/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.9671691]

>IQ of 117 according to

test.mensa.no

>Took SAT and got 1150

What's it like to have an IQ of 100 or 140?
I think I only met two genius men in my lifetime.

I think I had a friend that was 100 IQ, and I loved him, but he grew to reject me.

I don't have very many friends, so I'm trying to place myself in a collective I've never really had. I had a white friend that said my intelligence level was ""Okay""

I've never been close to another human being before.

Can anyone tell me if the mensa Norway test is close to real? I waited two years and retook it and got 128, but I don't know if that's an inflated number.

I look at Puerto Rican DNA and this chart, and I kind of can't believe I'm smarter than 72 people in Puerto Rico. 1 in 14 sounds more accurate

https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/iqtable.aspx

[Anonymous No.9671697]

>>9671691
Tfw no 4 digit IQ

[Anonymous No.9672111]

I have an 110 IQ and my answer is simply to stop comparing the worth of a person based a number.
People will start to like you more when you stop limiting them to something they have no control over
>"oh shit it's the IQ faggot again he's gonna come up and tell us how much of a brainlet we are, lets leave this faggot alone."

People dont like company of someone who degrades them everytime they're around

[Anonymous No.9672115]

>>9672111
>Realize there are improbable odds that I was the sperm to inseminate my mother
>Realize I could easily have 128 IQ and be smarter than 72 people

I want to get a professional assessment.
I want to do it before I'm too poor to care about getting an IQ test.

I absolutely must watch this video before I die

[Anonymous No.9672116]

>>9671691
>SAT of 1150
C'mon now you can get at least a 1300 with just basic algebra and logic

[Anonymous No.9672118]

>>9671691
Took that test by just clicking on random answers fast, got a score of 125 IQ. That test is shit

[Anonymous No.9672126]

>>9672115
High IQ wont automatically make you know the formulas for your test.
Being smart is not being some math fag, is knowing how to manage your shit right, take the right decisions and NOT FUCKING LIMITING YOUR ENTIRE CAPACITY TO A NUMBER THAT CHANGES ON DIFFERENT PERIODS OF YOUR LIFE.

YOU DONT NEED TO BE SMART TO GET MONEY AND LIVE YOU JUST NEED TO NOT BE FUCKING LAZY.

[Anonymous No.9672127]

>>9672118
>Hit random answers
>Get branded retarded

How are you doing that?

[Anonymous No.9672138]

The Mensa Norway test isn't close to real. It is basically a Raven's Progressive Matrices test only. This is what people call Spatial IQ. The problem is that it only tests one skill and that one skill actually has the highest Flynn Effect (people today score much higher than people did when it was made).

You could be mediocre at this test and have a very high IQ still.

[Anonymous No.9672150]

Puerto Rico certainly does not have an average IQ of 100 and its IQ distribution could also be different that the nation as a whole.

[Anonymous No.9672158]

>>9672150
It has a genetic IQ of 93-96

Anything you pull-up on it is muddled by garbage educational system.

[Anonymous No.9672166]

>>9672111
Retarded Rappers and Pop musicians are popular and loved by a lot of retarded fans.
But they still retarded regardless.

[Anonymous No.9672170]

>>9672116
>Basic algebra
>Plot the function graph chart

It has some weird shit you need to be experienced in on it, or you'll fail.

I think Texas has the worst mathematics score on the SAT because of the way math is taught down here.

[Anonymous No.9672178]

>>9672170
I've never heard of an algebra class that doesn't teach how to plot a function. Just how bad is it down there

[Anonymous No.9672183]

>>9672111

Continuing >>9672166

A retarded can still become successful.

There are a lot of retarded yet popular Comedians, Rappers, Pop Stars, Porn Stars, Top Models, Sportsmen, and Modern Artists out there.

So it's possible to be successful as a retarded Brainlet

But they will still be regarded as retarded no matter how rich they become.

[Anonymous No.9672185]

>>9672116
>>9672170
I just found my highschool, and the average SAT score was 906

http://www.collegesimply.com/k12/school/new-caney-high-school-new-caney-tx-77357/

[Anonymous No.9672191]

>>9672185
Also, it's not a race thing

http://www.collegesimply.com/k12/school/silva-health-magnet-el-paso-tx-79905/

[Anonymous No.9672196]

>>9672191
>Magnet high school
>Regular high school
come on, anon

[Anonymous No.9672201]

>>9672185
>>9672191
>>9672196
You compared a selective high school in a high income area to a nonselective high school in a low income area. This is not a good way to go about fighting "racism".

[Anonymous No.9672215]

>>9672126
IQ just means how quick can you develop or learn something, it doesn't give you knowledge nor gives you wisdom it just makes the path easier.

[Anonymous No.9672222]

>>9672201
I'm not fighting racism, but I am displaying differences in educational standards.

I distinctly remember fucking off really hard back in math class. I didn't really have to learn anything, and I pretty much flushed it all down the toilet because the tests were easy and there was no real need to go beyond memorization and really learn the material.

