[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 66 KB, 1377x604, c - nonconst.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9807587 No.9807587 [Reply] [Original]

Hello!
I gradually continue to create my little work.

>> No.9807590

Are you the same guy who made multiple attempts at solving P = NP?

>> No.9807596

>>9807590
no

>> No.9807603
File: 37 KB, 485x443, grug.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9807603

>i see that here speed of light

>> No.9807633

>>9807587
I assume you're a larping brainlet because this is graphic is just terrible.

>> No.9807668

P = NP
N = 1.
N = 0 and P = 0.
P = 0.
Maybe N = inf and P = inf.
Maybe P = inf.

>> No.9807677

>>9807587
Speed of light is always <=c regardless of observer.
It can be less than c in vacum. never more. not observed or otherwise. even if two light beams are shined toward eachother traveling at c, they approach eachother with ct, not 2ct

>> No.9807734

wrong: Fucking McDonald's = Fucking USA
correctly: Fucking McDonald's = Fucking USA x X

>> No.9807750

t = yt0
ct = yct0
t0 = t =>
c = yc

Why do not you see it yourself?

>> No.9807753

Your logical unit simply does not work.

>> No.9807761

my skill...
my braggin...

>> No.9807766

>>9807587
Let's say it out loud, for two different points in 3D space we have two different delta t per time for another observer. C is in which time?

>> No.9807767

I'm just kiddin

>> No.9807775

And now seriously.
Probably, the time delay does not work along the X axis.

>> No.9807780

and t0 ≠ t

>> No.9807790

>>9807775
Along the X axis, the speed of light is a constant. (and all other speeds)
In other cases (Y, Z), the speed of light is not a constant. (and all other speeds)

>> No.9807796

Similarly with mass and length, but there are other axes.

>> No.9807808

Perhaps all the experiments were carried out along the X axis.
And the problem is precisely this.

>> No.9807819

Or, perhaps, light is a one-dimensional object.
But can such objects exist in our universe?
In the past, I thought not.

>> No.9807866

t = yt0
ct = yct0
l = yct0
l/t0 = yc
v = yc (> c)
This is the speed of light
This is seen by all who are inside the moving object.


t = yt0
ct = yct0
ct = yl0
c/y = l0/t
v = c/y (< c)
This is the speed of light.
This occurs inside the moving object for all external fixed spectators.

>> No.9807891

>>9807819
Then (suppose) the universe-ancestors of our universe could have two and one dimensions.