/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.9649930]

Is there a scientific reason why girls are so stupid?

[Anonymous No.9649934]

>>9649930
They aren't, but:
Men have 175 trillion neocortical synapses and women have about 110 trillion.

[Anonymous No.9649937]

a very very very very very long history of never being held accountable or responsible for anything, not even themselves

[Anonymous No.9649948]

>>9649930
if that's true it could be attributed to girls being the selective sex for the variational sex (males). this explains the okcupid data of males being attracted to girls on a bell curve but girls mainly being more strongly attracted to the more attractive males

[Anonymous No.9650108]

>>9649937
/thread

[Anonymous No.9650698]

>>9649937
/thread
t
h
r
e
a
d

[Anonymous No.9650765]

>>9649934
Do you have the DOI of a peer reviewed scientific paper containing such information? I'd like to take a look

[Anonymous No.9650771]

because women are hot so they don't have to think

[Anonymous No.9650785]

>>9649930
Girls have smaller brains on average.

However the Girls with the Big Brain Phenotype are much Smarter than most males.

[Anonymous No.9650798]

>>9650785
You do know that the form of the head doesn't equal the size of the brain right?

[Anonymous No.9650811]

Ime they're not stupid, they just have different insanity to men and tend to have broad awareness rather than narrow focus.

[Anonymous No.9650820]

>>9650798
The form of brain, not only the head.
Because there is a disease called hydrocephalus which the brain case is filled with water (cerebrum spinal fluid) and the brain is smaller & compressed.

Insted the Head must be filled with gray and white matter.

[Anonymous No.9650824]

>>9649934
How come I think more like a woman than when I was born a man?

>>9649930
Did someone recently go through a breakup?

[Anonymous No.9650840]

Slightly lower IQ on average but not a big deal.

[Anonymous No.9650855]

>>9650840
t. Woman

[Anonymous No.9650863]

>>9650824
>How come I think more like a woman than when I was born a man?
Are you gay?

[Anonymous No.9650892]

>think like a woman
I hate to go all sjw on you but gender roles don't exist. Genders (two) exist but stereotypes aren't important for the real world. They're just funny sometimes.

[Anonymous No.9650893]

>>9650840
I heard u are women
Post Bob's

[Anonymous No.9650900]

>>9650840

Very slightly lower IQ on average, however a significantly lower spread of IQ. There are much less female retards and female geniuses compared to males. Hence why at institutions of higher learning, where high intelligence individuals are highly overrepresented, women are will be highly underrepresented.

[Anonymous No.9650908]

>>9650892
>I hate to go all sjw on you but gender roles don't exist. Genders (two) exist but stereotypes aren't important for the real world. They're just funny sometimes.
The SJW stance is that gender roles exist but they are socially constructed. "Thinking like a woman" is a thing, because our culture and upbringing have shaped it (beyond the slight hard-wired biological differences).

[Anonymous No.9650920]

>>9649930
why develop your thinking if Chad can take care of you?

[Anonymous No.9650931]

>>9650892
>gender roles don't exist.
So do you have menstruation with cramps and bad mood in a monthly basis.
Are sex hormones and Chromosomes just social construct? Really?

[Anonymous No.9650935]

>>9650892 #
>gender roles don't exist.
So can men have menstruation with cramps and bad mood in a monthly basis.
Can women beat men in Olympic sports.?

Are sex hormones and Chromosomes just social construct? Really?

[Anonymous No.9650942]

>>9650935
Gender roles and biological sex aren't the same thing, but the 3rd wave feminists thing that BOTH sex and gender are constructs, whereas the 2nd wave radfems believe that only gender is a construct but sex is real (there is such a thing as "male" and "female" but not "masculinity" or "femininity").
The Radfem TERFs are smart and cool, the 3rd wave intersectionalists are a bunch of morons.

[Anonymous No.9650943]

>>9650935
Gender=/=sex you fucking idiot

[Anonymous No.9650949]

>>9650942
I still disagree (not who you replied to). Masculinity and femininity definitely exist as does sex but gender roles don't. Like so if a females is masculine or a male is feminine that's fine.

[Anonymous No.9650963]

>>9650942
>believe gender is a construct
>believe
How is this a point of belief? By definition the word gender is used with respect to cultural and social differences.

[Anonymous No.9650967]

>>9650949
>gender roles dont exist
So you dont think there is a societal pressure on men to not cry?

