Moon Landing

File: 299 KB, 1512x1069, moon-landing-1969-apollo-11.-space-print-poster-canvas.-sizes-a3-a2-a1-2924-p.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Moon Landing Anonymous Fri May 4 11:06:33 2018 No.9718060 [Reply] [Original]

Name a more impressive feat given the level of technology and knowledge available.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 11:07:01 2018 No.9718061 the internet

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 11:09:12 2018 No.9718065 File: 21 KB, 544x408, boob-cat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9718061 I dunno. I've seen the Internet: as much as I like cats and tits, it's not all that impressive.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 11:10:55 2018 No.9718067 >>9718061 that's the invention of a new technology though

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 11:12:16 2018 No.9718071 >>9718067 It's a feet irregardless.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 11:14:11 2018 No.9718075 >>9718071 Pedes please go.

Anonymous Fri May 4 11:22:42 2018 No.9718098

>>9718067
>that's the invention of a new technology though
>implying we had moon-capable tech just sitting around gathering dust before JFK called for a manned landing "in this decade".
>>9718060
>more impressive feat
Impressions are in the eye of the beholder. It's gotta be hard to top the moon landing.
For me, it's gotta be nanotech:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180117092334.htm
https://www.cnet.com/news/single-atom-transistor-built-with-precise-control/
etc.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 11:27:00 2018 No.9718104 >>9718075 What are pedes? I'm not MAGA.

Anonymous Fri May 4 11:30:38 2018 No.9718111
File: 100 KB, 960x646, nintchdbpict000319076839.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9718060
nope, it's pic related
>constructed in less than 20 years
>tallest building in the world for 4 fucking millennia and still 90% intact today
>total mass of 6 fucking million tonnes, all transported without any kind of modern technology, which would mean they had to move 12 blocks into place each hour without pause for 20 years
>mean opening between joints of the casing stones was 0.5mm
>average error of the sides is 5cm
>base is completely flat +-15mm
>alignment to North within an error of 0.003 degrees
>ratio of perimeter to height equals to 2pi with an accuracy of more than 0.05%
literally god tier construction planning and execution

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 12:24:05 2018 No.9718197 >>9718098 >Single atom transistor Smallest working process size is Intel 10nm and GF 7nm. Nano transistors are Meme technology that isn't relevant currently and won't be brought to market for the next 50 years.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 13:10:35 2018 No.9718274 >>9718060 >moon landing Didn't happen

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 13:12:58 2018 No.9718275 More specifically, the LEM semi-autonomous SSTO with life support systems

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 13:37:28 2018 No.9718308 >>9718104 Pun on "Pedos please go" for foot-fetishists.

Anonymous Fri May 4 13:56:22 2018 No.9718335
File: 53 KB, 750x543, 82NrGHi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9718197
>. Nano transistors are Meme technology that isn't relevant currently and won't be brought to market for the next 50 years.
Wow, so you're saying the article I quoted involves technology a half-century ahead of its time?
And somehow that makes it _NOT_ impressive?
Especially in light of OP's call for tech that's "a more impressive feat given the level of technology and knowledge available."

???????

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:00:33 2018 No.9718344 File: 2.62 MB, 332x215, legit.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9718274 This, don't be brainlets please. https://youtu.be/63Y899FmqKw

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:02:18 2018 No.9718349 >>9718111 and it does, fuck all.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:06:10 2018 No.9718353 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EP2GdhmPWXo

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:22:16 2018 No.9718378 File: 271 KB, 800x800, apollo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9718274 Yes it did

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:24:06 2018 No.9718381 >>9718378 Kek, that's a miniature model.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:26:34 2018 No.9718386 >>9718381 uh huh

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:29:06 2018 No.9718396 >>9718060 photoshop

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:33:03 2018 No.9718407 >>9718386 You seriously think that couldn't have been taken on earth?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:35:12 2018 No.9718409 >>9718407 You seriously think if Soviet Russia could have proved it was fake, they wouldn't have? Instead they corroborated it.

Anonymous Fri May 4 14:40:19 2018 No.9718417 [DELETED]

>>9718409

Why debunk NASA when Russia can join them in stealing billions from the public? I dare you to research Youtube videos with keyword "NASA harness hoax" and come back here with the same conclusions. I didn't want to believe it either. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSbznWiJdcY

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:40:48 2018 No.9718418 >>9718407 You seriously think that couldn't have been taken on the moon? It's only rocket science.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:41:13 2018 No.9718419 >>9718409 They were in on it, they were pretend enemies at the time, and probably still are. NASA have no problem sharing the ISS with Russian astronauts do they?

Anonymous Fri May 4 14:42:11 2018 No.9718421

>>9718417
Bitch.

If you wanted billions, you would go into arms dealing, pharmaceuticals, computer software, fossil fuel energy or some other giant industry.

You wouldn't spend 50 years perpetuating a multi-million person conspiracy about a moon landing to skim a measly little bit off the US budget.

Anonymous Fri May 4 14:42:16 2018 No.9718423

>>9718060
The guy who invented the textile loom desu. He was literally just a bored preacher who lived alone. He used wood, no metal. It's one of the most complex mechanical designs. This was back in the 1700s too, so no internet references or huge libraries to use

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:42:42 2018 No.9718424 >>9718419 /x/ is that way

Anonymous Fri May 4 14:49:51 2018 No.9718433

>>9718419
>t, they were pretend enemies at the time, and probably still are. NASA have

There are plenty of videos on Youtube that prove NASA fake space missions with harnesses and bubbles. Now there are augmented reality examples where they screw up. I dare the skeptics to go and research Youtube NASA hoax videos and come back here with the same conclusion that NASA is playing it straight with the public. We are all being lied to. I don't know how far the lies go but the video evidence is self-evident. Just ignore the flat earth retards that are trying to conflate a legitimate crime (fraud and money laundering) with flat-earth nonsense. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qb10p__Y7BE

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:52:28 2018 No.9718438 >>9718349 Put a 30,000 pound razor blade inside and then say that.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:53:45 2018 No.9718440 OP' subtle troll pays off. Do not feed.

Anonymous Fri May 4 14:56:59 2018 No.9718448

>>9718424
Why are there Russian "astronauts" on the ISS if Russia is supposedly an enemy?

>>9718433
Yes they fake pretty much everything and they're not very good at it either. If you don't think they've lied about the shape of the earth as well then you're in for a shock.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 14:59:22 2018 No.9718456 >>9718349 the moon landing didn't do shit either faggot

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:02:18 2018 No.9718461 >>9718448 Are you actually braindead?

Anonymous Fri May 4 15:05:02 2018 No.9718469

>>9718448
>Yes they fake pretty much everything and they're not very good at it either. If you don't think they've lied about the shape of the earth as well then you're in for a shock.

Every large celestial body is a sphere. Earth should be no different. Although NASA hoaxes are real (supported by video evidence) flat earth is just disinformation to degrade the discussion.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:05:23 2018 No.9718470 File: 164 KB, 1126x1126, 1525280921365.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9718461 Do you actually have an argument?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:06:48 2018 No.9718475 >>9718448 You understand there's a difference between 1969 Soviet Russia and the Russia that the ISS was made in collaboration with?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:07:19 2018 No.9718477 >>9718433 >videos on Youtube every fuckin time

Anonymous Fri May 4 15:08:59 2018 No.9718482
File: 86 KB, 1600x900, Pluto.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9718469
Even if other celestial things were spheres, why does automatically mean the earth is? That's not a logical argument.

The close up pictures of the planets we get are from NASA who are clearly mocking people with them like pic related. A civilian will only see planets using a telescope with a curved lens that will make it look like a sphere, when really it's just a light in the sky, its shape is not conclusive.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:10:39 2018 No.9718490 >>9718475 Oh? And what's that then?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:10:39 2018 No.9718491 >>9718461 he's a flatard, answer is self-evident

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:12:05 2018 No.9718493 >>9718477 Since you are too lazy to search here is just one video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDK5v8YkYJ4 Ignore any flat-earth disinformation meant to muddy the discussion. We are all being lied to.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:12:27 2018 No.9718495 >>9718308 So what is a foot fetishist's technical name? Podophile? Or should we rename child-lovers to pediaphiles?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:12:29 2018 No.9718496 >>9718491 Really impressive argument globecuck

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:13:53 2018 No.9718499 >>9718493 MY YOUTUBE VIDEO BRO

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:16:07 2018 No.9718505 >>9718061 The internet is literally just a bunch of interconnected phones. They could have made it in 1940. Would’ve been slow though.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:16:23 2018 No.9718507 >>9718499 Many NASA hoaxes are legitimate. Flat-earth is designed to muddy the discussion. People are slowly waking up. Jelly?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:16:38 2018 No.9718509 >>9718111 So this is the power of slavery.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:17:10 2018 No.9718510 >>9718499 >I have nothing to dispute the video but it's on youtube so it doesn't matter

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:17:54 2018 No.9718515 >>9718507 YOUTUBE VIDEO

