/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.9819127]

Is this THE most beautiful equation in all of math?

[Anonymous No.9819129]

-1 + 1 = 0
much easier than this nerd shit

[Anonymous No.9819308]

>>9819129
t. brainlet

[Anonymous No.9819313]

>>9819127
eiπ+(1)=1

[Anonymous No.9819321]

>>9819127
No, this is.

1*0 = 0

[Anonymous No.9819322]

>>9819127
I don't know, but it's certainly not Euler's meme identity

[Anonymous No.9819325]

>>9819127
yes

[Anonymous No.9819327]

>>9819127
2+2 = 2*2 = 2^2 =2↑↑2 = 2↑↑↑2 = ...

[Anonymous No.9819332]

>>9819127
This is the ideal mathematical equation.You may not like it, but this is what peak equality looks like.

[Anonymous No.9819367]

>>9819332
>The identity also links five fundamental mathematical constants:[4]
>The number 0.
Not a number. Could be considered a representation of infinity.
>The number 1.
A number, but there are arguments it doesn't have to be one. Also can be a representation of infintiy.
>The number π (π = 3.141...).
Pi is not a number. But could be a representation of infinity.
>The number e (e = 2.718...), which occurs widely in mathematical analysis.
'e' is not a number. But could be a representation of infinity.
>The number i, the imaginary unit of the complex numbers.
'i' is not a number. But could be a representation of infinity.

All the "equation" is saying is that infinity, to the power of infinity infinity, plus infinity, equals infinity. Come on, fuck this brainlet shit.

[Anonymous No.9819394]

>>9819127
You can't take the natural log of -1 though

[Anonymous No.9819411]

>>9819367
you are retarded my man

[Anonymous No.9819412]

>>9819367
This is very strange shitposting

[Anonymous No.9819414]

>>9819127
[math]\displaystyle\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}=-\frac{1}{12}[/math]

Is this THE most beautiful equation in all of math?

[Anonymous No.9819417]

>>9819127

[Anonymous No.9819420]

>>9819127
[math]\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n = -\frac{1}{12}[/math]

Is this THE most beautiful equation in all of math?

[Anonymous No.9819422]

>>9819420
B b b but n n numberphiles

[Anonymous No.9819433]

>>9819367
this is gold

[Anonymous No.9819437]

I believe this one does is the best equation.

[Anonymous No.9819473]

>>9819394
[math] \ln (-1) = \ln|-1| + i\pi = i\pi [/math]

How does it feel to be a brainlet

[Anonymous No.9819485]

>>9819367

[Anonymous No.9819491]

>>9819473
Not sure how you pulled i/pi out of that, brainlet

[Anonymous No.9819498]

[math]-n y \left(x \log ^{-\frac{1}{n}}(x)\right) \sqrt[n]{\log (z)}[/math]

[Anonymous No.9819611]

>>9819127
The volagorean theorem

[Anonymous No.9819657]

>>9819491
: eiπ=−1 . If you take the natural log of both sides you get that ln(-1) = iπ.

[Anonymous No.9819667]

>>9819367
I’m going to flip a coin to determine whether or not you’re memeing.

[Anonymous No.9819679]

>>9819367
>1 can be a representation of infinity

[Anonymous No.9819681]

>>9819367
The pills will help only if you actually take them.

[Anonymous No.9819713]

>>9819127
No. It's not even the most beautiful version of that equality. = -1 is prettier than +1 = 0

[Anonymous No.9819718]

>>9819367
Obviously a shitpost, but I'm sure some mathematician (brainlet) genuinely believes this from the bottom of his heart.

[Anonymous No.9819948]

>>9819679
>This opinion, once posted, is an opinion/representation from the infinity that isn't you.

[Anonymous No.9820238]

>>9819367
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
*pew POW TOOOTOOTOOOTOOTOOO POWWOW WOOOOOOOOO
HOLY SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
MANZ

[Anonymous No.9820242]

>>9819127
Only freshman and pop scientists talk of "beautiful formulas".
Truth and beauty are not comparable to each other, they are different dimensions.

