/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.9732919]

What happens here?

[Anonymous No.9732924]

>>9732919
Nothing, as they don't exist.

[Anonymous No.9732977]

>>9732924
Eh we have observed them indirectly, no different really from saying we know air exists because we can see and feel the effect it has in wind.

[Anonymous No.9732998]

full of interdimensional bookshelves

[Anonymous No.9733051]

>>9732919
u mom there

[Anonymous No.9733282]

>>9733051
*that's ur mom's pussy in space

[Anonymous No.9733290]

>>9732924
I’m sure you’ll provide evidence that black holes don’t exist. Your bare assertion has truly obliterated over fifty years of science.

[Anonymous No.9733368]

Makise Chris said that the black hole can actually be made with a microwave oven.
That's why I thought.
Actually, it seems that micro black holes are overflowing in our daily lives.
And calculated.

Firstly, the classical electronic radius is replaced with the value of the Napier number, and as the Schwarzschild radius, the mass that is required at that time is calculated.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(2.71828182846*10%5E(-15))%3D(2*(6.674*10%5E(-11))x)%2F((299792458) % 5E2)

The required mass x = 1.83029 * 10 ^ 12.

Next, it divided by the static mass of electrons.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(1.83029*10%5E12)%2F(9.10938356*10%5E(-31))

Since mass was divided by mass, some coefficient should come out.

It was a value of 2.00923584 ... * 10 ^ 42.

I paid attention to the coefficients of 1/2 and 1/4 that often appear in the formulation of quantum mechanics and relativity theory, I thought that this world may be 1/8.
So, it was assumed by the wormhole of ER = EPR hypothesis that the black hole is connected to 8 spaces.

So I decided to calculate the 8th root of the above value.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=((1.83029*10%5E12)%2F(9.10938356*10%5E(-31))%5E(1%2F8)

The value that came out is 1.94034 × 10 ^ 5.

This value appeared to me as the energy of electrons.
Heat energy was calculated by assuming similar values as thermal energy.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(1%2F2)(9.10938356*10%5E(-31))*(v%5E2)%EF%BC%9D(3%2F2)(1.38064852 * 10% 5E (-23)) (1.94034 * 10% 5E 5)

The exercise speed v of the emerging electrons was 2.97027 × 10 ^ 6.
This is about 1/100 of the speed of light.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(2.97027*10%5E6)% 5E (1% 2F8)

And I calculated the 8th root, it was 6.44317.

It seems that these numbers are telling us something.

[Anonymous No.9733381]

What excludes black holes from just being a mass that's translucent, eg a transparent planet

[Anonymous No.9733400]

>>9733381
......They’re black holes, as in light doesn’t escape, and thus can’t be “translucent’.

[Anonymous No.9733403]

>>9733400
light could become translucent

[Anonymous No.9733409]

>>9733403
....What? Something that is translucent is something that allows photons to penetrate it. “Light” can’t be translucent.

[Anonymous No.9733411]

>>9733381
No mechanism known to man can support that much mass in that small a place (3 solar masses in a space the size of the moon is about the limit), and non-baryonic matter self-annihilates when you pack it that tight.

Plus, some of these "planets" are several dozen times the size of the entire solar system.
https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1525489879527.webm

[Anonymous No.9733413]

>>9733409
Why can't light be translucent

[Anonymous No.9733415]

>>9733411
thanks it's a thought experiment, the other guy seems to think it's a personal attack

So those planets don't draw light to them correct? Despite their large size

[Anonymous No.9733433]

>>9733400
Hawking cosmic radiation disagrees with you

[Anonymous No.9733659]

The terrible thing as the eschatologist was saying did not happen at LHC.
There is much higher energy cosmic rays falling on the earth than dealing with LHC, but it does not appear to be forming black holes by reacting with particles in the atmosphere.

In other words, the micro black hole should be a common phenomenon on a daily basis.