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:19:13 2018 No.9718519 >>9718510 Hey moron, Youtube videos originate directly from NASA. You can't debunk the evidence of harnesses, bubbles and augmented reality.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:21:10 2018 No.9718523 >>9718510 YOU TUBE

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:22:28 2018 No.9718528 >>9718507 >Flat-earth is designed to muddy the discussion Where is your proof of this? >>9718519 Hey moron, the hosting service of the video is irrelevant when it is the video content that should be judged.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:23:44 2018 No.9718535 >>9718523 Flat earth is designed to distract, deceive and disinform people away from the genuine NASA hoaxes.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:26:12 2018 No.9718545 >>9718535 Hey bro all the conspiracies are fake except the ones I like

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:27:04 2018 No.9718546 >>9718535 Proof?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:28:15 2018 No.9718549 >>9718545 Flat earth is also meant to degrade the discussion and take away attention from real NASA hoaxes.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:29:42 2018 No.9718550 the next hollywood film

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:31:29 2018 No.9718553 >>9718549 If you're not a shill, be honest, how much flat earth research have you actually done to form this opinion?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:35:03 2018 No.9718559 >>9718553 Either you are a disinfo agent or a religious nuttard. Pick one. I am not going to help you degrade the discussion on genuine NASA hoaxes.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:36:09 2018 No.9718561 >>9718559 Nice false dichotomy. It's a simple question, how much research have you done on the subject?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:36:28 2018 No.9718562 >>9718060 when the Russians conquered Antarctica

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:41:13 2018 No.9718571 >>9718553 We're not seriously discussing your flat earth fantasies

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:41:25 2018 No.9718573 File: 2.53 MB, 501x343, china fake moon landing.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 15:43:44 2018 No.9718580 >>9718571 I would respect your opinion more if you had actually researched it first. Condemnation without investigation is the highest form of ignorance.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 16:14:49 2018 No.9718651 >>9718274 Prove it. Cite five convincing pieces of evidence.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 16:46:44 2018 No.9718730 >>9718651 Live streaming a TV signal from 238,000 miles away to a supposedly rotating earth with tech from 1969.

Anonymous Fri May 4 16:53:34 2018 No.9718751

>>9718509
>the slaves meme
do you unironically believe slaves could build with that precision
>The Greeks believed that slave labour was used, but modern discoveries made at nearby workers' camps associated with construction at Giza suggest that it was built instead by tens of thousands of skilled workers

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 16:55:21 2018 No.9718752 >>9718060 nuc-elar

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 17:01:04 2018 No.9718765 >>9718730 I asked for five pieces of evidence, you gave "mild disbelief"

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 17:06:23 2018 No.9718775 >>9718730 What exactly is so impossible about using radio in 1969? you can point it out from here: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/CSM18_Telecommunications_Subsystem_pp173-188.pdf

Anonymous Fri May 4 17:24:05 2018 No.9718820

>>9718765
>>9718775

Do you know how much power is required to broadcast a TV signal? You think that tin can they landed had the power to do such a thing? Complete with sound, communications back and forth from ground control, and ground control being able to move the camera around, which again, uses electricity. The batteries in those times were awful.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 17:33:35 2018 No.9718838 >>9718820 What is this, 1974? Do you really think these surface level dive bar musings are going to prove something?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 17:39:09 2018 No.9718849 File: 74 KB, 440x309, apolloSbandequipment.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9718820 You're confusing broadcasting in all directions with sending a signal.

Anonymous Fri May 4 17:39:40 2018 No.9718851

>>9718838
I remember the cell phones back in the 70s had huge, heavy batteries that could only run for 30 minutes. You're telling me the lunar rover had the power to not only communicate voice back and forth, but also broadcast a TV signal, despite the lightweight craft. How fucking big and heavy would those batteries need to be?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 17:45:28 2018 No.9718858 >>9718851 The lunar module and rover didn't communicate directly with Earth, the command module stayed in lunar orbit and communicated between the lander and Earth.

Anonymous Fri May 4 17:54:05 2018 No.9718880

>>9718858
Fucking kek. You actually believe Michael Collins was in the command module orbiting the moon for over 20 hours while his buddies fucked around on the moon. It had the battery capacity for that? And then Neil and Buzz flew off the moon and without issue docked with the command module. It's completely nuts.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 17:55:07 2018 No.9718884 >>9718880 >mild disbelief!

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 17:56:15 2018 No.9718886 File: 411 KB, 1600x1000, Moon Landing 1920x1200 wallpaper.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >2018 >doubting facts

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 17:58:50 2018 No.9718893 >>9718880 >I don't believe it because I don't wanna, it's nuts yeah, ok also, they had custom made top military tier equipment, not some consumer shit

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 17:59:10 2018 No.9718894 >>9718884 Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, of which you have absolutely nothing.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:00:33 2018 No.9718896 >>9718894 >all evidence you bring is fake btw

Anonymous Fri May 4 18:03:26 2018 No.9718899
File: 609 KB, 1024x700, 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

OK, hate to feed, so here's this and a sage.

Flatists, explain this. I'm not talking to you unless you can explain this. You can't.

And don't get sidetracked into creating confusion because the guy that made this confused "elevation" and "altitude." Stay on point -- how is is possible, on a flat Earth, for one point in the sky to be at all times due south when viewed from any point in the southern hemisphere?

Nonsense, hand-waving, goalpost-shifting and subject-changing just demonstrate that you fail.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:04:49 2018 No.9718900 >>9718880 What makes you think the Apollo command module ran on batteries? The fact that you know this little about it makes your opinion pretty worthless. They stopped running their electrics off of batteries early in Gemini.

Anonymous Fri May 4 18:06:02 2018 No.9718902

>>9718893
Oh I see, it was cutting edge equipment in 1969, so imagine what they have in 2018. Oh wait, they don't even have a spacecraft that can fly around in space for a bit like Neil did when he docked with with the command module that was travelling at over 5,000km an hour.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:08:36 2018 No.9718909 >>9718900 Oh dear, maybe you should do some research first. Command Module: Electric system batteries: three 40 ampere-hour silver-zinc batteries; two 0.75 ampere-hour silver-zinc pyrotechnic batteries

Anonymous Fri May 4 18:11:11 2018 No.9718914

>>9718902
height of cold war vs nobody cares

>>9718909
>do some research first
>proceeds to spew bullshit
Electrical power was produced by three fuel cells, each measuring 44 inches (1.1 m) tall by 22 inches (0.56 m) in diameter and weighing 245 pounds (111 kg).

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:12:24 2018 No.9718917 >>9718914 *These combined hydrogen and oxygen to generate electrical power, and produced drinkable water as a byproduct

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:12:49 2018 No.9718918 >>9718909 What this guy said, >>9718914 CM had batteries for the brief period between jettisoning the SM and rentry. Collins was not on battery power while orbiting the moon.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:17:38 2018 No.9718927 >>9718909 >Sector 4 (50°) contained the Electrical Power System (EPS) fuel cells with their hydrogen and oxygen reactants.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:24:00 2018 No.9718940 >>9718456 >being this much of an uneducated brainlet where do you think Velcro came from

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:27:06 2018 No.9718946 >>9718899 People in the southern hemisphere look to south relative to the southern magnetic pole, not the northern, because it's the dominant magnetic force.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:28:05 2018 No.9718948 >>9718580 we're not going to debate whether bears shit in the woods or not on a science and math forum, if you want to have a discussion about flat earth go to >>>/x/

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:28:53 2018 No.9718951 >>9718917 >produced drinkable water as a byproduct Kek. >>9718918 But I thought the Command Module was broadcasting everything to the earth while orbiting? It didn't need electricity for that?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:31:35 2018 No.9718959 >>9718751 considering the prominence of slave labour, they probably used the skilled workers as semi-foremen slaves do the grunt work, skilled workers check and finish

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:34:42 2018 No.9718968 >>9718948 Flat earth is a scientific theory.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:37:24 2018 No.9718973 >>9718951 hydrogen and oxygen reacting together releases energy and produces H2O, you fucking brainlet

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:42:56 2018 No.9718990 >>9718973 Yeah, Michael Collins was just chilling orbiting the moon sipping on battery water.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:47:55 2018 No.9719003 >>9718990 >fuel cells are the same thing as a battery complete fucking moron

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:48:27 2018 No.9719006 >>9718344 Blocked in Canada, anyone got a mirror? I'm saving vids and pics from Nasaholes

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:49:00 2018 No.9719007 >>9718060 Pyramids

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:53:16 2018 No.9719014 >>9719006 here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9y_AVYMEUs

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:54:19 2018 No.9719016 >>9718060 Manhattan Project

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 18:58:06 2018 No.9719020 >>9719003 You monumental brainlet, I don't care about the semantics, it's all complete fantasy. >>9719006 https://www.youpak.com/watch?v=63Y899FmqKw&feature=youtu.be Also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 19:00:51 2018 No.9719023 >>9719020 >semantics fuel cells produce energy from reactants, batteries store energy you uneducated retard

Anonymous Fri May 4 19:15:19 2018 No.9719037

>>9719023
That's not the point cretin, the fact you think someone was orbiting the moon and drinking water from the "fuel cells" (I'm not disputing they can create water) is crazy when you have zero scientific proof this actually occurred in the first place.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 19:16:36 2018 No.9719042 >>9718899 You've gone quiet...

