short iq test

[Anonymous No.9393178]

https://memorado.com/iqtest

Post your scores faggots.
126 here.

[Anonymous No.9393192]

>>9393178

[Anonymous No.9393199]

>>9393178
>https://memorado.com/iqtest
bullshittest

[Anonymous No.9393200]

>>9393199
you're just mad you got a low score, brainlet

[Anonymous No.9393202]

>>9393200
im mad i didnt get a lower score i know im much more stupid than this psudo inflated 126
my iq is average as fuawk

[Anonymous No.9393204]

>>9393178

[Anonymous No.9393205]

>>9393202
Did you make sure to apply the brainlet filter, i.e. finish the test before 60 seconds had passed?

[Anonymous No.9393212]

>>9393205
yeah, granted i didnt think much of the answers. maybe just luck that it scored such that. whatever i resign to the brainlet crew for i know i am

[Anonymous No.9393218]

>>9393178
>https://memorado.com/iqtest
what's this one?

[Anonymous No.9393224]

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSPvRT4IXImuYZmKQkhNP2UDLb3AF9Vd816pV0BvWFuPaxYiaDAUhXTLEX5T6jea-ObPdRCBK96D3zE/pub

[Anonymous No.9393228]

Gotta love the inflation

[Anonymous No.9393232]

its fucking useless i went back and clicked on the questions randomly and it said i had an IQ of 114 don't trust the results

[Anonymous No.9393236]

>>9393218
The one that doesn't have 6 edges.

[Anonymous No.9393244]

>>9393218
>https://memorado.com/iqtest
first one has 5 sides
all others have 6

[Anonymous No.9393247]

Does this thing even care about time? I took my time and got 130, went back through and clicked the same answers as fast as I could, and still got 130

[Anonymous No.9393251]

>>9393218
4th one
count the sides on each shape

[Anonymous No.9393261]

>>9393178
Easy.

[Anonymous No.9393275]

134

and I skipped through a couple of questions without fully figuring it out because I'm lazy. They all seemed fairly simple and I could have got them all If I could have been bothered. (assuming I got some wrong)


Oh and I've done two real IQ tests in my life and I scored 114 and 117 on each of those.

[Anonymous No.9393279]

>>9393178
134

[Anonymous No.9393286]

>>9393178
doesn't seem very accurate

[Anonymous No.9393291]

130

[Anonymous No.9393296]

Ok so I just tried to get them all wrong on purpose and scored 98.

I like the questions on this test as they go beyond pure pattern/number problems like some online tests but how they calculate the results is awful. Its just a dumb facebook test

[Anonymous No.9393298]

>>9393178

[Anonymous No.9393314]

>>9393204
>>9393228
>>9393275
>>9393279
>>9393286
>>9393298


Top appears to be 134 and the questions are all easy as fuck. If you score less than 134 you should leave /sci/ forever.

[Anonymous No.9393322]

>>9393296
Maybe you got like half of them right.

[Anonymous No.9393329]

>>9393322

Nah, I wasn't randomly clicking, I figured out the answer and then chose the incorrect one.

[Anonymous No.9393344]

>>9393329
Maybe you're just that dumb.

[Anonymous No.9393346]

>>9393344
But my mom said i'm very smart and that everyone else is stupid.

[Anonymous No.9393355]

>>9393314
>tfw got 132
Should I just end it?

[Anonymous No.9393361]

>>9393314
I got 132 and it took me like 10 minutes. I took another test years ago and got 101. Should I calculate the medium and pretend I'm not that brainlet anymore?

[Anonymous No.9393388]

>>9393361
>10 minutes
No.

[Anonymous No.9393396]

>>9393178
Finally my massive genius was recognized. I knew those MENSA tests were bullshit.

[Anonymous No.9393407]

>>9393388
It doesn't have time limit.

[Anonymous No.9393415]

Took me 5 minutes meh

[Anonymous No.9393566]

What is this one?

[Anonymous No.9393578]

plate

[Anonymous No.9393580]

>>9393566
plate.

[Anonymous No.9393581]

>>9393566
>closed the targeted ad before taking screenshot so we can't see the dragon dildo ad delivered based on your browsing preferences
nice try faggot but you just outed yourself

[Anonymous No.9393585]

>>9393578
>>9393580
Why? Whats the logic there?

[Anonymous No.9393604]

>>9393178

Kneel to your god, mortals.

[Anonymous No.9393605]

>>9393604
t. 112 iq javascript hacker

[Anonymous No.9393648]

>>9393604
Damn...

[Anonymous No.9393955]

>>9393578
>>9393580
>im retarded

[Anonymous No.9393977]

>>9393585
the plate holds the cake in place so that you can transport it without it falling everywhere just like the cup holds the coffee in place

i suppose napkin is a sort of reasonable answer too since it stops the crumbs getting everywhere when you try to eat the cake and the cup is more for transporting it to your mouth than to a table. in fact coffee cups are on plates for that exact reason so i think its actually napkin in retrospect lol

[Anonymous No.9393980]

>>9393977
apparently not since i went from 132 to 130 when i switched plate for napkin

arguable

[Anonymous No.9394009]

>>9393314
This.

