Infinity

[Anonymous No.9486719]

How can we rationalize infinity?

[Anonymous No.9486743]

If there exists no maximal real number [math]\stackrel{max}{\mathbb{R}}[/math] equal to infinity, there exists no minimus real number [math]\stackrel{min}{\mathbb{R}}[/math]equal to zero.
If there exists no maximal real number that is identifiable to be 1 element less than infinity, there exists no minimus real number that is identifiable to be 1 element greater than zero.

If there is no singular discernable maximal real number that is 1 element less than infinity, there exists no singular discernable maximal real number that is solely less than infinity. Any real number is less than infinity.

If there is no singular discernable minimus real number that is 1 element greater than 0, there exists no singular discernable minimus real number that is solely greater than 0. Any real number is greater than 0.

No matter how big a number sums, it never equals infinity. No matter how small a fractional decimal can divide into, it never equals 0.

Because there exists no minimus real number equal to zero, nor any boundary for a least significant minimus real number which can be greater than 0, [math]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{9}{10^n} \neq 1 [/math]
At no point in the sum will there ever exist an insignificant decimal place, and any real amount of 9's in the repetition will never be an infinite amount of 9's. At every point in the sum, will require addition of a minimal number to sum 1, such that
[math]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \Bigg[ \frac{9}{10^n} + \big( \rlap{no}{\sum} \frac{1}{10^n} \big) \Bigg] = 1 [/math]

[Anonymous No.9486749]

If there exists no maximal real number [math]\stackrel{max}{\mathbb{R}} [/math] equal to infinity, there exists no minimus real number [math]\stackrel{min}{\mathbb{R}} [/math] equal to zero.
If there exists no maximal real number that is identifiable to be 1 element less than infinity, there exists no minimus real number that is identifiable to be 1 element greater than zero.

If there is no singular discernable maximal real number that is 1 element less than infinity, there exists no singular discernable maximal real number that is solely less than infinity. Any real number is less than infinity.

If there is no singular discernable minimus real number that is 1 element greater than 0, there exists no singular discernable minimus real number that is solely greater than 0. Any real number is greater than 0.

No matter how big a number sums, it never equals infinity. No matter how small a fractional decimal can divide into, it never equals 0.

Because there exists no minimus real number equal to zero, nor any boundary for a least significant minimus real number which can be greater than 0, [math]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{9}{10^n} \neq 1 [/math]
At no point in the sum will there ever exist an insignificant decimal place, and any real amount of 9's in the repetition will never be an infinite amount of 9's. At every point in the sum, will require addition of a minimal number to sum 1, such that
[math]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \Bigg[ \frac{9}{10^n} + \big( \rlap{no}{\sum} \frac{1}{10^n} \big) \Bigg] = 1 [/math]

[Anonymous No.9486773]

it was already done by my man cantor

[Anonymous No.9486783]

just do ((infinity + 1) - 1) * ((infinity + 1) + 1) / ((infinity + 1) + 1)

[Anonymous No.9486785]

Just take the square root of your mom's weight and you have infinity.

[Anonymous No.9486798]

infinity is real fuckin big dude like wtf go get laid this shit dont matter what are you gay

[Anonymous No.9486953]

>>9486719
Infinity is the Dedekind cut consisting of all rationals. Negative infinity, on the other hand, is the Dedekind cut consisting of the empty set. That's it.

[Anonymous No.9486978]

>>9486719
it like just goes on forever man

[Anonymous No.9486993]

infinity and beyond

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBp0bEczCNg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVZqPaH94qU

[Anonymous No.9487035]

>>9486993
>numpherphile
>gene doubled retards

[Anonymous No.9487083]

>>9486749
lol nerd tl:dr

[Anonymous No.9487104]

>>9487035
don't judge a book by its cover

they're interviewing a real mathematician instead of goofing off themselves

[Anonymous No.9487479]

infinity is how many natural numbers there are

[Anonymous No.9487498]

>>9487479
so infinity is only 10^200?

[Anonymous No.9487508]

>>9487498
10^200+1

[Anonymous No.9487517]

>>9487508
that's a dark number

[Anonymous No.9487574]

>>9486719
>applying or discussing infinity at all

[Geometric Unity No.9487579]

>>9486719
>How can we rationalize infinity?
with a framework of transfinite analysis, duh

check out my new book which contains one such framework
>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
>http://vixra.org/abs/1712.0598

[Anonymous No.9487682]

>>9487104
Oh i understand shes a real mathematician. Real mathematicians never understand what they're talking about.

This is her video
>[math]\mathbb{N} = \big[ 0,1,2,3,..., n \big] [/math] is all numbers
>[math]\mathbb{N*} = \big[ k, k+1, k+2... \big] [/math] is all other numbers greater than n

Mathematicians are stammering bumblefucking retards and women are especially less intelligent than men.

[Anonymous No.9488126]

>>9486719
it go but it don't stop

[Anonymous No.9489069]

>>9486749