The BIGGEST Number

File: 35 KB, 305x222, Rayo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

The BIGGEST Number Anonymous Thu Oct 19 20:41:23 2017 No.9243999 [Reply] [Original]

It's about time for another biggest number competition!
The only rule is that any constants or functions used must be defined (if it's well known, naming it is enough) in the post. This means no using other anons' numbers without redefining them first!
Bonus points for sexy [math] \LaTeX [/math]!

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 20:42:10 2017 No.9244001 OP here, I'll start it simple: [math] 10^{100} [/math]

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 20:53:25 2017 No.9244009 [eqn] \prod\limits_{n=1}^{10^{100}}n^n [/eqn]

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:06:33 2017 No.9244024 ten

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:07:40 2017 No.9244027 >>9243999 xkcd not welcome

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:08:21 2017 No.9244029 Do we exclude complex numbers? If not then we will never know...

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:10:58 2017 No.9244035 >>9244009 What is that?

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:15:04 2017 No.9244051 File: 9 KB, 345x186, ss+(2017-10-19+at+07.12.56).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9243999 [math]G^{G^{G^{G^{G^{G^{G}}}}}}[/math]

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:16:28 2017 No.9244055 >>9244051 hmm, odd. it displayed fine in the preview, and i just pasted it out. oh well. this is a dumb thread and a bad response such as this one is all it deserves anyways

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:17:35 2017 No.9244056 >>9243999 [math]10^{100} \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 10^{100}[/math] The up arrows are this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knuth%27s_up-arrow_notation Get on my level noobs

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:18:37 2017 No.9244060 >>9244055 You might've overdone it, idk

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:18:57 2017 No.9244061 >>9244056 >>>youtube.com/numberphile >>>/highschool/

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:20:35 2017 No.9244064 >>9244035 [math]1^1 \cdot 2^2 \cdot ... \cdot (10^{100})^{10^{100}}[/math]

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:21:39 2017 No.9244067 >>9244061 I watch neither numberphile nor do I attend highschool, I don't get what you're trying to say

Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:28:17 2017 No.9244077

>>9244067
Only highschoolers don't know about knuth, only highschooler that watch numberphile know about knuth's arrow notation
put the two together and only a highschooler that watches numbersphile would think knuth's arrow notation is obscure as evidenced by "get on my level"
now kys underager

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:33:10 2017 No.9244086 Googolplex*Graham's#^0

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:39:47 2017 No.9244094 >>9244077 I'm always amazed at what internet strangers think they can learn from someone with such limited information. I'm a second year at U of T, doing analysis ii under the great Edward Bierstone

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:44:24 2017 No.9244102 >>9243999 -1/12

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:48:59 2017 No.9244112 C-(1/C)

Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:49:17 2017 No.9244113

Define by induction the following sequence of functions:
[math]f_0(n) = n+1[/math]
and
[math]f_{k+1}(n) = f_k^n(n)[/math]
where f^n is the function f composed n times with itself.

e.g.,
[math]f_1(n) = n + 1 + 1 + \ldots + 1 = 2n[/math] since "+1" appears n times.
[math]f_2(n) = 2 \times 2 \times \ldots \times 2 \times n = 2^n \times n[/math]
[math]f_3(n) \ge 2^{2^{\cdots^n}}[/math], a tower of exponentials of size n.

Now define:
[math]f_\omega(n) = f_n(n)[/math]
This is basically the Ackerman function.

We can go beyond: [math]f_{\omega+1}(n)
= f_\omega^n(n) [/math]

[math]f_{\omega+1}(64)[/math] is about as big as Graham's number.
The "use the Ackerman function with Graham's number" xkcd joke is actually just [math]f_{\omega+1}(65)[/math]

Define similarly [math]f_{\omega+k}[/math] for all k.
Define [math]f_{2 \omega}(n) = f_{\omega + n}(n)[/math]

We can keep going, define [math]f_{k \omega}[/math] for all k.
Then by the same process define [math]f_{\omega^2}[/math], then [math]f_{\omega^\omega}[/math].

Eventually we get to an infinite tower of omegas,
[math]\omega^{\omega^{\omega^\cdots}}[/math] which is called [math]\epsilon_0[/math].

[math]f_{\epsilon_0}[/math] grows about as fast as the Goodstein sequence.
[math]f_{\epsilon_0+1}(100)[/math] is bigger than the kinda famous TREE(3) number.

