[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 71 KB, 800x1200, 756CFC7A-41B1-4679-8B72-CAF509362D16.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9852916 No.9852916 [Reply] [Original]

Any good popsci books worth reading?

>> No.9852924

>Any good popsci books worth reading?
Why don't you read them and find out?

>> No.9852948

Depends on how much you want to learn.

>> No.9852953
File: 755 KB, 813x644, manga_15set.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9852953

>>9852916
Popsci is cancer. Read primers instead.

>> No.9853386

>>9852916
desu pic related isnt really too pop sci

>> No.9853405

>>9852916
Elegant universe is very good as far as popsci goes

>> No.9853409

>>9853386
So what is it, a string theory textbook?
Of course it's popsci!

>> No.9853437

What is mathematics? One, two, three, ... inifinity.

>> No.9853444
File: 477 KB, 700x514, 1516907626001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9853444

>>9852953
>basic anime shit

>> No.9853450
File: 60 KB, 255x326, 1194791850640.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9853450

>>9853444
>I came on 4chan to whine about anime and have no other arguments about anything

>> No.9853454
File: 32 KB, 600x683, spedepasanen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9853454

>>9853450
cool, please tell us more about your cartoons anon

>> No.9853470

>>9853444
>>basic

>I don't know what the difference between speed, travel, velocity, momentum, and kinetic energy is
>hurr durr so lets read a book about string theory but hold the math; science be lit kray kray \>o</ im (pronoun: xer) a pickle

Spoiler: you're learning nothing reading about grad level buzzwords

>> No.9853475

>>9853470
wow, cartoons, velocity and momentum, truly reading material for the intellectual elite

>> No.9853497
File: 3.37 MB, 1360x2765, Required Reading &#039;fixed.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9853497

>>9853475
We have reading lists for people who want the meat and potatoes. Popsci readers don't.

>> No.9853507

>>9853470

>I don't know what the difference between speed, travel, velocity, momentum, and kinetic energy is

most readers interested in popular science books know this

you are acting as if this is some advanced shit and not fucking high school material

there is plenty a person interested in science can learn from reading good popsci books

>> No.9853513

>>9853507
>there is plenty a person interested in science can learn from reading good popsci books

No.

>> No.9853527

>>9853513

Yes. Getting a popular understanding of a subject is the point here.

>> No.9853533

>>9853470
>hurr durr so lets read a book about string theory but hold the math

Unless you have a PhD in physics then yes, holding the math is the only sensible approach to learning about string theory.

>> No.9853562

Can someone please explain time in a satisfying pop sci hot take? I've listened to both physicists and philosophers talk about the subject and it seems like they either don't understand it or that they're embarrassed to say what they really think. Both state that that it isn't really part of the universe like it's some kind of illusion. Being and becoming is an ancient problem, is consciousness/the soul/whatever a fixed entity external to the universe which moves through the universe (layers of fields of potential) on an axis we call time? Clearly time exists independently of people as it necessarily precedes our existence, but I've heard a bunch of physicists say that all moments in time exist simultaneously and our experience of particular moments as serial is just because of our narrow perspective, i.e. consequent of physiology.

http://philosophybites.com/time/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVINOl0Ctfk

>> No.9853577
File: 26 KB, 309x475, 27313221[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9853577

>>9852916
Best popsci book I've ever read by a longshot

>> No.9853596

godel escher bach

>> No.9853610

Inflationary Universe by Guth was good.

>> No.9853618

I wouldn't call it pop science but..

The big picture - Sean Carroll.

Excellent philosophy of physics, quantum field theory, some biology, conciousness etc

>> No.9853625
File: 65 KB, 1000x853, raptisbooks_2914_00[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9853625

>>9852916

>> No.9853788

>>9852916

(((Brian Greene)))

>> No.9853789

>>9853497

>Numerous Jewish authors and a Bible.

This reading chart is a joke right?

>> No.9854445

>>9853533
Or you could not be an autist and learn about something appropriate for your level.

>> No.9854852
File: 3.05 MB, 1360x2765, Required Reading - easy mode.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9854852

>>9853789
Just a more advanced version of this.