[Anonymous No.9650974]

>>9650949
If gender and sex aren't the same
Then to ender gender inequality in STEM is simple
Just half on men start identifying as females.
And problem solved

[Anonymous No.9650975]

>>9650908
>>9650935
Gender roles do exist and they are partially socially constructed. I mean for fucking real you never heard boys don't cry and all that shit about what is manly and what is not? That is the socially constructed part of gender roles. General women airheadness and perceived stupidity comes from that too. Most are sheltered, pampered and encouraged to turn their brain off, rise of sjw and modern feminism actually hurting them more than helping on average.

[Anonymous No.9650977]

If gender and sex aren't the same
Then to end* gender inequality in STEM is simple
Just half on men start identifying as females.
And problem solved

[Anonymous No.9650987]

>>9650949
That doesn't make sense at all to me. Masculinity and femininity are based of the very gender roles you're saying don't exist. The definitions of masculinity and femininity have been different for different cultures and time periods.
It used to be masculine to wear high heels as a man in Europe.
In Ancient China, is was masculine to be shorter than your wife, men were supposed to be smaller than women.
In ancient greece, it was masculine to fuck teenage boys during military training.
None of it's real, we'll all be better off jsut saying "those are the XY males and those are hte XX females" and everyone can just do what they want and we drop all this "feminine" "masculine" stuff.
>>9650963
I don't give a shit about cultural and social differences about gender in the same way I don't give a shit about cultural differences in the belief about unicorns. This is only ever used as an argument to justify the cultures of third world brown people shitholes who treat women like garbage because "durr durr it's just their culture!".
>>9650967
The roles and expectations exist, but what they represent is made up. There is nothing innately "male" about being stoic or not crying, it's an oppressive set of behaviors to force people to act a certain way because of how they're born.

[Anonymous No.9650991]

And to end gender inequality in Nursing profession which is dominated by females is simple.
Just by half of Nurses start to identify themselves as males and problem solved.

[Anonymous No.9650994]

>>9650975
>rise of sjw and modern feminism actually hurting them more than helping on average.
The whole point is to eliminate societal pressure to conform to socially constructed gender roles. The only way it's doing more harm is when people focus on the really dumb ones to make the whole cause look bad.

[Anonymous No.9650999]

>>9650987
there are things that are objectively masculine/feminine, independent of culture
Like having a big dick is a masculine thing

[Anonymous No.9651007]

>>9650994
Yeah but they going about in a very fucking wrong way antagonizing a lot of people in process. It could be done in a better way without going full retard in process. Hell early feminism waves did exactly that already.

[Anonymous No.9651008]

>>9650974
>>9650977
>>9650991
The whole point of what we're saying is that because gender isn't real but biological sex is, there is no such thing as "identifying as a man" or "identifying as a woman" because there's no such thing as being a man or woman other than having XY or XX sex chromosomes.
>>9650999
No, it's a male thing. In ancient Greece, having a small dick was the epitome of masculine beauty, just like in Ancient China, being small was masculine.
None of this shit is real, the only real objective measurement is "does it have XY chromosomes and produce sperm gametes? It's male. Does it have XX chromosomes and produce ovum gametes? It's female".

[Anonymous No.9651012]

>>9650994
>The whole point is to eliminate societal pressure to conform to socially constructed gender roles.
When presented with an egalitarian society, women will increasingly flock towards stereotypical "female careers", while the opposite holds true in less egalitarian societies. Case in point: Scandinavia/India.

[Anonymous No.9651018]

>>9651008
that just means culture can be retarded sometimes

[Anonymous No.9651019]

>>9651008
>because there's no such thing as being a man or woman other than having XY or XX sex chromosomes.
But that´s objectively wrong. Biological differences (which exist) translate to differences in cognition, which translates to genetic predisposition to certain behavioral patterns.

>In ancient Greece, having a small dick was the epitome of masculine beauty
It was considered unnecessary to depict large penises in works of art. You clearly have no idea what you´re talking about, and instead prefer to make up things that seem reasonable in your mind.

[Anonymous No.9651022]

>>9649930
they are just meant to be cumdumpsters, all they live for is sucking in as much DNA as possible

[Anonymous No.9651032]

>>9649930
Not all girls.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVoQM6tYm30

[Anonymous No.9651037]

>>9651018
That doesn't make sense.
>>9651019
>But that´s objectively wrong. Biological differences (which exist) translate to differences in cognition, which translates to genetic predisposition to certain behavioral patterns.
If this were true, there wouldn't be either cultures with vastly different standards nor individuals with vastly different behavior. The brain is more plastic than hard wired.
>It was considered unnecessary to depict large penises in works of art. You clearly have no idea what you´re talking about, and instead prefer to make up things that seem reasonable in your mind.
I'm not making any of this up. You're the one clinging to 'masculinity' and 'femininity' which are the ACTUAL made up shit. Your projection is pitiful.

