Thot-free zones at universities

File: 146 KB, 500x540, funnybuttoobaditisbillnye.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Thot-free zones at universities Anonymous Tue Jul 3 18:12:31 2018 No.9846516 [Reply] [Original]

What is your opinion about thot-free zones inside universities?

For me, it is really annoying to see young girls dressed like strippers in the halls of my building and classroom. I think halls and classrooms should be designated thot-free zones. This could be anything from having a mandatory dress code to outright denying entrance to thots. I really don't mind which one it is, I just want to have one place in the world that is not my room where I am completely free from thottery. And honestly, I don't get it. I have nice clothes too, I have a lot of clothes meant to attract women, but I only wear them when I am going somewhere to look for sex. I would never dress like that to class but for some reason, thots do not share this sentiment. Thots will be thots, I guess.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:07:40 2018 No.9846618 go back to the dark ages old man

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:09:48 2018 No.9846621 >>9846618 I will if you give me one good reason to dress for sex when going to class.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:10:03 2018 No.9846622 >>9846618 >go back to the dark ages old man 6 months of holidays in sunny Spain, drinking hallucinogenic wine and beer while talking metaphysics with monks God I wish that were me.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:11:00 2018 No.9846625 >>9846621 there doesn't need to be one, you're the horny goat with the problem

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:13:19 2018 No.9846632 >>9846618 >t. boomer

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:18:37 2018 No.9846643 I agree with you OP. Conservative safe spaces are the last thing university campuses need. Don't they have churches for that?

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:18:54 2018 No.9846645

>>9846625
>there doesn't need to be one
>there does not need to be a reason for my actions
I despise the brainlet lifestyle. You say this, but you are clearly lying. You just, for some reason, don't want to be honest with yourself and examine why do you do certain things.

> you're the horny goat with the problem
This completely contradicts what I am saying. My position is that my classroom is not a place for sex. When I'm at university I am quite literally the opposite of horny. And I am a very tolerant person, but when I saw a thot literally twerking that's where I draw the line. These people are wasting my time (and their time) coming here.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:19:51 2018 No.9846646 >>9846645 if you weren't horny you wouldnt even notice how women were dressed

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:21:07 2018 No.9846648 >>9846646 Oh, yeah. You are right. I forgot about that. Men can only use their eyes when their penis is erect. Silly me, forgetting basic facts about anatomy.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:24:40 2018 No.9846652 >>9846648 it's not about what your eyes see but what your brain notices. just accept that you're thinking with your dick, it's ok

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:24:47 2018 No.9846653 File: 618 KB, 741x668, 1530650328250.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9846632

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:27:22 2018 No.9846659

>>9846652
I was not going to say this but you seem to be set in your ways so I will.

>if you weren't horny you wouldn't even notice how women were dressed
Think about this. You are saying that you cannot notice how a woman is dressed unless you are horny. This means that if a female colleague of yours recently purchased a new dress which looks great on her, you are physically incapable of noticing the charm and giving her a compliment unless you saw her in a sexual way.

In my opinion that is just sick and twisted. You sound like a rapist right now.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:33:59 2018 No.9846669 >>9846516 Just stare at them like an awkward creeper until they stop. Make them feel uncomfortable. It's honestly a win-win for you. Blatantly indulge in the eye candy when the thottery is afoot. If they don't like it then they shouldn't dress that way.

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:34:11 2018 No.9846670

>>9846645
>I am quite literally the opposite of horny.
Then why do you care what women wear?
>And I am a very tolerant person
No, you're just a beta male afraid to speak up, so you take it out on girls who probably don't even know you exist.
>when I saw a thot literally twerking that's where I draw the line.
Now your problem is their behaviour? Wasn't it their clothes?
>These people are wasting my time
How exactly are they wasting your time?

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 19:38:11 2018 No.9846672

>>9846670
>Then why do you care what women wear?
Please see >>9846659

>No, you're just a beta male afraid to speak up, so you take it out on girls who probably don't even know you exist.
Well, the personal attack already shows you have no genuine point, but I already started replying to you so I might aswell keep going.

>Now your problem is their behaviour? Wasn't it their clothes?
In my original post, I use very explicitly the word thot. Thottery has many aspects, including clothing and behaviour. I have actually not said anything new. Just reiterating my points by giving an example.

>How exactly are they wasting your time?
I have to give lectures to people who are literally never going to make it. Waste of time really. I would prefer if they took themselves more seriously and devoted themselves to study. That way I could actually come out of my classroom proud.

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 20:02:54 2018 No.9846691

>>9846659
>You are saying that you cannot notice how a woman is dressed unless you are horny.
either you were horny to start with or you lacked the mental willpower not to become horny

listen, it's ok. everyone's been there. you just have to practice controlling yourself

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 20:16:29 2018 No.9846709 >>9846516 great b8 OP

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 20:37:29 2018 No.9846742

>>9846691
>either you were horny to start with or you lacked the mental willpower not to become horny
Okay, repeat with me: You can look at women and make objective observations about what they are wearing WITHOUT being horny.

All it takes is being a normal human being. I mean, the people that think about how women look the most are fashion designers which tend to be gay men with 0% attraction to the female models they use to test their creations.

Please take a chill pill.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 20:39:16 2018 No.9846746 File: 141 KB, 600x800, thot-patrol-wang.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] This sounds like a job for... ...THOT Patrol !

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 20:41:18 2018 No.9846747

/sci/ - Generalizations and labels.

I'm going to go all out and assume you're a guy who is attracted to the girls but you know they wouldn't like you and this hurts your ego so you don't like seeing attractive or girls dressed in little clothing at all.

Grow up, ignore it.

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 20:41:54 2018 No.9846748

>>9846742
what you're making is a purely subjective observation. there's nothing objective about it. and i'm not the one who's so hysterical about what other people are wearing that i complain about it on the internet.

your blood pressure will go down if you just stop being so goddamn horny all the time

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 20:55:05 2018 No.9846757 >>9846516 >annoying gay

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 20:55:08 2018 No.9846759 >>9846747 >>9846748 read the thread, retards

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 21:01:52 2018 No.9846772 >>9846759 i'm half the thread dumbass

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 21:37:44 2018 No.9846818

>>9846747
First of all, I would not date my students for two reasons
1) It is really hard to see undergrads, regardless of gender, as anything more than subhuman
2) #metoo

Joking about 2 obviously but you get the idea.

>>9846748
It is actually objective. I think we can make the distinction between clothing that is practical and professional, and clothing that is designed to attract sexual attention. I think the latter is not appropriate for a university, but I don't mind women wearing that. It should just be a social norm that those types of clothes are reserved for parties, clubs, bars or any other places where people go explicitly to look for sexual partners.

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 21:40:04 2018 No.9846822

>>9846818
if they wore the same clothes at home or in a situation where they were not among their preferred sexual partners, they would just be wearing normal clothes, not clothes designed to attract attention. that you interpret it as attention-seeking clothing says more about your own uncontrollable horny impulses than their desires

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 21:41:21 2018 No.9846825 >>9846516 I personally just have an issue with people dressing like they have absolutely no fucks to give and like the university itself is an extension of their bedroom.

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 21:42:07 2018 No.9846826

>>9846822
>You interpret it as attention-seeking clothing says more about your own uncontrollable horny impulses than their desires

You are ignoring the fact that there are clothes that are DESIGNED to be sexually appealing. I am actually not judging the women who wear them, but the clothes themselves. And if you genuinely do not know what kinds of clothes I'm talking about... fuck man go to a party or something. Meet some women.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 21:43:22 2018 No.9846830 The Jesuits at my school protect me from all the nasty impure women who want to steal my virginity away from me and my future wife

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 21:44:11 2018 No.9846831 >>9846830 >my future wife Your future wife sucked my dick last night

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 21:44:46 2018 No.9846834 >>9846831 no bully pls

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 21:49:01 2018 No.9846842 >>9846826 Everyone gets it, you're a bitter incel with autism incapable of acting above your base instincts and blaming that on everyone else. Go back to /r9k/ and stay there.

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 21:51:01 2018 No.9846848

>>9846842
>replies to my post
>does not respond to my point
>incel
>autism
>base instincts
>/r9k/
>bitter

Fuck man, these new 4chan buzzword AIs are getting better and better every day. How can I change your settings to /a/ buzzwords? I want you to tell me that anime was a mistake.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:01:43 2018 No.9846866 File: 227 KB, 1600x1200, 1528209421178.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] this thread is pathetic

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:10:05 2018 No.9846876 >>9846866 >thread in which the OP is criticizing women, but also asking for opinions >instead of arguing, post this shit. Yeah, no. If you think women are above scrutiny then you are just a cuck.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:11:14 2018 No.9846878 >>9846826 >You are ignoring the fact that there are clothes that are DESIGNED to be sexually appealing. sexual appeal is entirely in the eyes of the beholder. in this case, it's you, the uncontrollable pervert

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:12:37 2018 No.9846879

>>9846878
>sexual appeal is entirely in the eyes of the beholder.
Yes, but I'm not talking about sexual appeal. I am talking about clothes.

A sexy woman will be sexy in pretty much anything. You can't hide a cute face. What I am complaining about is explicitly the use of inappropriate clothing.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:13:38 2018 No.9846881 >>9846879 you only think it's inappropriate because you're embarassed by the raging boners you get

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:15:09 2018 No.9846884 >>9846881 I think it is inappropriate because that's what I see women wearing at the fucking club.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:16:25 2018 No.9846888 >>9846884 ah, i get it. if only men went to the clubs you could dance without being hunched over to hide your erection

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:17:14 2018 No.9846890 >>9846888 >clothes for being at the club are not clothes for being in my class Why is this so hard to comprehend?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:18:22 2018 No.9846891 >>9846890 if you didn't have a throbbing member from your constant arousal i bet you could concentrate on class, right?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:18:28 2018 No.9846892 >>9846890 >clothes for being at the club are not clothes for being in my class lol who are you, the university owner?

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:24:39 2018 No.9846903

>>9846891
No, my good man. A boner would be no problem. I could give a lecture high and drunk off my ass. I could give a lecture while getting my dick suck. Fucking undergrad shit man, I could do it while a horse fucked me in the ass.

>>9846892
I am just a concerned professor, looking to save the souls of some poor thots and bring them to the good side so that they can become mathots.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:27:08 2018 No.9846904 >>9846903 then why do you care? also lol. there's no fucking way you're a professor. you're a TA at best, probably an undergrad lab TA.

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:29:07 2018 No.9846908

>>9846904
>then why do you care?
Because I want to save their souls.

>>9846904
>also lol. there's no fucking way you're a professor. you're a TA at best, probably an undergrad lab TA.
No, I am the research assistant of the undergrad lab TA's technician.