Anonymous Fri May 4 19:22:50 2018 No.9719052

>>9719037
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9HdPi9Ikhk
>hurr it's fake
No, it's not, they didn't have the technology to fake that video in 1969, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGXTF6bs1IU

also, for more, see
https://spacecentre.co.uk/blog-post/know-moon-landing-really-happened/
and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 19:34:05 2018 No.9719064 >>9719052 >they didn't have the technology to fake that video in 1969 You've gotta be kidding me. This is awfully bad 60s special effects: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_OD2V6fMLQ

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 19:37:27 2018 No.9719069 >>9719064 >it's fake because I say it is nice response you bring to evidence being presented not sure what i was expecting from a shiteating conspiracy theorist, this is why everyone with half a brain ignores you morons

Anonymous Fri May 4 19:54:20 2018 No.9719104

>>9719069
Autistic rage. You posted a no-name director who assumes to know the technology that military wing of the government with billions of dollars had access to, and then goes on to explain how it could have been possible. Then jokes about being a NASA shill at the end as a way to distance himself from the fact he actually is one.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 4 23:21:47 2018 No.9719428 File: 504 KB, 800x618, Moon1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] They don't even know why they deny them, they just do because it's the thing for conspiracy theorists to do.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 08:41:07 2018 No.9719974 >>9718510 More like >it's youtube so I don't even need to watch it to know how retarded it is

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 10:00:27 2018 No.9720058 >>9719020 >I don't care about being wrong, it's all complete fantasy. You should care. If your argument is based on something that is incorrect you can't just change the basis of your argument. That would be dishonest.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 12:43:43 2018 No.9720270 >>9718940 from a swiss engineer more than a decade prior you faggot.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 12:57:51 2018 No.9720283 >>9719104 >You posted a no-name director To be fair you, posted a no name Russian doing the opposite. And his "recreation" looked like shit by the way. You could totally see the effects of earth's atmosphere on the dust.

Anonymous Sat May 5 12:59:54 2018 No.9720288

>>9719974
It's official, everything on youtube is bullshit. Thank you for your insight.

>>9720058
The burden of proof is on you to show me that someone was orbiting the moon and drinking water created by the fuel cells, as well pinging back the transmission signals/TV broadcast back to earth for over 20 hours.

The lunar module then flew off the moon and docked perfectly with the command module at thousands of miles an hour orbit speed. I just can't fathom how people are not at least sceptical about this nonsense. It reeks of 60s sci-fi writing.

Anonymous Sat May 5 13:01:42 2018 No.9720290

>>9718111
>move 12 blocks into place each hour without pause for 20 years

Which isn't that impressive, if you have thousands of skilled workers at your disposal. Building it somewhat precise also isn't that hard. Stonehenge is built pretty precise. You just need a few guys who know some basic things about astronomy for that. What is really impressive is that 5000 years ago there was a statehood so advanced they had thousands of skilled workers do something essentially useless for the survival of the state for 20 years (useless in the sense of, they could have for example built a giant wall protecting them from invasion in the same time, which they didn't need, because there was nobody around even close to being capable of invading them). It's basically a monument of a massive superpower, one that relative to the other powers of its time, might be the most powerful and most advanced that ever existed.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 13:03:01 2018 No.9720292 >>9720288 >The burden of proof is on you to show me When you accept no evidence then that makes the burden infinitely high.

Anonymous Sat May 5 13:03:18 2018 No.9720293

>>9720288
>The lunar module then flew off the moon and docked perfectly with the command module at thousands of miles an hour orbit speed. I just can't fathom how people are not at least sceptical about this nonsense. It reeks of 60s sci-fi writing.

If two cars drive next to each other at the exact same speed, docking them together isn't really that hard.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 13:08:53 2018 No.9720302 >>9720292 So you're convinced 100% it happened?

Anonymous Sat May 5 13:14:39 2018 No.9720310

>>9720302
I am at 99% the only way to be convinced 100% is to have been there, and if we built a time machine and sent you back the first thing you would say is "how do I know you didn't send me to the future and this is all a setup."
If we took you to the moon and showed you the left over stuff the first thing you would say is, "This was put there for moon tourists it didn't get here in the 60s."

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 13:16:59 2018 No.9720314 >>9720293 The lunar module has to get to 1000s of miles an hour first, and Neil Armstrong nailed it first time. Give me a break.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 13:20:39 2018 No.9720321 >>9720310 So the footage to you looks 100% legit, the technology they had sounds 100% legit, and the manoeuvres they did sound 100% legit?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 13:29:17 2018 No.9720338 >>9720321 Yes, you fucking retard, yes. Everything looks absolutely 100% without a single shadow of a doubt, legit. I'm not that guy, but you're just proving his point.

Anonymous Sat May 5 13:32:49 2018 No.9720342

>>9720321
Yes. I'm an engineer not a /sci/entist I know that this may seem hard for you to believe but they did a metric shit ton of prep work for the moon landing and had everyone watching, fucking up was not an option. They checked and rechecked they did all the math and prepared for the foreseeable problems They had teams of scientists and engineers making sure that every part was made properly. All that work payed off, they made it to the moon and back and made their mark on history.

And then some shitdicks heard some stuff from a Russian troll and started all sorts of great theories for why it didn't happen. These shitdicks are your forefathers you are a shitdick just like them. You can't refute anything I've said because you don't have the basic knowledge to understand how they got there, all you can say is that it was faked, your only response to our evidence is ignorance, and I'm supposed to believe you, A shitdick?

You shouldn't be here.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 13:35:36 2018 No.9720350 >>9720314 Yes, that's not easy. That's why NASA used the most elite pilots it could find to do the job.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 13:39:53 2018 No.9720360 >>9720350 It's likely that Neil spent more time behind the stick of some sort of aircraft than most of us have spent in our cars waiting for traffic lights.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 14:29:24 2018 No.9720452 >>9718060 MANHATTAN PROJECT MANHATTAN PROJECT MANHATTAN PROJECT

Anonymous Sat May 5 14:47:53 2018 No.9720479
File: 2.78 MB, 884x552, 1525126706442.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9720342
What a load of shit. Perhaps the moon mission was actually genuine but today,..NASA is full of hoaxes. Take a look at their video mistakes involving harnesses, space bubbles and augmented reality on Youtube. Disinformation agents are trying to discredit this evidence by throwing in flat earth theory. You have no idea how much I want to believe you but the hoax evidence is overwhelming. It is really depressing to know that NASA space missions are faked. Are they all fake? I don't know and neither do you.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 15:00:49 2018 No.9720495 File: 2.95 MB, 1280x720, 1525126900204.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] North American Space Actors (NASA)

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 15:06:52 2018 No.9720509 File: 131 KB, 716x712, 3745b8fe97c86b44b433844eb704cefe[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9720338 >>9720342 You've fallen hook, line and sinker for 1960s propaganda, it's really quite embarrassing.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 15:18:26 2018 No.9720527 >>9720479 Please, even in that video, if you look at the blue shirt how wrinkled up it stays, it's obvious they're in 0g Clothes do not look like that if they're pulled down by gravity.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 15:22:28 2018 No.9720539 >>9720479 >>9720495 >>9720509 Whew! Glad to see so much incontrovertible evidence posted. Here I was thinking you were an annoying troll.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 15:24:18 2018 No.9720541 >>9718060 Me.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 15:24:43 2018 No.9720543 >>9720314 If you think flying in sync is hard, than I can see why you would believe landing on the moon is impossible.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 15:25:54 2018 No.9720547 >>9720527 >t. PhD in wrinkled clothes Yes, I'm sure nothing else could cause that. And "zero-g" is possible on earth, so your point is moot. >>9720539 >I have no argument

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 15:29:22 2018 No.9720553 File: 1.55 MB, 720x576, 1525127296411.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9720539 I can keep em coming. Plenty of NASA hoax video mistakes. You may not be able to discern reality from fantasy but I bet many other readers here can.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 15:30:44 2018 No.9720559 File: 70 KB, 640x640, lunarlanding[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9720543 Yeah you're right, I bet Neil could have done it blindfolded. That Lunar Module was something special, it had precision controls to perform such a feat.