[Anonymous No.9733686]

>>9732919
that is where la creatura spawns

[Anonymous No.9733738]

>>9733433
hawking radiation doesn't escape the black hole. It's created outside the event horizon

[Anonymous No.9733751]

>>9732919
it's so black, it's stealing everything. Even light.
yet it claims that it din du nuffin

[Anonymous No.9733758]

stealing your genes

[Anonymous No.9734011]

>>9732919
"Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists." Nikola Tesla

[Anonymous No.9734016]

>>9734011
>some engineer trying to make a point about science
funny

[Anonymous No.9734075]

>>9732919
Large massive bodies in space go through various stages. 1.) planet,2.) gas giant 3.)star 4.) black hole.

The conventional models were intentionally made to prevent scientists from figuring out how a star works. Stars are heavily electromagnetic and are composed of the same heavy elements as every other massive body in its core. If you want to understand how heat transitions to electric: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_FxTricy0c

For an experiment that validates electric sun model check out the SAFIRE project: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeVdzSjPx0g

Black holes are basically large massive bodies with extremely strong gravity, not rips in space/time.

[Anonymous No.9734077]

>>9734011
>le Tesla meme

[Anonymous No.9734122]

>>9734075
>>>/x/

[Anonymous No.9734153]

>>9734122
Ironic how a deterministic and empirical point of view is shunned by Einstein supporters. Black holes and time travel is science fiction. Fantasy is what belongs in /x.

[Anonymous No.9734164]

>>9732919
La luz extinguido...

[Anonymous No.9734180]

>>9734153
>moron thinks relativity = time travel
>ignores all observational evidence for black holes just because
It's obvious now why you worship Tesla, you don't understand shit.

[Anonymous No.9734188]

It spawns

[Anonymous No.9734234]

>>9734180
>time travel isn't in relativity

You evidently don't understand relativity. lol

[Anonymous No.9734271]

>>9732919
The Succ.

[Anonymous No.9734405]

>>9732919
[math] \displaystyle
\begin{align*}
\text{Mass} && M \\
\text{Radius} && R &= M \cdot \frac{2G}{c^2} \\
\text{Surface area} && A &= M^2 \cdot \frac{16 \pi G^2}{c^4} \\
\text{Surface gravity} && \kappa &= \frac{1}{M} \cdot \frac{c^4}{4G} \\
\text{Surface tides} && d \kappa_R &= \frac{1}{M^2} \cdot \frac{c^6}{4G^2} \\
\text{Entropy} && S &= M^2 \cdot \frac{4 \pi G }{ \hbar c \; ln10} \\
\text{Temperature} && T &= \frac{1}{M} \cdot \frac{ \hbar c^3 }{8k \pi G} \\
\text{Luminosity} && L &= \frac{1}{M^2} \cdot \frac{ \hbar c^6}{15360 \pi G^2} \\
\text{Lifetime} && t &= M^3 \cdot \frac{5120 \pi G^2}{ \hbar c^4} \\
\end{align*}
[/math]

[Anonymous No.9734969]

>>9732919
The next dimension.

[Anonymous No.9734978]

>>9732919
We dont know

[Anonymous No.9735029]

The massive gravity of it crushes you down to your atoms and you die a seemingly slow, painful death that actually lasts .5 nanoseconds.

[Anonymous No.9735054]

>>9733413
Why do you not understand what translucent means.

[Anonymous No.9735056]

>>9732919
Spacetime ceases to exist

[Anonymous No.9735061]

>>9733411
Imagine the size of the neighborhood of one of these supermassive blackholes. Makes you think there's probably life out there orbiting around one of these monsters.

[Anonymous No.9735264]

>>9734075
People dont actually think this is valid do they?

[Anonymous No.9735645]

>>9735054
Replaced the word with invisible if that helps your literalist autism

[Anonymous No.9735646]

So anyway they're stars made of invisible material that turns what touches them invisible

[Anonymous No.9735894]

>>9735646
Except, in addition to the fact that they're not, they are attracting and warping everything around them, and occasionally pull in and compress matter in such a way as to create the brightest objects in the observable universe.

Either way, they're pretty much the most visible things around.

>>9734011
Might be worth noting that Einstein didn't think these things could possibly exist. He assumed there must be some other heretofore unknown force that prevented the collapse, even if he could never find one himself. It wasn't until after his death that we started observing gravitational masses that had no other explanation and the related neutron stars. Eventually we just found so many of these gravitational collapses that there was no use in denying it anymore. Get too much shit in one place and eventually, it'll just implode.