the lens of economics.

>> No.9856049

>>9855823
The glorious ringed planet, or the rather ill-defined antique deity?

>> No.9856052

>>9856032
Welcome newtroll.

>> No.9856054

>>9855934
>You need to divide its contents into zero cups. How many times can you do it

You can't do it at all.

>> No.9856059

>>9856054
Oh wow. It's like exactly what he said.
>>9856052
>>9856048
So /sci/ is just more pretentious /b/.
>>9856045
That's a different matter entirely. 0 is 0, 1 is 1.
10 apples shared among 0 friends is still 10 apples.

>> No.9856061

>>9856059
>So /sci/ is just more pretentious /b/.
Shit, guys he figured out our dark secret.

>> No.9856063
File: 74 KB, 357x290, Tim.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9856063

>>9856032
>Is /sci/ actually retarded? What the fuck is the point of this post.

>> No.9856070

>>9856063
This is /sci/ Prove to me EXPERIMENTALLY what was the point of that post. Opinions not welcome only hypothesis.

>> No.9856094

>>9856070
Good luck creating testing methodology for determining motive in actions.

Justice Studies majors have been trying to do that for a long time, but I mean.. they are Justice Studies majors.

10,000 monkeys, 10,000 keyboards really.

>> No.9856099

>>9856094
It's much more simple here though. Either he's a fuckin retard or he will tell me what little coma I have missed which changes the entire meaning of that sentence.

>> No.9856100

>>9855697
10/0=n
(10/0)/n=1
10/0 * 1/n = 1
10(1/(0*n))= 1
0*n = 0 -> 10(1/0)=1 -> 10/0 = 1

>> No.9856108

>>9856100
Might as well make it n= 0.2456
What are you trying to prove here?
That you've just finished highschool?

>> No.9856119

>>9855986
Sure so here's a few other examples of it working coherently and actually displaying similar behavior to [math]1[/math] where if [math]n[/math] was replaced with [math]1[/math] everything would remain true (with the only exception being division with itself where it instead returns a [math]0[/math])
[math]\frac{-1}{0}=-n[/math]
[math]\frac{i}{0}=i\frac{1}{0}=in[/math]
[math]n^x=n[/math]
[math]\sqrt{n}=\frac{\sqrt{1}}{\sqrt{0}}=n[/math]
[math]\frac{n}{x}=\frac{1}{0}*\frac{1}{x}=\frac{1}{x}n[/math]
[math]n+n=\frac{1}{0}+\frac{1}{0}=\frac{2}{0}=2n[/math]
[math]n-n=\frac{1}{0}-\frac{1}{0}=\frac{0}{0}=0\frac{1}{0}=0n=0[/math]

Maybe someone who has more time can expand on this until he finds a contradiction because I can't find any so far

>>9855991
Yeah my adblocker was blocking them as well. Disable it for /sci/ and refresh the page

>> No.9856121

>>9856108
>that's the joke

>> No.9856141

>>9856119
Good guy on the adblocker.

>> No.9856148

>>9855968
We can define a number system that extends R with the result of 1/0, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projectively_extended_real_line

>> No.9856155
File: 50 KB, 3840x2812, something something divide.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9856155

>>9855634

>> No.9856160

>>9856155
That's even worse than trying to prove it by using mathematical formulas.
More convoluted and more wrong.

>> No.9856543

>>9855701
>pretend
Lol you realize that if you change your example to 12/3 so that n=n then your example reinforces his point, right?

>> No.9856587

>>9855778
Anyone who says x/0 = 0 is proposing that they're both equal to the same number.
>>9855700
>>9855701
News flash: you're not just pretending.

>>9855697
a = 0
10a = n
9a = n
10a = 9a
10 = 9
:^)

>> No.9856669

>>9855634
it doesn't. taking ten apples and dividing them into zero groups is impossible unless the apples actually disappear. it will always be one group left of ten apples which means you won't have divided anything really.

>> No.9856674

>>9856669
How do I intuitively divide by -pi?

>> No.9856683

>>9855634
>>9856680

>> No.9856831
File: 1018 KB, 2725x2266, DSC_0247~01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9856831

I sure hope no one thinks division by 0 is 0.