Anonymous Sat May 5 15:30:57 2018 No.9720560

>>9720547
>they're on a harness!
>no, wait, impossible because that's floating
>then they're in a vomit comet!
>no, wait, impossible because no turbulence
>then they have secret unknown alien tech!

pointless to argue with you morons, you'll sooner believe literally anything else

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 15:39:03 2018 No.9720570 >>9720553 I laughed so hard at this. The droplet doesn't even looks like its on the same perspective plane. No shadows, reflections, etc. Keep practicing.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 15:44:06 2018 No.9720576 >>9720559 It's even easier with smaller vehicles, brainlet. As a matter of fact, it took the first few Apollo missions a few Moon orbits until they synced up, the later missions didn't even need one full Orbit because they got so good at it.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:01:55 2018 No.9720594 File: 2.74 MB, 932x524, WireHarness.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9720560 Oh dear did he get a little tangled up with his harness?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:04:00 2018 No.9720598 >>9720576 Oh yeah I know, and they were different pilots as well, amazing, just amazing.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:04:32 2018 No.9720599 >>9720594 he hit the "ceiling" with his leg? i'm not sure what you're imagining seeing here

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:08:24 2018 No.9720608 >>9720599 He was untangling his hands from the harness at the end - they need more practice at this shit, they really do.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:10:21 2018 No.9720610 File: 10 KB, 210x239, duh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9720570 lol, obvious evidence of gravity since droplet is falling in a straight line. You decided to focus on lighting instead.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:10:57 2018 No.9720613 >>9720608 how do you figure? he just moves his right hand up, how would that untangle anything?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:16:10 2018 No.9720621 >>9720610 everything moves in straight lines unless acted on, that's just simple physics look here how all the droplets move straight after they get a push https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Z2KNDGNnlc

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:19:17 2018 No.9720625 >>9720613 Like a damn robot?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:20:44 2018 No.9720628 >>9720594 We need to send NASA more tax payer money so they can defraud the public without making obvious mistakes like bubbles. Bubbles in space: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PB7AwZzaOo

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:21:56 2018 No.9720630 >>9720610 >straight line >gravity Gravity curves space you dumbfuck damn is this what this place is like now

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:22:45 2018 No.9720634 >>9720625 he probably got embarrassed for wanting to do a roll for no reason and hitting the cables on the top, that or he's a robot i guess

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:31:18 2018 No.9720649 File: 65 KB, 500x551, 163xpj.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9720625 Don't bother trying to convince retards. They will beat you down with experience. Normal folks can easily spot the problems.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:38:09 2018 No.9720669 >>9720649 >>9720610 These 2 retards are the same poster this motherfucker is on /sci/ and doesnt know gravity curves space, meanwhile calling other people retarded with 9gag-tier images

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:50:38 2018 No.9720705 Their computers were literally on the level of a shitty old iphone and there's no way you'd be able to guide plane let alone a rocket with that.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 16:51:49 2018 No.9720710 The faking of the moon landing

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 17:15:56 2018 No.9720749 >>9720710 which didn't happen

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 22:48:16 2018 No.9721380 Valid

Anonymous Sat May 5 23:16:19 2018 No.9721427

>>9718946
Hand-waving disregarded.

They lookout south. The same point in the sky is due south off all of them, but in the flat model due south is 360 degrees, depending on where you are in the world. Mentioning magnets is not a explanation.

>>9719042
Nothing has been posted worth relying to, really. Just the above-referenced hand-wave irrelevancy about muh magnets.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 5 23:29:37 2018 No.9721444 >>9718482 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>	Anonymous Sun May 6 00:36:10 2018 No.9721541 >>9718968 ur mom gay is a scientific theory too

>>	Anonymous Sun May 6 00:48:12 2018 No.9721558 >>9718493 dude.....do you really, unironically believe this stuff? c'mon man. I worked at Scott base, Antarctica for a summer. I promise you the Earth is not flat

>>	Anonymous Sun May 6 00:51:26 2018 No.9721562 File: 21 KB, 248x189, crying pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9718482

>>	Anonymous Sun May 6 00:54:31 2018 No.9721566 >>9721558 was this before or after Lockheed dropped out of the USAP? I'm considering applying for a fuckton of ganaayoo jobs just to get my ass down there. Is Christchurch as boring as they say?

Anonymous Sun May 6 00:57:45 2018 No.9721570
File: 55 KB, 539x960, eddywhat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9718899
>unironically believing in flat Earth
I know a plethora of brainlets do, but it just makes no fucking sense to me. How can anyone take something so observably self-evident and blatantly deny it, arguing their point ""scientifically"" without any evidence?

>>	Anonymous Sun May 6 01:11:52 2018 No.9721584 >>9721570 It's 99.9% trolls, 0.09% people who are simply anti-intellectual, and 0.009% actual believers. Some other factor is in there, but I can't be bothered to carry more than three decimal places.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 6 01:15:44 2018 No.9721592 >>9721584 come now, have you been to /x/ recently? It is much higher than .01%. I'd say 20% easy. You can tell by the way they phrase certain things and respond to criticism.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 6 01:16:36 2018 No.9721594 >>9721570 Memers and dreamers. Memers are trolls that think it is fun. Dreamers are simple people who find small solace in their sad lives by believing that they are part of a select few that know the truth hidden from the sheep.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 6 01:19:02 2018 No.9721595 >>9721584 >>9721594 Makes sense to me, anons. I guess i'm just a faggot and got trololol'd ecks dee, because it just seemed like more people than I thought unironically believed in the flat Earth meme.

Anonymous Sun May 6 01:22:24 2018 No.9721596

>>9721595
if you keep track of the filenames you can quickly find out that it's, oh, about three different people on /sci/ who cycle in and out of shitting up space threads. There used to be a particularly annoying Italian anon two or so years ago who also was a retard shitposting conspiracy theorist, but I think he moved on to better things.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 6 01:29:45 2018 No.9721602 >>9718651 Moon gravity changes for no reason Flag appears to wave, no wind in spaces Say they were visiting different spots but same one keeps reacurring Lots of others but im tired of typing Heard they forgot to bring back moon rocks

>>	Anonymous Sun May 6 01:35:29 2018 No.9721606 >>9721602 are you from 1974?

>>	Anonymous Sun May 6 09:52:24 2018 No.9722240 >>9721602 >Moon gravity changes for no reason This doesn't happen

>>	Anonymous Sun May 6 22:50:14 2018 No.9723699 >>9720710 bullshit

Anonymous Sun May 6 22:57:01 2018 No.9723711

>>9721602
>Moon gravity changes for no reason
Lie.

>Flag appears to wave, no wind in spaces
>What is solar wind
>What is galactic wind
The flag is literally shaped like that. It’s wires.

>Say they were visiting different spots but same one keeps reacurring
Lie.

>Heard they forgot to bring back moon rocks
Lie.

Anonymous Sun May 6 23:42:44 2018 No.9723802

>>9720288
>The lunar module then flew off the moon and docked perfectly with the command module at thousands of miles an hour orbit speed
Relative to one another, the two spacecraft were practically stationary in the moments before rendezvous. That's what docking in orbit means, dumbass. You can look on youtube to see the space shuttle orbiter dock to the ISS and they take their time, several minutes slowly inching their way to dock. Relative to the surface, both spacecraft are traveling quite fast, but relative to each other they're nearly still.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 7 00:07:37 2018 No.9723827 >>9718111 I’m always skeptical of these statistics. +/- 15mm? How would they even measure that?

Anonymous Mon May 7 00:20:35 2018 No.9723835 [DELETED]

Nuclear weapons don't exist. It's all a hoax propagated by the global elite to keep the masses in a state of perpetual fear, and to cow you when the media is leveraged to whip you all into a frenzy. They decided war was bad for business, so they make up these "weapons of mass destruction" to discourage war.

Wake up sheeple.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 7 00:46:47 2018 No.9723856 >>9723835 reminds me of the excellent short novel, "The Duplicated Man". Good Blish scifi

Anonymous Mon May 7 01:13:14 2018 No.9723872

>>9718111
If we could gather up hundreds of thousands of men and tell them to build or get your throat slit we could achieve this again easily, It's just an extreme example of manpower.
It's not in the same category as leaving the fucking Earth in a rocket and landing on another world then returning home.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 7 07:12:42 2018 No.9724215 >>9718060 Faking a moon landing without cgi, a way to replicate the light or gravity

Anonymous Mon May 7 07:17:20 2018 No.9724223

>>9723872
The hardest part is leaving the Earth. Once you are out of the gravitational pull of our homeplanet flying to the Moon, landing there, stick a flag on its surface and flying back is the relatively easy part.

So basically, you just need a big enough rocket, and the Saturn 5 definetely was big enough to do that.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 7 09:19:50 2018 No.9724364 >>9724215 Which didn;t happen

>>	Anonymous Mon May 7 09:43:07 2018 No.9724389 >>9724364 I dunno, I don't really care either

>>	Anonymous Mon May 7 14:18:51 2018 No.9724845 >>9721602 >Flag appears to wave, no wind in spaces If you move a flag in vaccum isn't going to stop moving

>>	Anonymous Mon May 7 14:37:53 2018 No.9724882 >>9723827 They couldn't, but making shit up is really really easy.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 7 16:31:54 2018 No.9725054 >>9718407 >rooster tails on Earth That's a big fucking vacuum chamber which is equally impressive as a lunar landing

Anonymous Mon May 7 17:03:19 2018 No.9725115

>>9721427
>They lookout south. The same point in the sky is due south off all of them, but in the flat model due south is 360 degrees

Where'd you get this idea from? North and South are dictated by the magnetic poles. Compasses aren't monopoles, they will point to the pole they are closest to.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 7 17:05:26 2018 No.9725120 >>9725054 The photos are figurines, it's hilarious.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 7 19:18:25 2018 No.9725410 >>9725120 no

>>	Anonymous Mon May 7 19:35:37 2018 No.9725442 >>9725410 Yes.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 7 19:40:51 2018 No.9725450 >>9725120 Prove it

Anonymous Mon May 7 20:45:30 2018 No.9725573

>>9725115
More handwaving about magnets.

