/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.9853240]

Who else here realize that all mathematics is just different methods of codifying repetition and interval?

>Who else here geometrician?

[Anonymous No.9853270]

>>9853240
I don't understand but also want to know more.

[Anonymous No.9853278]

>>9853270
Spoken like a true a-metric centroid.

Man, maths lets you do the craziest shit with language and exchanges. So long as you have some sort of pre-memory trigger sequence to follow.

Why do people give a shit about radii? You're never measuring a circle in isolation so wouldn't some phi radical work just as good?

Like, being a more pedantic geometer would probably help everyone because it's the most autistic mathematics out there. Each step is some retard level, "FREE SPACE! FREE SPACE! FREE SPACE!" and even though everyone looks at you, at least you've established and advertised the free space.

You might not want to occupy it yourself, but advertisement invokes at least some intelligent capacity for concession, correct?

[Anonymous No.9853281]

>>9853278
>Spoken like a true a-metric centroid.
I don't know what that is either.

>Why do people give a shit about radii? You're never measuring a circle in isolation so wouldn't some phi radical work just as good?
Anon I'll be honest I'm an enormous pseud and while I generally subscribe to the idea of formal Platonic truths you are talking way above my head to the point that it may as well be in another language.

[Anonymous No.9853299]

>>9853281
An a-metric centroid would simply be a central point of reference, unbounded.

Ah, the ol', "It's all greek to me!" strategy.

I'm basically saying that a singular radii is just a geometric way of saying, "Accepted initial rounding error."

>I accept Platonic formalisms as my interpreter

[Anonymous No.9853320]

>>9853299
>Ah, the ol', "It's all greek to me!" strategy.
It's not a strategy, I'm literally incapable of agreeing or disagreeing with you because I don't know what you're talking about.

>I accept Platonic formalisms as my interpreter
I... is that bad?

[Anonymous No.9853324]

>>9853299
>I'm basically saying that a singular radii is just a geometric way of saying, "Accepted initial rounding error."
Also this isn't a pun is it? It feels like a pun.

[Anonymous No.9853328]

>>9853320
No, I welcome any permutation or isomorphic helper that let's you inspect me in the fashion you find more appealing. A platonic inspector would be a welcome change to my usual geocentric idiocy.

>>9853324
Not a pun but can easily be interpreted as a way of saying
>I know how to shitpost like a mathematician
Or that I'm being self-deprecating so that if you follow our shared measurements back far enough, we at least called each other 'fag' in some way so we both knew that thought was from 4chan and not some actual conversation we just had.

[Anonymous No.9853331]

>>9853328
> No, I welcome any permutation or isomorphic helper that let's you inspect me in the fashion you find more appealing. A platonic inspector would be a welcome change to my usual geocentric idiocy.
Ok, well in that case, is there anyway that you could explain what you're saying as though I were a five year old who was also a massive pseud?

[Anonymous No.9853336]

>>9853324
>>9853328
Actually if you want a better one you could translate it as, "Starting with the fact that I'm not dead, I make the following claims: Accept you are an isolated circle as a mathematical construct before any other communication in existence takes place with you. Then, shift through the symmetries and sorting styles of your choice. Present the resultant in this thread."

You guys should be following this with ease so don't think of yourself as unable to understand. I'm attempting to be a stabilizer for your understanding what is a pretty cool mathematical trick you can do with language and command structures.

>>9853331
Just tell me how you prefer your brain upgrade. This is one of those moments of language where you have subscribed to someone willing to gift free knowledge that you can shove down other people's throats, if ya want.

[Anonymous No.9853609]

>>9853240
So what's the difference between this and topology then?

[Anonymous No.9853929]

>>9853336
Im not him, but could teach me everything that doesnt destroy my sense of self, please?

[Anonymous No.9854469]

>>9853609
Topology is more for materials, this is more for advertisement of safe-space intervals.

>>9853929
Sure.
>As an individual I can only ever be a void struct of your existence because there is no true way for us to be isolated CLONE circles.

[Anonymous No.9854483]

I am 99% certain this is phil /lit/ trolling /sci/

[Anonymous No.9854492]

>>9854483
Nah, I'm pretty sure it's just another crank.

[Anonymous No.9854494]

>>9854483
What would be the point of that? Otherwise this exchange fails my own personal test of engaging with others and being able to compare my expectations and interests in mathematics (space, repetition, identity) with others.

Philosophy is a waste of fucking time beyond learning that it is okay to question fundamentals, but 99% of THAT shit is dead men masturbating about how amazing their thoughts are.