[Anonymous No.9651046]

>>9651037
Yeah it does.
>sex==gender
>masculinity and femininity objectively exist
>gender roles don't exist (eg. a man isn't necessarily masculine)
All problems solved without resorting to insanity.

[Anonymous No.9651051]

>>9651032
She mistakes mass with weight in that video. But overall, she does a good work.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9BDkeFJlOCE

[Anonymous No.9651064]

>>9651008
>No, it's a male thing. In ancient Greece, having a small dick was the epitome of masculine beauty,
Ancient Greeks from Athens were degenerate faggots. The true Greek masculinity standard were the Spartans.

[Anonymous No.9651071]

>>9651008
>just like in Ancient China, being small was masculine.
Wrong. Chinese men are taller than Chinese Women. Chinese are just smaller than westerners.

[Anonymous No.9651085]

>>9649930

The female womb miscarries males easier, so therefore male fetuses must have slightly higher quality to be born. Hence like 1% higher potential from the outset. Then since most information is contained on the X chromosome, men have a higher spread in genetic variation, producing more geniuses. Thirdly, society rewards boys/men more akin to their performance than women, pushing men toward self-improvement. Finally, the brain reacts to androgens by increasing the size of the cortex (esp the visual cortex), forming more synapses, and by rewiring the mid-brain to be more responsive to strong stimuli. This responsiveness to strong stimuli is why men have tunnel-vision mode, can endure more discomfort, and are more ambitious.

[Anonymous No.9651103]

>>9651037
>If this were true, there wouldn't be either cultures with vastly different standards nor individuals with vastly different behavior.
There aren´t, either. Men in every country adhere to macho culture - it is simply observed in different ways in different countries.
>The brain is more plastic than hard wired.
You can teach a children lies, but that doesn´t change the brain structure of said child.
>I'm not making any of this up
Yes, you are.
>.You're the one clinging to 'masculinity' and 'femininity' which are the ACTUAL made up shit.
Science says otherwise.
>Your projection is pitiful.
>t. shit-for-brains liberal-arts dropout SJW

[Anonymous No.9651140]

>>9651032
I like her channel.

[Anonymous No.9651152]

>>9651103
>There aren´t, either. Men in every country adhere to macho culture - it is simply observed in different ways in different countries.
This is a blatant lie.
>You can teach a children lies, but that doesn´t change the brain structure of said child.
Your physical brain structure changes all the time with different stimuli.
>Yes, you are.
No I'm not, neuroplasticity has been proven at this point.
>Science says otherwise.
Science literally doesn't say shit about masculinity or femininity because they aren't objective things. They differ across times and cultures and they are products of language. It's not real.
>t. shit-for-brains liberal-arts dropout SJW
I study mathematics you fucking brainlet.

[Anonymous No.9651162]

>>9651152
but the implications of science
being big and strong and having a big dick and lots of children is definitely masculine

[Anonymous No.9651169]

>>9651152
So can pregnancy be masculine?

[Anonymous No.9651175]

>>9651169
Pregnancy is not masculine or feminine it is physical trait of being a female.

[Anonymous No.9651186]

>>9651175
wtf
>female exists
>femininity doesn't
femininity comes from female, it's a logical extension

[Anonymous No.9651196]

>>9651175
>pregnancy isn't feminine

Cognitive dissonance at its finest. Kek

[Anonymous No.9651213]

>>9651186
Both exist. Female is what you physically are and come with physical traits such as having vagoo, tits and being able to get pregnant. Feminity exists too but it is built by society at large, there is nothing inherently feminine about liking pink, sewing or wearing accessories, cosmetic and heels.

[Anonymous No.9651220]

>>9651213
I think the sensible thing to say it's that femeninity seemd to exist, as behavioral diphomorphism exists cross culturally, but there isnt really a predetermined set of personality traits, because societies have evolved massively different.

[Anonymous No.9651240]

>>9651213
No but there is something feminine about have big tits or soft skin etc

[Anonymous No.9651260]

>>9651240
And no beards

[Anonymous No.9651368]

>>9650987
>it's an oppressive set of behaviors to force people to act a certain way because of how they're born.
So you agree that gender exists as a cultural concept.