>>	sage goes in all fields Tue Jul 3 22:30:12 2018 No.9846910 ITT: insecure /pol/tards

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:30:22 2018 No.9846912 wtf is this thread? SAGE that shit.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:30:52 2018 No.9846914 >>9846903 >I am just a concerned professor Or some crossboarding shitposter LARPing as one.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:33:22 2018 No.9846919 >be 31. >back in college. >feel like billy madison in the fourth grade. >in my le pleb calc 2 class, thot next to me wearing spagetti strap? >can see her nips. >sqrt of sin is areolas. >dick like diamonds. This was like 6 years ago.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:35:05 2018 No.9846922 >>9846908 you're a bootlicker, then. get off your high horse and grow the fuck up

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:36:48 2018 No.9846924 >>9846922 >he unironically believes that there is such a thing as the research assistant of the undergrad lab TA's technician Jesus fuck, on how many layers of pseud are you on right now?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:39:27 2018 No.9846927 >>9846924 that's why i said bootlicker, because it's not a real position. i figured you were a brown-noser undergrad who sucked up to the TA so much they thought they had a modicum of power

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:40:43 2018 No.9846928 >>9846927 Yes, nice backtrack my dude. One more layer!

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:45:09 2018 No.9846934 >>9846928 all i know is that you'll go to any length to justify feeling bad about becoming erect at seeing a slightest hint of cleavage

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:50:58 2018 No.9846941 >>9846516 >it is really annoying to see young girls dressed like strippers in the halls of my building and classroom. t. Turbo faggotron (incel)

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:51:51 2018 No.9846944 >>9846934 Not any length. I've gone as far as I've needed to counter your arguments. You've now reverted to the same argument from like 20 posts ago which means I don't need to go any further. You can just re-read our previous conversation.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:52:54 2018 No.9846946 >>9846941 Why the homophobia?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:55:49 2018 No.9846951 >>9846944 >You've now reverted to the same argument from like 20 posts ago which means I don't need to go any further. did it really, really take you this long to realize i've been intentionally riling you up? are you that dumb?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 22:57:21 2018 No.9846953 >>9846951 >Haha XD I have been bumping your thread! GET PRANKED. REK'D! ???????????????????????????????????????

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 23:05:07 2018 No.9846963 >>9846946 They're embarrassing. Just like ur life.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 23:21:25 2018 No.9846979 >>9846516 Not even gay but places with only men tend to be more productive and organized, women somehow just add retardation to an area. All the stupid giggling and gossip.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 23:22:49 2018 No.9846981 >>9846842 Oh jesus this is why we want you away from us, this stupid irrational NUH UH YOU SUCK method of reasoning is why women are fucking cancer.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 23:28:03 2018 No.9846993 >>9846953 i bet you got really really excited to have someone to talk to

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 23:31:42 2018 No.9847001 >>9846922 >being this retarded holy shit my man, ice yourself

Anonymous Tue Jul 3 23:35:55 2018 No.9847009

>>9846979
i started working in an office that had all dudes after working coed for so long. its so quiet in between keyboard and mouse clicks that you can hear the black guys music coming out of his headphones from across the cubicles. less than 100 words spoken by my whole team per day. fuck man, its nice.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 3 23:42:38 2018 No.9847019 >>9847001 i cool myself down in the cold hard truth

Anonymous Wed Jul 4 01:24:26 2018 No.9847211

>>9846979

As a general rule men have much greater spatial and environmental awareness. Women just stand in the way all the time, don't know how to organize shit, and put things in dumb places, cluttering up the workspace area and generally making everything untidy.

Working with women really was an eye opener for me because I had previously bought into that whole equality and "we are all the same" bullshit. It was a huge relief to get out of that environment ( with all the social toxicity that women add ) and into an entirely male workplace.

Now I know this is not strictly true. I have worked with some really great females, and some real idiotic males. But they were the exceptions, not the general rule.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 02:34:13 2018 No.9847334 >>9846516 just go into a masculine major

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 03:26:47 2018 No.9847448 >>9846516 i agree with you. it's very unprofessional and discourteous.

Anonymous Wed Jul 4 03:31:27 2018 No.9847463

>>9846516
Thots are great, you can be a fuqboi and it's okay because their only friends to warn are other thots, who are more sexually interested in you for being a fuqboi than they are turned off.

Just wrap your dick and get a penicillin shot after, champ.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 03:39:19 2018 No.9847480 File: 189 KB, 717x880, fgwefwe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9846516 >THOT

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 03:56:15 2018 No.9847500 File: 47 KB, 640x399, 1529471384349.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] this made me fucking laugh, naturally /sci/ are taking it seriously and getting BTFO

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 04:32:34 2018 No.9847544 File: 34 KB, 480x740, 1525182507570.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Jesus there's so many butt blasted women on this thread.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 04:34:30 2018 No.9847546 File: 35 KB, 435x453, thot-B-gone.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Wed Jul 4 05:13:40 2018 No.9847574 [DELETED]

File: 247 KB, 1183x1578, 1456855643864.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Women don't understand how male lust actually operates. Women think that men experience women as "the Beautiful," as something pleasant and trifling that can be enjoyed at a distance and then allowed to pass on. They think that a picture of themselves wearing clothing that shows off all their fat and all their soft skin and warm nice holes is like a postcard with a picture of a beach on it. But to men, female beauty is not the Beautiful, it's the Sublime, it's not trifling but great and terrible, and it stirs something great and terrible and daemonic in man's subterranean depths that impels him forward to fuck things from roughly below and behind the prostate area.

When a man sees a picture of a beautiful sexy woman he feels half a million years of race knowledge thrumming in his veins, an infinity of sexy women reaching around behind themselves to spread their asscheeks and pussy apart with one hand and say "fuck me." He hears the drums from the movie Jumanji, his soul tangibly but invisibly leans forward outside of him grasping desperately for the pussy and gnashing its teeth. He wants to taste her holes and squeeze her fat and smell that combination of smells girls have that when you ask them what it is they say it's just normal shampoo and fabric softener but you know it's something more.

It's not fair to post these hot sluts constantly. The jezebels guy is right and this post is not an homage. I'm going to kill myself if I can't escape from this feeling soon. Women don't understand what they're doing. I saw a girl on a bicycle yesterday and I started thinking about what it would be like to be a bicycle seat for 10 minutes.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 05:31:23 2018 No.9847602 File: 997 KB, 960x1432, 1517863458232.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9847574 >I started thinking about what it would be like to be a bicycle seat for 10 minutes

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 05:45:33 2018 No.9847617 >>9847574 nigga just close your eyes and walk away haha also STEM faculties are natural thot free zones already.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 10:43:55 2018 No.9847976 >>9846659 You sound like a fucking faggot.

Anonymous Wed Jul 4 10:52:45 2018 No.9847997

>>9846659
>Think about this. You are saying that you cannot notice how a woman is dressed unless you are horny. This means that if a female colleague of yours recently purchased a new dress which looks great on her, you are physically incapable of noticing the charm and giving her a compliment unless you saw her in a sexual way.
I wouldn't dare doing that out of fear of being labelled a misogynist and having my career destroyed. It's best to just pretend women don't exist. If you see some bright flowery dress on a shapely woman with your peripheral vision, do not look. Don't even give them the benefit of knowing they've been noticed.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 11:05:18 2018 No.9848016 >>9846516 I fully support men only universities. Meaningful work might actually get accomplished.

Anonymous Wed Jul 4 12:47:51 2018 No.9848214

>>9847574
Congrats on having not a single ounce of will and giving your power - your attention, away to a bunch of dumb attention-whores. Thanks for acquiescing to the shitty game women are playing. Thanks for diverting your attention away from more meaningful things. You are not a man.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 13:07:39 2018 No.9848241 >>9847617 >also STEM faculties are natural thot free zones already. This, I'm sure humanities classes are literal orgies tho

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 13:28:17 2018 No.9848275 >>9848214 That was probably written by a thot. They actually believe men should be grateful just to touch the ground they walk on. Like, no thanks, I don't want your dirty fucking panties as a souvenir. Throw them in the garbage for all I care.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 14:32:41 2018 No.9848407 sure is samefag in here

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 14:42:51 2018 No.9848426 >>9846516 All vagina-having lifeforms are thots and all thots are vagina-having lifeforms. There is no non-thot female and there are no male thots.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 16:28:29 2018 No.9848622 >>9848426 But some women are nice and save their thottery for the appropriate time and place.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 16:33:23 2018 No.9848635 >>9847574 >Being so brainlet that you can't into intellectual celibacy

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 17:20:03 2018 No.9848698 next time go in the class in vest and baggy jeans with underwear exposed and sit close to a roastie. she wont ever be a thot again. Or she'l suck your dick. both options are good

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 17:33:05 2018 No.9848721 >>9846516 Are you fuckin gay my son?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 17:49:38 2018 No.9848750 >>9848721 No, I'm a professional you 3 boners away from being a rapist bastard.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 17:51:05 2018 No.9848754 >>9846516 >How to avoid thots at university Just go like one floor up in the natural sciences building and you'll no longer encounter thots.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 17:56:17 2018 No.9848761 >>9846618 the dark ages of 15 years ago when highschools used to ban spaghetti straps because everyone knew it was a huge distraction

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 17:56:49 2018 No.9848762 >>9846516 Thanks for the thread OP, had a good laugh. Kek'd at the butthurt low IQ samefag who couldn't come up with a better quip than "u horny"

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 17:59:09 2018 No.9848767 >>9846516 The slippery slope of rape will be our salvation, join me brother, release the kraken.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 18:00:36 2018 No.9848771 File: 530 KB, 1334x694, Female Brain.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9846516 Women shouldn't even be in collages in the first place. Pic related.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 18:02:42 2018 No.9848776 File: 530 KB, 1334x694, Female Brain.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9846516 Women shouldn't even be in universities in the first place. Pic related.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 18:22:19 2018 No.9848800 >>9848776 you better watch that edge anon

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 19:06:01 2018 No.9848865 >>9846516 This is the spergiest most retarded post this board has seen in ages. Are you also going to start banning guys who lift because they look too muscular?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 19:09:16 2018 No.9848871 >>9848865 Not OP but I generally agree with him. I've also seen guys at school who dress inappropriately. I don't find it sexually distracting but others might, but it's still very unprofessional

Anonymous Wed Jul 4 21:17:15 2018 No.9849056

>>9848865
>Are you also going to start banning guys who lift because they look too muscular?

In my experience, when it comes to men the worst offenders are guys who wear sleeveless shirts to show off their muscles. I do not say this because it bothers me (similarly to the women), but because it is not appropriate for the classroom.

But there is a huge difference here. While it is clear that guys who dress like this are doing it to look attractive, arms are not a lewd body part. Thinking about equality, I would not discipline a woman for showing her arms, so in principle, I have to act similarly towards men.

But for the sake of argument let's say that someday there are even worse offenders. To be equivalent to thots, who wear tight clothing to show off their butt and breasts, imagine that in the future it becomes popular for guys to wear really tight pants that show off your dick. Miss me with that shit, they are going out of my fucking classroom.