Of course you can keep going till [math]\epsilon_1[/math], [math]\epsilon_\omega[/math], [math]\epsilon_{\epsilon_0}[/math], an infinite tower of epsilons, etc.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:50:44 2017 No.9244118 >>9244112 being C the sum of the set of complex numbers

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 21:51:10 2017 No.9244119 >>9244056 Graham's number is vastly larger.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 22:06:04 2017 No.9244136 the smallest number that cannot be defined in less than thirteen words

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 22:09:21 2017 No.9244145 the opposite of the size of your penis hehe

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 22:13:42 2017 No.9244148 >>9244145 doesn't hold if you have an innie

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 22:21:53 2017 No.9244163 TREE(3)

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 22:27:48 2017 No.9244176 >>9244163 ah so you saw the new numberphile video today?

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 22:29:54 2017 No.9244183 >>9244094 im third year u of t quit being such a dweeb we're not special for going to this school

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 22:32:15 2017 No.9244186 >>9244176 I didnt understand your question so I will not answer it

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 22:34:22 2017 No.9244191 [math] ℵ_G [/math] Where G is Graham's number.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 22:37:40 2017 No.9244201 infinite+1

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 22:44:12 2017 No.9244215 >>9244186 What's your native language? I'll translate for you

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 22:46:51 2017 No.9244217 >>9244215 xiri language

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 22:51:16 2017 No.9244221 File: 120 KB, 747x1120, 774898fa9f3a471b250e00a4f694c4da.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9244113 that's a big number

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:00:27 2017 No.9244245 Define [math] f(n):~\mathbb{R}^+\rightarrow\mathbb{N} [/math] to be the least integer [math] m [/math] such that [math] \frac{\varphi(m)}{m-1} < n [/math]. [eqn] f\left(\frac{1}{\textrm{TREE}(3)}\right) [/eqn]

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:02:23 2017 No.9244251 >>9244245 >>9244163 TREE(4)

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:09:35 2017 No.9244263 >>9244251 TREE(TREE(5))

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:10:44 2017 No.9244265 >>9244263 TREE(10000)^TREE(100000)

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:11:47 2017 No.9244268 >>9244263 TREE(TREE(5)) + 1

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:18:45 2017 No.9244287 TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(1000))))

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:24:39 2017 No.9244307 >>9244287 TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(1000)))) + 1

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:33:15 2017 No.9244334 >>9244307 TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(1000)))) + 2 BTFO TT F F O F

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:33:50 2017 No.9244335 File: 94 KB, 950x720, 1507609165715.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9243999 itt: retards using digits that aren't 9 Why would you write 10 or 3 when you can write 99 or 9 instead

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:34:59 2017 No.9244342 File: 3.42 MB, 3840x5760, 1507667103356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9244335 Anyway the obvious answer for a given number of characters is TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(...9

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:44:29 2017 No.9244364 >>9244148 An innie penis?

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:51:11 2017 No.9244378 >>9244119 this

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:53:29 2017 No.9244381 >>9244334 TREE(TREE( ... (TREE(420) ... )) where the length is TREE(3)

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:53:38 2017 No.9244382 >>9243999 the size of my BBC.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:54:47 2017 No.9244386 >>9244183 You seem to have the 'tism. Be sure not to give it to other aspiring students

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:55:55 2017 No.9244389 >>9244381 TREE(TREE( ... (TREE(420) ... )) where the length is TREE(4) Checkmate

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 19 23:58:15 2017 No.9244397 >>9244389 fugg

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 00:05:59 2017 No.9244412 >>9244389 his number plus one

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 00:06:42 2017 No.9244413 BB^(BB(1000))(1000) where the ^(BB(1000)) part denotes functional composition and BB is the Busy Beaver function.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 00:08:26 2017 No.9244418 >>9244413 >>9244389 these two numbers added together plus one

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 00:09:35 2017 No.9244422 >>9244418 Your number plus one half

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 00:10:53 2017 No.9244426 >>9244422 damn

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 00:15:25 2017 No.9244436 File: 650 KB, 499x699, 1441740108082.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] eleventy

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 00:20:31 2017 No.9244453 >>9244389 This number to the power of >>9244413 This number

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 01:43:16 2017 No.9244589 >>9244453 that number plus three and six thirty-fifths

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 02:07:19 2017 No.9244614 >>9244221 >>9244221 >>9244221 >>9244221

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 02:13:21 2017 No.9244620 >>9243999 >any number you can fit on a white board All numbers can fit on a white board.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 02:13:51 2017 No.9244621 [eqn]\infty[/eqn]

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 02:25:58 2017 No.9244636 >>9243999 BIG FOOT

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 02:41:24 2017 No.9244649 >>9244620 The smallest number that cannot fit on a white board.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 13:19:53 2017 No.9245570 >>9244621 Infinite isn't a number it's a concept

