[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 13 KB, 342x359, 41m5louvf4L._SX342_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9342244 No.9342244 [Reply] [Original]

How many holes are there in this shape?

>> No.9342252

>>9342244
0 holes, 4 handles.

>> No.9342256

>>9342244
There are actually infinitely many holes.

>> No.9342259

2

what do i win?

>> No.9342261

6 holes

>> No.9342265

>>9342244
Isn't it topologically equivalent to a spherical "hull" with 4 holes drilled into it?

>> No.9342274

>>9342265
Nah.

>> No.9342280

>>9342274
Yeah. There are 4 holes, the pipe/cross shape is a red herring. Put it this way: if I blew smoke into one end, out of how many places would smoke emanate? Three plus one (the hole I'm blowing the smoke into) equals four.

>> No.9342298

>>9342265
actually, the metal in the shape has a thickness, so it is merely homotopic to a spherical hull with 4 holes

if you treat it as a 3-manifold then its boundary is a 3-handled sphere (homeomorph the four "holes" together in a row on top of the sphere to see the handles)

>> No.9342308

>>9342280
Nah-ah. (Re-read your topology textbook.)

>> No.9342322

>>9342298
>actually, the metal in the shape has a thickness, so it is merely homotopic to a spherical hull with 4 holes

Okay, I'm with you there.

>if you treat it as a 3-manifold then its boundary is a 3-handled sphere (homeomorph the four "holes" together in a row on top of the sphere to see the handles)

But have no idea what this means.

>>9342308
>Nah-ah. (Re-read your topology textbook.)

If only I'd ever read one...

>> No.9342336

>>9342244
4 2D holes
2 3D holes

PROVE ME WRONG BRAINLETS

>> No.9342468

>>9342244
one hole

if a hole is defined as an opening through an object with no restrictions on how many other sides to the hole there are, then this is one hole with four exits, including the entrance as an exit

>> No.9342473

>>9342336
>2d hole

>implying there is such a thing

>> No.9342481

>>9342473
Black holes?

>> No.9342485

>>9342481
blackholes in 3d are 3d themselves

>> No.9342515

3 holes

one opens so much that it becomes a sheet with 3 holes

>> No.9342654

>>9342244
3 holes

These guys understand >>9342298 >>9342515

>> No.9342672

>>9342322
imagine putting your hands in the bottom hole and gaping it infinitely wide in every direction until the pipe is a flat sheet

then you'll see the edges of that hole are the edges of a flat sheet which has 3 holes in the middle of it

>> No.9342687

>>9342672
Ah I see what you mean.

>> No.9342822

>>9342244
3, topologically it's a shirt. Just impose it onto a 2d plane and you see that there is 3 holes pretty easily.

>> No.9342849

>>9342822
Makes no sense the boundary could still be classified as a hole.

And what about the laws of objectivity? Which hole do you select to be the boundary? Select a different hole and you wind up with a set of holes different from the last, or is there some kind of formal logic in topology that excludes counting in this manner?

>>9342244
1, 2 and 6 are all acceptable answers.

>> No.9342875
File: 68 KB, 1195x399, holes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9342875

2

>> No.9342881
File: 18 KB, 175x135, 1289790689514.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9342881

>>9342672
>infinitely wide
>edges

>> No.9343180

1 hole, radial patterned 4 times.
t. ME

>> No.9343200

>>9342849
>is there some kind of formal logic in topology that excludes counting in this manner
I'd have thought that, topologically speaking, all holes are equal.

>inb4 some sex pun

>> No.9343239

>>9342515
>>9342654
>>9342822
you're forgetting the hole at infinity

>> No.9343252

Pre-calc student here. I say 4: The one on the top, bottom, left and right.

>> No.9343256

>>9342244
2 holes.
Unless the edges are sharp, in which case it will disintegrate in a moment.

>> No.9343289
File: 47 KB, 370x385, 1345329792160.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9343289

>>9342672
>imagine putting your hands in the bottom hole and gaping it infinitely wide in every direction

Now you're talking my language.

>> No.9343305

>>9343289
What are your thoughts on (John) matrices?