Anonymous Wed Jul 4 23:01:53 2018 No.9849242

>>9849056
You keep reiterating "my classroom" as if that is a justification for your stance. Do whatever the fuck you want with your class as long as the school you work for allows it, I dont give a shit. Just realize that you dont have a sound argument for it. You are like a father being mad at their daughter for having a tattoo because you personally dont like tattoos.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 4 23:08:29 2018 No.9849253 >>9849056 lewd is a subjective opinion, not an objective one

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 01:23:24 2018 No.9849376 >>9846625 >>9846646 >>9846652 holy shit shut up you fucking faggots men are sexually stimulated mostly visually, am I a rapist for noticing a girl walking around dressed in spray-on clothes?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 01:25:48 2018 No.9849380 >>9849253 it's definitely objective and you're a retard

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 01:28:05 2018 No.9849384 >>9849380 >nurrr nurrrr you're wetawd! yikes. someone call the incel patrol.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 14:48:31 2018 No.9850381 >>9846516 Everyone reading this thread should also read this: http://www.dlshq.org/download/brahmacharya.htm#_Toc441556933 t. Ivy League mathfag with a 4.0 gpa

Anonymous Thu Jul 5 14:54:10 2018 No.9850387

>>9849384

"incels" are a natural consequence of a degenerate hedonistic society which thinks that one of the main purposes of life is having constant sexual pleasure. There's a reason why religions and ancient societies feared unrestrained sexuality so much. They knew it could be highly dangerous and corruptive

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 15:16:21 2018 No.9850412 >>9849376 if you look at her longer than you do anyone else on the street, your penis has overcome your rational mind and you're demonstrating your flimsy willpower

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 17:02:29 2018 No.9850545 >>9850381 Can you just give a TL;DR?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 17:25:58 2018 No.9850579 >>9850387 There's more going on in modern society than hedonism. Most incels are just not properly socialised because they can survive in their own little worlds playing games and reading books. You're just a prude my dude.

Anonymous Thu Jul 5 17:59:38 2018 No.9850626

>>9850545
Ok then. TL;DR, The book talks about the benefits of complete celibacy (no porn, no masturbation, no looking at women, no thinking about sex, and not even any wet dreams). By practicing celibacy you get solid willpower, extremely strong concentration, and, if you can maintain it for a long time, occult powers (the easiest to obtain are the powers of attracting people, influencing people, empathy/telepathy/mind-reading). All of it is 100% true.

Read the document in its entirety before you dismiss this as nonsense. I've practiced full celibacy for stretches of months at a time and I have seen some shit.

Every single ancient society had priests, monks, nuns, virgin girls, shamans, medicine men, etc. whose life was devoted to celibacy and the development of religious and occult powers. The reason that all this is so hard to believe is very simple. It's because living in the modern world has made complete celibacy impossible (just the remembrance of say, a sexy advert can break someone's meditation).

This book gives practical tips for trying to maintain complete celibacy and briefly outlines some of the religious history/philosophy/metaphysics behind all this (although it's much, much deeper than just what's covered in the document).

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 18:01:22 2018 No.9850627 >>9850579 You, and most other people, have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. You're so far from the truth. Read the document and my summary of it.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 18:14:10 2018 No.9850643 >>9850381 How many threads are you going to shill this in?

Anonymous Thu Jul 5 18:22:39 2018 No.9850662

>>9850643
As many as it takes so that people get the message. If I can help even just one anon reading this, I'll feel like I've accomplished something. The situation for young men in modern society is worse than it's ever been. Psychic and occult power is being transferred from the male to the female, from the ordered state to several chaotic ones.

All the social phenomena and memes like 'incels' and 'angry and sad young men' have a deeper reason driving them. If I can help just one 'incel' or 'depressed virgin' or even some normal guy sad because his girlfriend cheated on him, I'll feel like I've accomplished something.

My life has been completely changed reading this. I've gone from depressed virgin to someone who's happy all the time, so happy that if I lost everything, my friends, my possessions, my family, my education, and had to live poor and naked and alone in the Himalayas, I'd still be happy and at peace. If I had to go fight and die in a war, and suffer pain and loss and death, I would be happy.

Read the book.

Anonymous Thu Jul 5 18:29:35 2018 No.9850673

>>9850662
>As many as it takes so that people get the message. If I can help even just one anon reading this, I'll feel like I've accomplished something. The situation for young men in modern society is worse than it's ever been. Psychic and occult power is being transferred from the male to the female, from the ordered state to several chaotic ones.
dude get help. So sad to see schizophrenics not realize they are.

Anonymous Thu Jul 5 18:38:11 2018 No.9850691

>>9850673
Lol. I'm the farthest thing from schizo you could possibly imagine. Not saying Ivy League math majors with a 4.0 can't be crazy (I guess Ted Kaczynski is an example). But I have a family who loves me, and a few friends who I talk to about normal every day stuff. I have a life and work and normal ambitions like everyone else.

None of what I'm saying is a delusion. I got this knowledge through reading older and more esoteric books (I can link you to some if you're interested). At first I didn't believe it either- no one wants to at first, because it's easier to just keep jacking off and thinking about sex. But I persevered, and I experienced some really weird things. It's all real. I can only tell people online because obviously people will think I'm insane IRL. But it's all real.

Anonymous Thu Jul 5 18:41:21 2018 No.9850697

>>9850691
you're an idiot for thinking other people's problems are your own. I used to jack off a ton. now im too busy doing academic shit to jack off even every day. Sometimes i dont even want to but i know it's a better option than waking up in a puddle of cum.
Im really sorry some people decide to indulge in certain biological processes you deem as unworthy of their time or attention, but who the fuck cares, it's not your life. I would absolutely love to never shit, eat, shower, or jack off again but guess what, you're in an imperfect biological body, and some people fall victim to its immediate pleasures. You have to get over it and worry about yourself.
again, who the fuck cares what other people around you are doing if you're accomplishing shit and making yourself a better person?

Anonymous Thu Jul 5 18:52:32 2018 No.9850706

>>9850697
> Im really sorry some people decide to indulge in certain biological processes you deem as unworthy of their time or attention, but who the fuck cares, it's not your life.

That's true. It isn't my life. But I know from personal experience that some people can dramatically improve theirs by taking up complete celibacy. If you're not at that stage, then I don't really have a problem with you.

> you're in an imperfect biological body, and some people fall victim to its immediate pleasures. You have to get over it and worry about yourself.

That's also true, I completely agree. But all the religions of the world teach a certain knowledge that has been lost or falsely maligned because of science. That knowledge is that we are, in fact, not our biological bodies. The eventual goal of human life should be to overcome the weaknesses and 'immediate pleasures' of our bodies, so that we can reside in our own pure Spirit. Celibacy is a good way to do that. Someone who practices celibacy and meditation wholly and sincerely will find that the bliss of residing in Spirit is much, much, much greater than the immediate pleasures of the physical body.

> who the fuck cares what other people around you are doing...

The only reason I care about what other people around me are doing is because it interferes with those who are trying to develop themselves. I'm a libertarian, I believe people should be free to explore the entire realm of human experience, but one very important dimension of experience is being shut off because of unrestrained sexuality everywhere. Sort of like a toxic, poisoned environment (hence the need to create 'thot' free zones, just like people would create smoke-free zones so that people don't get lung cancer involuntarily).

> ...if you're accomplishing shit and making yourself a better person?

When I began the practice of complete celibacy, my definition of 'accomplishing shit' and 'making myself a better person' drastically changed.

Anonymous Thu Jul 5 19:00:59 2018 No.9850716

>>9850706
>That's true. It isn't my life. But I know from personal experience that some people can dramatically improve theirs by taking up complete celibacy. If you're not at that stage, then I don't really have a problem with you.
who cares about them? why do you care? what is there to be gained? why would you waste your time when you could be improving yourself?
>The only reason I care about what other people around me are doing is because it interferes with those who are trying to develop themselves.
how? how the hell is someone thotting it up stopping me from getting research done? also as a libertarian, you want absolute personal freedom except when people do shit you dont like, like slutting it up in school with what they wear. how do you not see the hypocrisy? what if they want to explore the entire realm of human existence by thotting it up?
>When I began the practice of complete celibacy, my definition of 'accomplishing shit' and 'making myself a better person' drastically changed.
great for you, but not everyone is you, and what you consider to be not an accomplishment is different to other people. You are only your perception of the world, and must acknowledge that other people's perceptions are equally as valid as yours. What you consider an accomplishment now others dont, and what you dont consider accomplishments now others do. get over it.

Anonymous Thu Jul 5 19:12:02 2018 No.9850729

> who cares about them? why do you care? what is there to be gained? why would you waste your time when you could be improving yourself?

There is value in selfless service. I'm posting on an anonymous message board. No one knows who I am. There's nothing for me to gain. But I think of myself as a kind and selfless person. I know for a fact that the overall amount of happiness and well-being in the world would increase more if one person took up celibacy then if a cure for cancer was discovered tomorrow. Of course, this will be extremely difficult for you to understand, but if you reach a certain stage of advancement, you will understand why this is true.

> How the hell is someone thotting it up stopping me from getting research done?

Unrestrained sexuality doesn't stop someone from getting scientific research done. But it blocks off an entire realm of spirituality which you currently have no power to appreciate unless you were actually in that realm (which you're not).

> also as a libertarian, you want absolute personal freedom except when people do shit you dont like

I already explained this. It's not hypocrisy. Everyone should be free to explore whatever realms of experience they wish WHILE NOT STOPPING OTHERS from exploring whatever realms they wish. Read my analogy about smoke-free zones again.

> What you consider an accomplishment now others dont, and what you dont consider accomplishments now others do. get over it.

I'm already over it. I understand better than anyone else that perceptions of the world can be relative, and vary among different people. I understand this because I underwent a dramatic shift in my own perception. I encourage you and everyone reading this to explore different realms of perception, even if it may be difficult. To boldly go where no one has gone before. Isn't this what being a scientist is all about?

