/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.9354179]

Why can't our American scientists find the optimal social and monetary policy and tax policy?

[Anonymous No.9354209]

>>9354179
my cocks too big

[Anonymous No.9354219]

If acience was perfect there would be no research.

[Anonymous No.9354310]

Because even if they did, the legislators wouldn't heed to it. It doesn't matter if it's optimal for the people.

[Anonymous No.9354326]

>>9354179
Because Karl Marx already figured it out.

[Anonymous No.9354327]

What is a technocracy?

[Anonymous No.9354332]

>>9354310
Also, how do you define "optimum"
Some argue that having 0.1% of the populace owning everything is the best course.
Their opponents favor more equality.

But you're right in that legislators don't listen to anyone except big donors. And they can get away with it because of gerrymandering.
Mathematicians _can_ redraw districts to make everything as fair as possible (everyone's vote counts equally) but do you think that'll ever happen without a gun to the politician's heads?

[Anonymous No.9354448]

>>9354179
Because morals are for fags. They don't exist in nature.
Because monetary policy is retarded, and interest rates should be controlled by the free market
Because taxation is theft.

[Anonymous No.9354462]

>>9354179
Optimal for whom?

[Anonymous No.9355407]

>>9354462
>Optimal for whom?

ding ding ding... we have a winner.