There is a reason why top scientists make lousy philosophers

[Anonymous No.9428212]

Ed Witten is brilliant, but his answer hear is simplistic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUW7n_h7MvQ

[Anonymous No.9428250]

>>9428212
>There is a reason why top scientists make lousy philosophers
Yeah they don't assume things or pull stuff out of their asses because they don't have a chip on their shoulder or a need to constantly try to convince everyone that they're intelligent.

[Anonymous No.9428253]

>>9428212
>There is a reason why top scientists make lousy philosophers
Yeah they don't assume things or pull stuff out of their asses because they don't have a chip on their shoulder or a need to constantly try to convince everyone that they're intelligent.

[Anonymous No.9428257]

Tons of philosophers think that way.

[Anonymous No.9428265]

He probably reads Chalmers.

[Anonymous No.9429889]

He sounds liek a total fag. All the memes made me think his voice'd be liek 10hz but he sounds like a literal autist.

[Anonymous No.9429907]

>>9428212
This fight between theoretical physicists and philosophers is kike slide propaganda.
They all have to act against it because true philosophy teaches you how to think on a concrete low level. And not abstract bullshit with no core. And some people don't like that. Sounds like a conspiracy theory I know but it's true. (((People))) don't want us thinking rationally, but like us thinking arbitrary concepts and not believe in truth, only opinions

[Anonymous No.9429909]

consciousness = proof of God

[Anonymous No.9429955]

>>9428212
So what? Just cause he's a top physicist also should mean he should have a very complex philosophical view and answer to an interview targeted for pop-science interview?
>hear
Many top philosophers have the same view, simplicity and complexity is completely irrelevant, it doesn't mean he's lousy because he speaks of one or the other.

[Anonymous No.9430007]

>>9428212
His voice is significantly higher than I was expecting