How can you be this retarded.

[Anonymous No.9651742]

>>9650900
Pretty idealistic anon. At my university 55% of students, including both undergrad and graduate, are women. Shows that mediocre intellect is all you need these days. Also note I'm at a top tier school. The days where only the most intelligent came to university are dead and gone. T.T

[Anonymous No.9651810]

>>9651742
> Shows that mediocre intellect is all you need these days.
Acquiring a master´s or bachelor´s degree never required a great intellect, anon.
>The days where only the most intelligent came to university are dead and gone. T.T
They still attend university and still grab the PhD spots that most students (read: brainlets) cannot compete for.

[Anonymous No.9651888]

>>9651810
From what I've heard most people basically get their doctoral thesis "ghost written" by their advisor...

[Anonymous No.9651907]

>>9651742
>At my university 55% of students, including both undergrad and graduate, are women
Yeah but have you seen some of the courses offered? You can get through even """reputable""" schools with a shit major while being a complete fuck up. College enrollment also means nothing, if that were the case black women would be the most successful people in America.

[Anonymous No.9653491]

>>9650785
Actually no, Paul Broca, the guy claiming that about women, Jews and black people, turned out to be wrong.

[Anonymous No.9653494]

>>9650840
The iq test is a bit biased in some subjects where the testee has gotten a bit of training by doing similar stuff. Men just happen to do more things that require similar thinking skills as the iq test.

Once you adjust for that the difference dissappears

[Anonymous No.9653551]

>>9649934
Isn’t that becuase men have more muscle to control?

[Anonymous No.9653554]

>>9651742
Women have been getting more bachelors than men sense 1981, this is easily googled.
Yet in high school women still got extra help and it was all "we need to get more women into college”. It is fucking retarded, socitiy has been throwing men under the bus for 45 years.

[Anonymous No.9653574]

>>9649930
Yes. Western Europe marriage patterns were such that a significant number of men never married (often the dumbest) yet monogamy was relatively strictly enforced, which in time led to greater variance in intelligence in men and lower in women (since men selected for beauty in women, not smarts).

This is noy so elsewhere. Eastern European women are smarter than Western European women, because in eastern Europe historically you had almost 100% marriage rates for men. Over time this resulted in equal variance in intelligence among both sexes.

[Anonymous No.9653576]

>>9650900
> a significantly lower spread of IQ.
Only in North-Western European women and populations descended from them (like US whites).

[Anonymous No.9653578]

>>9653574
Interesting.

[Anonymous No.9653579]

>>9650943
They're the same thing you brainwashed fool.

[Anonymous No.9653581]

>>9653578
if true

[Anonymous No.9653588]

>>9653581
The part about eastern European men and women having the same variance in intelligence is a fact (some studies, for example a recent one in Romania, found that women there have a _higher_ variance in cognitive ability than men). The why of it is my own theory (different marriage patterns between E and NW Europe, which is another well documented historical fact, but the link between this and the variance in IQ hasn't been studied yet).

[Anonymous No.9653594]

>>9653554
http://time.com/4064665/women-college-degree/

>For the first time since the Census Bureau began collecting data on higher education attainment, women aremore likely to have a bachelor’s degreethan men.

Last year, 29.9% of men had a bachelor’s degree, while 30.2% of women did, the bureau reports. A decade prior, in 2005, 28.5% of men had bachelor’s degree, while only 26% of women did

[Anonymous No.9653598]

>>9653588
are those the only two cultures you've studied for this and i assume the rigour of that iq document was sound. as well this would be a recent development or over a long period of human history? do you think the time frame is viable?

[Anonymous No.9653599]

>>9653554
>>9653554
http://time.com/4064665/women-college-degree/

>For the first time since the Census Bureau began collecting data on higher education attainment, women are more likely to have a bachelor’s degree than men.

>Last year, 29.9% of men had a bachelor’s degree, while 30.2% of women did, the bureau reports. A decade prior, in 2005, 28.5% of men had bachelor’s degree, while only 26% of women did

[Anonymous No.9653600]

It is not I think an accident, for example, that the only woman to receive a Fields medal is not from western Europe (or a WEurope descended population) but Iran, and that the other lead woman candidate to get a Fields this year is Ukrainian.

