/sci/ - Science & Math

[Piangle No.9362202]

Where's the line for the Nobel Prize?

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/112215-introducing-the-piangle/

[Piangle No.9362489]

[Anonymous No.9362500]

Great, just what we needed. More trigonometry autism.

[Anonymous No.9362502]

>>9362202
>http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/112215-introducing-the-piangle/
Please not the piangle, I refuse to call it the piangle.

[Piangle No.9362509]

>>9362500
Not everyone has what it takes for trig, anon.

>>9362502
I get to call it whatever I want

[Anonymous No.9362514]

please no

[Anonymous No.9362518]

>>9362509
>I get to call it whatever I want
Please, please not "piangle", please. Maybe something 'proper' Greek?

[Piangle No.9362536]

>>9362518
I'd rather make math a meme. What would you rather call it?

[Anonymous No.9362578]

>>9362202
Pretty cool anon. But how do you pronounce piangle?

[Piangle No.9362581]

I supposed I could call it the Pizza Pi or a Right Pepe if that's your guys style.

>>9362578
pie-angle

[Anonymous No.9362592]

>>9362581
Rare Pi-pi

[Anonymous No.9362602]

pretty intresting

[Anonymous No.9362612]

>>9362202
What would be its applications?

[Anonymous No.9362629]

>>9362202
easy on the delusions OP

[Anonymous No.9362639]

>>9362629
I googled the latex for the hypotenuse too and found nothing.

>>9362612
There is probably an analog in 3 dimensions. You can maybe deal with circles in rectangular coordinates with this.

[Anonymous No.9362643]

>>9362639
E.g. in integration

[Anonymous No.9362645]

>>9362202
yeah but its nothing special and you can't do anything with it.

[Anonymous No.9362651]

>>9362581
>Pizza Pi
100%, make a poll.

[Anonymous No.9362653]

>>9362645
>nothing special
>t. engineer
It's a fucking discovery, anon!

[Anonymous No.9362654]

>>9362645
I think people used to say that about arithmetic back in the old days. Anyway you can measure squares in radians now

[Anonymous No.9362656]

>>9362639
>I googled the latex for the hypotenuse too and found nothing.
He is implying that he is the first to construct a triangle with a [math]2\pi[/math] hypotenuse, which is some next level delusion. The fact that he specifically wrote that line and that he posted it on a forum with accounts before posting it here (so he can use his account name to claim credit should his delusional power fantasy come to reality) is even sadder

[Piangle No.9362667]

>>9362656
Anon pls. The hypotenuse isn't 2pi.

[Anonymous No.9362673]

>>9362667
fuck you're right, the leg, but the same still applies

[Anonymous No.9362680]

>>9362667
>Anyway you can measure squares in radians now
Thanks, anon.

[Anonymous No.9362682]

>>9362202
pi-thagoras

[Piangle No.9362692]

>>9362673
>>9362656
You can look and look but you won't find one single Piangle

[Anonymous No.9362700]

>a triangle with a specific side length
Why is this supposed to be impressive
What we should be talking about is my new discovery, the Pythagoriangle, which is a right triangle where one leg has length [math]x[/math] and the other leg has length [math]6.27374ex[/math]
It is quite interesting, NOBODY has invented this alternative triangle before. It is SIGNIFICANTLY RARER than the Pizza Pi Triangle (which OP flagrantly plagiarized from a Wendy's napkin where I discovered and defined it eight years ago).

[Anonymous No.9362706]

>>9362700
>(which OP flagrantly plagiarized from a Wendy's napkin where I discovered and defined it eight years ago)
[CITATION NEEDED]

[Anonymous No.9362717]

>>9362706
Don't EVER reply to one of my posts again. This kind of chicanery will not fly with me.

[Anonymous No.9362720]

>>9362717
B-but, a-a-anon I-

[Piangle No.9362726]

>>9362700
But is your Pythagotriangle a circle too? Checkmate.

[Anonymous No.9362727]

>what is calculus
Dude look at this page:
https://betterexplained.com/guides/calculus/

[Anonymous No.9362733]

>>9362720
I said STOP IT. If you try to give me another (You) I will be forced to take action. Do not reply to me ever again. Reply to other posts and engage them instead. I want nothing to do with your nonsense.
>>9362726
No, because I don't need my discoveries to be some reddit meme shit like that. I went through that phase when I discovered the Pizza Pi Triangle in 2009; since then I have left that era of my life behind, and op would be remiss not to move on as well.

[Piangle No.9362736]

>>9362727
That guy doesn't give Piangles their proper credit

[Anonymous No.9362739]

>>9362202
Wow its 2017 and someone finally discovered that the circumfrence of a circle is 2πr

[Anonymous No.9362742]

>>9362727
KEK op's delusional power fantasy btfo

[Anonymous No.9362747]

>>9362742
>op

why the homophobia?

[Anonymous No.9362754]

>>9362727
That's a useful page, anon, thank you.