[Anonymous No.9394016]

>>9393178
I guess around 83.

[Anonymous No.9394018]

>>9393261
Must be all that Mork and Terty

[Anonymous No.9394052]

pretty sure it's bullshit, at best i'm 115 or something

[Anonymous No.9394066]

>>9393178
not an IQ test
move on

[Anonymous No.9394069]

>>9394066
you're just mad you got a low score, brainlet

[Anonymous No.9394087]

>>9394069
didn't even answer a single question

[Anonymous No.9394161]

>>9393346
Your mom is a turbo stacey who fucked the players of the football team while pissed drunk.

[Anonymous No.9394169]

>>9393977
>>9393585
>>9393580
>>9393578
>>9393566
holy FUCKING shit is this actually being discussed? No wonder people are scoring below 132

[Anonymous No.9394178]

>>9394169
napkin is a better answer than plate, regardless of what the shitty test claims.

problem is that fucking uncouth american fat fucks probably dont even use a napkin when eating cake

[Anonymous No.9394198]

>>9393199
I got 126 too.

[Anonymous No.9394201]

>>9393261
embrace our overlord!

[Anonymous No.9394211]

>>9393178
>IQ test
>not administered by a registered psychologist.

[Anonymous No.9394212]

>>9394178
>coffe to cup
>napkin is a better answer than plate
>napkin when eating cake
holy shit you can't be serious right now
do you hold your cake with a napkin while eating it or what?

[Anonymous No.9394217]

>>9393314
indeed....

[Anonymous No.9394218]

>>9393178

Is this max?

[Anonymous No.9394222]

>>9394009
>no white background on 134
you could have made your fake less obvious at least

[Anonymous No.9394226]

>>9394212
I do, but I answered plate because usually you don't do that I guess

[Anonymous No.9394230]

>>9394218
apparently i also got it

[Anonymous No.9394235]

128, but I'm pretty dumb so inaccurate test

[Anonymous No.9394241]

>>9394230

Yeah, it's clearly max based on the thread.

[Anonymous No.9394244]

>>9393178
This is a queer test (just like you) and you should feel bad for posting it, OP.

[Anonymous No.9394259]

>>9394212
>do you hold your cake with a napkin while eating it or what?
yes because i have manners

as i said before the IQ test is clearly geared towards fat smelly yankee doodle dandies who find the idea of using a napkin hilarious

[Anonymous No.9394274]

>>9393178

[Anonymous No.9394286]

Ayyyy

[Anonymous No.9394318]

huh

[Anonymous No.9394359]

[Anonymous No.9394362]

86, i hate myself.

[Anonymous No.9394394]

>>9394362
That's impossible. I test made, it clicking at random, and got 114.

[Anonymous No.9394404]

>>9393178
>>9393204
>>9393314
>>9394009
>>9394217
>>9393228
>>9393286
>>9393298
>>9394218
>>9394244
Top 1% reporting in here. Fuck this shitty quiz.

[Anonymous No.9394415]

Seems like a usual online IQ test that let's you feel smarter than the most (scored 134 myself)

[Anonymous No.9394452]

>>9393178
>Online IQ test
smokes some weed a while back, so my brain is still pretty slow.
Well, i think this is good enough.

[Anonymous No.9394454]

>>9393314
If you think all questions in this test have only a single absolutely true answer, you should stop posting until you learned some scientific thinking.

[Anonymous No.9394457]

>>9393218
First one, only has 5 sides, the others have 6

[Anonymous No.9394459]

>>9393178
forcefully answer every question wrong
>98 iq

[Anonymous No.9394461]

>>9394452
>not using an ad-blocker

[Anonymous No.9394471]

>>9394178
as someone from central europe the napkin always seemed like shitty way to eat cake, way shittier than fucking plate.

[Anonymous No.9394476]

>>9393199
i got that too

[Anonymous No.9394487]

>>9394461
>Weed smoking chemlet brainlet.
what do you expect of me?

[Anonymous No.9394500]

it was alright

[Anonymous No.9394509]

>>9394471
>not dipping your napkin into your coffee and sucking it out
fucking ameritards

[Anonymous No.9394512]

>>9394454

Yeah but being a genius I have the ability to think beyond that and give the answer the test deems as correct. I'm trying to get the highest test score. Going off on some autistic tangent and trying to find a multitude of other "correct answers" to the question will give you a lower test score.

Autism is a disability.

[Anonymous No.9394520]

>>9394471

If you're at a birthday party with 100 small children and they're all playing outside Napkins are far superior. Just imagine having to tidy all the fragments of 100 smashed plates all over your garden.

[Anonymous No.9394521]

i got 135 in iqtest.dk and 133 in test.mensa.no but they were raven only, my main language is not english and i am retard about dates.

i started to believe my iq is 130 :\

[Anonymous No.9394529]

Most of IQ tests on the internet give participants high scores just show they can share it and give free publicity for the hosting site and therefore more Ad revenue

[Anonymous No.9394530]

>>9393178
At least they try and make me think I’m smart even though I’m reality I’m probably sub 100

[Anonymous No.9394535]

>>9394529
*just so

[Anonymous No.9394537]

>>9394521
now 132, just didn't know the word twig :\

[Anonymous No.9394545]

>>9393178
The person I’m typing this for got a score of -12, but to be fair I may have picked the wrong answer.