[Anonymous No.9653603]

>>9653574
this explains a lot

[Anonymous No.9653608]

>>9653594
Where did you get that trash?
It has been well known, and from different sources, women get more degrees from men sense 1981.
>for the first time...
>women aremore likely to have a bachelor’s degreethan men.
I guess that is including all the old fucks from the 1950s when most women did not get degrees dying off, but that is a slipply sentence becuase THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MY POINT THAT WOMEN GET EXTRA HELP IN SCHOOL BECUASE “WE NEED MORE WOMEN IN COLLEGE” DISPITE THE FACT THERE HAS BEEN MORE WOMEN IN COLLEGE FOR 35 years.

[Anonymous No.9653610]

>>9653598
Significant change can happen in 20 generations (500 years) yet these marriage patterns are over 1000 years old. (The cultural diversion between the NW marriage pattern and the E marriage pattern happened during the Dark Ages.)
There is not a lot of rich data on IQ outside Europe or European-descended populations. The fact that such differences happen in such closely related populations is interesting food for thought though. The fact that women clump at the average is sipping into popular culture by now, yet given the data we have it only seems to be true for certain populations, and is not a human universal.

I know people have began to investigate this in China and Japan as well, so it'll be interesting to see how it turns out there.

[Anonymous No.9653611]

>>9653610
begun*

[Anonymous No.9653614]

>>9653599
See here,
>>9653608
And stop deleting your posts. There might be more men around with degrees, if you count all the old fucks, but women are awarded more degrees every year than men, and that has been true sense 1981.
Of course almost none of those degrees are in math or anything hard.

[Anonymous No.9653619]

>>9653610
so then how do you interpret inherited intelligence? father to son with a lesser degree of father to daughter?

[Anonymous No.9653625]

>>9653614
>Of course almost none of those degrees are in math or anything hard.
Yet again, this seems to be the case only in North-Western Europe or populations descended from NW Europeans.

https://womenandmath.wordpress.com/past-activities/statistics-on-women-in-mathematics/

[Anonymous No.9653629]

They're smarter than men

[Anonymous No.9653630]

>>9653619
Stronger heritability on the mother's side.

[Anonymous No.9653636]

>>9653630
which makes sense in terms of x chromosomes and at least some intelligence coding on the y chromosome that would be strictly (but modified) gained from the father. do you think a variation in this heritability or perhaps a different distribution of "intelligence" genes on the sex chromosomes could could explain or account for these differences?

[Anonymous No.9653650]

>>9653625
These are interesting findings actually. Do you have more supporting data to support the main hypothesis? As an anecdote, at my university (top 10 in math) all of the female faculty, graduate students, and even undergraduates have been Oriental.
Even so, the top mathematicians from even Oriental countries are male by a large margin.

[Anonymous No.9653666]

>>9653636
as well since i'm pretty ignorant into eastern culture but could a cultural motivation (effort or perhaps women being encouraged to pursue academia more) influence your results? i know i've seen the jewish motivation into trying hard be an influence for the ashkenazi dominance. as well Emmy Noether is, in my opinion, the smartest woman in existence and she was german. alternatively, Sophie Germain was french and too did things with energy (put the 1/2 into kinetic energy to make it dimensionally consistent). i know these are anecdotes but i hope this information will help your theory

[Anonymous No.9653676]

>>9653636
To date I think none of the studies have found any cognitive ability related genes on the Y chromosome but we have found some on the X. I expect that this pattern will hold. There are only something like 60 genes on the Y chromosome.

However, according to the best and most recent study "peaks that were identified as being associated with education on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 18", so the mechanism might be more complicated.

Look up "A combined analysis of genetically correlated traits identifies 187 loci and a role for neurogenesis and myelination in intelligence" (posting the doi or a direct link keep triggering the spam filter for some reason, even if I break up the links)

>>9653650
>Do you have more supporting data to support the main hypothesis?
Not a lot I'm afraid. This is something I've looked at only in my spare time. There's not a lot of data available to begin with.

[Anonymous No.9653678]

>>9649948
that data also showed that while men were attracted to women on a bell curve, they only messaged the prettiest ones.

[Anonymous No.9653681]

>>9653666
>i know i've seen the jewish motivation into trying hard be an influence for the ashkenazi dominance.
Ashkenazim overrepresentation at the top in intellectual fields is most likely due to recent selection for intelligence. I don't think culture has as large a role as you'd imagine.

[Anonymous No.9653684]

>>9653666
Noether was Jewish.

[Anonymous No.9653689]

>>9653666
Jews selected themselves through a strict religion centered around reading and writing , causing the people with lower cognition to turn to Christianity.

