[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 13 KB, 600x515, 4b6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9838706 No.9838706 [Reply] [Original]

>Proof: The proof is obvious

>> No.9838707

>refer to lemma 1-50

>> No.9838712

>It just says: "Retard."

>> No.9838717
File: 16 KB, 500x461, 1337084726137.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9838717

>Proof: check corollary 3.12

>> No.9838752

>>9838706
lol

>> No.9838791
File: 47 KB, 475x530, 1524450928059.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9838791

Proof: Bookwork

>> No.9838903

>>9838706
Assume lemma A is false. By lemma A, we know lemma A is true. This is a contradiction.

>> No.9838906

>>9838706
>stackoverflow : that is a stupid answer

>> No.9838911

>As we see...

>> No.9838914

>Think!

>> No.9838917

>theorem is just stated without any comment about proof

>> No.9838931

>>9838706
https://youtu.be/P4GgBr-INMk

Yeah its obvious 1=0

>> No.9838935
File: 79 KB, 477x640, math proofs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9838935

>> No.9838970

>>9838917
Theorems are axiomatic because the proof is trivial, nerd. Why don't you prove that the sky is blue.

>> No.9838997

This is a good thread
>Proof: my uncle works at CERN

>> No.9839021

>Chapter 12 question 5
>Proof uses exercise 12 of chapter 3

>> No.9839075
File: 20 KB, 400x710, 1530128950177.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9839075

>>9838706
>Proof: Trivial.

>Proof: Exercise.

>Proof: Apply corollary 13.1, followed by Theorem 14.5 and Lemma 14.7.

>Proof: Please refer to this 1970s unpublished manuscript that is only available as a shitty scan.

>> No.9839085
File: 28 KB, 600x584, 107.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9839085

>>9838706
>We omit some details of the proof.
>Work a month reconstructing the details and realize the proof was wrong.

>> No.9839086

>Proof: we Will not print in this notes because it is Best done in a movie (see it is my turn)

>> No.9839087

>>9838935
fucking kek

>> No.9839100
File: 11 KB, 237x229, 1522101761228.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9839100

>proof is left as an exercise

>> No.9839107

>the statement will be proven after a break
>...
>as we have proved before the break it follows that

>> No.9839113

>>9839100
lol i was just gonna post this

>> No.9839118

>Proof: check these dubs

>> No.9839386
File: 62 KB, 320x371, 1472338311394.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9839386

Proof: dude trust me

>> No.9839409
File: 37 KB, 282x248, 1519677609808.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9839409

>and by inspection and engineer's judgement...

>> No.9839510

>(ii) follows directly from (i)
>(ii) implies (iii) is straightforward
>Exercise: show that (iii) implies (iv)

>> No.9839579
File: 15 KB, 220x389, Big Tits.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9839579

>the following proof is due to Tits

>> No.9839596

>The proof is left as an exercise to the reader

>> No.9839794

>the reader is left as an exercise to the proof