/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.9625338]

Many greetings, with deep respect to your excellencies, as is my duty in writing to your excellencies. Most worthy Mathematicians, you must know that there is a most important question, in regard to which I desire and beseech an answer from your excellencies.

My question is: Is it possible to have a field K that is contained in the real numbers, but is not Lebesgue measurable?

Take it not evil of me that I ask such questions, for I do it for my instruction. Farewell.

[Anonymous No.9625359]

I have forever damaged by psyche after reading that abortion. Jesus man.

[Anonymous No.9625471]

>>9625338
this is some high level autism. never speak like this. you sound like an idiot.

also:
1) take the definition of a measurable set
2) negate it
3) attempt to give algebraic properties to this set (try a group first, dont rush into constructing a field like an idiot.)

[Anonymous No.9625504]

>>9625338
>Is it possible to have a field K that is contained in the real numbers, but is not Lebesgue measurable?
Maybe. I'm not really sure. Sounds like mathy stuff.

[Anonymous No.9625511]

>>9625338
After reading this, i need a brain enema.

[Anonymous No.9625629]

>>9625359
>>9625471
>>9625511
>t. brainlets