Intellectual status of 4chan boards

[Anonymous No.9264569]

What boards have you browsed, and how would you fit them into these (or your own) categories?

Intellectual boards:
>/lit/
>/his/

Ironic retards:
>/v/
>/g/

Actual retards:
/vg/
/sci/
/b/
/pol/
/tv/
/x/

[Anonymous No.9264579]

Thread.

Except /v/ is just retards with money.

[Anonymous No.9264583]

>>9264569
Ascended:
/s4s/
/r9k/
/tg/
AVE NEX ALEA:
/k/

[Anonymous No.9264584]

Do they do this meta sort of discussion on other boards? Or is /sci/ like the round table of 4 chan?
Also /lit/ and /his/ are pseud central.

[Anonymous No.9264589]

>>9264584
Yes /his/ is pseud central

t. /his/fag

[Anonymous No.9264590]

>>9264569
Explain how/why /pol/ is retarded?

Are you saying the races aren't genetically distinct? Because if that's what you're saying, you're objectively (and scientifically) wrong.

[Anonymous No.9264591]

>>9264590
What does races being different have to do with /pol/'s utter retardation?

[Anonymous No.9264594]

>>9264590
The unique thing we know about races is that Amerindians are superior to europeans. How is this hard to get?

[Anonymous No.9264596]

>>9264590
No one disagrees that races aren't genetically distinct in some ways. The important questions are, how much do these distinctions play on behavior, and what policy should be implemented as a result of it. /pol/, no surprise, goes full retard and presupposes the answers to these questions without knowledge, because they're (mostly) just racist.

[Anonymous No.9264597]

>>9264591
How about you answer my question instead of avoiding it with another question?

>>9264594
Then how come they lost their continent to Europeans? Lmao.

[Anonymous No.9264599]

>>9264597
Amerindian superiority is based on their higher development rate.
>lost
You mean invaded, because most are Amerindians or eurangutan mongrels with Amerindian genes. The genocide happened due to eurangutan pestilence.

Amerindians are superior to europeans. History demonstrates it.

[Anonymous No.9264600]

>>9264590
/pol/ is retarded because of people like you.
You see a condemnation of your board and bring up racial iq statistics in an attempt to dissuade it, being too retarded to realize that this kind of incessant autistic bitching is why people hate you in the first place.

[Anonymous No.9264605]

There are no intellectual boards as no intellectual browses imageboards because they are a waste of time. Maybe there will be some hope if pol, r9k and frog and wojackposting gets banned.

[Anonymous No.9264607]

>>9264605
Why do inferior subhuman eurangutans want to make /sci/ their safespace?

[Anonymous No.9264627]

>>9264569
/sci/ would be good if it wasn't filled with pseuds from /pol/

as for /v/ being "ironic" retards yeah no. vidya is actually retarded and so are the people that play it.

[Anonymous No.9264628]

/sci/ has a very high learning curve (order of 7+ years college) so it's no surprise we don't seem as intellectual as /lit/ or /his/. on the other hand we aren't rote babbies.

[Anonymous No.9264629]

>>9264599
Gimme a call when it's called the Amerindian States of America HAHAHA

>>9264600
I'm not seeing any arguments here.

[Anonymous No.9264630]

>>9264629
So you agree with Amerindian superiority? Great for you, chimpo.

[Anonymous No.9264636]

>>9264600
So people hate /pol/ because they are incapable argue against the facts the present. got it.

[Anonymous No.9264637]

>>9264629
Because I wasn't attempting to argue your retarded argument, anon. I was calling you an idiot for being too stupid to comprehend the posts in this thread, and you are continuing to prove my point.

[Anonymous No.9264641]

>>9264636
See>>9264594

[Anonymous No.9264645]

>thread on /sci/ calling /sci/ retarded
>thread is full of people being triggered about it calling /pol/ retarded as well

Really makes those neurons go.

[Anonymous No.9264647]

>>9264599
Amerindians were only superior if you're a cuck that believes in egalitarianism.

[Anonymous No.9264648]

>>9264645
See>>9264607

[Anonymous No.9264652]

>>9264569
I agree except /his/ is like half /lit/ and half /pol/.

[Anonymous No.9264653]

>>9264636
>>9264629
This image will never cease to be relevant

[Anonymous No.9264658]

>>9264569
Intellectual board (IQ: ~125-130):
/his/
Pseudo-intellectual board (IQ: ~120):
/lit/
Wannabe try-hard board (IQ: ~110):
/sci/
Normal intelligence:
/pol/
/tv/
/g/
Retards (IQ: ~<100):
/b/
--
Not familiar with any other boards so cant' say.

[Anonymous No.9264659]

>>9264647
Wrong.
Europeans settle on europe: 40000BC
Amerindians reached Canada: 25000BC; then after the deglaciation (10000 years later) populated the rest of the continent in 15000BC

European crops date from 10000BC.
Amerindian crops date from 6000BC.

Europeans getting the bronze from other culture in 3200BC.
Amerindians reached the bronze age in 500BC approximately.

Also as a great factor:
Horse domesticated in 3000BC approximately.

Knowing that the rests of all amerindian populations of 14000BC to 10000BC were pretty much paleolithical-tier and all lived as nomads, practiced some artistic manifestations as european paleo-populations. It's safe to assume they started again in the paleolithic and had to morph the environment of woods, jungles and coasts to their convenience, the same the europeans did with their environment for thousands of years before the Neolithic.