The only way you would get it in your brain is through a vested interest, and there was none for me.

It resulted in a low math score years later.

[Anonymous No.9672239]

>>9671691
never took an iq test because I’m not a fag but I got 1570 so bow before me brainlet

[Anonymous No.9672255]

>>9672239
>out of 2400

[Anonymous No.9672260]

>>9672116
i didn't know algebra or geometry when I took it and my score was similar to OP's lmao.
i did much better on the GRE, though.

[Anonymous No.9672261]

>>9672222
>>9672201
Here's another one with even less white kids

http://www.collegesimply.com/k12/school/international-school-of-america-san-antonio-tx-78213/

[Anonymous No.9672274]

>>9671691
Why do you care about your IQ? Are you afraid it's going to be a barrier to your accomplishments?

[Anonymous No.9672285]

>>9672274
I've got nothing in my life that I'm blossoming into anything.

I'm going to work and then die.
I'm just curious if my thoughts are valid, and the best way to find that is through an IQ test.

I've got an anti-natalist perspective on this reality, and I'm wondering if it's the right answer and if I can even trust myself to answer that question, so I need to see how I stack-up against others.

[Anonymous No.9672287]

>>9672285
>I'm just curious if my thoughts are valid, and the best way to find that is through an IQ test.
This is fallacious.

[Anonymous No.9672289]

>>9672261
It is very high income and has a strange name (might be a selective high school). I don't know what point you are trying to make.

[Anonymous No.9672304]

>>9672289
It's selective, but it's selective through a lottery.

>>9672287
I'm holding a belief in my brain about the world I live in that goes against minds faster than my own.

I need to see how I think and get my mind gauged before I can commit to something that flies in the face of so many people.

I might just be missing a piece of reality that other people see that I can't.

[Anonymous No.9672311]

Lmao OP relax man. You sound young (which means your brain will become smarter and more retarded at different times in the future) and you're going to be fine.

Stop worrying about it. IQ is a meme. Take the LSAT if you want a better idea of actual (non-nerdy autist) intelligence. The LSAT is an IQ test, but it tests for a much more analytical intelligence than the Mensa scam or the fucking SAT (lmao, the SAT is retarded, don't worry about that at all). For math intelligence, it's like chess; you need to practice everyday, and you're probably not a super-genius at it. For science, it's a combination of math and curiosity. And curiosity just comes with wisdom. You'll be a better scientist than any research-school faggot if you actually start to question your surroundings. That's why so many of them go through cringey drug phases; 95% of scientists would kill for natural curiosity, because 95% of scientists have engineer/autist brains that are geared towards repetition and memorization (due to SAT/mensa/GPA academic system).

Don't spend any time thinking about IQ. It's a Jewish invention (look this up). It's designed to identify military officers who can interpret and follow instructions and mega-autists who can design missiles. These archetypes are important and commendable but lack in areas of much more importance than pattern recognition or whatever. Also the people who obsess over this shit are always super gay and heavily autistic and annoying (IQcucks are almost exclusively Redditfags who are universally detested). Also basically everyone lies about their IQ, and very few have had it done professionally.

If anything, IQ is just a measure of how easy the education system will be for you. Success in non-academic settings is much more chaotic, and those who get ahead don't necessarily have high IQs.

****Remember: Adolf Hitler's IQ was 125. You can do anything with your life OP!****

[Anonymous No.9672334]

>>9672311
>Remember: Adolf Hitler's IQ was 125. You can do anything with your life OP!
125 IQ still pretty high compared to Op's IQ.

[Anonymous No.9672341]

>>9672111
One standard deviation is 15 from 100, you're normal.

[Anonymous No.9672355]

>>9672334
pffftXD give me a break, there are turbo-dweebs with 160+ IQ's that are slaving away for the Chad CEO at some aerospace corporation or for Professor Shillstein at Western Shithole University.

IQ discreetly measures for servility. In fact, it's an inherent aspect of the test, not to mention the history of the test's development. And servility handicaps people in the non-academic and non-military setting (the only settings where IQ is repeatedly measured). Notice I didn't say non-scientific! Like I said before, physicists are taught like engineers these days, which is why we haven't seen many fundamental breakthroughs that aren't 99.9% tied to technological breakthroughs (i.e. detecting gravity waves is a tech feat, not a advance in overall understanding -- quantum computing is a tech feat, based on physics that has been understood for 50 years -- non homogeneous supergalactic structures are a tech/optics feat, not an advance in understanding).

[Anonymous No.9672360]

>>9671691
The ingredient in the sandwich of your post that I’m choosing to focus on is that you’re sad and lonely. So I’m choosing to write *hugs* and I hope you find friendship in the truest and realest sense and I hope you feel better and I’m sorry you’re sad.

[Anonymous No.9672363]

>>9672355
>IQ discreetly measures for servility.
I think our school system is a much bigger problem. The end of "Boys Will Be Boys" has been disastrous for human capital.

