/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.9302594]

>"Elon for President!"
>cheering and applause from audience
>"ELON FOR EMPEROR!!"
>audience erupts in exuberant cheer, laughter and applause
>people start bowing, others humping the stage
Why do people like this guy so much, /sci/?

[Anonymous No.9302600]

>>9302594
> openly patriotric
> successful
> smart
> turns visions into reality
> knows how to gather and manage people who are smarter than him
> smashes qts, doesn't even care when they divorce him because he's so rich

[Anonymous No.9302639]

He's a super rich guy who's using actually trying to make the world into the "future" it could be.

Things that everybody always wanted but didn't try because they didn't think it was practical or marketable or just because it had never been done before are being done by him. I think, deep down, everybody would love it if there were good, reliable, powerful self driving electric cars. That would be great if it happened. People would love if they could take a fast, safe, reliable rocket for a long distance trip or a vacuum tube. People want to be able to be able to visit Mars.

That's why I like musk anyway. He's trying to make The Jetsons reality

[Anonymous No.9302662]

>>9302600
>smashes qts, doesn't even care when they divorce him because he's so rich

lol no have you seen his latest interview? He cries about sleeping alone.

[Anonymous No.9302667]

>>9302594
He plays on people's need to believe in order to create a cult like following.

[Anonymous No.9302686]

>>9302662
link?

[Anonymous No.9302689]

>>9302662
It's a terrible thing about modern culture that if you're rich but busy, your wife can decide to leave you, get enough money to still live in luxury and never have to work again, and go have all the casual sex her physical attractiveness still warrants. There's no way to strike a deal so this isn't the case: you sign up for children and sexual exclusivity, she gets an option on making you the designated taxpayer for a welfare slut instead.

[Anonymous No.9302700]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qU7FuAswPW0

[Anonymous No.9302704]

>>9302689
I honestly don't understand why alimony is still a thing in 2017. Women can get jobs just as easily as men now. It made sense 100 years ago but now it's completely nonsensical

[Anonymous No.9302833]

>>9302704
Feminism as a branch of communism, or as it's more clearly labelled, kakistocracy: the rule of the worst. Those who know they are undeserving are the most loyal allies in a revolution (whether rapid and violent, or gradual and subversive) that promises to give them what they know they don't deserve.

For marriage to work as an institution, the support of a decent man must be a reward reserved only for a virtuous woman. By attacking this and making the deal one-sided and unfair, the kakistocrats encourage women to become unworthy, and therefore committed to the success of their regime and the prevention of a return of decency in the courts and laws.

Reform is possible. Not only can the law be changed to end alimony and allocation of property to the marriage-abandoner, but it can even be changed to allow men to sue for the return of these funds paid in the past, just as it was possible to change the law to make divorce easy and guarantee financial support for the initiating woman at the expense of the man, for marriages that hadn't been undertaken under those conditions. The fear of this restoration of decency locks in a large number of women as unconditional supporters of kakistocratic politics.

[Anonymous No.9303091]

OHNONONO

[Anonymous No.9303096]

>>9302833
This post is the reason alimony still exists. Somebody tries to get rid of it and then some woman hating nutjob jumps up and screams "I agree", making the reasonable person look bad by proximity

[Anonymous No.9303122]

>>9302594
>Why do people like this guy so much, /sci/?
Because they are stupid and like whatever the libtard media tells them to like.

[Anonymous No.9303193]

>>9303096
>woman hating nutjob
Did I say I hate women? Did anything I say imply that I hate women?

Hating feminism has nothing to do with hating women. Feminism doesn't seek what's best for women, but what's best for rotten women, who are corrosive to society and harmful to the people they personally interact with. As it gains power, it increases the temptations for women to act rotten.

Where feminism tries to sound like it's pursuing what's best for women, if you listen carefully, they're actually taking standard morals and twisting them into something poisonous, like turning "rape is a horrible crime" into "any sex a woman regrets is rape" and "doubting a rape accusation because of lack of evidence is a horrible crime". Have you noticed how feminists have allied themselves with Islam, a religion notorious both for harsh treatment of women and for producing dysfunctional societies in the modern era? And socialism, an economic system notorious for producing poverty and starvation? It's not about what's good for women, it's about forming a coalition of the undeserving, and each branch has its own Big Lie that it's about something else, that's good and pure.

The problem with the divorce laws isn't that they're too good for women and it's unfair and men deserve better ---boo women! yay men!-- but that they specifically reward bad behavior in women, which ultimately hurts women collectively as well as men. The profits an older generation of women made, in divorce settlements, are dwarfed by the losses of the younger generation of women who find themselves unable to get married, who never enjoy the material support or lifelong love of a committed husband, which in previous generations nearly every woman could count on.

For society to work, both men and women must be virtuous. It can't just be one or the other. And in practical terms, that means our laws and customs must punish both men and women alike for not being virtuous.

[Anonymous No.9303214]

>>9303091
So how much cosmetic surgery has he had?

It's not just his hair and getting a tan, he's better looking than he was when he was 20 years younger.

[Anonymous No.9303237]

>>9302594
I've never seen anything but hate for this man on forums like 4chan. I don't understand why he gets so much hate. He's only done good things. Give him some credit or just ignore him. It's not like he's making your life worse.

[Anonymous No.9303242]

>>9303193
I like you

[Anonymous No.9303244]

>>9303096
Women are fucking gay you fucking nigger.

[Anonymous No.9303245]

>>9303237
We don't hate him, we hate his shitty fanbase who can't take the banter.

Case in point: your post.

[Anonymous No.9303248]

>>9303214
>there are no ugly people, only poor ones

[Anonymous No.9303282]

>>9303214
I think he's just got a better diet/lifestyle. Probably has a personal nutritionist and all that shit.

Obviously he had his hair fixed, but you can't blame him for that, pretty much everyone would if they could afford it.

[Anonymous No.9303320]

>>9303214
Hair transplant for sure. Maybe some dermafillers. Weight loss.

[Anonymous No.9303322]

>>9303214
Shop hair and tan on him and see the difference for yourself

[Anonymous No.9303324]

>100 hour work week
ELON
>creates electric car
MUSK
>lands rocket
IS
>founds openai, solarcity, boaring company, neurolink
A
>refuses to make companies public, whereby he would make billions
CON
>gives away patents
ARTIST
>lands on mars

tell me /g/, how is this scammer not in jail yet?

[Anonymous No.9303328]

>>9303248