Explain how a single observed point can be seen in 360 degrees of different directions by observers spread around the southern section f a flat disk.

I'm not responding to "gibberish gibberish magnets gibberish" any more.

Magnets are irrelevant to that.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 7 20:46:33 2018 No.9725576 >>9725120 The vids are also figurines? That level of robotics back then would have been as hard as going to the moon.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 7 21:10:42 2018 No.9725624 >Moon landing was real You poor baby.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 13:56:45 2018 No.9727151 >>9724845 It didn't wave butt nuts, it was slightly crumbled tinfoyl

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 13:59:02 2018 No.9727155 >>9718407 They didn't have to technology to fake the moonlight back then

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 14:00:23 2018 No.9727157 >>9725573 One of those 130 dollar 360 gopro cams?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 14:31:15 2018 No.9727221 File: 7 KB, 232x250, poop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9718060 >technoLOGy

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 14:43:28 2018 No.9727247 >>9727155 I've heard this before but couldn't they just have used collimators? Either an array of fresnel lenses or parabolic mirrors or whatever, I don't understand what's supposed to be so hard about that.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 17:34:47 2018 No.9727539 File: 42 KB, 640x480, 1475523996595.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9718065 Internet is not all that impressive?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 00:44:53 2018 No.9728356 File: 2.86 MB, 636x357, 1525320414185.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9718899 disnifo, space is fake, earth is flat

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 08:05:51 2018 No.9728952 >>9718456 you didn't do shit, faggot, and you never will.

Anonymous Wed May 9 08:17:29 2018 No.9728966

>>9718060

My favorite science-feat actually doesn't seem as impossible except logistically : the annihilation of smallpox. Think about it : they vaccacinated people all around the globe, on both sides of the iron curtain, on every place in the world. Whole civil wars stopped in order to get vaccacinated. This might be one of humanities brightest moments.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 08:22:38 2018 No.9728972 >>9718060 The Large Hadron Collider.

Anonymous Wed May 9 09:35:02 2018 No.9729057

>>9725573
It's not 360 degrees is it brainlet?

Another thing is certain, that from and within the equator the north pole star, and the constellations Ursa Major, Ursa Minor, and many others, can be seen from every meridian simultaneously; whereas in the south, from the equator, neither the so-called south pole star, nor the remarkable constellation of the Southern Cross, can be seen simultaneously from every meridian, showing that all the constellations of the south--pole star included--sweep over a great southern arc and across the meridian, from their rise in the evening to their setting in the morning. But if the earth is a globe, Sigma Octantis a south pole star, and the Southern Cross a southern circumpolar constellation, they would all be visible at the same time from every longitude on the same latitude, as is the case with the northern pole star and the northern circumpolar constellations. Such, however, is strangely not the case; Sir James Clarke Ross did not see it until he was 8° south of the equator, and in longitude 30° W

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 09:36:04 2018 No.9729059 >>9725576 What level of robotics? It looks fucking retarded.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 10:06:38 2018 No.9729106 >>9729057 Are you genuinely stupid, or do you just enjoy lying?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 10:51:11 2018 No.9729201 >>9729106 The earth is demonstrably flat - you are in complete denial and it's only because you're a complete ignoramus.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 11:21:01 2018 No.9729263 >>9729201 No, it isn't. I have never heard of one instance of a proof of a flat earth. >>9728138

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 11:26:08 2018 No.9729276 >>9729201 >flat - you are in complete denial and it's only because you're a complete ignoram Flat Earth is meant to degrade the discussion away from genuine NASA fraud. Keep that in mind everyone.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 11:35:31 2018 No.9729303 >>9728356 That's a stupid claim.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 11:36:38 2018 No.9729306 >>9729059 I love this argument, that there's a MASSIVE CONSPIRACY of millions that's covered all this up...but also they could only afford cheap sets and models that look phony.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 11:37:09 2018 No.9729307 >>9729201 demonstrably round*

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 13:03:50 2018 No.9729460 File: 617 KB, 1265x883, what.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] what did BBC mean by this?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 13:19:33 2018 No.9729483 >>9729263 You're again in complete denial, but that's expected from a globe fanboy. >>9729276 Do you accept you cannot trust any images of the "globe" from NASA then? >>9729306 It was done in the 60s before they knew about the internet.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 13:30:07 2018 No.9729493 >>9729483 The 1960s, not the 960s.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 13:32:44 2018 No.9729499 Flat earthers are irrational

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 13:56:40 2018 No.9729519 >>9718490 One was communistic and at a nuclear arms race with the US to fight for control over who is the world's superpower and one isn't? Please get off /sci/ you have the cognitive reasoning of a 6th grader. Please return to your home board >>>/x/

Anonymous Wed May 9 14:09:41 2018 No.9729535
File: 165 KB, 683x1024, young-businessman-with-luggage-waving-good-bye-picture-id467052133[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9729493
Noted.

>>9729519
Pretty cool that they settled it with a competition to land on the moon, almost out of a comic book! Well, I can't argue with your high IQ post, so I'll be off back to /x/. Catch you on the flip side.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 14:11:11 2018 No.9729539 >>9729499 Now that's what I call a rational post.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 14:20:45 2018 No.9729548 >>9718482 Oh shit please keep posting. I haven't had a good laugh in a long while.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 15:35:30 2018 No.9729690 File: 2.86 MB, 764x430, earthapollo_5.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Hey look, it's the globe earth from the Apollo mission, they're not staging anything, okay?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 16:04:25 2018 No.9729743 >>9718493 I watched the first 3 minutes and none of these are inconsistent with zero-g movement. You're so stupid you can't even understand how you're wrong.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 16:14:34 2018 No.9729778 >>9727539 So you like tits and cats more than I do.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 16:15:50 2018 No.9729779 >>9728966 A+ post.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 16:18:45 2018 No.9729787 File: 1.16 MB, 720x576, 1525734836774.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9729743 Detailed and informative. Top quality debunk.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 16:47:28 2018 No.9729850 required viewing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQOEC9gHpmA

Anonymous Wed May 9 19:18:31 2018 No.9730124

>>9729787
The beauty of it is, no-one has to debunk you. Your posts are so full of shit that everyone recognizes the flaws and ergo that you're a troll. You are a waste of time. When you get serious about posting something that resembles logic and honesty, you'll get proper resonses. Until then, shitpost away tally your (You)s. Nothing else matters to you.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 19:30:19 2018 No.9730153 >>9729850 have you checked out http://apollo17.org? It's incredible. Sometimes I just jump to a random spot and let it play. Has transcripts, commentary, statistics, and it plays back the video, comms, and photos as they were taken in real time

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 19:36:12 2018 No.9730161 >>9730153 Hell yes. Sometimes I fall asleep listening to it. The banter between Gene and Jack during the lunar surface EVAs are my favorite part, but damn Ron Evans talking to himself while he works is comfy.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 19:47:12 2018 No.9730180 File: 504 KB, 3832x1898, blue marble apollo 17.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9730153 >photos as they were taken in real time i thought it was an oblate spheroid, this looks like a perfect circle

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 19:58:02 2018 No.9730199 >>9730180 Maximum difference in radii is only 0.4%

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 19:59:46 2018 No.9730204 >>9730199 >>9730180 (i.e 20km)

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 20:05:37 2018 No.9730213 File: 380 KB, 3827x1908, apollo17.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9730153 >http://apollo17.org the high alt shots before it turns into a cartoon are neat

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 20:06:08 2018 No.9730215 >>9730213 they delve into deep sandwich discussion later on

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 20:09:27 2018 No.9730220 File: 251 KB, 1200x802, nasaearths.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 20:21:09 2018 No.9730238 File: 1.74 MB, 3832x1908, nasabs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] looks pretty flat

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 20:23:19 2018 No.9730244 File: 1.68 MB, 3832x1898, blue marble apollo 17 and a half.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 20:28:24 2018 No.9730250 File: 2.34 MB, 3832x1898, faggotsblue marble apollo 17.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] you guys know they can't leave earth atmosphere and space travel is fake

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 20:30:48 2018 No.9730255 >>9730220 >>9730238 >>9730244 >>9730250 Hey, you've got four more (You)s! How many more before you win that prize?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 20:31:45 2018 No.9730256 >>9730255 if it's anything like an arcade he'll cash in 5000 of them for either a candy bar or two Chinese finger traps

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 21:25:29 2018 No.9730341 >>9730124 >it's so easy I don't even need to refute it Just debunk him and get it over with. You two stop running around in circles or get a room.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 21:31:57 2018 No.9730366 File: 19 KB, 236x236, terrastronot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9730250

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 21:39:32 2018 No.9730381 >>9730366 Isn't that quote in regards to how the NASA budget right now is fucking garbage?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 21:43:14 2018 No.9730393 >>9730381 Yes. But obviously the loss in NASA's capabilities is due to the watchful eye of Youtube commenters, and not the tenfold reduction in operating budget.