Unlike other posters I know there are intelligent people that visit this board. Some damaged, some not. I'm just trying to give confidence to the teacher/lecturer/professor that frequents this bored as they get bored of the N-th undergrad claiming one thing or another.

>>9854492
If that's what tickles your testicles.

[Anonymous No.9854575]

>>9854494
Pretty sure it's D. Seems pretty easy if that's all your jerking off over.

So explain to me why I should choose geometry as my focus in mathematics instead of any other of the pure choices?

[Anonymous No.9854583]

>>9854575
Because mathematics is easy if you phrase the questions to the inquirer in a 'everyone can do this' kind of fashion.

As for WHY geometry? Well for one geometers love roots of unity and all material science requires a geometric progressions for ratio. Packing problems, spatial deformity, plasticity. Etc.

[Anonymous No.9854586]

>>9854494
it tickles my testicle. Why don't you give some concrete examples that are enlightening rather than rambling incoherently?

[Anonymous No.9854592]

>>9854586
Cool, what's your poison? It's actually explainable with simple language but I get that most people require visual aids. For geometers you start with a circle and then eventually start fucking with ellipticals (circular deformation).

The image that should help you guys get the idea is attached.

[Anonymous No.9854600]

>>9854592
when I say give some concrete examples, I don't mean post a random picture with nonsensical technobabble. (circular jerking)

[Anonymous No.9854606]

>>9854600
Conversation has to start somewhere because I asked what is your preferred poison, meaning I am asking you what your preferred explanation is.

I gave an image, your reaction helps me temper the explanation because I'm making an argument for geometry so you are the person I gotta convince/educate.

Some people don't enjoy technical, some do.

I could start with describing secant/chord.

The main thread argument though is that radii are never measured in isolation and are usually a form of continual tangent/secant combo.

[Anonymous No.9854630]

>>9853240
What am I supposed to take away from this thread?

[Anonymous No.9854632]

>>9853240
I Have a master's in applied math, still have no idea what the fuck this thread is talking about

[Anonymous No.9854636]

>>9854632
How is geometric decomposition difficult? I'm just demonstrating.

>>9854630
That you are larger than just 'one' circle or identity, and you can construct more self-actualized structures if you just adopt a phi tangent to demonstrate a resultant chord.

Is number theory more your cup of tea?

[Anonymous No.9854643]

>>9854636
>is number theory more your cup of tea
No, I love geometry, I’m actually working through Euclid’s Elements right now. But I don’t really know what you’re talking about, dude. I’m only a freshman so I don’t know enough advanced math but I think you’re just being vague.

[Anonymous No.9854648]

>>9854643
Right, I'll boil it back that far.

Turn, plane, angle

Do you prefer pi or tau?

[Anonymous No.9854651]

>>9854632
applied math is shit

[Anonymous No.9854665]

>>9854648
>pi or tau
My opinion doesn’t count for much, but I think relating the radius and circumference makes more sense than diameter and circumference, and I think maybe pi became known first because it’s easier to measure the diameter of a disk than the radius, so I don’t know why tau isn’t mainstream now. But, again, I could be ignorant of some important details relevent to this issue.

[Anonymous No.9854679]

>>9854665
relevant*

[Anonymous No.9854681]

>>9854665
So you're saying that your opinion should have no impact on the general case measurement?

[Anonymous No.9854684]

>>9854665
I mean in the sense that for geometers pi is used for 'acceptable rounding error' and tau is 'general practice principle'.

[Anonymous No.9854699]

>>9853281
its okay anon he has schizophrenia

[Anonymous No.9854707]

>>9854699
Totally, call the cops! That's how reality works, right? We listen to other adults and they tell us their opinion of existence and if we are intelligent individuals we can 'hash it out' amongst ourselves?

[sage goes in all fields No.9854710]

>>9854592
that image's from here: http://www.lanera.com/casteldelmonte/cvtech_172/page-172-07.html

so I suppose this confirms >>9854483

[Anonymous No.9854721]

>>9854710
Capstone! Thank you! That's the word I was looking for. Yes, I was trying to describe a 'capstone'.

[Anonymous No.9855163]

>>9854684
But Tau is just 'general rounding error' x2

[Anonymous No.9855234]

>>9855163
Why would you perform a multiplicative operator on it and call it a day? From a geometric perspective, I'm asking.

[Anonymous No.9855269]

>>9855234
>pic

[Anonymous No.9855292]

>>9855269
Correct, I love intelligent women that get the idea that if guys aren't going to 'get the hint' then women can do the mathematical confidence instead.

