[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 478 KB, 566x792, 1516853816970.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9785961 No.9785961 [Reply] [Original]

If you don't have a number, you have negative one numbers not this made up zero bullshit.

>> No.9785977

>>9785961
4-4 is negative what?

>> No.9786080

>>9785977
negative something

>> No.9786082

>>9785961
What is -1 + 1?

>> No.9786091

>>9785961
>If you don't have a number, you have negative one numbers
Get some sleep man.

>> No.9786471

How many cups of water am I holding if I'm holding zero cups of water

>> No.9786473

>>9785961
Why do brainlets argue with axioms? Take your meds.

>> No.9786502

>>9785961
If the soccer team that I support scores negative one goal, then how can I find the replay of when it happened in the game?

>> No.9786509

>>9786471
If your not holding any cups of water there is no set of numbers saying how many cups you are holding there for zero does not exits

>> No.9786564

>>9786502
Beta. Just play a goal in reverse lmao

>> No.9787467

>>9786082

If you have an apple shaped hole (-1) then you put an apple in the hole (+1) then you have ONE FUCKING APPLE.

>> No.9787472
File: 39 KB, 466x349, 1527826739894.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9787472

>>9787467
>Implying 1 represents a object
Gtfo brainlet. 1 is distance between a point and another one. -1 is the opposite of 1.

>> No.9787473

>>9785961
>If you don't have a number, you have negative one numbers
So if you have four apples and I steal your four apples you now have negative one apples.
Isn't that just a different definition of the same thing?

>> No.9787482

Peano axiom number 1: 0 is a natural number

Stop being a brainlet, learn math and stop wasting everyone's time with this pointless threads.

>> No.9787576
File: 68 KB, 400x570, 1526502957691.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9787576

>>9785961
0 is just the acceptance of Null, and while it doesn't exist on a physical level, its semi necessary for maths and sciences.

Null is a virtual thing, but that doesn't mean it isn't important. A variable changed to Null could easily throw off a calculation, resulting from as small as a light flickering, to a nuclear meltdown.

Trying to mesh physicalities with virtualities without discerning the two is an argumentative fallacy that is borderline trollish.