>> No.9854889

>>9853409
Its not a string theory book despite what the title says, iirc he doesnt even bring up string theory until chapter 20 something. Its closer to a history of particle physics leading up to his presentation of string theory.

>> No.9854896

>>9853562
>Clearly time exists independently of people as it necessarily precedes our existence
>clearly
No.

>> No.9854929

>>9854896
How could earth have formed without time?

>> No.9855041

>>9853625
The Feynman Lectures are real science disguised as popsci to sell.

>> No.9855053

>>9853497
>New Jerusalem Bible

Good to see you took a break from fucking your sister to share with us the books you've seen on book store shelves.

>> No.9855062

>>9853625
Based Feynman

About to start physics 2 soon. Might complement this with the other books.

>> No.9855064

>>9853788
Your /pol/ is leaking.

>> No.9855082

>>9855053
>took a break from fucking your sister

But that's not a protestant bible...

>> No.9855174

>>9853577
is sautoy an alright author? symmetry is such a fucking slog, he really likes to waste time on historic parables and travel diaries instead of actually talking symmetry

>> No.9855189

>>9852916
I recently read Everything and More by DFW of /lit/ fame and I really enjoyed it. It's a historical look at the concept of infinity in math and starts with Zeno's paradoxes and ends with a look at Cantor's diagonalization proofs with a look at mathematical philosophy and the incompleteness theorems. DFW's voice really comes through in it and while it was the first thing I've read by him I kind of felt like he was a teacher I had by the end of it. Would recommend.

>> No.9855238

>>9854889
peak reading comprehension

>> No.9855271
File: 42 KB, 334x500, 51PXthXhbiL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855271

>>9853625
this book has reignited my ability to withstand grad school

>> No.9855540

>>9854929
Define time such that it exists outside of human perception.

>> No.9855545

>>9855238
Idk what are on about.

>> No.9855574

>>9855540
Phase, stage, period, etc.

It seems like the flow of time is merely human perception, but there's an inherent relationship between matter on an axis of change, i.e. time.

>> No.9855594

>>9854445
yeah, no

string theory is the leading description of physical theory of everything, you are a certified brainlet if you dont have or arent even interested in at least a popsci understanding of it

>> No.9855635
File: 80 KB, 640x701, 1486910559152.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855635

>>9855594
>string theory is the leading description of physical theory of everything, you are a certified brainlet if you dont have or arent even interested in at least a popsci understanding of it

string theory is irrelevant if you don't know field theory
field theory is irrelevant if you don't know quantum theory
quantum theory is irrelevant if you don't know classical theory

Reading about string theory is like reading about hyperfine structure before you learn about spectral lines. In leddit speak, it's DLC to the main game.

>> No.9855646

>>9855635

>quantum theory is irrelevant if you don't know classical theory

Again, we are talking popsci here. Mathematics of quantum theory is irrelevant if you dont know classical theory. But you better have a conceptual, popsci understanding of quantum theory even if you have no idea what a Lagrangian is. Otherwise you are a certified brainlet.

You should know the names of 8 planets even if you are not an astrophysicist. Similarly, you should know the basic idea behind string theory even if you are not a physicist. Especially if you are interested in natural sciences at least a little.

>> No.9855659
File: 223 KB, 2047x788, chadrationalist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855659

>>9852916
Rationality: From AI to Zombies

>> No.9855673
File: 398 KB, 1024x1216, Star Proof.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855673

>>9855659
But utilitarianism did solve all of philosophy.

>> No.9856968

>>9855574
In that sense what is the difference between entropy and time or causality and time? Moreover according to the math there is no uniqueness to any point in time and which way and how it can "flow". The concept of time is not intrinsic in any normal sense to the universe based on our own principles, the arrow of time is very much still under debate.

>> No.9856970

>>9855646
>But you better have a conceptual, popsci understanding of quantum theory
>conceptual understanding of QM
The limit of conceptual understanding of QM with no mathematics is "probabilities man".

>> No.9857013

>>9855646
>You should know the names of 8 planets

phiff, I know 9

>> No.9857845

>>9852916
I would suggest works by Ian Stewart or Douglas Hofstetter (sp?)

>> No.9858116
File: 44 KB, 329x500, the science of roman history.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9858116

new /hisci/