/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.9415057]

Why do people get so heated about global warming?

Is the science not conclusive enough?

If the science is conclusive then surely the opinions of retard amerimutts shouldn't have that much of an effect on geopolitics.

[Anonymous No.9415060]

>>9415057
>why do people get so heated about global warming
desu made me chuckle, good on ya lad

[Anonymous No.9415062]

>>9415057
>Is the science not conclusive enough?
No

[Anonymous No.9415075]

[Anonymous No.9415077]

>>9415057
It's the tobacco discussion all over again
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=manufacturing+doubt

[Anonymous No.9415083]

>>9415057
Americans prefer corporate schlong and concenience over long-term benefit. That's all our politics boils down to.

[Anonymous No.9415084]

>>9415062
https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php

[Anonymous No.9415090]

>>9415083
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cl9Y8ZhJP2s

[Anonymous No.9415096]

>>9415057
>effect on geopolitics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbrKLnh8wLA

[Anonymous No.9415100]

>>9415090
And Amerifats actually thought that the best way to shake up and end this vicious cycle was to elect a corporate icon.
People here are so fucking dumb

[Anonymous No.9415103]

https://www.edx.org/course/making-sense-climate-science-denial-uqx-denial101x-5

[Anonymous No.9415110]

>>9415100
Lots of single-issue voters.
Some people love their guns, others love their church.
The only thing they're looking for, is a politician who'll do those all, while cutting tax.
They don't give a damn about the big picture.

GOP is a group of con men, specialized in taking advantage of this short-sightedness, in order to serve the 1%.

https://youtu.be/Lv7iflHYx_E?t=38m

It is always easier to divide than to unite.

[Anonymous No.9415111]

>>9415057
>global warming
No such thing.

[Anonymous No.9415112]

>>9415100
>And Amerifats actually thought that the best way to shake up and end this vicious cycle was to elect a corporate icon.
The Democratic Party should have offered literally any other candidate.

[Anonymous No.9415119]

>>9415100
I voted for Obama twice but there was no way I was voting for someone as corrupt as Hillary.

[Anonymous No.9415123]

>>9415111

[Anonymous No.9415130]

>>9415112
I'm not saying HRC isnt a corporate shill but at least her supporters pretty much knew she was "more of the same." Trumptards actually believed their drain the swamp crap and that he was going to fight for them lmao

[Anonymous No.9415133]

>>9415123
ruh-roh raggy

[Anonymous No.9415143]

>>9415119
She's a Wall St. puppet, like most the liberals in the Dems - not because of ideological reasons, but because they think that in a post-CUvsFEC world, that's the only way forward.

The only time to vote for her is when the alternative is Dumb Corleone.

Voting isn't a bachelorette show where you are giving someone a rose as a sign of love.
Grow up.

Voting is trying to nudge the mighty ship of State in a direction you want it to go.

[Anonymous No.9415144]

>>9415130
>I'm not saying HRC isnt a corporate shill but at least her supporters pretty much knew she was "more of the same."
And America was desperately in need of anything other than "more of the same", big surprise who ended up winning

[Anonymous No.9415145]

its a new age religion

[Anonymous No.9415146]

>>9415144
really, the solution to lobbying was to vote in a lobbyist?

jfc americans are retarded

[Anonymous No.9415149]

>>9415057
>Why do people get so heated about global warming?
I've had far more rational arguments with skeptics than alarmists, I honestly don't think I could go through another conversation with another one of Al Gore's cult members

[Anonymous No.9415152]

>>9415144
It's not about that at all
voting is a racial head count, whites in the rust belt are slowly waking up to racial realities as their states approach 60% white status, so they are voting more & more republican

affluent whites generally trend Democrat because they enjoy having cheap house keepers/lawn work/pool cleaners/etc

[Anonymous No.9415154]

>>9415143
>a direction you want it to go.
In the case of 2016, away from the edge of the cliff

[Anonymous No.9415165]

>>9415133

[Anonymous No.9415183]

>>9415112
true

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/796213887133777920

[Anonymous No.9415189]

>>9415152
>voting is a racial head count, whites in the rust belt are slowly waking up to racial realities as their states approach 60% white status, so they are voting more & more republican
t. antifa

[Anonymous No.9415204]

>>9415112
name a real candidate who was in the primaries ?

[Anonymous No.9415205]

>>9415204
>name a real candidate who was in the primaries ?
Bernie would have beaten Trump.

[Anonymous No.9415207]

>>9415205
Bernie signed an agreement to never attack Hillary before he was allowed to run
Plus the votes were rigged to make him lose

He was not a real candidate

[Anonymous No.9415209]

>>9415207
>Bernie signed an agreement to never attack Hillary before he was allowed to run
[citation needed]

[Anonymous No.9415214]

Is it true that bitcoin accelerates climate change?

What's the mechanism behind it?

[Anonymous No.9415217]

>>9415209
it was in the emails

[Anonymous No.9415223]

>>9415214
Uses a surprising amount of electricity.
So acceleration of CC depends on how the electricity is produced.

[Anonymous No.9415228]

>>9415223
http://nordic.businessinsider.com/bitcoin-mining-electricity-usage-2017-11

[Anonymous No.9415286]

>>9415057
>heated about global warming

[Anonymous No.9415327]

>>9415057
HAHAHA YOU SAID 'HEATED' AND 'GLOBAL WARMING'. You are a punny guy, anon.

[Anonymous No.9415349]

>>9415057
because the leftists are to dumb to real science, so they invented their pseudo climate science to compensate for their scientific microbenis

[Anonymous No.9415360]

>>9415349
>this opinion brought to you
>by the idiots that think gay causes hurricanes

[Anonymous No.9415361]

>>9415360
i don't care for opinions.
it is fact.
climate 'science' is a political movement sponsored by big financial interests

[Anonymous No.9415380]

>>9415111
denialist deniers gonna deny

[Anonymous No.9415450]

>>9415361

[Anonymous No.9415621]

>>9415360
>>this opinion brought to you
>>by the idiots that think gay causes hurricanes
Who are you quoting?

[Anonymous No.9415638]

The "think tanks" that fuel AGW deniers aren't trying to challenge the science; that's expensive and time-consuming and they will likely end up confirming it if they actually try and produce work that's convincing to the research community.

They're trying to muddy the waters with conspiracy thinking simply designed to act as fodder for media to plant doubt in mind of laypeople. It's the same thing cigarette companies did for decades.

[Anonymous No.9415648]

The "think tanks" that fuel AGW deniers aren't trying to challenge the science; that's expensive and time-consuming and they will likely end up confirming it if they actually try and produce work that's convincing to the research community.

They're trying to muddy the waters with conspiracy thinking simply designed to act as fodder for media to plant doubt in mind of laypeople. It's the same thing cigarette companies did for decades.

Same thing with some liberitarian think tanks like tax policy center. They're not interested in the commanding heights of academia, they wanna circumvent changing expertise to put out econ101isms easily digestible to the general electorate.

[Anonymous No.9415677]

>>9415450
How about:
>Create hoax of human induced climate change
>Make people believe it like a dogma
>create co2 tax
>impede developping countries like china/india with taxes, because they cant afford "clean" technology
>secure your economical relevance in the future
>profit

[Anonymous No.9415683]

>>9415450
Hey that actually is a great argument now I'm all for exterminating the parasite that is humanity and leaving only the 0.1% responsible caretakers of Gaia to do whatever Gaia-approved things they have to do!