[Anonymous No.9653905]

>>9651888
>From what I've heard most people basically get their doctoral thesis "ghost written" by their advisor...
They still have to defend their thesis in an academic setting. If they´ve done none of the work themselves, their attempt at gross fraud will be revealed at the point in time.

[Anonymous No.9653909]

>>9653650
>As an anecdote, at my university (top 10 in math) all of the female faculty, graduate students, and even undergraduates have been Oriental.
That has more to do with the fact that most Asian women live in a poorer and less egalitarian society; they are forced to fend for themselves, while western women piggyback on the welfare state and strong economy.

[Anonymous No.9654009]

>>9649930
Incubator gender meant to nurture young and die thats all. Men do everything to ensure the tribe survives women are just slaves.

[Anonymous No.9654406]

>>9649930
by girls do you mean you? ask your mama

[Anonymous No.9654431]

>>9653614
Women in college go up, birthrates go down. Society doesnt need women to be intelligent. Society needs women to breed.

[Anonymous No.9654552]

>>9653909
That would most certainly not imply the varience hypothesis for Oriental women as described earlier in the thread. Perhaps on average it would have an effect, but not at a top institution, for the people selected are at the top at their field.

[Anonymous No.9654767]

>>9653681
>>9653689
i'm aware of the banking/math selection the ashkenazis did i'm just saying it's naive to put it all on genetics

>>9653574
relating back to this. is there a possibility the more intelligent males would be more attractive in nw european males or is this still mostly due to having good genetics therefore good intelligence

[Anonymous No.9655190]

>>9650824
>How come I think more like a woman than when I was born a man?
hmmm...

[Anonymous No.9655201]

>>9649930

Yes. The scientific reason why girls are so stupid is that none of the attractive ones are willing to have sex with you.

[Anonymous No.9655222]

>>9655201
are you a woman or just supremely ignorant?

[Anonymous No.9655232]

A lot of it is because they aren't challenged growing up and their culture revolves around conformity rather than exceptionalism

They understand their main job is to look hot, and if they are hot they are going to coast, not push themselves

[Anonymous No.9655252]

>>9655222

I'm in agreement with the premise stated by the OP: it is the case that girls are stupid. I simply identified the scientific reason for their stupidity.

Nor would any victory be claimed if you were to observe that the above is some version of Arguing With Holes. After all, that would just prove again that girls are stupid, which I agree with. Rather, more simply and to reiterate, the reason why girls are stupid is because the attractive ones do not want to have sex with the OP.

The image choice which an OP elects to use often betrays a subliminal desire, which is at cross purposes with the language of the post. Often, the OP will write something directly or obliquely opposed to the visual suggestion of the image file, in an effort to negate the image choice that they end up using. Notice also that the OP indicated "girls", as opposed to women generally, and chose an image which can clearly be construed as a young female student. Who is stupid, as we've established.

[Anonymous No.9655267]

>>9655252
you are autistic
it's a well defined language thing that girls is used in the place women in quite a lot of places and lo and behold it's in french too. anybody who isn't so far up their ass with insecurity would see this thread and either think about that iq distribution with males being both higher and lower and/or the lack of women in some stem fields along with a lack of presence in prestige among a significant amount of fields

[Anonymous No.9655366]

>>9649937
>oh what's up priest marx

[Anonymous No.9655836]

>>9654552
>Perhaps on average it would have an effect, but not at a top institution, for the people selected are at the top at their field.
What makes you believe that the distribution of top female talent at a prestigious university would somehow include equal parts oriental and caucasian females? If the average attendance rates in their home countries differ, the distribution of top talent will also differ.

I don´t understand your argument.

[Anonymous No.9655850]

>>9650824
>How come I think more like a woman than when I was born a man?
Hmmm ...

[Anonymous No.9655888]

>>9649930
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNbMRmtEoS0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0XVuU-iF5U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YruxhWO8QSY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3dw76DR-9Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtliwj9ps_8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqp8t37VftA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKuTnvVqA1Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVzjIty28EA

[Anonymous No.9655954]

>>9655190
I have a feminist colleague and I want to show this to her, what do you think her response will be?

[Anonymous No.9656080]

>>9649930
Higher representation of IQs at the statistical mode, relative to men.

Relative psychological preference for openness proper over intellect (the arts over ideas).

Relative psychological impulse to enthusiasm over assertiveness.

Relative psychological notion toward agreeableness, in opposition to disagreeableness.