[Anonymous No.9672644]

>>9672285
I don't really understand what you mean. Anti-natalist...you're anti reproduction?

Look, about this IQ thing: it can be used to predict some things, but what, are you expecting there are magic thresholds of numbers where people just know everything? The world doesn't work like that. The smartest person in the world isn't qualified to give you direction for your life. There are no storybook sages or wise men, there are no immutable answers to solving your problems, you need to figure shit out yourself.

I decided that if I'm going to work and die, I might as well work for the best goddamn goal I can imagine. What have I got to lose? If it's worth pursuing, why would I let anything other than the laws of the universe come and stop me? I'll worry about failed experiments and gaps in my knowledge as it's clear I'm not succeeding. It's not over until I give up.

[Anonymous No.9672653]

>>9672116
>c`mon now you can score in the 90th percentile on a standardized test by trying harder
Are you retarded?

[Anonymous No.9672671]

>>9671691
Wew in my country (Singapore) any score under 2000 is bad for SATs.

You Americans have it easy

[Anonymous No.9672684]

>>9672653
>I can't score better than literal retards
I didn't prep and got a 1440. That was considered decent at best. My friends who took it seriously got 1500+.
>>9672671
New scale is out of 1600 now.

[Anonymous No.9672859]

>>9671691
141 here. I find myself playing dumb a lot because i dont like when people obsess over my intelligence.
>woah how did you figure that out?
>you must be some sort of genius
>just ask anon, he knows everything
>why do you remember such weird stuff
How am i supposed to act/respond to these? If i agree i seem egotistical, if i disagree its hard to make it seem genuine and then there is an awkward stall in the conversation. At work it becomes a problem because they rely on me for EVERYTHING. If i say no then im the lazy asshole who just doesnt want to work. If i dont say no im doing 5 times the work as everyone else is for similar pay. Ive been downplaying my intelligence ever since i was a kid. I just wanted to be like everyone else. Still though, the only thing i would trade my intelligence for would be being born filthy rich.

[Anonymous No.9672864]

>>9672355
Chadiness isn't Intelligence

As a Chad You can be rich, successful and fuck a lot of girls' pussies.

But being a Chad [math] \neq [/math] being intelligent.

A Retarded Chad would never be able do advanced Physics and math because He is RETARDED.

Retarded Chads will simply either Cheat or pay a Autistic Math/Sci-Fag to do It.

[Anonymous No.9672867]

>>9671691
>tfw got 133
am i smart now?

[Anonymous No.9672873]

>>9672334 >>9672355

You can still be successful, rich and powerful being a Brainlet Retard Chad.


But Chad [math]\neq [/math] smart


Chadiness (Charisma, Leadership, Intimidation & Strength) make people respect a Chad regardless how much retarded a Chad is.


Abraham Lincoln is famous for lacking formal education
He was a Leader who made History, but a Brainlet regardless.

[Anonymous No.9672877]

>>9671691
Can you even take those online tests serious (even if it's test.mensa.no)?
Although the test told me that I'd have an iq of 123 I feel like I wasted 13 min of my life

[Anonymous No.9672999]

>>9671691
>IQ of 117 according to test.mensa.no
My dude, that's bad. Real bad. Irl you're probably 105

[Anonymous No.9673447]

>>9672999
I would support an IQ of 105, but I have a SAT score that supports 117.

I got 128 on the OP test after I retook and bet my entire life on it, but I don't know if that's inflated.

I also don't remember the 117. I don't remember if I was serious when I took the test or not.

[Anonymous No.9675539]

>>9671691
I don't visit /sci/ often but when I do there are 3 or 4 IQ threads up. Are these ironic? I really can not tell.

[Anonymous No.9675571]

plenty of tards out there living kickass lives.
my first wife, was tarded
she's a pilot now

>>9675539
ITT OP seeking validation, rest is shit posting, except for the occasional LARP (>>9672859)

[Anonymous No.9677944]

bumping based thread

[Anonymous No.9678066]

>>9672201
>You compared a selective high school in a high income area to a nonselective high school in a low income area. This is not a good way to go about fighting "racism".
It's actually a useful data point against the /pol/tards that infest /sci/ spamming wild theories about genetics.
They spam meme images claiming whites from low income areas actually outperform minorities from high income areas. But here we can see that this is always not the case.

[Anonymous No.9678079]

>>9671691
>What's it like having a 140+ IQ?
It's pretty boring, you just see everyone as apes and you feel quite lonely in the world, like no one really understands you. And you can't have true friends cause they'll all sooner or later grew to reject you, envious because of their own limitations.

[Anonymous No.9678092]

>>9671691
That's a pretty average SAT score unless you need to take calc 1 in your first semester . Stop being insecure because you're not a genius and you'll be fine. Acknowledge your mediocrity. Nobody on /sci/ is a genius either, the ones who sound like they know what they're talking about are more disciplined than anything 9/10 times

[Anonymous No.9678316]

>>9671691
God I wish I had an IQ of 1150