Anonymous Wed May 9 21:48:09 2018 No.9730410

>>9718111
>obscene amounts of smog in background

>>9718482
A curved lens didn't allow me to see shadows of mountains on the moon through my spotter scope.

>>9730381
I think so, though I think I remember hearing an interview where they were specifically referring to the space shuttle.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 21:52:09 2018 No.9730427 File: 404 KB, 2079x1865, plasmajetstream.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9730381 no we can't physically do it

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 21:57:59 2018 No.9730444 >>9730341 This is the room.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 21:59:29 2018 No.9730450 >>9730393 >watchful eye of youtube commenters oy mate

Anonymous Wed May 9 22:02:52 2018 No.9730464

>>9730366
Yes - the problem is the quote is part of a meme manufactured from fragments of an interview to make it sound like we have a problem. I can see this might be referring to the ISS only, or maybe with our current inventory of rockets.
But I get that you're looking for (You)s. Here's another.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 22:11:32 2018 No.9730493 File: 128 KB, 1370x1794, flatproof.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9730464 humans have never left earth's atmosflat, unless you count the moon landing

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 22:28:59 2018 No.9730548 >>9730493 >I don't understand scale.

Anonymous Wed May 9 22:29:59 2018 No.9730558
File: 22 KB, 608x410, images(10).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9718433
>AAAAAND IN THE RED CORNER, WITH HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF MAN HOURS OF REPEATABLE RESEARCH, ACTUAL, LIVING ASTRONAUTS WHO TOOK PART IN THE MISSION AND LITERALLY THE ENTIRE FIELDS OF ROCKETRY AND COMPUTING, ITS THE MOOOOOOOOON LANDING!
>HE'LL BE FACING TONIGHTS CHALLENGER, HAILING FROM THE DARKEST DEPTHS OF YOUTUBE, FED ON NOTHING BUT PURE, WILD SPECULATION AND TRAINED BY THE FINEST CONSPIRACY NUTS THE INTERNET HAS TO OFFER, ITS EVERYONRS FAVOURITE GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY, THE MOON HOOOOOOOAX!

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 22:39:46 2018 No.9730575 File: 1.37 MB, 1828x1500, larpersinspace.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9730381 no https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgXDi7mc43M https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BK-uatwOOeA

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 22:44:21 2018 No.9730586 File: 491 KB, 442x600, f63.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9730575

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 22:48:47 2018 No.9730590 >>9730575 Wow. The sun at Jupiter got really bright!!! BTW, watched your first video. He literally said "right now, we can't go outside of Earth's orbit". Now, what, exactly do you think that means?

Anonymous Wed May 9 22:56:15 2018 No.9730607
File: 138 KB, 1041x1041, earth_rise.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9730590 >>9730590
>"right now, we can't go outside of Earth's orbit"
we cant reach moon's orbit, or any orbit execpt floating in balloons and planes above the flat plane.
>do you believe pic attached is a photo

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 00:13:58 2018 No.9730734 >>9720608 He was being super awkward because moving his hand gives him a rotational moment Space is hard yo

Anonymous Thu May 10 00:31:33 2018 No.9730755

>>9718061
>the internet
I would say that the invention of the telephone or telegraph was a greater feat, since both created a network that allowed for distance communication. Something that just didn't exist before. All the internet did, was add a level of complexity to the communication.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 12:58:57 2018 No.9731663 File: 91 KB, 972x841, Dish Network Satellite Dish.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9718060 Flat earth debunked in less than 1 second...pic relevant. Great job on mixing Flattard ideas to distract people from genuine NASA fraud.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 13:02:11 2018 No.9731678 >>9730493 >atmosflat OK, that's funny, I don't care who you are.

Anonymous Thu May 10 13:09:56 2018 No.9731691

>>9731663
No, the NWO ballheads have floating stealth baloons that transmit from locations you aren't allowed to go to on banned frequencies. That's where your satelite signal comes from. Also, acceleromaters in the dishes detect when they are moved so they can make it seem like the signal is coming from a tiny point. Get your head out of the grass!

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 13:44:39 2018 No.9731727 >>9731663 >bouncing off the ionosphere = satellite

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 14:45:18 2018 No.9731851 File: 134 KB, 720x900, DFk8Ts3XUAIarNS[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] 666 and the all seeing eye, moon landing confirmed.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 14:50:34 2018 No.9731863 >>9718111 yah none of those things are correct, but it impressive https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYFyVBxIuSA&list=PLtFnfSc9NwNxhcj_o6AflrSxLMhiP1sNm

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 14:53:13 2018 No.9731870 >>9731691 You are legally allowed to receive any frequency you like. Broadcast is controlled, not reception. Except in Britbong, I guess, but they don't count.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 16:57:58 2018 No.9732195 >>9731727 what

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 18:01:20 2018 No.9732395 >>9718111 It's an impressive stone structure with practically zero usable internal volume.

Anonymous Thu May 10 18:06:07 2018 No.9732415

>>9729460
LEO is pretty much the only thing modern spacesuits are used for, exploring Mars for example will demand a better suit, especially if the mission lasts for extended periods of time, going anywhere near Jupiter or Saturn will require both ships and suits to be massively more shielded from radiation than current habs and suits are. I wouldn't put much stock in anything BBC says though, they're MSM and as such the quality of their "research" into any article they print is trash.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 18:14:28 2018 No.9732454 >>9729460 The bbc's research is about as good as buzzfeed's You'd be just fine in a modern suit on the moon, its all the same vacuum. You just wouldn't be able to walk because they're stiff as fuck being mostly a solid shell.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 18:17:22 2018 No.9732464 >>9731727 >ionoshphere exists >we're in a closed off dome dome filled with air nigga decide please

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 18:20:43 2018 No.9732475 File: 25 KB, 621x545, shocked-face-trump-swimming-suit-swim-suit-.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >first plane is invented >made from wood and cloth and only flys 3 feet above the ground >60 years later someone took a shit on the moon

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 18:20:59 2018 No.9732477 >>9732464 exactly. My ham friend has talked with random Ukrainian fishermen across the globe due to bouncing radio off of the heavyside layer. Can't exactly do that with a flert erth

Anonymous Thu May 10 18:24:31 2018 No.9732485

>>9732475
Did you forget the part inbetween where we fought each-other with better and better wood planes, and then planes made of half wood and half metal, and then planes that flew using a sustained air-breathing explosion? Or the part where some bright spark filled up a metal tube with a lot of propellant and launched it into the sky so it could drop on someone elsess city? Or do you believe that jets, missiles, and ICBMs are a global conspiracy too? See the thing is, if those technologies exist, dropping a few dudes in a can onto the Moon really isn't anywhere even remotely in the neighborhood of impossible, just risky and expensive.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 19:58:06 2018 No.9732648 >>9718060 The nuclear bomb is pretty damn impressive given it was the 1940s.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 21:11:07 2018 No.9732778 measuring big G was pretty neat

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 22:02:14 2018 No.9732833 File: 688 KB, 1920x1080, Screenshot from 2018-05-10 20-46-19.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9729787 This is absolute nightmare fuel. We didn't have any astronauts... err.... not come back, did we?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 22:31:13 2018 No.9732890 >>9732454 Wouldn't the amount f reflected light n you be a lot higher on the moon than in orbit? That should make for some thermal control differences, but I have no idea how severe that might be.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 23:00:09 2018 No.9732933 File: 64 KB, 904x564, Ck3WS_7WEAAVEJq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9732890

>>	Anonymous Thu May 10 23:04:53 2018 No.9732943 >>9729787 desperate reaching. typical of a goon or troll recommended action: report and disengage

Anonymous Fri May 11 07:10:26 2018 No.9733643

>>9718940
in any case, that whole "ohhh technology came from the apollo project" argument is shit, it means that we hate our life here on earth so much that we only try to improve it when it is a wasteful by product of a project to send 3 people of the most children asasining army of the world to a planet wihtout life.

like if they really wanted to improve life on earth they would have grabbed those 600 billion and spent them on earth improving technology, im sure they could have made a hell of a lot more than velcro

>>	Anonymous Fri May 11 11:05:25 2018 No.9734045 calculators didn't even exist at that time. they had slide rules with them in space to make calculations.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 11 11:22:43 2018 No.9734073 >>9732933 lol. why do you think you are able to see that globe?

Anonymous Fri May 11 12:11:42 2018 No.9734167
File: 57 KB, 706x448, Moon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

I found it funny these two threads came up side-by-side.
LEFT True. And very impressive. Risks we wouldn't take today.
RIGHT Conspiracy theorist assholery. Go back to making up stuff about chemtrails and Tesla.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 11 12:36:20 2018 No.9734244 >>9734167 Left is virgin sci-fi bullshit, right is chad intellectualism.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 11 17:06:14 2018 No.9734916 >>9718071 >irregardless.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 11 17:08:36 2018 No.9734922 File: 436 KB, 623x459, 1524596976873.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9732933

>>	Anonymous Fri May 11 21:13:50 2018 No.9735279 >>9734916 >feet

Anonymous Fri May 11 21:28:14 2018 No.9735291

>>9729535
>Implying the Cold War ended with the Moon landing
Hell, even the space race didn't end with the Moon landing; the Soviets were the first to land probes on Mars and Venus, which happened after the Moon landing.