[Anonymous No.9394632]

>>9394512
Especially the glove question wasn't thought through well, though.
You don't even need to turn your glove inside out in the first place.

PS: You gotta work on that pretentiousness of yours.

[Anonymous No.9395202]

>>9393314
Nope.

[Anonymous No.9395307]

>>9393314
Should I kill myself too?

[Anonymous No.9395329]

>>9395202

nice job overlaying the 6 over the edge of the three.

>>9394632
Did you even read what I said? yeah some of the questions were dumb, but its about trying to get the highest score, not finding alternative answers that are also correct.

[Anonymous No.9395346]

>>9395307
>Should I kill myself too?

nah..

[Anonymous No.9395348]

WTF, this IQ test was easy a s fuck

[Anonymous No.9395360]

>>9395307
yeah... kys

[Anonymous No.9395362]

Are you a Male or a Female!

[Anonymous No.9395379]

134
I had a legit WISC test done that showed 135, so this doesn't seem too unreliable.

[Anonymous No.9395403]

>>9395379
Dude the questions where easy as fuck, you can't call this reliable.

[Anonymous No.9395417]

>>9394211
>Believing a test can be valid when the individual administering it isn't "registered".
Incredible what people believe.

But in all seriousness, just taking a well-normed Ravens on a website is probably decent at measuring IQ, but this test looks ridiculous and I doubt it's been designed or normed properly.

[Anonymous No.9395426]

>>9395362
I got 50/50

[Anonymous No.9395438]

>>9393566
>>9393977
Fork ought to be correct though, since both the fork and the cup of coffee is what is used to bring the edible into your mouth, the proper eating instrument.

[Anonymous No.9395446]

>>9394362
>>9394394
when you're so brainlet that even clicking random is a better option than using your brain kek

[Anonymous No.9395456]

explain how this question doesnt clearly have 2 answers ? as a 1% it bothered the fuck out of me when i got a 132 and not the highest score aka 134. this was found out to be the offending question.

my logic was that the edges of the line should meet with its environment at the same kind of angles (either 90° or not 90° please point out any other possible trend from this example set)

honestly its not my fault that one question set has two supposed answers

any other 1% who can confirm if he sees the same pattern as me or did i lose a few IQ points along the years ?

[Anonymous No.9395464]

>>9394521
My main language isn't english too but in this I got 134 ( highest score possible as it seems )
In iqtest.dk I got 152 when I was 16, now I'll be 20 years old in 12 days
What's the problem if you're 130? My only friends in high school was a 129 guy, other classmates were dumb as fuck, he wasn't smart as me, but at least he wasn't a fucking monkey

Funny fact: every debate we had, we started with different opinions but at some point of the discussion he admitted I was, as usual, right

[Anonymous No.9395467]

>>9395456
more explanation. i get their logic but honestly IQ test questions are supposed to be obvious after you know the answer

[Anonymous No.9395474]

>>9395467
>>9395456
Logic 1: one in five object is divided symmetrically
Logic 2: one hasn't the same kind of angle

Which one is easier?
In an IQ test just pick up the easier

[Anonymous No.9395482]

>>9395456
>>9395467

Honestly I don't know what the fuck you're talking about and your scribbles are illegible.

[Anonymous No.9395483]

>>9395467
the shape like a razor blade is the odd one out, as the line cuts it evenly. All of the others are off centre.

[Anonymous No.9395488]

>>9393178
this test is trash, you should feel bad for posting it

[Anonymous No.9395506]

>>9395482
for this question (just like for all questions) we need to identify patterns to solve the given question.

one pattern that comes out to me is that the angle which the divider line makes with the background of the shape can be classified into 2 categories (the defining feature of a category being more than one example being present of a category) :-
1) in this category the divider line's contact with the background is 90°
2) in this category the divider line's contact with the background is anything other than 90°

as from the two circled shapes the left one cannot be classified into any category using this logic it is the odd one out

>>9395474

wouldnt the second logic be more 'correct' as it strengthens the basic argument of categorization ; on which this question os supposed to be solved because it gives more examples of categorization and henceforth a more concrete argument (the basic argument of this problem is that categorizing objects will lead to two results ; similar or dissimilar so isnt it illogical to give a solution with only 2 categories which could very well be simplified into right or wrong ? as an IQ test it should consider the observation of highest complexity as the right observation. with the second logic there exists 3 categories and my answer is the odd one out because it represents only one example of a certain category instead of the standard two examples)

[Anonymous No.9395515]

>>9393178
i guess watching all of rick and morty really paid off

[Anonymous No.9395516]

if you put every answer wrong, you get 100

[Anonymous No.9395519]

>>9395516

nah 98.

