[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 12 KB, 300x168, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9330700 No.9330700 [Reply] [Original]

Should I just do chemistry or materials science?

>> No.9330713

>>9330700
chemistry bruh
if your country has developed industry, go for chemistry, it's a really decent job and it's quite interesting

>> No.9330716

>>9330700
Chemistry is just watered down ChemE. Take inorganic and analytic chem and you have a chem double major.

>> No.9330721

>>9330716
You have that all separated? Is that in the USA?

>> No.9330729

>>9330716
>chemistry is watered down ChemE
huh?

>> No.9330746

>>9330713
what are the downfalls of chem. eng?

>> No.9330750

>>9330713
My country isn't first world, but the industry's decent (oil refining/bauxite,alumina, alcohol, etc.). I'm studing in the US though.
With chem eng, could I still work in the chemistry field?

>> No.9330759

>>9330750
I really don't know the education system in the US, but I believe chem eng probably work in the industry.
But if you're really interested in chemistry field, analytic chemistry is the thing tho, it's kinda boring if you ask me
But maybe you'd like, check it

>> No.9330809
File: 3 KB, 211x239, images.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9330809

>>9330716
>Chem eng pissbreath sperg pipelord thinks that taking 1st year organic is basically a chem degree

>> No.9330819

>>9330759
analytic chem is for autist who just wanna look at spectres and shit, not doing any actual lab work

>> No.9330874

I did both chemistry and chem eng for my undergrad, chem eng was more fun tbqh and that's what I went for grad school.

>> No.9330883
File: 10 KB, 234x307, 4565768573.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9330883

>>9330819

>Eeeeh gad!

>> No.9331001

>>9330883
lol

>> No.9331221

>>9330874
So would a chem eng degree allow one to get into chemistry positions? I'd like to get into R&D but wouldn't mind working in industry.

>> No.9331225
File: 56 KB, 583x435, tom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9331225

>>9330716
"Chemistry is just watered down ChemE"

Found the glorified plumber

>> No.9331232

>>9331225
Your way of writing is the most obnoxious and infuriating I've come upon so far. Congratulations you absolute fucking waste of space, you've managed to enrage me not by the content of your comment, which is just you being a little bitch boy about a subject you're too much of a brainlet to understand, but by its very form. Please fuck off.

>> No.9331240

>>9331232
triggered, and by the format, not the meaning, of a post.

I guess nobody really expected to be able to UNDERSTAND anything, they just have to produce results

>> No.9331245

>>9331232

>Your way of writing is the most obnoxious and infuriating I've come upon so far
>you've managed to enrage me not by the content of your comment but by its very form

>bitch boy about a subject you're too much of a brainlet to understand!

I think you're mad for all of the above - but mostly the latter.

>> No.9331263

>>9330700
You dont take much chemistry in chemE desu...I would choose Chem over chemE, but material science over both. I regret not going to a school with material science for undergrad

>> No.9331264

>>9331225
>glorified plumber
Not him, but could you expand on that please?

>> No.9331283

>>9331263
>don't do much chem in chemE
So was it mostly transport physics and process optimization?

>> No.9331294

>>9330700
you should shave your head and become a crystal meth kingpin

>> No.9331295

>>9331221
Maybe yes, but if you want to do R&D, then chemistry is the choice.
Also a chem eng degree doesn't really give you the mindset of a chemist, especially in the R&D. (at least that's how I see them)

From my very short experience is easier to get into the industry as a chemist than in the R&D as a chem eng. (but then again, really depends on the position/field)

>> No.9331319

>>9331295
thanks for the reply. seems like materials engis have it even easier.

>> No.9331348

>>9330716
Are you retarded? How did you even know how to use a computer?

Chem eng has hardly any chem. If you choose chemical engineering have fun designing giant mixing bowls for McDonald's chicken mcnugget goo.

>> No.9332079

>>9330700
chem engis isn't where you want to go, but you're prob a euro so w.e