>>9729690
During the part where the "moving of the insert creating the terminator line" is seen, you can literally STILL SEE THE TERMINATOR LINE.

>>9730220
This is literally simple perspective; the closer you are to a sphere, the less of its surface you can see.

>>9730427
One, the upper atmosphere is thin. So thin, in fact, that no meaningful heat transfer will take place between the atmosphere and an object in it, as there are so few particles to transfer heat from. This means the object doesn't obtain a meaningful increase in temperature while in contact with atmosphere that technically has a very high temperature.

It doesn't matter anyway, since rockets aren't launched from that close to the poles.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 11 21:38:08 2018 No.9735300 >>9735291 >During the part where the "moving of the insert creating the terminator line" is seen, you can literally STILL SEE THE TERMINATOR LINE. What part of "moving" don't you understand?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 11 21:40:49 2018 No.9735302 >>9735300 What he means to say is that the terminator line isn't moving. You can see that it remains exactly where it was/is.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 11 21:49:37 2018 No.9735313 >>9729787 I've mentioned before that it could have been an astronauts leg. https://youtu.be/x1HBV5RObAg?t=233 Looks like there's even evidence it could be.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 11 22:37:55 2018 No.9735354 >>9735302 What was happening then?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 11 22:38:54 2018 No.9735355 File: 91 KB, 675x1013, 26250298378_bf2be42932_k.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9718060 falcon heavy

>>	Anonymous Fri May 11 22:39:55 2018 No.9735356 >>9735313 A leg? Where's the foot? How flexible are spacesuits?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 11 22:41:19 2018 No.9735357 >>9718959 They used farmers, who were glad to get paid for extra work during the flood seasons.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 01:02:34 2018 No.9735571 >>9735356 Did you even watch the video I linked at all?

Anonymous Sat May 12 01:07:38 2018 No.9735577

>>9735354
We can't tell because it was exposed for the light from Earth, not the inside of the craft. It could have been someone moving around between the camera and the window.
If this is the video I think it is then they were reconfiguring the camera for in filming inside the cabin again so they had moved the camera back from the window and soon after that clip they change the exposure settings so you can see the inside of the cabin.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 12:33:51 2018 No.9736448 File: 64 KB, 639x632, DSeyFi7WsAAVYKo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9735291 >This is literally simple perspective; the closer you are to a sphere, the less of its surface you can see. How high do you have to go before you see curvature

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 12:36:03 2018 No.9736459 File: 92 KB, 1000x793, Dc4spRGXUAAtfcD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9736448 >>9718060 Human Flight

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 12:38:31 2018 No.9736462 >>9736448 >How high do you have to go before you see curvature If you can't see curvature from up there it's not a disk either, right? Or do you think the edge of a disk is straight?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 12:42:59 2018 No.9736466 >>9736462 Infinite plane.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 14:58:48 2018 No.9736657 >>9730575 >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgXDi7mc43M Lmao, even out of context (i.e. assuming he wasnt specifically referring to the current launch vehicles) the moon is still in Earth's orbit.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 15:04:18 2018 No.9736670 >>9718060 Feeding your fat mother

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 16:44:35 2018 No.9736873 File: 99 KB, 450x271, globeisalie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9736657 if humans went to the moon you would be in the moon's orbit

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 16:45:57 2018 No.9736879 >balls flying around in nothing >globesheep believe this LMAO

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 17:12:07 2018 No.9736916 File: 5 KB, 211x239, 1525794189601.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >replies to an argument that doesn't even bring up curvature >I see no curvature REEEEEEE pic related

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 17:14:20 2018 No.9736922 >>9736916 fuck I forgot to leave the post I was replying to it's >>9736448

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 18:16:49 2018 No.9737022 File: 2.92 MB, 1280x720, esacgi.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Why fake this AT ALL???? ESA (Europeon NASA) fucked up their CGI, see 15:10 https://youtu.be/HpBEduGMapw?t=908

>>	The Lord Sat May 12 18:18:18 2018 No.9737023 File: 248 KB, 1024x593, Great-Giza-Pyramids-Egypy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9718060 >Name a more impressive feat given the level of technology and knowledge available. ok

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 18:19:22 2018 No.9737024 >>9737022 It's dust on the camera, look at 15:49 you fucking moron

Anonymous Sat May 12 18:19:49 2018 No.9737025

Moon Hoaxer brainlets please answer this question!

Why would the Soviets, who had the technology to see if the Americans actually made it to the moon, not call out the Americans for lying if the moon landing was faked? Americans beating them to the moon was a HUGE blow to the pride of the Soviet Union, so why would they keep quiet about the Americans lying?

Do you think the Soviets were in on the lie as well and getting utterly defeated and humiliated was part of their plan?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 18:45:34 2018 No.9737058 >>9737025 $$$

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 18:54:19 2018 No.9737066 >>9737058 Money from who?

Anonymous Sat May 12 18:59:57 2018 No.9737074

>>9737066
Who do you think? America! The Russians couldn't get to the moon, nor could the Americans, so they struck a deal. America will fake it, because they've got the Hollywood studios, and Russia will keep hush about it in exchange for money/resources. It ends the "war" and everyone's happy.

This is why the Russians have never attempted to back to the moon, instead they share the ISS with the Americans. Enemies on earth but not in space? Interesting...

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 19:05:22 2018 No.9737086 >>9737074 >1950's-70's >Cold War >Worst relations between US and Russia ever >They decide to mutually fake space exploration >Only US gets to land on the moon >Cold War continues

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 19:12:19 2018 No.9737094 >>9736879 Isn't that what the Sun and Moon are doing in the flat model?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 19:13:22 2018 No.9737095 >>9737086 >Only US gets to land on the moon They get to fake landing on the moon, if the war continued Russia could then call them out. Why are there Russians on the ISS might I ask?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 19:16:19 2018 No.9737100 >>9737095 The war did continue though. Up until 1991. And there are Russians on the ISS because the Soviet Union dissolved, and there aren't so many tensions between us anymore.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 19:16:37 2018 No.9737103 >>9737074 That would make sense except for the two N1 rockets Russia tried to launch after Apollo 11.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 19:32:21 2018 No.9737116 File: 3.00 MB, 682x384, flight.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 19:41:44 2018 No.9737127 >>9737100 >>9737103 Yeah I guess you're right, everything happened as it was depicted officially. Doesn't matter that NASA was composed of Nazis shipped over after WW2.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 19:44:24 2018 No.9737129 >>9718493 2:58 wtf?!

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 19:47:20 2018 No.9737135 >>9737116 Wow it's nothing

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:00:26 2018 No.9737150 >>9737116 That is a plane fly over a flat plane with a sun moving over a flat, stationary plane.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:02:35 2018 No.9737156 >>9718493 12:32 explain this

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:16:34 2018 No.9737178 >>9737150 says who

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:18:10 2018 No.9737180 >>9737178 Me. What do you say it is?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:18:49 2018 No.9737181 >>9737178 a sunset

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:20:41 2018 No.9737185 >>9737180 It's the sun setting

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:22:23 2018 No.9737187 >>9737127 >Doesn't matter that NASA was composed of Nazis shipped over after WW2. I honestly don't see how that matters at all. Do you have any examples that would show why it must be faked simply because they are Nazis?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:23:57 2018 No.9737191 >>9737185 Yes but could you describe what's going on physically to cause that please?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:24:31 2018 No.9737193 >>9737191 Earth turns, sun goes out of view.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:26:31 2018 No.9737199 >>9737191 The Earth rotates.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:28:07 2018 No.9737203 >>9737187 Can you trust Nazis? Are you seriously asking me that? >>9737193 >>9737199 You believe that 100%?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:30:39 2018 No.9737209 >>9737203 >You believe that 100%? Yes. It matches all our observations.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:35:38 2018 No.9737217 >>9737203 yes

Anonymous Sat May 12 20:38:22 2018 No.9737221

>>9737209
So you watch that and see an earth rotating at a constant speed of 1000mph (give or take) while orbiting a stationary (to us) sun, while the sun is orbiting the galaxy at over 500,000mph, and the galaxy is orbiting at over a million mph. Is that a correct description of your belief about what's going on in that video?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:41:23 2018 No.9737226 >>9737221 Yes.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:42:24 2018 No.9737228 >>9737217 Does >>9737221 also match your beliefs about what's going on in that video?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:44:15 2018 No.9737231 >>9737226 Thank you. I have no further questions your Honor.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:44:27 2018 No.9737232 >>9737203 >Can you trust Nazis? No, I trust the Americans who were overseeing them.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:45:06 2018 No.9737236 >>9737221 Yes.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:49:07 2018 No.9737243 >>9737228 it does

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 20:57:02 2018 No.9737260 >>9737232 Good for you. >>9737236 >>9737243 It was pretty brave to admit that, so respect

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 21:13:30 2018 No.9737295 >>9737260 >It was pretty brave to admit that, so respect No, it's not. It's common knowledge.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 21:16:10 2018 No.9737301 >>9737295 Well, I wouldn't go that far. It's a common belief, for sure, but knowledge is a bit far-fetched.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 21:17:58 2018 No.9737303 >>9737301 There is no difference between knowledge and belief. There can be a difference between truth and either.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 21:19:47 2018 No.9737310 >>9737303 >There is no difference between knowledge and belief. So, do you know you have ten toes, or do you believe you have ten toes?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 21:19:53 2018 No.9737311 >>9737178 >>9737180 >>9737181 >>9737185 >>9737187 >>9737191 >>9737199 >>9737203 >>9737209 >>9737217 >>9737221 >>9737226 >>9737228 >>9737231 >>9737232 >>9737236 >>9737243 >>9737260 >>9737295 hello JIDF, samefagging this hard.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 21:26:11 2018 No.9737324 >>9737311 Have you actually got an argument Einstein?

