[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 62 KB, 418x720, 1510322420667.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9819218 No.9819218 [Reply] [Original]

I want a mathematically strict, yet introductory book on QM. What would you recommend?

>> No.9819234
File: 6 KB, 159x159, yes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9819234

define mathematically strict

>> No.9819237

Except you want to learn functional analysis, there aren't any there I know off.

>> No.9819250

>>9819234
i want it to have more linear algebra and functional analysis than the typical introductory book

>>9819237
yeah but all the functional analysis books i've got have only a small portion of QM mainly as an application of commutation relations of operators and/or sturm liouville problems

>> No.9819257

>>9819218
QM written for mathematicians. A little unconventional but I liked it:

https://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319646107

>> No.9819262

>>9819257
thank you, i'll check this out

>> No.9819299

>>9819218
Do you have a better resolution image? I like that image and would like a better one, or at the very least a pdf with the calculations or a link to them

>> No.9819361

>>9819299
im afraid im gonna disappoint you anon, i do not have a better res one..

>> No.9819413
File: 79 KB, 558x960, 1511538520109.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9819413

>>9819299
>>9819361
I do, brothers. However, the increase is small.

>> No.9819517

>>9819218
"Quantum Theory for Mathematicians" by B.C. Hall, which is great even for undergrads.

"Quantum Mechanics for Mathematicians" by L.A. Takhtajan, if you already know functional analysis and have a broader knowledge in math in general.

Both are great.

>> No.9819536 [DELETED] 

>>9819218
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Physics_Textbook_Recommendations#Quantum_Mechanics

>> No.9819561
File: 8 KB, 255x204, 1501018162047.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9819561

>>9819413
Saved. thanks anon

>> No.9819593

>>9819413
Oh shit thanks anon, sadly some of the words are still fuzzy. I’ll make do though

>> No.9819597

>QM
>mathematically strict
lol

>> No.9820393

>>9819413
OP here, thanks man!!!

>> No.9820478

Binney and skinner

>> No.9820493

>>9819299
I love it too but I saved it because I remember laughing out loud the first time I saw it in 2012 and I want to remember that feeling.

>> No.9820527

>>9819413
Is that last equation correct? It seems there's a redundant hbar there that could be simplified.