What's you best brainlet filter for other boards?

[Anonymous No.9272281]

How do do filter the brainlets from other boards with math related questions?
>inb4 muh waifu's cake and dice roll
Here is 1 of X

[Anonymous No.9272283]

>>9272281

>Holden and his wife Boong

>white man miscegenating with slopes

kike test

[Anonymous No.9272285]

>>9272281
2 of X

[Anonymous No.9272286]

Ask /g/ what electric potential is. Some of them think it's the strength of the electric field.

[/psy/mon|0-X's|/sci/mon No.9272293]

>>9272285
Kebab removal is NaN

[Anonymous No.9272296]

>>9272283
Yeah, I have been meaning to make an Israeli one. Might do that this weekend if I get some time from grading (drop deadline is next week).

>>9272286
Yeah, those guys are bigger brainlets than if there was an /eng/ board for engineers

[Anonymous No.9272301]

>>9272296
>>9272285
>>9272281
90% of /sci/ wouldn't be able to solve this.

[Anonymous No.9272309]

>>9272281
correct number: 0.5
correct number and not busy: 0.01x0.5 = .495
correct number and busy = .005

[Anonymous No.9272312]

>>9272301
These are basic probability questions that all stat and math majors at the undergraduate level should be able to solve if they attend a R1 university. The one in the OP requires some Bayesian knowledge, but is pretty straight forward.

>>9272309
see >>9272301

[Anonymous No.9272314]

>>9272296
13! / 3!(10!)

[Anonymous No.9272320]

>>9272312
>>9272296
>>9272285
I wish I could give out test questions like this kek

[Anonymous No.9273053]

>>9272320
Your Dean would definitely have a sit down with you

[Anonymous No.9273057]

Meta threads should go to /qa/. I doubt the mods will care tho.

[Anonymous No.9273412]

>>9272281
Depends on the board. It's very easy for a few boards though:
For /g/, the solution is simply to make them solve a programming problem.
For /k/, they could be asked to name a labeled part of a firearm or name the caliber of a cartridge. It's easy to cheat, but to cheat you'd have to know how to do research before posting and that'd be good enough.
For /lit/, maybe a captcha based typing test where they have to type more than 100 WPM to prove they have actual experience writing.
For /pol/, the solution is to simply ban all of them because everyone there is a brainlet.

[Anonymous No.9273506]

>>9273412
>For /pol/, the solution is to simply ban all of them because everyone there is a brainlet.

Kek

[Anonymous No.9274109]

Are there any good /sci/ spinoffs? I would go to a board that made you post that to start a thread / start posting from an IP.

[Anonymous No.9274608]

>>9273412
>For /g/, the solution is simply to make them solve a programming problem.
most of /g/ can't even solve a basic fizzbuzz

[Anonymous No.9274627]

>>9274608

#include <stdio.h>
const char* fmt_str[15] = {"FizzBuzz\n", "%d\n", "%d\n", "Fizz\n",
"%d\n", "Buzz\n", "Fizz\n" "%d\n", "%d\n",
"Fizz\n", "Buzz\n", "%d\n", "Fizz\n",
"%d\n", "%d\n"};
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
for(int i=1;i<=100;i++)
printf(fmt_str[i%15], i);
return 0;
}

[Anonymous No.9274749]

>>9272285
0.4375
am I a brainlet?

[Anonymous No.9274777]

>>9272281

[Anonymous No.9274801]

>>9272296
364

[Anonymous No.9274938]

>>9272283
A boong is an abo you boong

[Anonymous No.9274958]

Math captcha, only /pol/ ubermensch will remain.

[Anonymous No.9274995]

>>9272281
>What's you best brainlet filter

Fucking n00bs, in my /sci/.

[Anonymous No.9275030]

>>9274995
Reminder that once you have filtering turned on you can do this too.

[Anonymous No.9275038]

>>9273412
>For /lit/, maybe a captcha based typing test where they have to type more than 100 WPM to prove they have actual experience writing.
Nah, you just have to discuss a book and realise that all the posters espousing their views (especially overt views) haven't read the book.

[Anonymous No.9275410]

>>9274777
>mfw I actually know how to solve all of these


parts 2 and 3 are trivial tbqh

[Anonymous No.9276894]

50% all other information is irrelevant

[Anonymous No.9277422]

>>9272285
0.25

[Anonymous No.9277476]

>>9276894
Hm if anything, that 50% is the only irrelevant number

[Anonymous No.9278844]

>>9272309
>correct number and not busy: 0.01x0.5 = .495
What did he mean by this?

[Anonymous No.9279271]

>>9277422
Nope