Anonymous Thu Jul 5 19:16:23 2018 No.9850735

>>9850729
oh boy this is gonna be fun

>There is value in selfless service.
holy shit you're such a martyr, thank you so much based anon sacrificing so much time from his important endeavors to enlighten me how women should wear what he thinks they should
> But I think of myself as a kind and selfless person. I know for a fact that the overall amount of happiness and well-being in the world would increase more if one person took up celibacy then if a cure for cancer was discovered tomorrow. Of course, this will be extremely difficult for you to understand, but if you reach a certain stage of advancement, you will understand why this is true.
seriously, get mental health help.
>Unrestrained sexuality doesn't stop someone from getting scientific research done. But it blocks off an entire realm of spirituality which you currently have no power to appreciate unless you were actually in that realm (which you're not).
see above
>I already explained this. It's not hypocrisy. Everyone should be free to explore whatever realms of experience they wish WHILE NOT STOPPING OTHERS from exploring whatever realms they wish. Read my analogy about smoke-free zones again.
so those girls are stopping you from entering a spiritual realm by forcing you to look at them with their clothing choice. got it.
>I'm already over it. I understand better than anyone else that perceptions of the world can be relative, and vary among different people. I understand this because I underwent a dramatic shift in my own perception. I encourage you and everyone reading this to explore different realms of perception, even if it may be difficult. To boldly go where no one has gone before. Isn't this what being a scientist is all about?
yea you're actually a crazy person with internet access. huge narcissist too. go ahead and give me your dismissive reply about how im not in a mental state of advancement enough to see the light.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 19:31:46 2018 No.9850752 >>9846516 Go to a uni that don't offer humanities

Anonymous Thu Jul 5 19:32:45 2018 No.9850756

>>9850735
> seriously, get mental health help.
Not an argument.

> so those girls are stopping you from entering a spiritual realm by forcing you to look at them with their clothing choice. got it.
No one is really, truly forcing anybody to do anything. I tend to think of this situation more calmly and objectively: like a fish being born in water, not knowing that land exists. I just think it's a bit sad that it's very difficult for young men living in our society to live in a more spiritual manner.

Of course, I admit that no one is physically stopping anyone from running away to be a monk. A student in the average hedonistic Western college is theoretically free to isolate himself from women, alcohol, and other pleasures in order to pursue his spirituality. But I take issue with the fact that there are a lot of obstacles in the way of this. All I'm asking is that there is room for people to pursue both their bodily pleasures, and their spirituality. As I said before, I'm not a prude, I'm a libertarian. In the same vein, I also believe that prostitution should be legalized, but also that there should be spaces for male students to live free of women if they wish. In the past, this would have been very normal and reasonable. It's only because of widespread feminist propaganda and ignorance that this is considered 'sexist' and 'bad' when in fact, it is not. It is you who resides in a state of ignorance, due to your lack of knowledge about the dictates of the past. You have been brainwashed into believing that our modern society is the best possible one because of 'freedom'. Freedom to pursue whatever material pleasures one desires is actually a meaningless freedom. It quickly becomes worthless. Real freedom is spiritual freedom. Read the book. It'll all make sense. I speak as someone who once believed what you believe, but now I know better.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 19:33:37 2018 No.9850759 >>9850756 get help anon. or go live in a cave, you're clearly not mentally appropriate for modern society and where it is going.

Anonymous Thu Jul 5 19:45:48 2018 No.9850779

>>9850759
Sadly I think this is true. My plan is to make enough money to retire early and spend the rest of my life in a cabin somewhere up north. I don't have a problem with this and I'm perfectly happy (no matter how hard this is for you to believe!) Participation in this material world of sex and intoxicants brings me more pain than pleasure now. It disturbs my meditation and has stolen away the faculties I've worked so hard to develop.

If there are any others on this board who are curious, I encourage you to read the book and to begin purifying yourself now. It is 100% possible to achieve unparalleled bliss and freedom from all material troubles. Look into religion (not modern Christianity- that has been degraded into an unsuitable form). Study the Eastern religions: Buddhism and Hinduism. Look into original, Orthodox sects of Abrahamic religions. Look into asceticism. There are great discoveries and great realizations to be made on this path, more than any scientist will find studying one highly specialized, technical, materialist topic over the entire course of his career. The Spirit shall eventually overcome all matter.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 19:56:58 2018 No.9850795 >>9850779 i never challenged your happiness. I only challenged the purpose of the pointlessness of trying to correct people's actions into what you consider to be "correct"

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 20:00:14 2018 No.9850800 >>9850795 Everything has a point. Nothing is ever pointless. I wish you and everyone reading this the best of luck.

Anonymous Thu Jul 5 20:23:17 2018 No.9850831

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bR-DOeAm-PQ

>Be woman in china
>Life is rough, but you keep your head down and work hard
>New factory opens up
>Spend all day on mindless labor making motherboards for $300 a month
>Bought and used by /pol/tard NEETs to complain about how women and foreigners have no value to society

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 20:24:22 2018 No.9850833 >>9850831 Taiwan is this case, but point remains.

Anonymous Thu Jul 5 20:59:57 2018 No.9850974

What is your opinion on unrelated posts on /sci/?

For me, it is really annoying to see retards shitposting about hating women or their IQ no one cares about. I think /sci/ should be a dumbass-free zone. This could be anything from denying manlet a access to the thread to taking away their electronics. I really don't mind which one it is, I just want to have one place in the world that isn't my room where I don't have to sit through manlets' retarded, unrelated bullshit.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 21:03:28 2018 No.9850980 >>9846890 You're getting baited by an (ironic?) retard

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 21:05:47 2018 No.9850984 >>9846516 sign of how retarded sci is that this thread got 122 replies. i hear reddits havin a purge. can we not purge you all. go back to /r9k/ or /b/ or /pol/

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 21:33:03 2018 No.9851025 >>9850980 Read the thread a bit more, he admits he is not ironic. He is a retard. The genuine article.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 21:33:40 2018 No.9851026 >>9850984 >122 replies >57 unique IP's go forum slide somewhere else

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 21:59:11 2018 No.9851058 >>9851025 i never admitted that, i only said i was trying to bait you the whole time. i do believe everything i said but that's beside the point

>>	Anonymous Thu Jul 5 22:13:18 2018 No.9851079 >>9851058 >i do believe everything i said Yes, so you are the genuine article. A retard in the flesh.

Anonymous Fri Jul 6 05:19:58 2018 No.9851683
File: 580 KB, 1582x1627, hpubw7gbpoiz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Ever heard the term "temple of science"? Temple. A sacred place to be respected.
Not a fucking catwalk for attention whores.
Those of you who see no problem with it - it's provably because youre being sexualised since childchood.
>>9846618
>>9846625
>>9846670

When cult of the flesh dominates over the cult of the mind, the civilisation is doomed. As it was with Greeks, Romans, and now, with Europeyans.

Protip: numerous great men in history criticised distracting factor women have on the developing Man. Shit, not so long ago being asexual was considered a good thing - no distractions, can focus on science.

If you don't understand corelation between cult of hedonism and the end of science, you're a retard.

>inb4 being called a poltard by some nigger
Oh, I don't hate women, either. I'm married & have a kid.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 05:27:22 2018 No.9851690 >>9851683 This is why Tesla was unironically the most redpilled genius in recent history

Anonymous Fri Jul 6 05:27:46 2018 No.9851691

>>9846979
>Not even gay but places with only men tend to be more productive and organized, women somehow just add retardation to an area. All the stupid giggling and gossip.
Its true.
What's even worse are 100% women workplaces. The women would get into those quiet wars where they all talk shit about each other behind their backs, build fractions agains each other, spew acid, all while pretending to be nice & civilised.
Actually, introducing some men into the open space they used to work in, calmed the situation and made them behave more normal.
>source: wife was an editor for a large int. corp. that owns several international women magazines, portals and books

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 05:39:36 2018 No.9851698 >>9846516 how did this shit thread get so many posts. u guys should segregate yourselves and make an incels page... /inc/

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 05:40:39 2018 No.9851699 >>9851691 u ever seen love island? men are cunts too,

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 05:53:25 2018 No.9851710 >>9846622 more like dying before reaching 30 from common cold :(

Anonymous Fri Jul 6 06:10:18 2018 No.9851729

>>9850626
I had similar thoughts

>just the remembrance of say, a sexy advert can break someone's meditation
where is this cited from?

I worked in advertising and 'sex sells' was the only thing we practiced. I was depressed and quit the job and now I'm studying CS because I don't ever want to manipulate humans for money again..

>>9850697
>waking up in a puddle of cum
do you think this is the only thing that happens if you stop to fap?

>You have to … worry about yourself
Look we humans are neither completely separated nor conjoined entities.

every human is himself AND part of the human species.

Complete eremites don't exit and can never exist, one can never completely(!) isolate himself from human society.

therefore most of societies problems are each individuals problems and vice versa.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 06:24:34 2018 No.9851738 >>9851729 but all they do in cs is manipulate humans. all the cs jobs are maintaining websites for companies with an emphasis on attractability and advertising with the rare occasional interesting ticktok

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 06:29:06 2018 No.9851741 >>9851729 u a virgin bruv?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 06:31:10 2018 No.9851744 >>9851738 that's simply not true, there is a lot more to CS than maintaining a stupid website... >>9851741 nah brah r u? bc only virgin fgts rite lik dis unironlically

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 06:34:10 2018 No.9851746 >>9851744 well i dnt know much about it but literally thats what all my cs friends do now. good wage though 45k in pounds starting. nd nah mate u right like this when uve had a bangin nite out. ITS COMIN HOME

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 06:34:16 2018 No.9851747 >>9850412 You clearly don't understand how sexuality works on a subconscious level >Ever wonder why women are always the first to notice that somebodies fly is down?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 06:36:36 2018 No.9851749 >>9851747 because they love it? #bigdix

Anonymous Fri Jul 6 06:42:57 2018 No.9851759
File: 176 KB, 750x750, 3713982725435398459.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9851729
>Complete eremites don't exit and can never exist, one can never completely(!) isolate himself from human society.
>therefore most of societies problems are each individuals problems and vice versa.
This is how I know you're into eastern philosophy
>Indra's net

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 06:57:14 2018 No.9851781 >>9851759 my eremite never exits. he just recedes and proceeds. into the perforation ad nauseum.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 07:28:47 2018 No.9851813 >>9850626 >occult powers (the easiest to obtain are the powers of attracting people, influencing people, empathy/telepathy/mind-reading). All of it is 100% true. I thought this was the science board

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 10:08:28 2018 No.9852016 >>9846672 I am completely unrelated to any debate here, but I just saw "thottery" and it gave me a chuckle. Thanks.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 10:15:45 2018 No.9852023 >>9846903 >I could give a lecture high and drunk off my ass. I could give a lecture while getting my dick suck. Fucking undergrad shit man, I could do it while a horse fucked me in the ass. Prove it.

Anonymous Fri Jul 6 10:22:08 2018 No.9852031

>>9851747
believe me, i do understand. i also know that if you dont have conscious control over where you put your attention, you're a simpleminded robot no better than a sack of ground meat. why are you even in school if you don't have the slightest ounce of willpower?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 10:23:55 2018 No.9852034 >>9852031 >Why don't you have willpower over your subconscious How retarded are you?

Anonymous Fri Jul 6 11:39:10 2018 No.9852167

>>9852034
It's totally possible to gain willpower over your subconscious, but it does take some effort. In fact, those who have willpower over their subconscious are often the most well-integrated, well-adjusted, and psychologically capable people. People whose subconscious and conscious are integrated, whose thinking and feeling are integrated, are the happiest. People who think logically one way but feel another way are very unhappy and depressed. It all starts with gaining mastery over the subconscious.