>> No.9856856

>>9855634
Imagine in volumes.

A tall cylinder of water, with equal volumes marked on the outside. So to the 10 mark, on this cylinder is 10-volume of water.

SO lets imagine I had two 5 volumes of water. I put two 5-V's and it gets in to the 10'V. It took me 2 of those 5Vs.

So 10/5=2. and im not a fuckin sci-pop ytube vid, so you can imagine the whole method.

3-mark, and I have 2V . It took me 1.5 volumes of water of the 2V volumes.


NOW...
to the 10-mark. I have 0-V of water. I pour it in. 0 of my V's where used.

Therfore 10/0=0 QED. just keep the nobel prize, give me a swedish girl instead when I get there in sweden.

>> No.9856900

>>9856856
Now that's embarrassing.

>> No.9856912

>>9855750
Ironically, reddit and 4chan are just 2 sides of the same coin

>> No.9856924

>>9856900
explain how?

>> No.9856925

>>9856912
Ironically, cancer is also humanoid

>> No.9856931

>>9855634
>mathematics
>experimentally
Go away.

>> No.9856933
File: 937 KB, 2400x1349, its pronounced nuke you lerr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9856933

>>9856925
You mean drumpf?

>> No.9857055

>>9855634
>I have 10 apples
>My apples only "exist" when they are labeled through "ownership"
>I divide them by nobody (not even myself)
>My apples don't belong to ANYONE anymore so the cease to be mine or anyone
>My apples are no longer defined
>No information stored as "apple"
>No apples

>tfw no snack because I divided by zero

>> No.9857062

>>9856933
That pic made me laugh. Thanks for that.
God, I really do hate Trump.

P.S. Please don't insult political figures through name-calling; name-calling is bad for your opinions because it's so juvenile. I'll get off my soapbox now, desu~

>> No.9857174

>>9856924
You ignored the remainder.

>> No.9857307

>>9855642
>Heh, I believe in DNA not SJWs, high school biology is all I need to derive objective knowledge about complex human social behaviours.
This image is so fucking dumb. Also,
>Science says that procreation is good.
wew

>> No.9857753

>>9857174
what does that mean?

>> No.9857794
File: 7 KB, 200x252, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9857794

>>9855634

youve got a chocolate, chocolate divided between 1 person is 1 chocolate given per person.

chocolate divided between 3 people is 1/3 chocolate given per person.

chocolate divided between 42 people is 1/42 chocolate given per person.

chocolate divided between 0 people equals to 0 chocolate given per person

>> No.9857806

>>9857055
Pseudointellectual.
>LE divide by ZERO AND IT DISAPPEAR XD

>> No.9857809

>>9857307
>Heh, I believe in DNA not SJWs, high school biology is all I need to derive objective knowledge about complex human social behaviours.
This is the part where you didn't get the point.
Science! is about making up shit for the general populance to go WOW I FUCKIN LOVE SCIENCE! over and pushing political agendas.
Real Science is about finding out how shit works and how to apply it and then testing those same long established beliefs to see if they were valid in the first place and just happened to work in a fluke of luck.
>Science says that procreation is good.
It is.

>> No.9857835

>>9856856
>>9857794
retards. stop it. brainlets shouldnt be trying this hard.

>> No.9858511

>>9855640
if so then 10/0=10
Ergo,
10/10=0
so,
1=0

Voila.

>> No.9858643

>0 isn't a number
>anything divided by 0 equals infinity
prove me wrong
protip: you can't

>> No.9858656

I have 10 coins, I divide them evenly among 0 piles. Each pile has 0 coins in it.

>> No.9858673

>>9855642
>science
>first name is of a guy who stole from a woman to get a nobel price
Not really a point in favour of the left side

>> No.9858674

>>9858656
where did the coins go? are you retarded?

>>9855634
>10/0=0 as you claim
whoever claims this is a moron, values divided by 0 approach infinity, not fucking 0

>> No.9858725

>>9858643
see >>9856831

>> No.9858814

>>9858674
>he thinks operations have to be continuous functions