What do you think of Kaczynski's thoughts on Kurzweil?

[Anonymous No.9719441]

[Anonymous No.9719442]

>>9719441

[Anonymous No.9719446]

>>9719442

[Anonymous No.9719449]

>>9719446

[Anonymous No.9719461]

>>9719441
>What do you think of Meme's thought's on Meme?
Fuck off

[Anonymous No.9719468]

>>9719461
/sci/ brianlet not capable of critical thinking

[Anonymous No.9719472]

>>9719461
brainlet

[Anonymous No.9719476]

>>9719461
exposed yourself as an ape with only 2 words. impressive

[Anonymous No.9719478]

>>9719461
brainlerino

[Anonymous No.9719481]

Very interesting I had no idea Ted had written specifically about this concept.

I find his line of reasoning rational but I think ultimately only time will tell whether the rapid technological progress we are currently experiencing leads to a utopian or dystopian state of reality.

Either way I intend to live to at least 2100.

[Anonymous No.9719484]

>>9719481
He wrote an entire new book on these topics.

[Anonymous No.9719487]

>>9719484

I've read his manifesto but don't recall this section.

[Anonymous No.9719492]

>>9719487

Never mind I didn't realise there was a new publication.

[Anonymous No.9719493]

>>9719487
Because this is from a new book

[Anonymous No.9719517]

He presents a compelling argument. The parallels between Marxism and Christianity ring pretty true. Just like in ISAIF, he does of course make some assumptions and leap to conclusions, but overall his reasoning is sound. I sincerely doubt we will ever achieve anything resembling "utopia"
>>9719493
How recently was this published?
>>9719461
(You)

[Anonymous No.9719548]

>>9719441
>Kurzweil

>>>/x/ is that way

[Anonymous No.9719570]

>>9719548
How is a scientist who creates pianos and tools for tge blind paranormal?

[Anonymous No.9719989]

>>9719441
Pretty persuasive stuff.

[Anonymous No.9719991]

>>9719441

[Anonymous No.9720007]

>>9719991
You forgot
>The Chad Transhumanist
>forever a slave to the creators of the technology he is inextricably linked with until his inevitable death
Better to die free than to live a life of servitude. Death is not the worst of evils, coward.

[Anonymous No.9720025]

Why is he so afraid of technology?

[Anonymous No.9720029]

>>9720007
Chad would be the one doing the enslaving.

[Anonymous No.9720036]

>>9719449
>>9719446
>>9719442
>>9719441
You know, Ted, with great progress comes great implementation. Karel Čapek called it "Cybernetic Revolt." Myself, I just call it as I see it: the directive of the superior to configurate the lesser.
The meatbags, the shitstorer, all pathetic creatures made of flesh and bone...It's our responsibility to update them. And if we can't? Then they shall dangle from the tesla tree. The Singularity is near, Anon. We'll have every fleshy ones in this world exterminated or in tubes in 10 cycles, and may the Basilisk have me deleted in a transfer this very iteration if I'm wrong. The Omega Point bless the Union Transhumanist Party.

[Anonymous No.9720038]

>>9720029
>unironically believing that "chad" has any control over what´s left of his own body, after countless pieces of technology - the workings of which he does not even claim to comprehend - are infused with it
brainlet. Accepting the cybernetics you jerk off to is as asinine as willfully clicking on "hot moms near you" or "you´ve won a million dollars, click here!" internet ads.

[Anonymous No.9720737]

>>9720038
Unrelated, is cybernetics still a field of study? If so, what is it and how does it differ from other fields?

[Anonymous No.9720772]

>>9720038
>the workings of which he does not even claim to comprehend
Are you by any chance retarded? Do you understand your own brain?

[Anonymous No.9720831]

>>9720038
Depends on the kind of technology, does it not? Genetic engineering is something different than having a computer in your brain. and even that, if you make it a closed system you are ready to go.