[Anonymous No.9362758]

>>9362733
>I said STOP IT.
B-but, a-anon... t-the... e-e-evidence?!

[Anonymous No.9362761]

>>9362758
This isn't funny anymore. You need to fucking cut it out right now. There are consequences for your goddamn actions. I know you think you're fucking hilarious but nobody is laughing.
DO. NOT. REPLY. TO. MY. POSTS.

[Anonymous No.9362779]

>>9362202
You'll be competing for the noble prize with the inventor of the nactorial operation.

[Anonymous No.9362792]

>>9362202
Until it has any mathematical or scientific use, this doesn't deserve a Nobel Prize.

[Anonymous No.9362793]

>>9362761
B-but-... sc-scrabble!

[Anonymous No.9362876]

>>9362202
I dont get it, you can make a right triangle out of two perpendicular lines of any length. So of course you could do this with the radius and circumference of a circle.

Or is this just advanced shitposting?

[Piangle No.9362966]

>>9362876
Yeah but you can transform a circle into a triangle this way. Theoretically you could even do it irl. It's only possible because the circumference is linearly proportional to the radius.

[Piangle No.9362970]

>>9362876
Just think about it, when you unroll a circle it becomes a triangle.

[Anonymous No.9363064]

>>9362966
Right, but this is nothing special.

You can also unravel a hexagon into a triangle, and any other polygon.

[Piangle No.9363080]

>>9363064

This is counter-intuitive though since nobody expects that something round unravels into something rectangular.

[Piangle No.9363082]

>>9363064
If you don't see how it's interesting that a circle unrolls into a triangle then... I'm done.

[Anonymous No.9363104]

>>9363080
>>9363082
I can't figure out what level of irony you're operating at, anon

[Anonymous No.9363231]

>>9363082
Yeah I'm legitimately curious on how to do it. Please someone come up with a real world solution.

[Anonymous No.9363286]

>>9362202
>mathematics
>geometry
>Nobel Prize

top kek

[Anonymous No.9363292]

>>9362202
>Where's the line for the Nobel Prize?

lol you don't know? You must have manure for your brains.

[Piangle No.9363304]

>>9363231
That isn't hard. All you need is like a roll of toilet paper without the tube.

[Piangle No.9363306]

>>9363231
Just cut this thing to the center and unroll it

[Anonymous No.9363833]

>>9362202
Like has already been said this is not really new, still kinda cool though

[Anonymous No.9363849]

>>9362202

>mfw the first 20 replies are this guy talking to himself

[Anonymous No.9363923]

>>9362727
/thread

[Piangle No.9363931]

>>9363923
To be fair though, it's pretty lucky that the rings vary linearly in size. Otherwise his calculus would have just yielded a curvy triangle.

[Piangle No.9363934]

>>9363931
Alas, so would my method too.

[Anonymous No.9364130]

>you can transform some shapes into other shapes
wow, truly amazed

[Anonymous No.9364153]

Someone do a sphere

[Anonymous No.9364159]

>>9364153
This.

If it works, I name it the PiBall

[Anonymous No.9364191]

>do a sphere
for fucks sake it's just a rotated triangle
[math]A=\pi \int_-r^{0} (2\pi y)^2\ dy = \frac {4\pi^3r^3} {3}[/math]
it's not the same volume, you'd need a different method of slicing it

[Anonymous No.9364194]

>>9364191
bounds were fucked up, [math]\pi \int_{-r}^0 (2\pi y)^2 dy[/math]

[Anonymous No.9364221]

>>9362202
As this is also a retarded thread for retarded ideas what about a number system with base pi.

[Anonymous No.9364234]

>>9364221
there would be a lot of non unique decimal values
in integer bases all we have to worry about is 0.9999... and 1, there are no other decimal representations of 1 than those two given

in non integer bases we have to deal with the fact that
4_10=(10.22012202112111030100…)_π
=(10.21320300121030000210…)_π
=(10.21313311212022122230…)_π

[Anonymous No.9364238]

>>9364234
How would the root of 2 look like ? Or other irrationals? How would a trigonometric function look like ?

[Anonymous No.9364245]

>>9364238
any non integer base would have an infinite amount of decimal representations, however some bases have a standard form

base phi, however, is an interesting one, and really the only one of any note.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio_base
see the non uniqueness section for how they determine standard form

[Anonymous No.9364266]

>>9364245
Thank you for the link.

[Piangle No.9365180]

>>9364234
How is [math]4_{10}[/math] = [math]10.2..._{\pi}[/math]? That would mean [math]4_{10}[/math] = [math]10.2..._{\pi}[/math] > [math]10_{\pi}[/math] = [math]6.283..._{10}[/math]

[Anonymous No.9365188]

>>9365180
10_pi = pi_10, remember that 4>=pi so it must be greater than 3.14_10

i think you accidentally thought pi was 2pi

[Piangle No.9365199]

>>9365188
Oh, I thought 1 base pi was pi base 10 for a second. Oops

[Anonymous No.9366435]

>>9364159