So they have less interested in ideas, are more likely to be of average intelligence (rather than notably dumb or apparently smart) and are prone to euthusiastic agreement rather than principled debate.

Pretty obvious senpai. Women are just fun people, not so autistic as us men.

[Anonymous No.9656094]

>>9651064
>The true Greek masculinity standard were the Spartans
That's a myth perpretated by the spartans themselves.

[Anonymous No.9656104]

>>9655954
>I have a feminist colleague and I want to show this to her, what do you think her response will be?
Depends upon the type of feminist.

[Anonymous No.9656112]

>>9654767
>is there a possibility the more intelligent males would be more attractive in nw european males
What...?

[Anonymous No.9656114]

>>9656080
>are more likely to be of average intelligence (rather than notably dumb or apparently smart)
Only verifiably true in NW Europe and populations descended from there.

[Anonymous No.9656168]

>>9653551

Yeah, like MY DICK!!!

[Anonymous No.9656185]

>>9656168
> more muscle control
> like my dick

> muscle
> dick

[Anonymous No.9656193]

>>9650987
>Gender's don't exist
>Except they do!!!!
t.retarded anon

Your "argument" is totally utilitarian based on subjective values created by the way(surprise) you were raised. You are a little unmanly bitch that should be sent to war to turn into a real man by the standards of yore , but in this feminist society, you were raised to believe that being a faggot is the right thing to do, based on the wrong a idea that just because the idea of masculinity and feminity is no inherently and permanently engraved in our genes, then it is good, moral, right and duty to suck as much dick and be a total and complete faggot like you are.

The funny thing is, for women to be equal to men, men have to be feminized. And gender is a social construct, but women still need laws and help from the state to be equal. If feminism was just about equality, women would be equal to men in almost every field from the moment they got the same negative rights as men.

[Anonymous No.9656197]

>>9649930
IQ 100 is a norm, not stupid.

[Anonymous No.9656201]

>>9649930
any scientific reason why op doesnt understand gender

[Anonymous No.9656205]

>>9649930
Aren't all flatearthers and creationists men?

[Anonymous No.9656241]

>>9649937
>women
>irresponsible
You are not comparing them with males.

[Anonymous No.9656279]

Is the average Asian female smarter than white males?

[Anonymous No.9656296]

>>9656205
Aren't all atheists men too?

[Anonymous No.9656300]

>>9656185
Spotted the brainlet

[Anonymous No.9656301]

>>9653494
>iq test is a bit biased in some subjects where the testee has gotten a bit of training by doing similar stuff
>Men just happen to do more things that require similar thinking skills as the iq test
>Once you adjust for that the difference dissappears

>an IQ test, although not entirely accurate, is a barebones method for predicting intellect and general success in science (to a point)
>men do more pattern analysis, computation, and general critical thinking on a day to day basis
>men overwhelmingly succed in fields where this type of mindset is required (STEM).
>a substantial (not all of course) portion of the women currently in STEM need their hand held by men or are tasked with some simple repetitive job that doesn't require much forethought.
>Its unfair that men are better at these things so lets change the test so that women are equal.
>If we completely ignore the results of the data, you can clearly see there are no differences between male and female thought patterns.

>.t progressive brainlet soyboy

[Anonymous No.9656304]

>>9649930
They're very intelligent in their own way, which is different from male intelligence.

[Anonymous No.9656308]

>>9653551
No

[Anonymous No.9656309]

>>9656304
EI doesn't count

[Anonymous No.9656316]

>>9656197
>IQ 100
>not stupid

[Anonymous No.9656320]

>>9649930
>>9649934
>>9649937
>>9649948
>>9651085
>>9653630
>>9655201
>>9655252
>>9655267

ITT: hkv teenagers

This anon is slightly on track. >>9653681

The reason is simple: you will fuck literally anything. She will not. Men who are strong enough to kill you or attractive enough to cuck you will fuck anything of yours that is out of your league.

Therefore, men have more sexual selection pressure on them. Women mainly have sexual selection pressure to be qt. And natural selection mainly for being able to bear children successfully.

>inb4 wat is seckshual selection
GIYF faggot

[Anonymous No.9656337]

>>9651032
that dick-softening cat lady voice.

[Anonymous No.9656340]

>>9656320
You're actually a fucking moron lol. The first post itt stating men have 65 trillion more neocortical synapses is exactly in line with what you're saying in this post yet you include it as a "wrong" answer.
Don't try to act smart when you aren't smart, faggot brainlet.