Anonymous Sat May 12 21:29:50 2018 No.9737331
File: 12 KB, 367x361, soclose.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9737310
Well, I haven't checked today so I believe I still have ten toes.
Let me put it this way. Christians believe God exists, but to them they will say they know God exists. The truth of the matter could be different.
The difference between belief and knowledge is just the certainty you ascribe to it but either could be truth.

>>9737311
So close.
>its samefagging if you reply to a question someone asks you

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 21:36:08 2018 No.9737342 >>9737331 So after checking your toes, do you know or believe you have 10 of them?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 21:37:48 2018 No.9737346 >>9737342 I haven't checked them, but I know I have ten toes because I don't remember losing any.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 21:41:53 2018 No.9737354 >>9737346 So therefore with the same knowingness that you have regarding your toes, you also share with your knowingness of the earth's rotation (and other movements)?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 21:55:30 2018 No.9737375 File: 107 KB, 1019x719, come on.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] ANSWER THE QUESTION.

Anonymous Sat May 12 21:56:45 2018 No.9737379

>>9733643
>they would have grabbed those 600 billion and spent them on earth improving technology

Every single dollar of that was, in fact, spent here on Earth. There is no place to spend money in space.

Apollo WAS, n fact, a great bargain in terms of dollars spent vs. spin-off tech generated. That is not to say some other massive high-tech project would not have had similar results. But that was the project people were willing to get excited about at that moment in history.

Anonymous Sat May 12 21:58:24 2018 No.9737380

>>9737354
Pretty much, yes.
Aside from observing the southern pole stars, which I did numerous times in the 30 years I lived in the Southern Hemisphere, I haven't personally done any of the experiments that show the Earth is rotating, orbiting the Sun and our solar system is flying around the galaxy. However, I have the same level of trust in the greater scientific community as I do in my own memory (probably more actually).
If you call that faith, as in a religious belief, then that's pretty much just your belief, which likewise may or may not be true. Should we be paralyzed by doubt in what we don't know for sure is true? Certainly not. We should use and refine the best models we have. Fortunately the globe Earth model is the best model we have that explains all our observations and unfortunately the flat Earth model has a hundred different people slapping a hundred different bandaids on each problem to try and make it work.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 22:01:31 2018 No.9737385 File: 78 KB, 1019x719, globe preacher.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9737380 Which living scientists have proven these movements using experiments?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 22:43:23 2018 No.9737459 File: 68 KB, 1019x719, evolution is the solution.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTION ATHEISTS.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 22:52:19 2018 No.9737468 >>9737385 Are dead scientists less credible?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 23:19:47 2018 No.9737493 >>9737468 Reproduce their experiments/results, that's what science is about.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 12 23:48:33 2018 No.9737526 File: 1.20 MB, 2609x1496, isaslabecalenlrg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9737493 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIhgFT-OipU&t=614s

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 00:12:06 2018 No.9737564 >>9737493 Well, you can find examples of Foucault's Pendulum all over the world.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 00:16:04 2018 No.9737573 >>9737564 https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=1xJLvmip7WE

Anonymous Sun May 13 00:20:19 2018 No.9737575

>>9737526
>if we put a concave lens under the light source we can make the shadows that we observe in reality
>of course, if the concave lens was stationary across the whole earth and the sun moved circled above it the effect would be different than we observe
>now there's also a concave lens circling the earth below the sun
Well done. You just introduced something else that hasn't been observed in order to make your model work. That's real smart.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 00:24:51 2018 No.9737579 File: 173 KB, 2928x1423, aircurrents.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9737575 the concave lens is the dome

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 00:38:16 2018 No.9737597 >>9737579 That's the problem, though, it has to move with the Sun. I addressed that.

Anonymous Sun May 13 00:43:08 2018 No.9737606

>>9737573
>skips over the specifics of the allais effect which only occurs during eclipses (probably something to do with the alignment of the gravitational pull of the sun and the moon)
>states no experiments in the last 200 years have detected earths rotation
https://www.livescience.com/17619-lasers-measure-earth-rotation-wobble.html
What if detecting Earth's rotation now is something so mundane it just doesn't make news unless there's something novel about it?

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 00:43:23 2018 No.9737608 File: 74 KB, 400x378, sunstudies_reading.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9737597 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PRiu3daPBg

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 00:47:43 2018 No.9737615 File: 488 KB, 736x307, 1525319010526.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9737606 gravity explains everthing in globe theory that doesnt make sense >holds atmosphere from the vacuum of space >curves oceans >bends light around a ball

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 01:02:03 2018 No.9737636 >>9737615 >Edit a picture >Point out the picture is edited >Accuse someone else of lying. Flat Earthers in a nutshell.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 01:08:22 2018 No.9737651 >>9737636 Actually that's the JPEG version of the image. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GV1nBkWR-Q Yeah, the flat Earth idiots actually downloaded the JPEG version instead of the lossless version.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 01:10:31 2018 No.9737656 File: 335 KB, 1813x1813, fakenasa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9737651

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 01:10:35 2018 No.9737657 >>9737608 Last I checked I don't have a personal dome.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 01:11:13 2018 No.9737661 >>9737656 Fair enough. That doesn't do anything to disprove that video though. That's literally a strawman.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 01:42:05 2018 No.9737717 >>9737615 >>holds atmosphere from the vacuum of space >>curves oceans >>bends light around a ball It's almost like gravity is described as an attractive force.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 01:45:50 2018 No.9737722 >>9737651 >Actually that's the JPEG version of the image. My mistake. I thought that came from a crappy edit of AS11-40-5868 that gets posted by these threads. >>9737656 >Someone claimed that a random rack was from the Moon. So what?

Anonymous Sun May 13 01:46:31 2018 No.9737724

>>9737615
>holds atmosphere from the vacuum of space
So you don't understand what a vacuum is or does, that's fine. But just know you are wrong and should probably attempt to educate yourself in the matter because onto of the conspiracy shit, it makes you look like an idiot
>curves oceans
Yes, and gravity isn't even the only force that can curve water. Do you have issue with the other forces too?
>bends light around a ball
If you mean atmospheric refraction, that isn't gravity. Well, it is because of gravity that our atmosphere isn't uniform density, but it is because our atmosphere isn't uniform density that we're see so much atmospheric refraction. Now if you mean bending light around large masses, yes that is due to gravity and it isn't even NASA who originally made the claim but they certainly support it and have found evidence of it with their telescopes.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 05:55:53 2018 No.9737981 >>9718060 You are using a computer, given your level of knowledge thats impressive!

>>	Anonymous Sun May 13 14:27:02 2018 No.9738590 >>9718071 >irregardless >feet Please, this sort of thing makes my face tense up.

Anonymous Sun May 13 18:38:24 2018 No.9739129
File: 2.97 MB, 854x480, londdist8.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>9737724
>>bends light around a ball
>If you mean atmospheric refraction, that isn't gravity. Well, it is because of gravity that our atmosphere isn't uniform density, but it is because our atmosphere isn't uniform density that we're see so much atmospheric refraction. Now if you mean bending light around large masses, yes that is due to gravity and it isn't even NASA who originally made the claim but they certainly support it and have found evidence of it with their telescopes.
or its just flat and the refraction of the atmosphere gives the illusion that you are on a ball but when measured there is no curve
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYK9085v1aU

Anonymous Sun May 13 19:42:49 2018 No.9739350

>>9739129
The refraction of the atmosphere only happens because atmosphere is non-uniform density. The reason it is non-uniform density is because of gravity. The air near the surface has a bunch of air above it compressing it, so it is more dense. The air at the top of the atmosphere doesn't have anything above it to compress it so it is far less dense. Light refracts as it passes between different materials of different density. The refraction happens across the normal of the density gradient, and only appears to curve over long distances because the density gradient curves over the surface. If earth was flat, the density gradient would be flat, and light rising up from the Earth nearly parallel to the Earth would just bounce back down and terminate on the ground. Because the Earth curves, shallow angles to the normal miss the surface after it curves away, where they can hit the density gradient again.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math