>> No.9343331

>>9342244
Define 'hole'

>> No.9343350

>>9342244
Assuming all holes are linked on the inside, and we propose the "surface" has thickness, it's a genus 3. Think of what happens when you bend up the two arms and smash it. You get three donuts merging together.

>> No.9343352

0
Holes must either be drilled, dug or otherwise carved.
This was extruded, cut, and welded.
When you look at an exhaust pipe, do you think "wow, look at that long hole"?

>> No.9343356

>>9343352
Engineer detected.

>> No.9343362

>>9343356
Just means my answer is more applicable.

>> No.9343365

>>9343350
two donuts. its a genus 2 surface.

>> No.9343370
File: 325 KB, 300x225, 1198336464888.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9343370

>>9342244
4 holes
I can stick my dick in it 4 different ways

>> No.9343383

>>9343365
oh god im stupid.
it is genus 3.

>> No.9343415

>>9342244
is that a threat?

>> No.9343443

3 holes

cover 3 of the holes and it turns into a sock
which is equivalent to a sheet

>> No.9343481

What's the point of topology?

>> No.9343494

>>9343481
What's the point of anything?

>> No.9343738

>>9342244
2 holes
t. brainlet cnc operator

>> No.9343765

>>9342244
Imagine building it as the composition of a bunch of tori. You can only construct that shape from three tori, so it has three holes.

>> No.9343779

http://home.sandiego.edu/~baber/metaphysics/readings/Lewis&Lewis.Holes.pdf

>> No.9343825
File: 34 KB, 347x428, 4cc9fd9ce9cfae337d35f28704010513.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9343825

>>9342244
Oh look, another discussion about DEFINITIONS to keep the retards busy

>> No.9343853

>>9342244
4, everyone else can fuck off.

>> No.9343876

>a : an opening through something : perforation The coat has a hole in it. a bullet hole
4

>> No.9343888

4
Everything else is just retarded mental gymnastics.

>> No.9343898

>>9343370
/thread

>> No.9343917
File: 131 KB, 1207x595, symmetry.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9343917

>>9343370
But can you really?
Suppose you are actually holding the object to insert your penis. You first insert it through hole A (see figure). Then you want to insert it through hole B, but you can't just teleport on top of the pipe, you would have to rotate the object so that hole B would be in position to hole A and after you do that, because of the symmetry of the system the new configuration is actually completely indistinguishable from when you fucked it from A.

Therefore by your logic, there is only one hole, as you can only fuck it in one way.

>> No.9343918

>>9342244
Zero.

>> No.9343925

>>9343917
write 1, 2, 3, and 4 on each extension from the middle to differentiate them

>> No.9343930

>>9343925
But that is not given in the OP. The object is perfectly symmetrical. All fuck-orientations are equivalent.

>> No.9343956

>>9343370
so you have a hole in your hand?
are you christ?
is this the miracle of christmas?

>> No.9344048

3 obviously

>> No.9344053
File: 258 KB, 1484x1352, 1494478335153.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9344053

>pic related has two holes
>this is what 4-brainlets actually believe

>> No.9344065

>>9343352
>>9343356
>>9343362
Underrated conversation.

>> No.9344833

>>9342875
That is six holes.

>> No.9344846

>>9343917
Someone call Gene Ray. We timecube now.

>> No.9346527
File: 22 KB, 990x545, triple-torus.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9346527

>>9342322
here's how i visualized it

>> No.9346561

>>9346527
How do you go from 3 to 4?

>> No.9346806

>>9346527
Fuck, that's far more clever than my approach.

>> No.9346812
File: 332 KB, 988x710, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9346812

>>9342244
If we assume a 50% probability of flow in each direction and the instantaneous flow in one direction blocks the instantaneous flow in the other direction:
a) there is a 50% probability of there being one hole.
b) there is a 50% probability of there being no holes.

>> No.9346885

>>9343443
/thread

>> No.9346895

>>9342244
8

>> No.9346907
File: 23 KB, 1563x363, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9346907

>>9346527
Got no idea how that's supposed to work, but here's how I did it.

>> No.9346925

2; the left and bottom ones could be filled