[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 33 KB, 500x333, dicks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9772650 No.9772650[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Wouldn't this be a much better board if we banned race/iq/gender/tranny/climatedebate threads?

Maybe make a new board for it, like /scipol/ or something. I'm tired of seeing "are niggers dumb" as every third thread on this board.

>> No.9772654

I'm not going to answer because this is exactly the kind of thread that this is, and as such, below the dignity of a response. I bid you adieu and a wonderful rest of your day good sir.

>> No.9772656

>>9772650
>Wouldn't this be a much better board if we banned race/iq/gender/tranny/climatedebate threads?
In what sense are any of those not scientific topics?

>> No.9772666 [DELETED] 

>>9772650
>t. nigger

>> No.9772709

>>9772650

What's with the lefty insurgency on this board?

Free discussion is great as long as it's predominately a science discussion then it belongs here

>> No.9772716

>>9772650
If you don't like any certain type of thread, just filter it or fuck off

>> No.9772725

>>9772656
they are scientific topics, but the amount of interest in them makes it clear that they are political topics first and foremost.

The interest in them doesn't come from a place of science, but a place politics. It would make for a much better board if they were banned outright and relegated to a new board, like I stated, where you can discuss hotbutton political issues with scientific vigor. It's just a nuisance.

>> No.9772732

It may be true that those type of threads usually degenerate into absolute retardation, but at the same time it's one of 4chan's redeeming features that people can actually discuss such topics without being censored.

So basically no, fuck off, freedom of speech is worth the nuisance of having the filter out a bunch of retards opinions.

>> No.9772839
File: 78 KB, 1306x354, why we hate pol.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9772839

it would be nice if we could have those threads without delusional autists from that one board showing up and constantly spamming them with obvious falseflags and outright lies.

>> No.9772878

>>9772732
>So basically no, fuck off, freedom of speech is worth the nuisance of having the filter out a bunch of retards opinions.
Do you even understand english, you absolute flyover? He didn't even say he wanted those posts banned, just moved to another board

>muh FREEZEPEACH
You're not allowed to post porn here, faggot.

>> No.9772894

>>9772709
>What's with the lefty insurgency on this board?
Most scientists are pretty lefty

>> No.9772902

>>9772894
what do you mean? today left is mostly associated with degeneracy.

>> No.9772925

>>9772650
won't work. Since a board like that would be filled with retards. After a few months the retards will come back here, 'cause they can't face the fact that they are retards

>> No.9772943 [DELETED] 

>>9772709
>What's with the lefty insurgency on this board?
Listen retard, I know /pol/'s infamy over the past few years has created the perception that 4chan is a right wing board, but that has never been the case in practice as politics either

>> No.9772948

>>9772709
>What's with the lefty insurgency on this board?
Listen retard, I know /pol/'s infamy over the past few years has created the perception that 4chan is a right wing site, but that has never been the case in practice on most board as:
1)politics was not widely discussed because its srs bsns faggotry and derails otherwise on topic threads
2) when it was brought up on a tangent; the political options of the posters here and on many boards could vary greatly, and so much so that making any blanket generalization about the stances of a board is typically wrong.

>> No.9772951

>>9772654
This.
>lets not talk about all the things i believe in so my world view wont unravel.
OP confirmed a scared little bitch.

>> No.9772953

>>9772894
[citation needed]

>> No.9772957

>>9772894
Depends what you qualify as science, desu. Different fields tend to attract different temperamental types, which results in some sciences being skewed more one way or the other

>> No.9772965
File: 342 KB, 1356x1356, 13lhkst455ey.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9772965

>>9772650
>Wouldn't this be a much better board if we banned race/iq/gender/tranny/climatedebate threads?
It certainly would.

>> No.9772984

>>9772650
/pol/ bait is exactly what this thread is.

>> No.9772986

>>9772650
you just exposed yourself, r*dditor

>> No.9773448

>>9772948

You are arguing with yourself

>> No.9773505

>>9772902
He's right though, most scientists/academics/professors are very politically left leaning.

Academia as a whole is very left leaning. Despite right-wing people crying about the left lacking logic or a scientific mind...

>> No.9773591
File: 507 KB, 575x420, 1527005188576.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9773591

>>9772650
LoOL

>> No.9773594

Ironic considering this is one. Wouldn't that be against free speech?

>> No.9773608

>>9772650
Yes. Whatever your feelings of /int/ are, you can't imagine what it was like before /bant/ was made.

>> No.9773624

>>9773505

When talking about hard sciences
You can easily argue that its because a lot of fundamental research which has diverged from consumer market relies on government funding

Or that free movement of scientists is beneficial to academics

>> No.9773683

not only this but fucking highschoolers and undergrads shitting this board with their brainletism

>> No.9774017

>>9772650
This board would be infinitely better if the race&IQ nonsense was banned because than the /pol/ fags would have to stick to their containment board.

>> No.9774035

What's wrong with being knowledgeable on racial differences?

>> No.9774083

>>9772650
>climatedebate
La creatura...

The only people who think climate change is political are americans.

>> No.9774090

>>9772951
We have the same thread on this shit every day with nothing new being added to it. I don't think it is about OP being scared, these threads just suck

>> No.9774108
File: 44 KB, 680x765, 1396938837108.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9774108

>Wouldn't this be a much better board if we banned race/iq/gender/tranny/climatedebate threads?

It would be better, but it wouldn't make everyone here a genius overnight. It would still be a shithole of people calling other people brainlets. It wouldn't make me angry though. Better, but still a complete joke for a place supposed to be dedicated to objectivism and rationality.

>> No.9774115

>>9773591
poor usage, it is you who has been added to shreks cringe compilation

>> No.9774175

>>9772650
>topics x,y, and z hurt my feelings
>move them to another board, REEEEE
Fuck off, faggot.

>> No.9774199
File: 21 KB, 1854x235, pol raid.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9774199

>>9772650

>> No.9774271

>>9772650
Niggers are dumb, and the faster we accept it the faster we can move on from this.

>> No.9774337

>>9772650
YES!

>> No.9774367

>>9774271
Whether we "accept" it or not, /pol/tards will continue to shit up our board.

>> No.9774381

>>9772650
Agreed, I wouldn't mind scientifically motivated threads about these topics, but I have yet to see one.

>> No.9774412

>>9774115
>poor usage
Is there a correct usage of Reddit memes?

>> No.9774483

>>9774271
>my sources are Richard Lynn and Jean-Phillipe Rushton!!! I'm so redpilled!!!
Fuck off