You should read Jungian psychology and his books about dream interpretation (like Man and His Symbols). Try NoFap seriously and look into lucid dreaming. There will be some wack shit in your dreams that will help you in day to day life. Like using your dream to get the solution of a math proof, which has happened to me before.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 11:59:28 2018 No.9852194 >>9851683 >imagine unironicalky writing all this I wish all the incel poltards would go back to plebbit whence they came

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 12:00:30 2018 No.9852196 >>9851698 It already exists, it's called /pol/

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 13:30:09 2018 No.9852325 >>9846516 Open your own private university with your own rules and stop whining.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 13:32:33 2018 No.9852328 >>9852167 >You should read Jungian psychology >Believing this crap Done listening to anything you have to say as it's clearly tainted with Peterson-esque pseudo intellectualism

Anonymous Fri Jul 6 13:44:28 2018 No.9852344

>>9850756
I thought you were a lunatic at first anon, but your posts have all been lucid and thought out. You may have (by contemporary standards) unconventional ideas about things, but I think you've clearly demonstrated self awareness and consciousness, which puts you a cut above the typical raving schizo posts that sometimes end up on /sci/. I'd love to check out some of the books you mentioned earlier, if you're still around.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 15:55:41 2018 No.9852541 >>9852328 >Believing that the only modern psychologist that uses Carl Jung's work is Peterson Amazing. I cannot even imagine how it must feel to be so ignorant about everything and yet be so confident about being correct.

Anonymous Fri Jul 6 16:19:59 2018 No.9852580

>>9852344
> I thought you were a lunatic at first anon, but your posts have all been lucid and thought out.

Gee, thanks.

> I'd love to check out some of the books you mentioned earlier

Here's a reading list with some descriptions:

The Practice of Brahmacharya by Swami Sivananda
(written with a view towards the common man. Includes a brief motivation, as well as useful and practical day-to-day guidelines for maintaining celibacy. For beginners, this is the Bible. It is also the Wikipedia, in the sense that it will serve as a guide to motivate your further researches into this topic)

A History of Celibacy by Elizabeth Abbott (title self-explanatory)

Eros and the Mysteries of Love: The Metaphysics of Sex by Julius Evola
(provides a comprehensive overview of ancient societies, doctrines, mythologies, and rituals and their views towards human sexuality.).

Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation & Political Control by E. Michael Jones
(describes how the vice of lust can be and has been exploited for malicious purposes)

Man and His Symbols by Carl Jung (a very good book, and not just for understanding sex. Includes interpretation of the archetypal symbolism of ancient religions and myths).

Any book by Swami Krishnananda is excellent (https://www.swami-krishnananda.org/books_4.html).). This man is a Hindu monk who has read Western philosophy (think Kant, Hegel) and can explain ancient Indian spirituality from the lens of the logical, Enlightenment-era Western philosopher.

Postmodernism 101 by Heath White (describes the current state of affairs in world history and how it came to be. Excellent for overcoming modern-day propaganda).

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 16:23:09 2018 No.9852583 >>9852541 >how it must feel to be so ignorant about everything and yet be so confident about being correct Never before has a more projected opinion been presented to me. Thank you

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 16:41:46 2018 No.9852609 >>9852580 Thank you, anon. I'm always interested in reading something new. If you haven't already, make sure you check out >>>/lit/

Anonymous Fri Jul 6 16:46:46 2018 No.9852616

>>9852344
Also, some other books, once someone has gotten the basics down:

The Doctrine of Awakening by Julius Evola (repeals popular myths about Buddhist spirituality, such as that it is for the weak, cowardly, or that it is intrinsically nonviolent. Reaffirms that the source of all morality is religion and reminds the reader of the true definition of sin, independent of any incorrect modern day conception of morality as some kind of utilitarianism or altruism).

The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda

How to Know Higher Worlds: A Modern Path of Initiation by Rudolf Steiner (Steiner was a German student of the natural sciences who also dabbled in mysticism. This book explains why and how science has usurped the status that religion once occupied in our society. It also provides an practical introduction to mystical practices and exercises).

Sayings of the Desert Fathers (deals with the overcoming of lust through asceticism, from an ancient Christian perspective. Pay particular attention to the sayings concerning fornication)

The Primitive Rule of the Knights Templar (law-book of this medieval Catholic military order, containing an injunction towards strict celibacy).

Any good book that has to do with Native American traditions will mention the hunting rituals of the Cherokee peoples and how it involved the practice of fasting, celibacy, and ritual purification for a fixed stretch of time.

Any book written by the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini of Iran, a great poet, a great imam, a great leader, and a great man.

Anonymous Fri Jul 6 16:49:32 2018 No.9852618

>>9852609
Also:

Occult Science in India and Among the Ancients by Louis Jacolliot (although the origins of this book are a little sketchy, Jacolliot comes close enough to many of the important aspects of ancient Indian/Aryan spirituality).

This pdf document about sex and religion (http://hbrucestokes.com/images/Kesher_-_Sex_and_Religion.pdf))

The Laws of Manu (at sacredtexts.com. Generally anything from sacredtexts.com is a good resource). It can be found here: http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/manu/manu09.htm.. Pay attention to the line "That chief of royal sages who formerly possessed the whole world, caused a confusion of the castes (varna), his intellect being destroyed by lust."

Lastly, the Srimad Bhagavatam, Canto 12, Chapter Two. This is an ancient Hindu prophecy/eschatology concerning the symptoms of decline we see modern times. It's disturbingly accurate.

There's actually a lot more you can find out. Once you start reading one thing, your natural curiosity will be triggered and this will start a chain reaction. You'll be searching for more and more, wanting to learn more and more. This truly is a hidden knowledge, a great secret, only hidden because it's been turned into a huge joke by modern society. I urge you and everyone else to start reading and help yourselves.

And yes, I do frequent /lit/ occasionally but I've made a conscious decision not to read modern and postmodern literature anymore since I've come to the conclusion that it can be toxic to the Spirit.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 16:53:20 2018 No.9852620 >this science and math related thread has been up for 2 days Bravo hot pockets.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 16:54:38 2018 No.9852623 >>9846903 > Fucking undergrad shit man, I could do it while a horse fucked me in the ass. t. voice of experience

Anonymous Fri Jul 6 17:05:42 2018 No.9852638

>>9852609
Sorry, there's even more. There's one last book I'll mention, unless anyone else has any specific requests or questions. This book is noted for inducing severe detachment in all who read it. Note that detachment is not the same thing as depression. In Eastern spirituality, detachment with the transience of this world and its material pleasures is seen as desirable, a prerequisite to achieve transcendence. The book is:

The Vairagya Satakam: http://estudantedavedanta.net/Vairagya-Satakam-The-Hundred-Verses-on-Renunciation.pdf

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 6 18:45:36 2018 No.9852786 >>9846516 How about limiting who is allowed at university instead? Only accept serious scholars and reject everyone else. Problem solved.

Anonymous Sat Jul 7 07:45:26 2018 No.9853564
File: 311 KB, 703x547, Banisadr_Fallaci_Khomeini.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9852616
>Any book written by the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini of Iran, a great poet, a great imam, a great leader, and a great man.

You almost had me, you muslim peace of shit.
I'm old enough to remember what that worshiper of feces is.

Anonymous Sat Jul 7 10:39:27 2018 No.9853752

Your post screams virgin OP.

Who cares what they wear? You don't have to interact with them if you don't want to. You don't have to look at them unless you can't help it.

I hate feminism for a number of reasons but all humans should have the right to bodily autonomy because all living things are born autonomous, meaning it is intrinsic to human nature.

As is sex. The reason we don't see men dressed as thots as frequently as women at our age (assuming you're in uni) is that women have an expiration date. Not many people want a girl past childbearing age. Women see that day coming and in university it feels closer than ever since they know work is coming right after and know that it's harder to find a mate in the work place since they cannot exploit their sexual appeal in a professional setting and because their co-workers aren't always the same age group.

For women, finding a mate becomes harder as time goes on. For men, it's kind of like a bell curve. Peaking when you've found a job and house and stabilized your life with a longer plateau than women that only lowers once you're senile, rather than dropping to zero the moment you hit menopause.

Men age like fine wine, women like spoiled milk, so it is their incentive to entice a mate before no one wants them anymore and their best chance is university when they're at their peak.

They're just following a drive for sex and survival like all of us are.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 19:19:10 2018 No.9854635 >>9853752 >You don't have to look at them unless you can't help it. OP is LARPing as a teacher He quite literally needs to look at them

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 19:39:00 2018 No.9854645 >>9846516 Women shouldn't even be allowed in unis in the first place desu

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 22:15:57 2018 No.9854849 >>9854645 This is a possibility worth considering, but it goes against my principles of liberty and equality. The only thing we can do is establish a pure meritocracy and then if women can't get in then so be it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 22:25:10 2018 No.9854863 >>9854849 Those are bad principles as they are not based in reality.

Anonymous Sat Jul 7 22:27:48 2018 No.9854868

>>9854863
They are. If you are trying to run a society and you directly oppress any group, those people will always try to stage a revolution against you. Living knowing that there is a growing number of people wanting to behead you is no way to live if you ask me. We must keep the people happy and grant them freedom so that they feel that they could also one day be at the top.

Anonymous Sun Jul 8 06:33:49 2018 No.9855641

>>9854645
This.
>>9854849
>equality
I'm with you, but the thing is, women arent equal to us. They are poor creatures who bleed once a month and are driven by emotions rather than logic. Wathing womens lack of response for rapid islamisation of Urop and how easy it is to manipulate them with marxism, made me loose all respect for them.
They do make fine doctors though, I'll give them that.

>t.ex hardcore feminist

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 8 06:36:04 2018 No.9855643 >>9854868 >people will always try to stage a revolution against you. Heh. No. All revolutions are orchistrated by intrest groups who use victims as canon fodder to achieve their goals of conquest. Wellcome to the real world, bro.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 8 07:54:52 2018 No.9855748 >>9846618 Go back to rolling in mud at Woodstock

Anonymous Sun Jul 8 08:46:14 2018 No.9855829

>>9855641
>I'm with you, but the thing is, women aren't equal to us.
I am talking about equality of opportunity.

>>9855643
No revolution can make it unless they amass a huge number of supporters (to use as cannon fodder, as you said). Read about Cuba's revolution for example. Had the government not been treating their farmers and their intellectuals so badly, Cuba would not be communist today. And then the communists treated their people like shit too, the only difference is that they went all the way to create a police state that immediately kills all dissenters.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 8 08:55:38 2018 No.9855853 >>9846516 >Thot >That hoe over there Why not just say hoe. It's literally faster.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 8 08:57:10 2018 No.9855855 >>9855853 Well, you gotta keep up with the kids. I know most people here are not professors and I know speaking like a grandpa is not very lit, senpai.