[Anonymous No.9820243]

>>9819127
Define "beautiful." I fucking hate this board.

>Exp is the most important function in all of mathematics.
BY WHAT FUCKING STANDARD YOU FUCK
>X is not an interesting case
BY WHAT FUCKING STANDARDS

[Anonymous No.9820246]

>>9820243
GIVE ME STRUCTURE! GIVE ME RULES! GIVE ME DICTIONARY, PLUS MEASURING TOOLS!

[Anonymous No.9820571]

>>9819367
the math checks out tho

[Anonymous No.9821489]

>>9819667
>t. multiple Ph.D in statistics

[Anonymous No.9821855]

>>9819127
0.99999999999999999999...=1
is a good one aswell

[Anonymous No.9821870]

>>9821855
0.9… = 0.9999999999999999…

Why are people so fascinated with adding more pointless 9s?

[Anonymous No.9821892]

I like these more.

1+2+3+4+... = -1/12
1+1+1+1+... = -1/2
1+(1/2)+(1/3)+(1/4)+... = infty
1+(1/2^2)+(1/3^2)+(1/4^2)+... = (pi^2)/6
1+(1/2^4)+(1/3^4)+(1/4^4)+... = (pi^4)/90

[Anonymous No.9821974]

>>9819473
Hello Mr branch cuts

[Anonymous No.9821977]

>>9820246
Measurement is an orthogonal protection onto a susbspace

t.Preskill

[Anonymous No.9822421]

>>9819367
Your momma so fat she is a representation of infinity

[Anonymous No.9822426]

No maxwell's equations are.
>inb4 not math
miss me with that shit

[Anonymous No.9822443]

>>9820242
>Tfw one of the most prominent theoretical physicists in history called OP’s pic related the most beautiful formula ever
Pfft... You must know all about freshmen retards because you are one

[Anonymous No.9822446]

>>9821870
They’re trying to be the first person to get to the end

[Anonymous No.9822457]

>>9819367
Is that you Terrence?

[Anonymous No.9822567]

>>9822443
He was just a kid when he said that, faggot. And I'm pretty sure he said that about Euler's other identity, namely e^ix = cosx + isinx

[Anonymous No.9822573]

>>9822421
no u

[Anonymous No.9822607]

>>9819127
That is childrens play. Now combine [math] e,\pi,i,\varphi [/math] into a single equation:

[math] e^{i\pi /5} = \frac{ \varphi + i \sqrt{3 - \varphi} }{2}. [/math]

[Anonymous No.9822635]

>>9819313
Plz repond :(

[Anonymous No.9823533]

Do you know about the "most beautiful formula in mathematics history"?
It's eipi+1=0, what people call Euler's Identity.
The natural logarithmic base e, the ratio of circumference to diameter pi, the imaginary number i, 1 and 0 all fit into this equation with nothing superfluous, and fir in such a way that it was meant to be. If there is a god in this world, this is a piece of evidence that will be listed as one of the most credible.
>What's amusing, or at least beautiful, is that this formula was "predetermined".
>It's beautiful, but when you think about it, it's also scary.
And yet, Ougi Oshino - that transfer student - just might throw out some candid advice even for the beauty of Euler's Identity, just like this:
>Yes. It indeed is beautiful, Araragi-senpai. Beautiful, so beautiful, it makes me swoon. The most beautiful part about it is that the answer is zero. That said, someone like me thinks that if the answer is going to be zero there's really no need to go out of your way to make the calculation.
Hearing that, I reconfirm my belief; Ougi Oshino is Ougi Oshino, and there's no way to express it. Before her, everything is zero. No matter what she does that may seem out of character, it always ends up being something characteristic of her.
And so, this time, we have a story about mathematics. Let's study. People tend to brace themselves when they hear "mathematics". So we can break it down and say this is a story about "arithmetic" instead. While we're at it, we can be more blunt and say this is a story about "numbers". After all, this is a story where strength in numbers provides a solution. I other words, it's a story about majority rule. Majority rule. The only method that can turn even a mistake into a truth. A formula of building blocks that pursues conspiring instead of happiness. Our inequality. Our unfair equation.
What can truly be said as something humanity has invented is probably this and only this. And, this is the ugliest formula in human history.