[Anonymous No.9395527]

>>9395506
Seriously, do you think in a crappy test like this, which I made it just for fun ( plus at half of the question, which should be in order of ascending difficulty ) you have to choose the most complex answer? kek

[Anonymous No.9395530]

Eat shit, you fucking nerds.

[Anonymous No.9395557]

>>9393178
>https://memorado.com/iqtest
mkay

[Anonymous No.9395559]

>>9393578
cake on plate or fork or napkin lmao

[Anonymous No.9395564]

>>9394212
only at cheap parties

[Anonymous No.9395567]

>>9395456
one goes down the middle. all the others are offset

[Anonymous No.9395584]

>Complete the series:
This is a sequence not a series.

Also ad related to the usual people that believe these tests.

[Anonymous No.9395656]

>>9393314
Will my dad no longer beat me?

[Anonymous No.9395746]

>kek

[Anonymous No.9395759]

130

i dont feel special at all

i guessed on one because i just didnt care

[Anonymous No.9396366]

>>9395759
Your actually stupid if you don't get 134, all the questions where super easy yet you still made 2 mistakes. Get off this board now, you don't belong here.

[Anonymous No.9396372]

>>9396366
why so mad kek

[Anonymous No.9396376]

>>9396372
GET OFF MY BOARD NORMIE! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.9396380]

>>9396376
>152 iq
>normie

kek

[Anonymous No.9396396]

>>9396380
By that logic /b/ and /pol/ are normie hives

[Anonymous No.9396438]

>>9396396
I had never frequented other boards but /gif/ and /sci/
what's wrong with them?

[Anonymous No.9396441]

>clicked some buttons randomly within 10 seconds
>108

[Anonymous No.9396517]

>>9393178
132 with this bullshit test. Fucking brainlet.

[Anonymous No.9396554]

Just take the IQ this test awards you with and reduce it by around 10 points, since I scored 120 at MENSA.

[Anonymous No.9396564]

The real IQ test is who wastes time on this thing.
t. someone who did the test

[Anonymous No.9396587]

>>9393178
literally guessed or picked the obvious wrong answer.
If you believe in the IQ meme still kys

[Anonymous No.9396721]

>>9393178
I got 120 but i was too slow on verbal questions because im not too good in english. So, it means i have higher iq than this?

[Anonymous No.9396750]

what a stupid fucking test

I got a 134. I don't understand how you could mess this up

[Anonymous No.9396792]

134

I'm drunk and its 3:30am and I know for a fact I'm a brainlet

This test was bullshit

[Anonymous No.9396798]

I got 130, should I kill myself?

[Anonymous No.9396800]

>>9396798

Only if you kill me aswell

[Anonymous No.9396836]

132, I put Leaves:Tree instead of Leaves:Twig and realized my mistake right after submitting the answer.

[Anonymous No.9396874]

>>9393178

134

[Anonymous No.9396952]

> No accomplishment

[Anonymous No.9397087]

i am the smartest

[Anonymous No.9397154]

>>9393178
>https://memorado.com/iqtest
122 Not bad if I do say so

[Anonymous No.9397191]

>132
this is dumb I'm 100 at most.

t. spic

[Anonymous No.9397414]

[Anonymous No.9397463]

>>9394066
smelling seeing smiling hearing
words starting with s -> hearing
words containing the letter e -> smiling
things associated with the face/front of the head -> hearing
senses -> smiling
words containing a fluid consonant (R or L) -> seeing
words with at least 7 letter -> seeing

the list can be extended arbitrarily.

[Anonymous No.9397544]

Lads, get on my level xx

[Anonymous No.9397747]

>>9393178
134
Anybody care to create a graph of iq of all anons who took the test?

[Anonymous No.9397788]

>>9393604
His power level...

[Anonymous No.9397797]

[Anonymous No.9397807]

>>9397747
fucking no

[Anonymous No.9397921]

>>9397747
fyi the test and this thread is a joke

[Anonymous No.9397934]

>>9393218
>https://memorado.com/iqtest
ah damn i got this one wrong, i was deceived by APPEARANCES

[Anonymous No.9397937]

>>9395438
oh this is actually a good point

[Anonymous No.9398003]

>>9394454
brainlet cope.
It's obviously a test with one correct answer per question, if you couldn't figure out what they wanted to hear, you're simply a brainlet

[Anonymous No.9398010]

>>9394178
>uncouth americans
So weird to hear that from someone who apparently only eats cake at cheap work parties...

[Anonymous No.9398015]

>>9393178
>TFW in real life i'm just a brainlet thirldworlder who took seven years to finish college.
Feels bad man

[Anonymous No.9398363]

Kek

[Anonymous No.9398366]

shortest iq test:
if you actually solved it your iq = 0

[Anonymous No.9399056]

i got every question wrong on purpose and still got 102

[Anonymous No.9399064]

am i a fucking genius?

[Anonymous No.9399070]

>>9393178
>approaching gifted
kek I guessed every answer

[Anonymous No.9399073]

>>9399064
>You are with the majority of the population
lmao sub 100 detected
>/pol/ tab
like poetry

[Anonymous No.9400409]

[Anonymous No.9400442]

https://www.queendom.com/tests/testscontrol.htm?s=72

This is a more accurate-ish test I've taken a couple times with my scores being near my actual one I got on the WAIS a few years ago.