Anonymous Sun Jul 8 10:10:54 2018 No.9855956

>>9853752
>Men age like fine wine, women like spoiled milk, so it is their incentive to entice a mate before no one wants them anymore and their best chance is university when they're at their peak.
They don't need to do it in the lecture rooms.

Sometimes I wish school uniforms would come back.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 8 10:18:52 2018 No.9855963 >>9846625 you sound like someone who would say that women want to look good for themselves. never mind what they really mean is feeding their self-esteem from the attention they get from guys exactly like OP. at some point, you are just asking for it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 8 18:46:33 2018 No.9856652 At first I didn't know which side I was on but thenI heard one side call the other a bunch of incels. That's when I knew that the side with said incels must be wrong. Very persuasive argument, would recommend for all current issues.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 8 18:50:54 2018 No.9856657 >>9855641 >>t.ex hardcore feminist I'm interested to see how you're an ex-feminist. Was there anything you think that drove you to be a hardcore feminist in the first place? And what made you drop it?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 8 19:11:22 2018 No.9856691 >>9846516 >>9856680

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 8 21:45:21 2018 No.9856851 >>9856657 >Was there anything you think that drove you to be a hardcore feminist in the first place? As I teen I could not get pussy. >And what made you drop it? Lost my virginity.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 01:52:29 2018 No.9857142 Bump. I just want more stuff for my NoFap reading list

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 04:02:15 2018 No.9857290 Just call them sluts and get on with your life lol.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 04:26:08 2018 No.9857313 >>9846652 Great logic m8. I should go to class wearing a cup and a leather tank top then if any women complain I'll just accuse them of being horny and having no self control

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 05:37:15 2018 No.9857387 >>9857313 We should unironically bring back codpieces though

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 05:41:58 2018 No.9857397 >>9855853 It's slang that originates from /pol/. I can't find the screencap at the moment but I swear I'm not joking.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 06:40:27 2018 No.9857462 >>9846625 Is it normal sexuality or a problem? Cunts spelling themselves in a classroom shouldn't be accepted CMV.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 09:42:03 2018 No.9857791 File: 78 KB, 776x1222, Modest-dress-for-women-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Tfw no modest qt3.14s anywhere at my uni.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 11:05:56 2018 No.9857907 >>9846516 what clothes do you use to attract women¿? (send help)

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 11:33:13 2018 No.9857958 >>9846881 >you only think it's inappropriate because you're embarassed by the raging boners you get Where does this line of thinking end? Should people be allowed to go to class in a swimming suit, underwear, nothing?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 11:36:21 2018 No.9857968 >>9857958 Why not?

Anonymous Mon Jul 9 11:42:15 2018 No.9857979

>>9857968
It makes other people uncomfortable. It makes other people so uncomfortable that it's already illegal in most public places. If nudity isn't allowed, it's not hard to imagine that revealing clothes wouldn't be allowed based on location and time. OP may be a faggot, but the people saying "they can wear whatever they want xDDD" are also faggots. There's already precedent for things like dress codes. Students shouldn't wear revealing clothes in class.

Anonymous Mon Jul 9 11:45:10 2018 No.9857985

>>9857958
>>9857979
I think asians should be required to take exams naked, so we can be assured they aren't cheating. Why does my right to have my degree mean something take a backseat to your right to not feel uncomfortable? Facts don't care about your feelings

Anonymous Mon Jul 9 11:48:59 2018 No.9857996

>>9857985
>I think asians should be required to take exams naked, so we can be assured they aren't cheating.
I remember you from another thread! That was a while ago.

>Facts don't care about your feelings
EVERYTHING is arbitrary. We have to choose values based off of our understanding of the society, culture, and tradition we find ourselves in. Once we've decided on values, we can use facts to help us make trade offs. Western industrialized societies are more worried about nudity in the classroom than the chance of a student cheating. That's why we aren't naked in the classroom.

Anonymous Mon Jul 9 11:54:14 2018 No.9858010

>>9853752
There is no empathy from /sci/ ever which makes me sad.

It must be truly frightening to know in 10 years time you won't have a great body anymore and that you also spent the first 18 years of your life not building any skills. Yes, most people are dummies but I look at all these people working lame jobs doing mediocre tasks for mediocre or little pay and I just feel bad.

A woman I know in her 30s sits on Facebook all day trying to sell facial products to people. I don't feel superior to her. I feel sorry for her.

Anonymous Mon Jul 9 11:57:38 2018 No.9858020

>>9857979
>It makes other people uncomfortable
No, it makes (You) uncomfortable, and frankly you seem like the kind of oversensitive pussy that gets offended by everything and lashes out in impotent rage on a myanmar papercraft fan subreddit like it's his little hug box.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 12:02:32 2018 No.9858029 >>9857979 This.

Anonymous Mon Jul 9 12:07:39 2018 No.9858041
File: 137 KB, 500x500, benis.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9858020
Dress codes and laws against public nudity exist. If you think you should be able to wear whatever you want in public, then you think you should be able to do things that would make you a sex offender. If you do those things, you are a sex offender, a pervert.

What OP considers unacceptable might be fine in your world view. It might be fine in the view of the people around you. It might be fine in the classroom. But there are things that are not fine, and you will not be able to live near an elementary school if you wear them in public.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 13:29:37 2018 No.9858236 >>9849376 This. I think that "faggot" is actually a woman because she can't grasp the basic fact that ogling at women is a instinctual behavior hardwired in all healthy, straight men.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 14:40:23 2018 No.9858402 >>9857907 Just look like you are rich. If you have a nice body then show it off.

Anonymous Mon Jul 9 15:00:01 2018 No.9858441

>>9858041
>Dress codes and laws against public nudity exist.
And they are by no means universal. In my town women are allowed to go topless and theres a big nudist park right in the middle of dowtown.
If you want everyone to follow your own personal flavor of morality feel free to transfer to Riad Polytech, GO FIGHTIN' ACKBARS!

Anonymous Mon Jul 9 15:05:11 2018 No.9858453

>>9858441
>morality
This has nothing to do with morality. It has to do with practicality.

Look, we all know there are plenty of women with daddy issues and Iwantattention syndrome, but does that mean that we should let them disrupt the other men and women who actually go there to learn? There are designated daddy issues disposal locations like bars, parties, concerts, etc. You know, places where people are not working. Places where you go specifically to have fun.

I know that from your perspective, it hurts that your dad never loved you and you really need that male attention and validation to keep yourself from tying that knot but try to think of other people. My mom and dad are still married. They still love me. People like me do not need your cancerous attitude. Keep it to yourself.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 15:05:58 2018 No.9858454 >>9846516 The only redpilled solution is to ban women from universities. Prove me wrong.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 15:07:43 2018 No.9858455 >>9857791 >modest >dress doesn’t even cover her ankles get that slut out of here

Anonymous Mon Jul 9 15:10:01 2018 No.9858459

>>9858454
That is a horrible solution. If we allow men to ban women from doing anything, then what argument will we have when, say, Asian people want to ban white people.

The actual redpilled solution is to make university so hard and competitive that women are effectively unable to get in, not because we are banning them, but because they just can't score high enough.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 15:16:00 2018 No.9858464 >>9858459 if Asian people want to ban whites from universities in Asia then they should go ahead

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 15:16:54 2018 No.9858466 >>9858464 Fuck man, I'm not this redpilled yet. Carry on you beautiful beautiful man.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 15:25:49 2018 No.9858474 >>9846516 ITT conservatives defend safe spaces for little horny bois

Anonymous Mon Jul 9 15:28:38 2018 No.9858482

>>9858474
I'm glad to see you have no argument against it and you just came here to report and give a summary for anyone new reading the thread.

Your summary is unfortunately only a half-truth. We are not sexist as you, this is something that will benefit both boys and girls. We are not doing it for any specific gender. It is for all of us.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 16:46:21 2018 No.9858618 File: 53 KB, 400x501, thot alarm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9846825 >>9846910 B E G O N E

Anonymous Mon Jul 9 21:59:17 2018 No.9859148
File: 238 KB, 415x457, 1529899065133.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9858441
>If you want everyone to follow your own personal flavor of morality
Your town is a rare exception. You're the only one forcing your personal morals on others. I'm reminding you that the overwhelming consensus across the industrialized world is that you're a perverted exhibitionist that shouldn't be allowed near children.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 22:06:48 2018 No.9859159 My physics department is 99.95% thot free, from what I've observed. >tfw no physics thots

Anonymous Mon Jul 9 22:34:43 2018 No.9859207

>>9857462
when you let it interfere with your studies, it is.

>>9857313
sounds like a plan. as long as you actually take the lesson to heart and get a grip on your own body

>>9857958
if you weren't an unrestrained sex pervert you wouldnt even ask that question

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 22:43:19 2018 No.9859220 >>9846516 we already have them, they are called engineering classes

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 22:44:59 2018 No.9859223 >>9846818 >1) It is really hard to see undergrads, regardless of gender, as anything more than subhuman Oh my god no one in my life has ever said anything I relate to more than this.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 22:46:31 2018 No.9859225 >>9846818 >>9859223 ha ha, us postgraduates right??! FUCK undergraduates

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 22:48:28 2018 No.9859230 >>9859225 what, are you a buttmad undergrad or something?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 9 23:13:49 2018 No.9859281 >>9846645 I agree with you OP I think people here are trolling

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 00:57:07 2018 No.9859445 >>9859281 I post on /sci/ regularly and I know for a fact that there is a small group of feminists here so I can guarantee the retardation you see in this thread is 100% non-GMO, organic and bought directly from the farmers.

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 00:59:18 2018 No.9859450

>>9846618
>>9846625
>>9846646
>>9846747
>>9846842
>>9846878
>>9846888
>>9846910
>>9846912
>>9846941
>>9848721
>>9848865
>>9850579
>>9852325
t. roasties
Quit kidding yourselves and just go work in a strip club or camwhore like all of you are truly destined for

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 01:08:11 2018 No.9859463 >>9859445 >everyone i don't like is a feminist

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 01:15:35 2018 No.9859468 >>9859450 If i was a roastie I would work in a strip club so fast. Its essentially 0 effort and you make mad rack

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 01:26:08 2018 No.9859484 >>9848761 >it is the girl's fault that other people can't control their boners Sorry pedro we don't allow pedos to be teacher anymore, nobody is slowing down the class

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 01:28:31 2018 No.9859489 >>9859484 >we don't allow pedos to be teacher anymore Guys I think this one might actually be genuine. >How could you possibly be this stupid?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 01:47:38 2018 No.9859533 >>9846946 Kike

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 05:51:44 2018 No.9859756 >>9859445 I think dressing like a thot is inappropriate for a learning environment I don't know why most females feel the need to over-sexualize themselves everywhere they go

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 05:55:00 2018 No.9859760 >>9859756 >I don't know why most females feel the need to over-sexualize themselves everywhere they g They are literal attention whores, they honestly want people to ogle at them

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 06:07:03 2018 No.9859781

Is it appropriate? No. Can you stop someone from getting an education because they wear short shorts? Also no. Your opinion doesn't dictate the lives of others. Fuck off. You can wear whatever you want within reason, so can they. You don't get special privileges, you snowflake faggot.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 06:55:19 2018 No.9859841 >>9859781 >Can you stop someone from getting an education because they wear short shorts You can establish a dress code

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 07:08:50 2018 No.9859854

>men are more visually stimulated than women
>it's acceptable for women to show far more skin than men in class
It really makes me think. It's obviously done for attention. There should be some studies done about this so if we can see if the claim that only perverts get distracted by this is true. Feminists really have some nerve, man.

