/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.9813646]

Realistically speaking how close are we to AI gfs

[Anonymous No.9813694]

Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.9813705]

>>9813646
Honestly? 30+ years. Progress has been slow since the space age.

[Anonymous No.9813708]

Closer than to actual ones.

[Anonymous No.9813723]

>>9813646
it could be done today. Using AI like path planning and SLAM a robot with specialized simulacrum of female genitalia could navigate through a room that isn't too cluttered to a human male that has assumed a limited set of positions. Using machine vision techniques, course path planning, and the special design of the female genitalia simulcrum the male's member can be maneuvered into the device. At this point bog standard control theory techniques and display of audiovisual pornography may be employed to sexually stimulate the male.

[Anonymous No.9813728]

not close enough

[Anonymous No.9813729]

>>9813646
100 years.

[Anonymous No.9813731]

>>9813646

Sex dolls that are more responsive and cooperative than 99% of women are already here, and this site is actually better company than any woman (you can always go to Twitter or plebbit for bitchiness and feminine stupidity), so for all practical purposes, we're there already.

[Anonymous No.9813818]

>>9813646
You are going to need to have some patience. The most optimistic projections predict the year 2025 for affordable sexbots on the market.

[Anonymous No.9813820]

>>9813731
>emotional connect to cube love

[Anonymous No.9813826]

>>9813731
>emotional connection

[sage goes in all fields No.9813840]

>>9813826
Unsurprising as the only demand for sexbots comes from psychopaths and autists who can't really develop emotional connections with women anyhow

[Anonymous No.9813845]

>>9813840
>laziness

[Anonymous No.9814467]

>>9813708
W - why do you hurt me?