[Anonymous No.9400447]

>>9400442

It's the Classical IQ test, BTW.

[Anonymous No.9400488]

I'm dumb at IQ test but I can solve math olympiad problems.

Example of easy puzzles that I failed to solve:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3431420/Puzzle-asks-way-bus-going-leaves-adults-flummoxed.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3127520/Are-smarter-Hong-Kong-grader-Logic-puzzle-Chinese-primary-school-exam-stumps-adults-6-year-olds-crack-just-20-seconds.html

Example of math olympiad problem that I solved:

Prove that for all prime p, there exist a prime q such that n^p-p is not divisible by q for all integers n.

Let m,n,k be positive integers such that k^2+k+3=mn. Prove that at least one of the following statements is true:
(statement 1) exist integer x,y such that (2x+1)^2+11(2y+1)^2=4m
(statement 2) exist integer x,y such that (2x+1)^2+11(2y+1)^2=4n

I believe that IQ has nothing to do with success in scientific research or success in creative career (e.g. author).

[Anonymous No.9400495]

I r smurt

[Anonymous No.9400498]

Shit test. Piss easy.

[Anonymous No.9400508]

Got 130
Pretty good given it's 5 in the morning here

[Anonymous No.9400517]

This isn't an actual IQ test. Real ones are administered by psychologists and include digit span subtests and block puzzle tests. If anything, this is a scored puzzle game with a very low maximum score.

[Anonymous No.9400548]

>>9400442
Got 144 on this one.

[Anonymous No.9400754]

>>9400517
This
I swear to god, /sci/ is filled with nothing but retarded underage pseuds
There's actually no point in this thread beside flaunting over a meaningless "good boy" number.

[Anonymous No.9400800]

>>9393178
21 year old American senior in private college.
Not from here but I used to browse /g/

[Anonymous No.9400811]

>>9399073
You fell for the bait

[Anonymous No.9400815]

>>9393178
Got 134.
Great meme.

[Anonymous No.9400818]

>>9400517
>measuring body temperature under your armpit isn't a temperature measurement, it has to be done by a doctor and you also need to take readings from your anus, ears and mouth.

[Anonymous No.9400830]

>>9395456
>>9395467
In an IQ test, all the figures would correspond to the same rule. You point out here yourself that under the logic you used, two of the figures use one rule (90 degrees) and another two use a different rule (not 90 degrees). That rules this logic out as the correct pattern.

The correct pattern has none of the figures being bissected, except of course for the odd figure out---thus they conform to exactly one rule.

[Anonymous No.9400848]

>>9393178
I got 130, but IQ is a meme and online IQ tests aren't even that accurate.

The majority of people who take online IQ tests are just looking for a pat on the back, they ignore any of the IQ tests that resulted in a low score, focusing only on the ones that said they were smart, and they're not even consistent.

The last time I took a /sci/ recommended IQ test I got exactly 100, so either my intelligence is fluctuating between being on the middle of the bell curve, and being in the top 3%, or these IQ tests are fucking meme-tier bullshit.

[Anonymous No.9400849]

Holy fucking shit, I'm a brainlet. I also took the Mensa Training thing and only got 30% right, am I retarded, should I kill myself and stop wasting oxygen?

[Anonymous No.9400856]

>>9393218
First one only has 5 edges

[Anonymous No.9400860]

>>9393977
My family was too poor for multiple desert plates so when there was a birthday we served cake in disposable napkins

[Anonymous No.9400894]

>>9400811
>I was only pretending to be a retard

[Anonymous No.9400898]

>>9400860
>poor people
poor people have low IQ. you don't need to take tests to know that.

[Anonymous No.9401296]

>>9400818
>compairing taking one's tempature to getting a comprehensive measure on cognitive abilities.

[Anonymous No.9401303]

>>9400754
No joke, I took the test for fun. But that's all I took it for - entertainmemt. If anyone on this thread is actually taking this online test seriously we may as well use it to weed out the actual brainlets on this board.

[Anonymous No.9401505]

>>9394529
Funny fact: your "friend" only said you were right at the end of the argument to get you to shut the fuck up.

Do people honestly believe they win every argument because they're smarter instead of the truth that the other person is tired of arguing to a wall?

[Anonymous No.9401516]

>>9395438
do you bite the cup to get your coffee or do you slurp the cake off your fork?

cup holds coffee, plate holds cake
>arguing why youre a brainlet

[Anonymous No.9401532]

>>9401505
Fuck my asshole.
Meant for
>>9395464

[Anonymous No.9401648]

i got a 130, probably because i didn't feel like getting out a pencil to do the math questions

[Anonymous No.9401682]

Brainlets should bow to their overlords.

[Anonymous No.9401691]

>>9400754
>90% of he replies in the thread call the test shit
>hurr durr /sci/ is filled with nothing but retarded underage pseuds
Are you ok anon?

[Anonymous No.9402295]

>>9400849
122 is perfect for a prostitute.

