[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 724 KB, 200x216, noname.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9387539 No.9387539[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Should we massacre all with an IQ lower than 100?

>> No.9387549

>massacre everyone with sub-100 iq
>suddenly half the population is sub-100 iq again
>keep genociding the retards, reducing the population by half every year
sounds like good idea to me

>> No.9387559

>>9387539
this is not a way you should be spending your winter break faggot

>> No.9387564

>>9387539
>kill everyone with sub 100 IQ
>suddenly can't keep up with labor
>world economy collapses for at least another 50 years

>> No.9387570

>>9387539
Oh, right positive eugenics...

>> No.9387571

>>9387549
Don't genetics play a big role in IQ? Also the earth is overpopulated af

>> No.9387578

>>9387571

They do, but regression to the mean is a thing.

>> No.9387623

>>9387578
k, thanks.

>> No.9387625

The IQ is related to mother nutrition, if the mother eated a lot of proteins during pregnancy the baby will have a high IQ, that's why a non-racist will prove that Africa has lower IQ because of poor condition even in the beginning

>> No.9387630

>>9387578
That's not regresion to the mean, it's just that definition of iq will always be comparative.

>> No.9387654

>>9387564
its called robots you nigger

>> No.9387662

>>9387578
Regression only happens when someone above average mates with below average, if we kill all the sub 100's then the only regression to the mean will just be because of individuals affected by minor environmental impacts. And it wont really be a huge issue, maybe 5% goes below 100 iq, but then we could just rko them and keep fucking

>> No.9387674

No, all kinds of horrendous bullshit will occur.
Topping this off, IQ has been proven to be inaccurate and malleable on numerous occasions. This is a warning before hell.

>> No.9387708

>>9387549
>tfw half of /sci/ doesn't even understand the sarcasm in this post

Life among brainlets is constant suffering.

>> No.9387733

>>9387708
It’s the pseuds freaking out here not the brainlets, oddly enough.

>> No.9387934
File: 10 KB, 213x283, 12.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9387934

>>9387674
>IQ has been proven to be inaccurate

No, no it hasn't.

>> No.9388005

>>9387539
>over 100 million whites slaughtered in america alone
why would you want that?

>> No.9388013
File: 180 KB, 1141x526, 1417397_Screenshot_2013-11-15_15_23_37_copy_jpg1fc6b1473cb409b97bf825b3437508f5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9388013

>>9387539
So that practically means almost everybody who isn't Asian?

>> No.9388017

>>9387934
Citation needed

>> No.9388069
File: 68 KB, 715x715, 1490181448266.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9388069

>>9387539
I'd say 110. And yes, with extreme violence.

>> No.9388073

>>9388017
Positive and negative claims you brainlet nigger, this is basic logic of refutation

>> No.9388109

>>9388013
>almost everybody
>what is an average

>> No.9388113

>>9388069
>111 IQ
Phew, just made it.