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 07:17:21 2018 No.9859865

>>9859841
Of course. That's completely fair and well within the rights of the school to do so. However, and I may be wrong here. I think establishing a dress code is different than establishing a no thot zone. Especially when OP wants to play God emperor and decide who is a thot.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 07:34:32 2018 No.9859884 >>9859865 It can simply be "No lewd or provocative clothing during scheduled classes" It's simple enough to understand, is general enough not to be discriminatory and will deal with the thot question

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 07:38:25 2018 No.9859891 >>9859865 It's not like people don't have a common understanding of what a thot is OP was an over the top post of passion but I understand what he meant

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 07:51:50 2018 No.9859913

>>9859884
You can't have a general rule like that. What is provocative to some, may not be interpreted as provocative by another. That's why school don't do this. They have things like "no seams hemmed 4 inches above the knee" or whatever. It's much more specific.
>>9859891
Of course. But What constitutes a 'thot' is not defined. If something like that isn't defined explicitly then you're going to have problems. It's the same reason the law has separate charges for burglary and larceny, when they could just have a general "don't take people's shit" law. They had to be picky about wording, because if it applies to a general population, then it's going to be interpreted differently by every person. Again, that's why schools have the hem line rule.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 08:40:40 2018 No.9859955 >>9859913 >implying all rules shouldn't just be as vague and elastic as possible to permit unbridled puritanism and arbitrary punishment daily reminder that "jurisprudence" is pure autism

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 08:47:20 2018 No.9859958

>>9859955
Sure, but it's the way our system is set up. I agree with it. I don't think these things should be too vague. If you don't like something, fine. You shouldn't be allowed to just blanket cover everything you don't like because it offends you. That's leftist tier cry baby bitching. I agree, there needs to be something in place. But "NO THOTS!!!!!!! :(" isn't good enough. Sorry.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 08:57:52 2018 No.9859973 >>9859958 >just blanket cover everything you don't like because it offends you >leftist tier Were you born in 2005?

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 09:11:46 2018 No.9859986

>>9859973
1993, why? How is that incorrect. Don't leftist try to blanket cover everything they don't like?
>White people?
"Racist. All of them. Unless you're actively calling others racists you are a racist. If you're not with the cause you're against it. Simply because you are white, you have built a foundation that supports and still supports racism."
See? I just blanket covered an entire race. That was easy as fuck.

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 12:01:54 2018 No.9860183

>>9859913
>That's why school don't do this. They have things like "no seams hemmed 4 inches above the knee" or whatever. It's much more specific.
Highschools have this because they're dealing with children. Higher education and offices do not. They are vague because adults can figure it out at their own discretion. If you don't know what business casual means and can't find out, you're a child.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 12:46:35 2018 No.9860243 >>9846516 anon is haunted by all that he can see but cannot touch, the thread

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 13:21:22 2018 No.9860292 >>9859756 you're the only person in the room who thinks they're dressed sexually at all

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 13:28:35 2018 No.9860301 >>9860292 >mini skirts >cleavage exposed >tight clothing >caked with make up >not sexual

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 13:32:56 2018 No.9860304 >>9860301 it's only sexual because you're a caveman with no self control

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 13:35:22 2018 No.9860308 >>9860304 If the intention is to induce sexual attraction then it's sexual clothing

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 13:45:55 2018 No.9860323 >>9860304 t. beta boi confusing low t with self control

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 13:53:57 2018 No.9860334 >>9860308 have you interviewed them to ask why they're wearing the clothing? or are you assuming that because you're sexually aroused, it must have been intentional? assuming things isn't good science, anon

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 13:58:43 2018 No.9860340 >>9857791 move to utah, not joking

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:05:10 2018 No.9860350 >>9860304 if you truly are just a Tibetan monk who's overcome lust with meditation or something then I sincerely admire you, but I'd bet you're either a fag or some other sexual deviant who's managed to escape the problem talking shit

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:06:54 2018 No.9860351 >>9860350 I just pay attention to the lecturer and my work.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:08:04 2018 No.9860353 >>9860334 how many women are going to admit they're wearing spandex pants because they like attention? that'd be like doing a survey asking fat people if they're fat because of their lifestyle or because of bad genes

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:09:12 2018 No.9860355 >>9860351 do you feel sexual urges?

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:10:54 2018 No.9860357

>>9860334
I can't tell if you're simple or trolling at this point
Mock me if you will but you are denying reality
Make up is not casually worn for novelty reasons
Mini skirts aren't worn for practicality etc...
It doesn't matter what my individual experience is
Make up is worn to enhance physical appearance, otherwise it would not be worn. Why would they go through the effort?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:25:36 2018 No.9860380 >>9860357 they just want to look pretty to enhance their womanly individuality and independence, not for you silly boy

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:28:38 2018 No.9860390 >>9860380 I'm interpreting that response as "I'm an idiot but I want you to think I was trolling"

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:29:14 2018 No.9860391

>>9860353
then you're working on flawed information and it's improper to make assumptions. be a better scientist, anon

>>9860355
of course i do. i'm just an adult and i don't let them interfere with my work.

>>9860357
>I can't tell if you're simple or trolling at this point
it's not my fault you haven't read the thread

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:36:10 2018 No.9860400 >>9860390 I wasn't the guy you were responding to

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:40:15 2018 No.9860409 >>9860391 you're a girl aren't you come clean

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:43:21 2018 No.9860415 >>9860409 i'm male

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:44:40 2018 No.9860416

>>9858482
>for anyone new to the thread
It's about four pages in m8, very obviously humor for those still invested in this nonsense onslaught
Also
>We are not sexist as you (sic.)
You pose this as a problem for men. I'm sure there's a segment of women who find this problematic too. Either way, this is a case of limiting personal liberties to appease the whole (or a small subpopulation that has a particularly hard time focusing), which should never happen.
Realistically, show-y girls will be treated like show-y girls. They'll be treated less professionally. It's a good life lesson for people less socially adept, especially as they enter the work world. Penning up girls who want to dress like sluts will make them act out as adults. I favor letting them get it out of their system before it wrecks working spaces.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:44:51 2018 No.9860417 >>9860415 you identify as male?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:46:26 2018 No.9860420 >>9860417 yes, my i identify as male. i was also born with a penis. i just don't let it run my life.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:48:00 2018 No.9860422 >>9860416 I don't think anyone was actually being serious about the safe spaces I do seriously think universities should have a dress code banning skin tight and showy clothes though

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:48:10 2018 No.9860423 >>9860391 Do I need scientific proof that jay walking will increase my chance of being involved in a road traffic accident? No because it's common sense Most human behavior is constrained by evolved strategies to survive and reproduce

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:50:35 2018 No.9860426 >>9860420 Why should the temptation be there in a learning environment? That is what the OP is essentially about

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:50:55 2018 No.9860428

>>9860423
sure, but that analogy is a bad fit to this situation. do you jaywalk because you WANT to be hit by a car? no, of course not. you jaywalk for another purpose, and if the drivers around you have no awareness of the road, they might hit you.

sexual attraction is a side effect of how someone dresses, not the purpose. it's the result of someone with low willpower.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:51:42 2018 No.9860431 >>9860428 Do you drinksoy by any chance?

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:51:52 2018 No.9860433

>>9860391
>then you're working on flawed information and it's improper to make assumptions
there are things you can learn better through social experience than through the scientific process, like how I assume you're an autist who can't understand that concept

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:51:55 2018 No.9860434 >>9860426 there is no temptation, just OP having so little willpower that the most trivial of things prevents them from learning

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:52:34 2018 No.9860436 >>9860431 absolutely not, basedmilk is disgusting and tofu is bland.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:53:29 2018 No.9860438 >>9860434 You said you experienced sexual urges and you're implying it requires willpower to subdue Is that not temptation?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:56:21 2018 No.9860444 >>9860438 i have the willpower to ignore things which might otherwise be distracting to someone with an underdeveloped mind like the op.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:57:08 2018 No.9860446 >>9859468 >strip club That has actual risk. They're usually in shitty places and run by shitty people. Camming on the other hand means you work from home whenever you want and can get a lot more money with less effort.

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:57:29 2018 No.9860447

>>9860428
>purposely misinterpreting the point of the metaphor
his point was that the common sense that jaywalking increases the chance of getting hit by a car is like the common sense of knowing college age guys will look at college age girls who wear a shirt that shows two thirds of their tits, not that jaywalkers want to get hit by cars like how girls want attention, you gormless windbag

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:57:50 2018 No.9860448 >>9860444 You might have low test, you should see a doc

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 14:59:31 2018 No.9860453 >>9860444 so your mind is also underdeveloped? at least you admit it...

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:00:59 2018 No.9860457 >>9860446 yeah but then you're on the internet and someone you know might see it ...I mean, someone also might find out you work at a strip club though

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:02:02 2018 No.9860460

>>9860428
>sexual attractive is a side effect of how someone dresses, not the purpose
I disagree with that. Like I said human behaviour is constrained by evolved strategies to survive and reproduce. Modern clothing goes beyond improving survival. It's sexualized hence why all clothing models are 10/10 chads and staceys
Wearing make up is a perfect illustration: it has not benefit to survival what other purpose is there?
How do you fundamentally explain why women wear make up? The obvious answer is to increase sexual attractiveness

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:08:38 2018 No.9860471

>>9860447
i didnt misinterpret your metaphor, i made it a better fit to the situation. your original metaphor was an incredibly poor fit and a bad argumentative tool.

besides, metaphors are shit. why waste time arguing about how best a metaphor suits the issue when we can just argue the issue?

>>9860453
of course it is, no one is perfect.

>>9860460
you can disagree all you want, that doesn't make you right. it's only sexual because you're a slave to a blood filled sack and a primitive mind that anyone with a modicum of willpower can overcome.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:10:00 2018 No.9860474 >>9860471 Why don't you give an alternative explanation? Your "arguments" are nothing but contradictions

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:10:42 2018 No.9860475

>>9860460
>How do you fundamentally explain why women wear make up? The obvious answer is to increase sexual attractiveness
again, you just reveal your bias

why do we paint houses? why do we hire architects to design buildings? why do we meticulously design and care for a lawn? it's not because we want to fuck the grass in our front yard, that's for sure.

women wear makeup because they want to hide embarassing acne scars

>>9860474
there are no contradictions and i've already given the alternative explanation dozens of times.