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 13:52:54 2017 No.9245639 Let [math]x[/math] be number such that [math]y \leq x < \infty[/math] for all [math]y \neq \infty[/math] Can't get bigger than that tbqh famalam.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 14:03:23 2017 No.9245651 File: 46 KB, 4504x6456, biggest number.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >all the branlets in this ITT

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 14:04:49 2017 No.9245654 >>9244221 TREE(4U)

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 14:24:12 2017 No.9245675 Let n be the sum of all the numbers in this thread.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 14:28:22 2017 No.9245686 >>9244001 10x10^125

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 14:42:40 2017 No.9245709 >>9245675 this number + 1.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 14:54:18 2017 No.9245739 File: 90 KB, 982x622, BIG NUMBER.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9245651

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 14:55:27 2017 No.9245742 Let X be a number such that X > all number expressed on this thread.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 14:56:22 2017 No.9245743 >>9245742 Let X be the number of anons that didn't properly read the OP.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 14:57:20 2017 No.9245744 - BB^(BB(9999)) (9999) take that, >>9245675 you're now the second smallest number ITT

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 14:59:26 2017 No.9245749 1/infinitesimal checkmate atheists.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:00:01 2017 No.9245750 >>9244113 Actually TREE(3) is way beyond that: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1950116/where-does-treen-sit-on-the-fast-growing-hierarchy

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:00:47 2017 No.9245754 >>9245743 Let X = max{all number in this thread} then TREE(X) what now?

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:01:08 2017 No.9245755 >>9244094 can you move to america, renounce your citizenship and never visit canada gain? youre making my county look like shit with how much of a fucking twat you are

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:03:11 2017 No.9245757 >>9245742 >>9245754 Both are infinite recursions and therefore not well-defined, dumbass

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:04:44 2017 No.9245761 Let X = X + 1

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:12:33 2017 No.9245774 >>9245757 [math]\textup{Let } Y = \{x \in \mathbb{R} \| x \in this thread excluding this post \}. \textup{Let }y = \textup{TREE}(\max Y)[/math] Acceptable now?

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:23:45 2017 No.9245798 >>9245774 My number is [eqn] your number + \lim_{n\to\infty}10^{-n}[/eqn] Get rekt, kid

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:24:04 2017 No.9245799 File: 64 KB, 689x1023, 0au3LDK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9243999

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:27:06 2017 No.9245807 >>9243999 Extend [math]\mathbb{R}[/math] to [math]\bar{\mathbb{R}}=\mathbb{R}\cup \{-\infty,\infty\}[/math]. Boom, [math]\infty[/math] is a number now and it is the biggest number. You're welcome.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:29:14 2017 No.9245815 >>9245798 [math]\lim_{n\to\infty}10^{-n}=0[/math], so you still have the same number as your #rekt friend, retard.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:30:42 2017 No.9245816 >>9245807 >Using the same name for two different things Found the brainlet

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:33:26 2017 No.9245823 >>9245816 OP doesn't say which space we're in, rETARD

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:33:32 2017 No.9245825 >>9245807 Wrong.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:36:41 2017 No.9245835 >>9245825 Why then, dumbass? OP only implies we're working in a totally ordered space with numbers.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:37:04 2017 No.9245836 >>9245755 underrated comment what is it with this U of Tard and others like him thinking that drawing attention to himself and his lifestory on an anonymous imageboard will ever make up for never having anyone's respect irl

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:38:17 2017 No.9245838 >>9245836 inb4 >you probably go to western

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:43:29 2017 No.9245844 a brazilian

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:48:08 2017 No.9245853 >>9244621 -(1/12)

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:48:50 2017 No.9245856 >>9245739 >tried to make it >failed to make it my number is bigger because it exists :^)

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 15:51:48 2017 No.9245863 >>9245675 Other comments are also recursively defined by other comments, so... ill-defined [math]\implies[/math] you lost

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 16:09:17 2017 No.9245893 >>9245835 Infinity is not a number. You could extend the real number line with whatever stupid shit you want to extend it with. That doesn't mean the things you added to the group become numbers.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 16:53:20 2017 No.9245977 Here's my answer [math]Your number + 1[/math]

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 17:05:03 2017 No.9245991 tree(3) fiddy

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 17:06:07 2017 No.9245993 ur moms weight lmao

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 20 17:13:25 2017 No.9246004 >>9244335 why would you write 9 when you can write 10 instead

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 01:02:14 2017 No.9246646 >>9244102 underrated

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 04:21:14 2017 No.9246814 >>9245836 Most likley he wasn't trying to draw attention to himself but to say that you can't make assumptions or create a lifestory form just one post or a single piece of evidence. Or he could just be a faggot.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 04:46:50 2017 No.9246839 >>9243999 n+1, where n is the highest number posted in this thread