[Anonymous No.9402309]

Pretty accurate I guess.

[Anonymous No.9402313]

I got 22

[Anonymous No.9402360]

I got 420 and I watch Richard and Mortimus.

[Anonymous No.9402466]

Sad score is sad

[Anonymous No.9402633]

>>9400894
>I'm a newfag that doesn't know 4chan memes

[Anonymous No.9402638]

>>9400848
>I got 130
Opinion instantly discarded

[Anonymous No.9402670]

It is sort of bullshitty, not too bullshitty, but a little. IQ tested by 2 psychologist, 1 was 133 the other was 146, took iqpro.org, 140. So in that ballpark

[Anonymous No.9402682]

>>9402670
128 in this btw

[Anonymous No.9402714]

>>9402670
>IQ tested by 2 psychologist, 1 was 133 the other was 146
You're full of shit. Re-test variance is not that high.

[Anonymous No.9402716]

>click literally random answers and finish in 30 seconds
>get pic related
Why aren't more people calling out this BS facebook quizz?

[Anonymous No.9402717]

>>9393178
>clicked randomly

[Anonymous No.9402724]

>>9393178
This is what I got when I put all the answers wrong.

[Anonymous No.9402728]

>>9395467
it's the second one, all the others are not lines of symmetry

[Anonymous No.9403074]

>>9402714
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Kemper

His IQ jumped 10 points.

[Anonymous No.9403091]

I'm dumb butt at least I know these scores are inflated

(99 -98 asvab tho desu)

[Anonymous No.9403130]

>tfw 134
>tfw was in GATE program because high iq when I was a child
>tfw still ended up as a degenerate drug user on 4chan anyways

[Anonymous No.9403142]

>>9403130
I feel like those programs were just good at grabbing kids that wanted to be smart, not ones that are necessarily intelligent.

[Anonymous No.9403144]

>>9403130
Are you me? I'm currently trying to decide if I should continue not smoking marijuana to get a w4Imart job on the weekends when community college starts up again. I'm two weeks without so far...

[Anonymous No.9403258]

>>9400442
>tfw 137
Am I gonna make it?

[Anonymous No.9403450]

>>9403258
I'm 137 too my dude. I stay at my house and nap all day.

[Anonymous No.9403561]

>>9393178
This test was bullshit. Piss easy and made just to stroke your epeen. Only thing they test is if you slip up and notice a pattern they didn't somewhere or make a mistake.

>>9394226
>>9394259
You know civilized countries use a small fork for that, right burger?

[Anonymous No.9403562]

>>9401648
if you couldn't solve the math questions on this test in your head you're an idiot

[Anonymous No.9403571]

>>9403562
i have adhd you jerk

[Anonymous No.9403596]

Tfw too intelligent

[Anonymous No.9403607]

>>9393314
I browse /sci/ to make me more smarter

[Anonymous No.9403608]

>>9400442
I have a B in CPE and don't know those words. Is this the "handiacp for being a burger or bong" part?

[Anonymous No.9403612]

How do you cure ADHD?

[Anonymous No.9403618]

>>9393218
It may be about the apparent number of acute angles in each shape too.

[Anonymous No.9403626]

>>9403618
5 6 6 6 6

Rymaksyouthungk

[Anonymous No.9403642]

>>9403608
>vertig(o)inous
>(ir)reverent
If you can't identify base words or somehow don't know vertigo or reverent, you're helpless.

[Anonymous No.9403653]

>>9403642
>Vertigo is a medical condition where a person feels as if they or the objects around them are moving when they are not.
>If you don't know the english name of this medical temr you're hopeless
Not my main language you fuckwit

[Anonymous No.9403655]

>almost this entire thread is top 1-3%

Really makes you think ...

[Anonymous No.9403656]

>>9400442
>Got 120 and guessed because I didn't want to read

I barely scraped into gifted classes, and I remember all of the other kids were smarter than me, so it's probably a low 130.

[Anonymous No.9403664]

>>9400442
tfw got the first fucking question wrong. I get that a line gets removed for each pic but there are 2 answers with two lines. Which one is the right one?

[Anonymous No.9403665]

>>9403655
It's almost as if at least one of these were true:
>this test was made to stroke the epeen of idiots and claims the tested people are smarter than they are
>for some reason, people who tend to post on /sci/ - Science and Mathematics are not the average sample and have higher IQ than the average human being

[Anonymous No.9403672]

>>9403653
>thinking vertigo is only used in medical circles
Not even close. Its usage is fairly common.

[Anonymous No.9403679]

>>9403672
I do not recall seeing it in use as a non-medical term, ever. Which is possible, given that I am not an English speaker and my use of English is virtually limited to the Internet.

[Anonymous No.9403688]

Brainlets

[Anonymous No.9403699]

>20+ Brain Games Designed by science

lmaoooooooo

[Anonymous No.9403779]

>>9393178
Meh

[Anonymous No.9403812]

>>9393178
136 but I highly doubt the validity of this test. These are akin to those facebook tests that go "you picked every color correctly WOW YOU'RE SMART MAKE SURE YOUR FRIENDS CLICK THE LINK TOO IDIO- ER GENIUS!"