[Anonymous No.9855311]

>>9853240

As a woman, I like clothing, especially pairs of pants, and this does influence my work to some extent. Wearing pairs of pants in a free society is much more comfortable than wearing hijab in an unfree one, for example.

I appreciate the conceit of this diagram: that pairs of pants can be sewn onto pant legs arbitrarily many times.

t. Maryam (oooOOOOOoooOOOOOOoooooooooOOOO...)

[Anonymous No.9855324]

>>9855311
Yes. I think this is what male tailor's refer to as, "What side does Sir dress himself?" Meaning if the inseam is up high enough does he tuck his 'male arguments' to the left or to the right. For purposes of continuum.

[Anonymous No.9855329]

>>9855311
Also https://www.abelard.org/asimov.php

[Anonymous No.9855350]

>>9855292
Eww, you sound like a pussy with a femdom fetish. Women should be dominated, not the other way around.

[Anonymous No.9855358]

>>9853240
mathematics is literally intervals
numbers are discretion by definition

[Anonymous No.9855373]

>>9855350
Dominated by what? An opinion/perspective?

>>9855358
So integers are discrete descriptionals?

[Anonymous No.9855375]

>>9855373
>Dominated by what?
Men.

[Anonymous No.9855385]

>>9855375
Men's what? Male collective or a singular male?

[Anonymous No.9855390]

>>9855385
Who cares?

[Anonymous No.9855433]

>>9855390
Apparently this person >>9855375

[Anonymous No.9855444]

>>9855433
That's me honey. Why are you asking stupid questions?

[Anonymous No.9855450]

>>9855444
So you're opinion is that I should be dominated by a guy that isn't you? Mathematically speaking you have to be the set identity outside of a matrix before you perform multiplicative identities.

[Anonymous No.9855461]

>>9855450
All women belong to me but I only have one dick, so in my magnanimity I will allow other men access to the pussy I can't be bothered to tap. D'ya get it now?

[Anonymous No.9855469]

>>9855461
Yeah, but having a general subscription marketplace would be about 5000% better.

[Anonymous No.9855474]

>>9855469
Better for whom? I take what I want. The dogs can have it among themselves.

[Anonymous No.9855478]

>>9855461
Also, I recognize you teacher. You dismiss too many from your class so obviously you don't get to pry the delights of the more accomplished harem.

>>9855474
You are welcome to do so, but you will be described as an animal by another name if your behavior is not fit to teach your 3 year old self. Become an instructor and demonstrator or orgasm, or become an old, withered, argument holder.

[Anonymous No.9855487]

>>9855478
Once again, who gives a shit?

[Anonymous No.9855489]

>>9855487
Us, the inhabitants of this conversation. I'm surprised I have to explain that to you fellow data-shard inspector.

[Anonymous No.9855494]

>>9855489
zzz

[Anonymous No.9855526]

>>9855494
I'm sorry that you snore through the selection process. You can pick out any one you like and they will perform as expected.

[Anonymous No.9856978]

>>9855234
Why would you turn a line half a turn and say you finished the object when you could rotate half that line the whole turn?

[Anonymous No.9857032]

Not science nor math.

[Anonymous No.9857053]

>>9853270
Dis

[Anonymous No.9857155]

>>9853240
What's it like not being a brainlet and how do I get into this "math" cult that you speak of?

[Anonymous No.9857275]

>>9856978
A completed rotation is less valuable than axial tilt.

>>9857155
I guess other mathematical disciplines do call certain others cult-like in their fervor, but really 'you' are the geometer. If it helps you can think of it like there is only ever one 'super' geometer at all times but we all take turns with the periodicity.

[sah geh No.9857381]

>>9854630
that OP is either a horribly dull troll or legitimately schizophrenic

[Anonymous No.9858439]

>>9857275
Geometrically rotations and 'tilts' are equivalent to each other.

[Anonymous No.9858737]

>>9858439
Not if you want a static plane measurement. Degrees versus radians.

>>9857381
If that's the best your 'interpreter' can come up with, sure. I'm amazed people on 4chan still think comments like that are somehow conversationally relevant to people who enjoy communicating in general. Guess everyone has to go through that phase where they parrot the abuse shouted at them once upon a time.
>Rhetoric

[Anonymous No.9859560]

>>9858737
They're still the same. Rotations can be expressed through reflections by themselves if you wanted to.

[Anonymous No.9859615]

>>9859560
Correct. However we only measure reflections/symmetry at roots of unity, do you disagree?