[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 13 KB, 220x281, 1471879626960.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9695072 No.9695072 [Reply] [Original]

>"studies have shown"

>> No.9695096

that's not how quotes work

>> No.9695125
File: 107 KB, 645x773, brainlet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9695125

>"correlation does not imply causation"

>> No.9695131

>>9695125
Aha! Clearly the large increase in shovels bought caused an increase in ski sales!

>> No.9695189
File: 35 KB, 408x450, 1512452177126.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9695189

>>9695125
>"there is such a thing as the scientific method"

>> No.9695202
File: 92 KB, 825x1000, 645643242553242.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9695202

>>9695125
>correlation does imply causation

>> No.9695217

>>9695072
>"Scientists discover new..."

>> No.9695220

>"..... says scientists."

>> No.9695222

>>9695072
>>9695125
based posters

>> No.9695383
File: 14 KB, 646x720, oooohhh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9695383

>according to science

>> No.9695396
File: 38 KB, 645x729, 1508779517474.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9695396

>"experts say..."

>> No.9695492

>>9695383
This but unironically

>> No.9695981

>based on the graph...might be the cause of discrepancy

>> No.9695991
File: 94 KB, 327x468, 32.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9695991

>"this recent discovery might..."

>> No.9696003

>"Global Warming is man made..."

>> No.9696017

>as a consequence of the illuminating paper by

>> No.9696021

>>9695072
>hence...

>> No.9696022

>it's proven that

>> No.9696024

>as was discussed in my conversation with **

>> No.9696113

>>9695072
>>9695125
>>9695189
>>9695202
>>9695217
>>9695220
>>9695383
>>9695396
>>9695981
>>9695991
>>9696003
>>9696017
>>9696021
>>9696022
>>9696024

Cringe.

>> No.9696188

>>9696113
Completely unbased

>> No.9696241
File: 7 KB, 252x200, 2r.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9696241

>let

>> No.9696278
File: 36 KB, 1024x576, el_goblino.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9696278

>>9695072
>Experts baffled at...

>> No.9696303

>>9696113
[math]\mathbb{BRAINLET:}[/math]
[math]\mathcal{THE\ POST}[/math]

>> No.9696309

>>9696113
Based

>> No.9696340

>>9696113
Go back.

>> No.9696343

>>9696024

>[5] Private communication

>> No.9696359
File: 289 KB, 1920x1080, mezzanine_511.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9696359

Some common verbal pathologies that annoy me:

1. So, … (thoughtlessly at the beginning of every sentence)

2. Indeed, <banal restatement or amplification of the effete language in the previous sentence, else a point whose emphasis does not benefit the reader>

3. a kind of <something that is not “of” any relevant “kind” but is simply the precise thing the speaker is describing>

4. a sort of (see previous)

5. using “motivate” as though it is synonymous with “present evidence for” to make the next few otherwise uninteresting slides of your powerpoint more… (see next)

6. compelling (used as though someone told a robot what figurative language was)

7. …right? (at the end of every sentence. A specious rhetorical habit and a verbal crutch of countless modern academics)

The ABSOLUTE state of the social sciences

>> No.9696373

>>9696359
these are good criticisms. how would you recommend getting over doing these things? I think I do these when I talk and explain something, but I think I just picked them up from talking and listening to other people.

>> No.9696424

>>9696373
in college I applied to a program that essentially groomed us for competitive grad fellowships and so it turned into one massive Cal Newport TED Talk "secrets of your neighborhood Rhodes scholar" blog post LARP, but the professor who directed the program was a scholar of Dickens from the English department. Naturally, he focused a lot on composing personal statements and not speaking like a numale in interviews.

Just learn to write well, be direct, don't use passive verbs. Say what you mean and don't be overly diffident. One of the LARP activities this prof required was called "officer speak", and we took a writing sample and stripped each sentence of frills and ambiguity. You can also find a numbered list of good writing practices and force yourself to adhere to it. We had to rewrite any assignments that violated the program's 10 or 12 point list of rules for good writing, often without direction as to the violation in question. Becoming a sharper writer will also sharpen your speech.

I associate the list above most strongly with social science and humanities grad students. They develop this effete manner of speaking that couches every single observation in a qualification. I think it stems from a heavily internalized fear of being corrected, because that is a trait that is selected for in academia. Avoiding getting marked down on papers tends towards higher academic success tends towards having a self image compatible with becoming an academic because it has proven to be "safe" for you so long as you are "safe" for other people.

Look inside yourself and determine whether that is the underlying source of your verbal pathologies. Good luck anon.

>> No.9696434
File: 4 KB, 220x230, 1524532265917.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9696434

>>9696359
based

>> No.9696442
File: 436 KB, 800x800, 1513936085464.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9696442

>>9696424
>I associate the list above most strongly with social science and humanities grad students. They develop this effete manner of speaking that couches every single observation in a qualification. I think it stems from a heavily internalized fear of being corrected, because that is a trait that is selected for in academia. Avoiding getting marked down on papers tends towards higher academic success tends towards having a self image compatible with becoming an academic because it has proven to be "safe" for you so long as you are "safe" for other people.
This ought to be printed and framed in every classroom. Good post

>> No.9696478

>>9696434
>So, indeed, we kind of get this model that sort of really motivates this notion in a sort of, compelling way, rieeeeeeeeeght?

>> No.9696480

So we looked at the data

>> No.9696483
File: 30 KB, 480x360, iu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9696483

>>9696480
>so we looked at the data

>> No.9696487

>>9696343

[7] To appear

>> No.9696490

>>9696113
>>>/r/iam12andicringeateverything

>> No.9696494

>>9696359
>sciences
>social
hehe

>> No.9696495

>>9696359
Good/10

Nothing wrong with saying the proper equivalent of "...right?", a tag question, every once in a while. But if you are saying it too often might as well turn On ebonics and practice repeat "Know what I am saying?" right now.

>> No.9696508

>>9696359
you forgot
>actually...
>giving completely inacurate explanations to make it sound simple
>not telling every part of the experiment
>giving only one hiposthesis as "the conclusion"
>science says
i dont know if this is considered but i wanted to participate
brainlet.jpeg

>> No.9696536

>>9696494
what is the meme here, just saying social sciences aren't real sciences or what?

>> No.9696669

>>9696536
>just saying social sciences aren't real sciences
you nailed it

>> No.9696684

>>9696669
ok that's just stating the obvious what do you want me to call them? they're legitimate fields, they're not humanities, and they don't claim to be natural or physical sciences

>> No.9696686
File: 133 KB, 500x417, blackholebrain.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9696686

>>9695072
>causation implies correlation

>> No.9696803

>statistically speaking

>> No.9696907
File: 58 KB, 645x729, 1512434908087.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9696907

>>9696686
>implication causates correlation

>> No.9696919

>>9696686
causation does imply correlation tho

>> No.9697889

>Experts agree..

>> No.9698966

>>9695072
dat chin tho

>> No.9698994

>>9696343
>[1]This was once revealed to me in a dream.

>> No.9699003

>>9698966
That's what inbreeding does to a royal family.

>> No.9699123

>>9695125
>>9695202
correlation INFERS causation

>> No.9699200

>>9699123
>inferring "causation" from constant conjunction
I'd post Hume, but someone beat me to it.