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:11:49 2018 No.9860476

>>9860471
>metaphor was an incredibly poor
You misinterpreted because you don't understand the premise. You are assuming that choice of clothing is not sexually motivated, the metaphor means that it's common sense for clothing choices to be sexually motivated. What other reason is there?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:13:06 2018 No.9860477 >>9860476 of course i understood the premise. how else could i correct your clumsy metaphor if i didnt understand it?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:13:14 2018 No.9860478 >>9860475 >they want to hide embarassing acne scars Thus improve physical appearance and increase sexual attractiveness I don't think women consider their face to be a work of art

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:14:42 2018 No.9860481 >>9860478 improving physical appearance is not necessarily an increase in sexual attractiveness. women wear makeup even when they're only going to be around the gender they're not attracted to.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:15:55 2018 No.9860483 >>9860478 it's also very brave of you to admit that you're sexually attracted to buildings. i bet the parthenon gets you raging hard

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:17:08 2018 No.9860486

>>9860477
>You say assumptions are bad science
>I respond with a metaphor illustrating the use of common sense/practical knowledge
>You respond by contradicting the premise (which is the usefulness of common sense)
You are debating caveats yet you call me clumsy

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:18:13 2018 No.9860488 >>9860486 i didnt contradict the premise, i contradicted the construction of the metaphor. it was shit. it didn't demonstrate what you thought it did at all.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:20:09 2018 No.9860490 >>9860481 >improving physical appearance is not necessarily an increase in sexual attractiveness

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:20:59 2018 No.9860493 >>9860490 yes, you quoted a correct statement. i take it you agree. it's good to see someone finally get it

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:21:31 2018 No.9860494 >>9860488 I don't jaywalk even though I could not cite any research into it. I ASSUME it would be dangerous How does that not illustrate the premise?

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:24:07 2018 No.9860495

>>9860494
are you jaywalking because you want to be hit by a car? of course not.

women might wear clothes that have a risk that someone would find attractive, but the objective is not to be attractive. the objective is to wear clothes.

you jaywalk with a risk of getting hit, but your objective is not to get hit. your objective is to cross the road.

your own metaphor supports my point.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:27:44 2018 No.9860500 >>9860495 The purpose of it is to demonstrate the usefulness of assumptions. It's independent of the main topic you misinterpreted it

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:28:34 2018 No.9860503 >>9860500 if i misinterpreted it, the interpretation you intended was irrelevant

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:29:13 2018 No.9860505 >>9860500 >your own metaphor supports my point with circular reasoning,yes You say that you've explained your alternative explanation elsewhere, link me

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:30:16 2018 No.9860509 >>9860503 Do you have a really bad short term memory?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:32:55 2018 No.9860511 >>9860505 it's not my fault you refuse to read the thread >>9860509 my short term memory is just as good as my strength of will not to be aroused by brutalist architecture, unlike everyone else in this thread

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:38:31 2018 No.9860517

>>9846818
bro, you are asserting that the manmade concept of "undergrad" is so powerful in your brain that it overrules millions of years of evolution that has programmed your brain to feel attraction to the bare skin of fertile young women.

youre delusional if you claim a complete lack of physical attraction, or youre a homosexual.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 15:42:36 2018 No.9860518 >>9846618 >t. dumbfuck incel that is trying to prove to himself that he is normal

NOT OP Tue Jul 10 16:54:21 2018 No.9860639

PEOPLE ARGUING WITH OP ABOUT WANTING A MODEST DRESS CODE/UNIFORM
>>9846618 >>9846625 >>9846632 >>9846646 >>9846648 >>9846652 >>9846659 >>9846669 >>9846691 >>9846747 >>9846748 >>9846757 >>9846822 >>9846842 >>9846848 >>9846866
>>9846878 >>9846881 >>9846884 >>9846888 >>9846892 >>9846904 >>9846912 >>9846914
>>9846922 >>9846927 >>9846934 >>9846941
>>9846951 >>9846993 >>9847463 >>9848214
>>9848721 >>9848767 >>9848865 >>9849242
>>9849253 >>9849384 >>9850412 >>9850759 >>9850831 >>9850980 >>9850984 >>9851026
>>9851698 >>9851741 >>9851813 >>9852023
>>9852034 >>9852194 >>9852196 >>9852325
>>9852328

WHAT OP WANTS THEM TO KNOW
>If you think women are above scrutiny then you are just a cuck
>These people are wasting my time
>I have to give lectures to people who are literally never going to make it. Waste of time really. I would prefer if they took themselves more seriously and devoted themselves to study.
>I want to save their souls.
>[ I ] Don't even give them the benefit of knowing they've been noticed.
>In my experience, when it comes to men the worst offenders are guys who wear sleeveless shirts to show off their muscles. I do not say this because it bothers me (similarly to the women), but because it is not appropriate for the classroom.

OP BELIEVES IN INTELLECTUAL/SPIRITUAL CELIBACY
Want to know more? Try OP's reading list:
>>9852580
>>9852616
>>9852638

ARE YOU A FEMINIST OR A MISOGYNIST?
If you answered "yes" to this question you were not welcome in this thread. Your biases made the thread fucking annoying to read.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:09:50 2018 No.9860681 >>9860639 thanks for adding literally nothing to the thread

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:17:21 2018 No.9860699 File: 32 KB, 499x401, 21441254124.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9860495 >the objective is to wear clothes yeah, the objective of dressing like a hooker JUST WEARING CLOTHES MAN lmao

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:20:14 2018 No.9860707 >>9860699 lots of people wear clothes

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:27:03 2018 No.9860714 >>9846516 >i don't like seeing attractive women ???? i guess having muscular naked men around instead would be more your style huh op

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:27:04 2018 No.9860715 >>9860707 but only thots dress like thots you're that same guy who misinterpreted that dude's analogy a minute ago to avoid responding to it aren't you?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:29:25 2018 No.9860718 >Spend two hours reading a thread and constructing a comment >Try to refocus thread, refute stupid arguments, and get OP's point across >Post adds "literally nothing" to thread I need to get a hobby. Time to go checkout the chess thread. >>9860098

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:29:49 2018 No.9860719 >>9860714 half naked girls are for when you're jacking off, when you're at school they're a distraction, not that you'd know

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:29:59 2018 No.9860720 >>9860715 you only think they're dressed inappropriately because you can't stop masturbating for thirty seconds to listen in class

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:31:12 2018 No.9860723 >>9860718 if a single offhand comment is enough to demoralize you then none of us can help you

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:31:55 2018 No.9860726 >>9860718 if you want to contribute you should join the discussion where it's at instead of making a textwall about the whole thread also no one cares, autist

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:33:39 2018 No.9860728 >>9860719 i can understand that, have been in plenty classes with really hot girls either jerk off beforehand or just have a gf to do it for you

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:35:05 2018 No.9860732 >>9860720 oh so it's my problem for having hormones? you're just the quintessential modern feminist aren't you? also you should google "straw man arguments" real quick and stop doing that

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:35:53 2018 No.9860738 >>9860723 I was making it out of satire and distaste for the /b/ tier comments on /sci/.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:36:47 2018 No.9860740 >>9860732 it's your fault for having less self control than a goldfish

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:37:39 2018 No.9860743 >>9860728 well I mean a girl can't help it if she's hot, the problem is when they come to class in belly shirts and shorts that cover half their ass

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:39:30 2018 No.9860745 >>9860740 being distracted by softcore porn while I'm in a boring class is low self control?

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:39:32 2018 No.9860746

>>9859986
>1993, why? How is that incorrect.
From the sedition act to McCarthy up through censorship/obscenity laws, the evangelical moral panics and Jack Thompson, this has traditionally always been a right wing thing. Calling it characteristically left shows a very short memory and lack of historical perspective.
The view you describe isn't even vague/subjective, it's just a generalization/dogma

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:40:33 2018 No.9860748 >>9860743 yeah i know what you mean, guess they want chads attention what classes are you taking that have hot girls in them though

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:41:42 2018 No.9860751 >>9860745 yes, now you're getting it!

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:46:52 2018 No.9860768 >>9860745 yes.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:49:23 2018 No.9860771 >>9860746 that was then and this is now. you don't see conservatives today advocating hate speech laws you classical liberals are just stuck sharing a party with modern liberals, too bad

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 17:56:20 2018 No.9860789

>>9860726
My "text wall" was made so that people don't have to sift through the shit wall of poor arguments to understand the thread or Op. I was joining the fucking discussion. I was showing a easy to comprehend overview for the thread to try to refocus the shitty arguments such as
>>9860720
being very similar to
>>9846646
This thread keeps on repeating the same arguments. It's stupid, and I don't like it, so I made a text wall to help y'all idiots see that and stop arguing over stupid shit over and over and over again.

Anonymous Tue Jul 10 18:00:47 2018 No.9860796

>>9860789
they're very similar because i posted both of them. i've easily posted more than half the posts in this thread. this thread is me responding to maybe two or three other anons

and as i said very early in the thread, i'm doing it on purpose. i dont know why anyone bothers to respond to me anymore but im having a blast

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 18:10:15 2018 No.9860811 >>9860789 >arguing over stupid shit over and over and over again where do you think you are? >>9860796 well the thread says there have been over 100 unique posters

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 18:12:09 2018 No.9860813 >>9860796 That explains why this thread is so repetitive and retarded.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 18:14:19 2018 No.9860817 >>9860811 hmm, true, i hadn't noticed. i counted, and i'm responsible for 13 out of 52 (numbers could be off) of the posts he quoted >>9860813 yep!

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 18:16:36 2018 No.9860822 >>9860817 You should look over the reading list.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 18:19:21 2018 No.9860825 >>9860822 nope!

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 18:25:42 2018 No.9860834 >>9860825 Ok

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 10 20:09:14 2018 No.9861033 >>9859207 >sounds like a plan. Not really. He'd get kicked out of the building for indecency and probably charged with sexual harassment.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 11 08:27:24 2018 No.9861788 >>9860751 >>9860768 The argument comes down to whether or not the temptation should be there in the first place The answer is no

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 11 10:26:24 2018 No.9861932 >>9861788 the temptation only exists in your own mind. if you weren't a mental child then you wouldn't feel the temptation

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 11 13:14:41 2018 No.9862157 >>9861932 If you don't experience sexual urges from seeing young near-bare skin girls, then you are part of an abnormal minority or a homosexual

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 11 13:23:58 2018 No.9862187 >>9862157 Don't respond to the troll.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 11 13:40:16 2018 No.9862232 >>9859484 >it's the girl's fault Sorry roastie, in high school that's actually the case.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math