[Anonymous No.9403826]

>>9393218
You're a fucking retard. It's the one without any right angles.

[Anonymous No.9403850]

>>9403826
No, one has 5 sides the others have 6

[Anonymous No.9403858]

>>9403672
Provide one example where the word vertigo isn't used to describe a feeling of dizziness or location

[Anonymous No.9403873]

>>9393178
well, whatevr

[Anonymous No.9403886]

>>9398366
you're on 4chan and whondering about people wasting their time!? wtf anaon

[Anonymous No.9403921]

>>9393314
>top appears to be 134
wrong

[Anonymous No.9404819]

>>9393178
>all these fat fucking low iq Americans
>mfw you disgusting piles of lard have the GALL to talk shit about CANADA, the much superior nation

I want all of you to take 1 wobbling step back, and FUCKING SHOOT YOURSELVES IN THE FACE

YOU FAT FUCKS

Everything in America is disgusting.

Your "body builders", your ""fitness"", your """education""", and especially your """"""""""""""women"""""""""""""

In AMERICA, all the women are either short, fat, or both.

Your mother is probably at the point of the American woman's life cycle where she's now a fat ass sow, but back then she was short due to an evolutionary trait, exclusive to Americans where the being short = easier to fuck and be slutty with 1,000+ men at any given moment.

Allof your women are slutty as fuck.

In Canada, our women are raised with traditional values. They could also eat the fuck out of yours too, due to all your women being fat as fuck, or small and slutty, making them mobile/easy to carry as they go around fucking everything in sight, as typical with American women.

A nations values are based on how strong our family values are; and evidently with divorce being as high as it is in USA, you people are a ruinous society.

Thanks for setting the bar so low for the next tier 1 society (Canada). We'll be sure to do a much BETTER job than you fat fucks.

But honestly, a dead hookers left ass cheek could do better than your rotten and decrepid society.

But anyways, back to the main issue;

The fact that ALL AMERIFUCKS ARE MANLETS

The fact that you're SHORTER than your slutty ass mom means that you were born with the attributes of a ducking woman.

Jesus Christ, just fucking end yourself already.

I'll commend you if you do this, because all Americans should honestly off themselves.

Go ahead, anon. Be a pioneer. Be an example for the rest of the Americans. I'll support you every step of the way.

Be carefully tho, the guns are all located on the top shelf, so make sure you bring a ladder

[Anonymous No.9404871]

I didn't know what "twig" was and almost picked tree.

Thank you google.

[Anonymous No.9405475]

134 is defintely the top and since most people here are getting 132 to 134 then unless people on sci are mostly above average, the test can't be very accurate. Probably people on sci on average are a little higher than average, but by that much? Not so sure.

My IQ is probably below 130, but I got 132 on my first try and then went through and corrected my mistake for 134. Which seems to be the max here, everything else being photoshop lulz.

Also though, I've never taken an IQ test with no annoying math questions before. Or 'spot the pattern' questions that made NO sense.

Most IQ tests use puzzles that you need to actually know about/have learned before how to solve, from my experience anyway. Making them biased towards people who have a certain kind of education.

Mostly an IQ test only reveals how good you are at IQ tests, that's my low IQ opinion.

[Anonymous No.9405862]

First time I did the test I got 130.

Then I took it again, waited 10 minutes before finishing, and deliberately answered everything wrong, and got 104. So even extreme brainlets score higher than the average?

[Anonymous No.9405895]

I got 135 in a real life test, so this is actually fairly accurate

[Anonymous No.9405903]

>>9394537
>>9404871
are you guys retarded? seriously, even if you're non-natives you should feel bad for this lmao

[Anonymous No.9405913]

>be me
>come to /sci/ cuz /pol/ is getting to me
>ha ha ha I'm such a brainlet wtf are they saying
>IQ poll
>seems legit
>nervous af, am I a brainlet
>le 130
>maybe I'm not retarded!
>read thread
Fuck you guys.

[Anonymous No.9405942]

Eh. I know I'm above average since I got to officer training (top 10% of each age cohort or something like that). The test was relatively good actually for an online test. Not accurate though.

[Anonymous No.9405964]

>>9393178
i answered them all wrong on purpose
98

[Anonymous No.9405981]

>>9400442
Got 127. I'm pretty sure it's all those "wut shape comes next" questions that fucked me up.

[Anonymous No.9406087]

So even though I'm a racist I'm above average iq, noice

[Anonymous No.9406131]

>>9393200
126 is above average you humongous cock goblin.
I swear you artists keep changing your minds and eventually 140+ will be a "low " score

[Anonymous No.9406139]

>>9393178
Utter bullshit, my IQ is certainly not that high.

[Anonymous No.9406140]

>>9406139
And even if it was, it is currently 1:15 am here and I'm semi-distracted.

[Anonymous No.9406143]

>>9404871
Twig > Stick > Branch > Tree

[Anonymous No.9406374]

>>9406131
yeah but even a lobotomized rock can score a 98 on this test so it's not precisely accurate is it?