[Anonymous No.9823551]

>>9819127
why are you idiots assuming i is imaginary in this picture; also imaginary numbers are 7million billion percent useless in earth applications.

[Anonymous No.9823708]

pi ≈ 3
e ≈ 3
pi = e
>inb4 engineers are brainlets

[Anonymous No.9823710]

>>9823708
meant to say e ≈ pi

[Anonymous No.9823714]

>>9823710
>Let

[Anonymous No.9823931]

>>9822567
You’re wrong about that. He said it about this identity, because the inclusion of five fundamental numbers fascinated him.
As for his age, he wasn’t famous enough to be quoted before he was at least 25.

[Anonymous No.9823933]

>>9823931
>inb4 b-buh they’re not numbers
Fuck off they’re numbers, get over it.

[Anonymous No.9824225]

[eqn] \oint _{\partial \Omega} \omega = \int \int_{\Omega} d\omega [/eqn]

[Anonymous No.9824416]

>>9819127
In a word, no. In a picture, see left.

[Anonymous No.9824419]

Beauty lies in simplicity.

[Anonymous No.9824511]

>>9819367
No number is a "representation of infinity". That doesn't actually mean anything. It's a cool equation I but nothing more and nothing less.

[Anonymous No.9824881]

>>9824419

[Anonymous No.9825218]

>>9823931
>As for his age, he wasn’t famous enough to be quoted before he was at least 25.
He quoted himself, retard.

[Anonymous No.9825449]

>>9819127
Maths is ugly.
You know this when it's only ever seen as beautiful when there appears to be little of it like that equation.

[Anonymous No.9825887]

>>9819367
Give us more please

[Anonymous No.9825889]

>>9819473
BTFO

[Anonymous No.9825964]

>>9819713
>meme negative
>beautiful
Fuck off, including both 1 and 0 makes it way more aesthetically pleasing.

[Anonymous No.9825992]

>>9819127
what about 01 + 0 = 3===D

[Anonymous No.9826305]

>>9824419
Far too underappreciated, considering it contains the fundamental theorem of calculus in it as well.
Yet people still get boners over Euler's equation which basically follows right from the definitions and is just meh, once you know what it means.

[Anonymous No.9826317]

>>9819367
>like numbers can't exist bro cause infinity n shieet
fuck off

[Anonymous No.9826346]

1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1=0,00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Stay pleb

[Anonymous No.9826729]

[Anonymous No.9826734]

>>9819127
>haha let's define imaginary numbers as a second axis on a 2d plane
>haha let's define exponentiation by an imaginary number as rotation around the origin in this 2d plane
>haha let's define exponentiation by e as doing a circle
>WOW PI SHOWED UP DUDE WEED LMAO SCIENCE

[Anonymous No.9826750]

>>9826734
> haha lets define exponentiation by an imaginary number as rotation around the origin

No. This arises from the power series of sine, cosine and real exponentiation. e^ix = cosx + isinx is not an axiom, its a derived result.

[Anonymous No.9826762]

>>9820243
name one other function that when you differentiate it you get the same function and zero of course does not count because ur mom gay

[Anonymous No.9826768]

>>9826750
>power series
>its a derived result
ohh boi do I have some bad news 4 u

[Anonymous No.9826776]

>>9826768
Yes, derived from the power series of e^x, sinx and cosx . Are you retarded?

[Anonymous No.9826822]

>>9826729
WOW so deep
much beautiful ekuation