[Anonymous No.9656341]

>>9656320
>muh girls are sexually selective
>they only have sex with most dominant males
>my pure innocent waifu only got railed out by 20 dudes in college because she was confused

This is some next level beta delusion right here.

[Anonymous No.9656349]

>>9656341
That's literally not what it says. It says men and women sexually select for different things. If you disagree, you might be a homosexualist.

[Anonymous No.9656356]

>>9656340
Show me in that post where it says I said those people were wrong. I didn't. I said they were hkv teenagers trying to justify their wizardry.
Anyone who isn't a total loser can find pussy, it's just a question of realistic expectations and being mad that women select for different things than your Super Rational® calculations say they should is a large part of why you would probably be happier co-jacking with your autistic buddies instead of dealing with a woman.
I literally don't care that women are different and have a more compact IQ spread. It is not their function to be geniuses. It may be in the future as roles change, but there hasn't been enough time for that to change population dynamics.
Have a nice day, cuntdestr0yers

[Anonymous No.9656359]

>>9656349
It's absurd to think women are more sexually selective than men. Maybe that works in your Darwinist utopia where everything is reduced to biological urges but the reality is women are complete hedonists and will fuck you as long as you don't sperg out in front of them.

[Anonymous No.9656404]

>>9656304
i guess social intelligence and knowing how to deal with people doesn't count as being smart among these autists; i'd argue that being interpersonally smart is the at the top of the hierarchy of smartness

[Anonymous No.9656494]

>>9656320
>you will fuck literally anything
wut

[Anonymous No.9656499]

>>9656279
>>9656279

[Anonymous No.9656549]

>>9656337
She is Alt-Right, dude.

[Anonymous No.9656585]

ive met chicks smarter than most guys

if a guy were to inject estrogen it would change him a lot and vice versa

[Anonymous No.9656624]

their brains mature a lot faster then male's cause there isn't much up there to develop.

this. they're slaves to their biological imperative.
>>9651022

[Anonymous No.9656636]

>>9654009
women use their physical beauty to buy their way into a man's success. low intelligence men are slaves to society and a lot of them don't even get to reproduce

[Anonymous No.9656644]

>>9656359
spot on mate.

[Anonymous No.9657248]

>>9655836
You missed my point: it is that Oriental women attend at all. That a fair portion do so is an indicator of Oriental female variation, as if there is no such effect we would see all of these women crowding at the lower tiered universities for mathematics, like the Occidental ones do.

[Anonymous No.9657319]

>>9656359
None of what you're saying contradicts what I'm saying. But over the entire population the *different* things that men and women select for do matter.

[Anonymous No.9657845]

>>9650824
Your mum fed you soy milk as a child. Kill her.

[Anonymous No.9657855]

>>9656549
How is that a good thing?

[Anonymous No.9658196]

>>9657855
It is a good thing.

[Anonymous No.9658205]

>>9658196
Unless you are an anti-science leftist/SJW, of course.

[Anonymous No.9658207]

>>9656112
kek
are the intelligent nw european males more attractive according to your theory or is the attractive genius just genetics

[Anonymous No.9658215]

>>9656356
you utter mong
some of the posts you responded to were in support of an equal or at the very least smarter female. do you not know how to read or are you just retarded. 10/10 btw :^)

[Anonymous No.9659305]

>>9658196
Alt-right babies are autistic as fuck and she's probably just an attention whore.

[Anonymous No.9659341]

ITT: virgins

[Anonymous No.9659382]

>>9650785
That's because male brains have more gllia.

[Anonymous No.9659409]

>>9650798
Brain size also isn't linked to intelligence. The Sperm Whale's brain is the size of a tractor for comparison.

[Anonymous No.9659413]

>>9650824
>Arguing with holes

[Anonymous No.9659419]

>>9649930
Maybe, if you consider sociology a science.

[Anonymous No.9659420]

>>9659305
The irony is that she looks like Anne Frank.

[Anonymous No.9659518]

>>9656359
They are more selective. Women could fuck every single day if they wanted to, despite not being in a relationship. They do not because they are more selective, which makes sense since they always, even before they became humans, had to carey the burden of pregnancy.

>>9649930
There are less female idiots and less gifted females. Probably a consequence of the Bateman principle to a certain extent. Also, as an aspect of the openness to experience personality trait, males are more interested in ideas while females are, on average, more oriented towards aesthetics.

[Anonymous No.9659985]

>>9656624
Stop with the truth bombs anon, some people don't take this bombing lightly.