[Anonymous No.9406375]

THIS IS NOT A SERIES

[Anonymous No.9406786]

Guessed on 2,
Is this test legit?

[Anonymous No.9406788]

>>9406786
forgot image

[Anonymous No.9406810]

>>9406087
being redpilled (especially antisemite) is a proof of intelligence

[Anonymous No.9406811]

was this supposed to be hard?

[Anonymous No.9406840]

wow, thats pretty mean

[Anonymous No.9406960]

>>9403664
Hint: alphabet.

[Anonymous No.9407014]

tested 128 in middle school tested 128 today. Guess I havent had too much brain damage.

[Anonymous No.9407156]

>>9406810
Yes.

[Anonymous No.9407260]

[Anonymous No.9407381]

>>9393178
>people on /sci/ actually got less than 134

Holy shit I just came here for shits while browsing 4chan and happened to stop in I don't even study math or science. This shit was amazingly easy step it up goddamn.

[Anonymous No.9407384]

>>9407381
Dumb sissy frog boi

[Anonymous No.9407436]

>>9393178

[Anonymous No.9407470]

stem dropout

[Anonymous No.9407597]

>>9393178
This test was literally bullshit. This test is wrong and is only good for inflating one's ego.

[Anonymous No.9407603]

>>9397463
Wait this question wasn't about senses?

[Anonymous No.9407718]

132, top 2%.

The number sequences screwed me. Math is a social construct anyway.

[Anonymous No.9407722]

>>9407597

Maybe you're smart with low self esteem.

[Anonymous No.9408038]

>Everyone gets 130and up.

I smell bullshit. That shit was easy as fuck.

[Anonymous No.9408049]

It took me some time to recognize the pattern in 3-6-10-20-24-?, because I was looking for a global one. Luckily the test doesn't take time into account.

[Anonymous No.9408099]

>>9393178
Are IQ's tests even accurate? Took this one and got 126 even though I took a different one months back and got 112

[Anonymous No.9408129]

You are in the top 3% of all people

Your IQ is:

130

wooow

[Anonymous No.9408754]

Fucking retards feeling good about themselves over an online test. This test was really crap and everyone should get 134 if they aren't blatantly retarded.

[Anonymous No.9408885]

>>9393247
I didn’t know IQ tests accounted for time?

[Anonymous No.9408895]

>/sci/
>this is supposed to be the SCIENCE board
>this is the thread with the 2nd highest replies right now
>a thread where you show off the score you got on a short online IQ test with a facebook share button

[Anonymous No.9408898]

I got 134 and I'm pretty sure my brain has completely rotted due to mental illness and antipsychotics.

This is not a real iq test, Facebook iq tests are probably more strenuous and g loaded.

[Anonymous No.9408899]

>That tfw when you'ms'tdve get 500

[Anonymous No.9409815]

>First question
It can either be Hearing because it's the only one that doesn't start with an S, or Smiling because it's the only one that isn't one of the five basic senses. I would have hoped that an "IQ test" would at least not have ambiguous answers like this.

[Anonymous No.9410136]

132

[Anonymous No.9410151]

>>9407603
it could be. but it could be anything else, just as easily.

[Anonymous No.9410155]

I got 134

[Anonymous No.9410161]

>>9403921
>138

[Anonymous No.9410186]

Outta my way brainlets

[Anonymous No.9411222]

>>9393605
JavaScript hacker, lol. Literally just use right click and inspect/inspect element, you should know this.

[Anonymous No.9411224]

>>9393566
Plate you brainlet, I hope you get mercury poisoning.

[Anonymous No.9411230]

>>9393178
too easy, fuck off with your normiebook clickbait shill, if you got anything less than 134 you're a certified brainlet

[Anonymous No.9411232]

knowledge or GET THE FUCK OUT, there are boards for you, /b for one

[Anonymous No.9411234]

>>9411232
yeah i guess this is a circle jerk, there is no such thing as an iq test, you'd know that if you weren't a 130, get the fuck out

[Anonymous No.9411238]

>>9402714
Yeah, I know, at least one had to be bullshitty

[Anonymous No.9411241]

>>9409815
congratulations you have assburgers

[Anonymous No.9411248]

>>9394520
>what are paper plates

[Anonymous No.9411253]

you use your senses to gather information about your surroundings
smiling communicates to others

fucking retards

[Anonymous No.9411698]

>>9396554
>http://test.mensa.no/
EVERYBODY DO THIS ONE AND POST YOUR SCORE
I got 131

[Anonymous No.9411764]

130

[Anonymous No.9411803]

Im such brainlet wtf

[Anonymous No.9411806]

>>9398363
>New pipe
You are smart

[Anonymous No.9411828]

>>9411698
I somehow severely doubt this.

[Anonymous No.9411829]

>>9411828
it's bs they just want you to pay for membership

[Anonymous No.9411847]

>>9393178
132

[Anonymous No.9411910]

>>9393178
did anyone beat 134?

[Anonymous No.9411913]

[Anonymous No.9413272]

>>9411910
no it's capped at 134 when you get all the answers right