Then let's compare:
Europeans lurking around as nomads: 30000 years.
Amerindians lurking around as nomads: 9000 years.

Europeans reaching the bronze age from other cultures after the Neolithic stage: 6800 years.
Amerindians reaching the bronze age by themselves without the influence of a culture thousands of years ahead of development: 5500 years.

Let's check also how many years have humans modifyed the horse population and environment: 37000 years.
Let's check how many years have amerindians affected the camelids of South-America, when the spaniards came: 16500 years. They had less than half the time, yet they already domesticated diverse species for food and whool. Llamas can carry up to 50 Kg.

And I didn't mention the disadvantages such as continental isolation (north-south and east-west), Niño fenomena that destroys coastal villages, less cultures to trade with, and no naval technology, iron, horses, wheel, and writting from north-african nor anatolian cultures.

As their higher development demonstrates, Amerindians are superior to europeans. Deal with it, subhuman.

[Anonymous No.9264662]

>>9264658
>pol
>normal intelligence
Are kids "normal" intelligence?

Are you another retard who shit up /his/ with dumb recycled threads every time?

[Anonymous No.9264663]

>/his/
>intellectual board
pissed myself

[Anonymous No.9264666]

>>9264653
>he typed a whole paragraph and somehow forgot to add an argument
wew

[Anonymous No.9264671]

>>9264630
Hahaha give me a call when Amerindians are running the most powerful country in the Americas

And even countries where they're a significant part of the population (Mexico, Brazil) have mostly Europeans among their upper classes

HAHAHA

>>9264636
Exactly. It's sad really.

>>9264637
Arguments: zero. Hahahahahahaha.

[Anonymous No.9264672]

>>9264662
I barely browse /his/ desu, but seemed okay. You're a retard if you think /pol/'s average IQ is <100. Or maybe you just don't go out enough and see how retarded the average person is?

[Anonymous No.9264682]

>>9264658
again, the buy in for /his/ is 2 years undergrad max. the buy in here is at least being at the graduate level. this is why we can't have good threads.

[Anonymous No.9264684]

>>9264671
>modern comparison
So you agree with Amerindian superiority? Then if you want to compare both modern populations then eurangutans have to get 90% genocided, 60-80% epidemics for 2 centuries, high class and middle class murdered and the survivors assimilated by an inferior race, the low class thrown to toxic mines where the life expectancy is less than 30years old while being mongrelized by another inferior race and their culture is almost completely obliterated as well as the social treatment despises their population. Don't you agree?

[Anonymous No.9264687]

>>9264682
>/sci/ is graduate level
You can't be this retarded? How long have you been browsing /sci/ for? This board is utter garbage

[Anonymous No.9264688]

>>9264569
/tg/ is borderline intellectual, and they're less autistic than /sci/

[Anonymous No.9264689]

Your average /sci/ poster is autistic so that's why we don't seem intelligent, because we aren't.

[Anonymous No.9264690]

>>9264590
Very subtle my friend, very subtle. 8/10

[Anonymous No.9264691]

>>9264569
>/lit/
>intellectual

Lurk moar feggit.

And start with the greeks.

[Anonymous No.9264693]

>>9264647
Amerindians had weird beliefs but were fairly intelligent.

[Anonymous No.9264697]

>>9264659
Saying something "superior" over something is an opinion without stated evidence. White superiority has no basis other then color of skin. Black superiority comes from misunderstanding of history. Jew superiority comes from manipulation. Asian superiority doesn't exist. Why is there no "human superiority"? We all have the same chromosomes. We may be slightly genetically different, but we think very similar. I still don't get why some normalfags with 100 IQ are so fucking stupid.

[Anonymous No.9264727]

I'd say /pol/ > /sci/ > old /b/ > everything not anime > anime boards

[Anonymous No.9264770]

>>9264687
i'm talking more about the material than the population. i don't think that we'd find a large age disparity between 4chan boards (except maybe outliers like /b/) so it's likely that the state of /sci/ is due to the high level of entry to things worth discussing.

[Anonymous No.9264782]

>>9264590
>mere suggestion of /pol/ somehow being wrong is enough to send some of them into tailspin autism to defend themselves
KEK

[Anonymous No.9264803]

Watch out folks, real stats coming right on through.
/his/ 110 IQ
/lit/ 115 IQ
/g/ 120 IQ
/sci/ 125 IQ
/pol/ 90 ~ 130 IQ

[Anonymous No.9264811]

>>9264590
Nice bait. But, honestly, it's kind of sad that this board went through a period of defacto race-denial. I've had numerous conversations with biologists, away from their colleagues, of course, who agree that humans are polytypic, but the public avoids talking about it and delving further, simply because it's too close to home.

[Anonymous No.9264813]

>Comfy:
/bant/
/out/
Sherman sticky era /his/
>Retarded dunning-krugers
/ic/
/sci/
Socrates /his/
>Regular retards
all others not mentioned

[Anonymous No.9264814]

ASCENDED TIER: /sp/
Great tier: /an/, /out/, /o/, /ck/
Good tier: /his/, /lit/, /fit/, /sci/
Good for shitposting tier: /tv/
reddit tier: /int/
Absolute dogshit cancer tier: /v/, /pol/, /b/, all the weebshit, pony and faggot boards

[Anonymous No.9264817]

>>9264814
I sort of agree with this, except /pol/ isn't that bad

Although I don't really go on it as much anymore

I just liked shitposting about Donald Trump. I don't wanna be a full fledged fucking Nazi. How much of a loser do you have to be to do that.