[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 289 KB, 1079x673, Screenshot_20180514-154400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9741305 No.9741305 [Reply] [Original]

>mfw /sci/ turds can't even solve this polynomial inequality

>> No.9741318

25

>> No.9741319

>>9741305
That's Linear Algebra though.

>> No.9741320

14
what's a polynomial inequality?

>> No.9741326

@9741305
x = cookie
y = banana
z= clock
3x = 30
x = 10
2y + 10 = 14
y = 2
2 + 2z = 8
z = 3
3 + 2 + 2(10) = 25

>> No.9741328

>>9741320
>14
No.

>> No.9741330

>>9741320
fuck, didn't notice the dots, it's 11

>> No.9741336

Impossible to solve, variables are undefined in the last line

>> No.9741339

>>9741330
nvm, it's 10, the clock turns too

>> No.9741343

>>9741305
3 0 0|30
1 2 0|14
0 1 2|8

1 0 0|10
0 2 0|4
0 1 2|8

1 0 0|10
0 1 0|2
0 0 2|6

1 0 0|10
0 1 0|2
0 0 1|3

So:
3+2+2*10=?

>> No.9741347

>>9741339
>clock turns too
So 10? This is so meta.

>> No.9741351

>>9741347
2 bananas = 2 so 1 banana = 1
clocks at 3 = 3 so clock at 2 = 2
cookies with 10 chips = 10 so cookie with 7 = 7
2 + 1 + 1 * 7 = 10

>> No.9741357

>>9741351
Yea. I know already. Still: So meta.

>> No.9741360

>>9741351
Guess this is right, but could also be: The dough part of the cookie is worth 5, each dot 0.5, so the answer is 11.5

>> No.9741365 [DELETED] 
File: 86 KB, 1000x1000, dog.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9741365

>>9741305
VALUE(SINGLE BANANA) = 1
VALUE(COOKIE) = NUMBER OF CHOCOLATE CHIPS ON IT
VALUE(CLOCK) = TIME ON THE CLOCK

2 + 1 + 1 * 7 = 10

THE ANSWER IS 10

>> No.9741368

>>9741360
Basically the last equation is undefined, because we don't know the rules for sure and the variables are just unknown.

>> No.9741369

>>9741305
VALUE(BUNCH OF BANANAS) = NUMBER OF BANANAS IN THE BUNCH
VALUE(COOKIE) = NUMBER OF CHOCOLATE CHIPS ON THE COOKIE
VALUE(CLOCK) = TIME ON THE CLOCK

2 + 1 + 1 * 7 = 10

THE ANSWER IS 10

>> No.9741379

Its 14

>> No.9741399

>>9741368
Yes, and that potential for argument is what makes it a good fit for posting here.

>> No.9741404

>riddles as a measure of intelligence

kek

>> No.9741408

>>9741369
You don't know that. You cannot know that.

Clock could be a 24 hour-clock too.

>> No.9741429

35

>> No.9741440

0.999....

>> No.9741459

Thank you OP for this brainlet contaiment thread

>> No.9741467

>>9741305
10

>> No.9741505

>>9741408
He just defined it as such.

>> No.9741537

>>9741305
System is underdetermined.

The chocolate chips and the cookie are separate entities.
Let c be cookies and d be chips.
So 3c+30d=30
But line two is 4b+c+10d=14 with b as bananas.
Equation three lets us solve directly for b giving us 2b=8-6 so b=1.
Subbing b back into line two yields c+10d=10.
We see that the first and second lines are linearly dependent
Leaving us with only 3 equations and 4 unknowns

>> No.9741580
File: 19 KB, 367x255, 1491511187984.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9741580

>> No.9741588

>>9741326

1 banana you spaz

>> No.9742248

So much autism itt

>> No.9743066

Ignoring the clock hand rage bait aspect, the answer is 50.

>> No.9743343

>>9741580
apple is zero

banana is one

pineapple is 2 - sqrt(3)

>> No.9743378

>>9743343
>retard thinks an irrational is a valid solution yet again

>> No.9743379

>>9741305
28.

Each cookie chip in a cookie is worth 1.
Each banana is worth 1
Each turn of the clock is worth 1.

This ends up 2 (2 o clock) + 1 (banana) + 1 (banana) x 7 (cookie chips) = 28

>> No.9743383

>>9741305
10

>> No.9743385

>>9743379
Ah shit forgot BIDMAS, it is 10 not 28.

>> No.9743388

>>9741580
apple= 154476802108746166441951315019919837485664325669565431700026634898253202035277999
banana=
36875131794129999827197811565225474825492979968971970996283137471637224634055579
pineapple=
4373612677928697257861252602371390152816537558161613618621437993378423467772036
easy

>> No.9743391

>>9741336
This, there's no reason to believe that it would follow some intuitive scheme and falling for that illusion only shows lack of IQ.

>> No.9743396

>>9743388
here's the actual solution, an interesting read
https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-find-the-positive-integer-solutions-to-frac-x-y%2Bz-%2B-frac-y-z%2Bx-%2B-frac-z-x%2By-4/answer/Alon-Amit