Anonymous Sat Oct 21 04:49:48 2017 No.9246844

let [eqn]
m \uparrow n = \left. m^{m^{\cdot^{\cdot^{\cdot^{m}}}}} \right\rbrace n \text{ times}[/eqn]
let
[eqn] m \boxtimes n = m \underbrace{ \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \dots \uparrow}_\text{$n$ times} n [/eqn]
let
[eqn] m \boxtimes^c n = m \underbrace{ \boxtimes \boxtimes \boxtimes \dots \boxtimes}_\text{$c$ times} n [/eqn]
now defining the series with the recursion relation
[eqn] C_n = C_{n-1} \boxtimes^{C_{n-1}} C_{n-1} [/eqn]
and [maths]C_1 = G_{64}[/maths] (Graham's number)
then my number is [eqn]
C_{G_{64}}
[/eqn]

Anonymous Sat Oct 21 06:00:25 2017 No.9246909

>>9246844
Let [math]X = TREE(3) \uparrow \ldots \uparrow TREE(3)[/math]. How many arrows? TREE(3).
Now this is only the first layer.

Let's now define the succession [math]X_n = TREE(X) \uparrow \ldots \uparrow TREE(X)[/math] where the number of arrows is [math]X_{n-1}[/math]. Now I take my succession at the term [math]X_{C_{G_{64}}}[/math].

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 08:06:07 2017 No.9247024 This sucks, make it so that you have to prove your number is larger than the previous thread record.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 08:12:59 2017 No.9247034 >>9245675 + >>9245807 + >>9246844

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 08:32:39 2017 No.9247059 >>9247034 +1

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 08:44:55 2017 No.9247068 >>9244035 Brainlet, the post

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 09:19:38 2017 No.9247118 >>9247059 +0.1

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 09:38:22 2017 No.9247144 >>9244176 These threads have existed for ages and the TREE function has been the standard response.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 09:52:45 2017 No.9247161 >>9243999 The maximum length of a straight line

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 10:58:30 2017 No.9247270 >>9247161 What about the maximum length of a homosexual line?

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 11:01:13 2017 No.9247275 >>9244009 The eight busy beaver number

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 11:04:04 2017 No.9247281 File: 296 KB, 388x424, the number 5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9245739

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 13:32:44 2017 No.9247577 [math]\sqrt(4)=2[\math]

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 13:39:53 2017 No.9247589 Infinite i win

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 14:21:53 2017 No.9247670 >>9244102 -1/12 + 1

James Grime Sat Oct 21 14:30:06 2017 No.9247683

TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(9)..)

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 14:34:20 2017 No.9247691 >>9247670 TREE(-1/12)

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 14:49:27 2017 No.9247725 >>9247683 >>9247691 these numbers multiplied together plus sixteen

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 21 19:14:18 2017 No.9248222 >>9245639 no such [math]x[/math] exists.

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 02:06:54 2017 No.9248946 >>9247281 this fucking fag looks like he's always high on adderall on each of his videos

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 02:41:09 2017 No.9248991 >>9243999 1. I win. Nobody in this thread can post a bigger number, they can only post my number more times than me in varying degrees of notation.

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 04:06:40 2017 No.9249064 >>9248946 he's high on illegal primes

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 04:59:19 2017 No.9249129 >>9244094 I literally had to google what U of T is. Also do you really think theres much of a difference between high school and 2nd year noob?

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 06:06:32 2017 No.9249219 Every number ever combined

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 07:31:10 2017 No.9249315 >>9249219 this plus one

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 07:33:19 2017 No.9249317 >>9244386 >'tism kys buddy

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 08:35:15 2017 No.9249391 >>9247691 10^(10^100)^(TREE(-1/12))

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 09:16:57 2017 No.9249430 [math] \omega [/math]

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 10:57:13 2017 No.9249546 >>9243999 14. But not just regular 14, Super-Ultra-Mega 14.

Anonymous Sun Oct 22 13:02:05 2017 No.9249682

>>9243999
9↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑9

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 13:08:59 2017 No.9249690 >>9244201 That would still be infinte

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 13:12:04 2017 No.9249692 >>9248991 1.3

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 13:19:21 2017 No.9249705 >>9244113 >Eventually we get to an infinite tower of omegas >Eventually When exactly does this happen?

Anonymous Sun Oct 22 13:19:42 2017 No.9249707

>>9247683
[math]\mathrm{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{TREE^{}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}(9)}[/math]

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 13:21:32 2017 No.9249710 File: 1.97 MB, 224x400, pkf7e6qtkihy.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9249682 >>9249707 You up arrow and tree faggots have nothing on the busy beaver.

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 13:27:21 2017 No.9249720 >>9243999 1/(size of OP's penis)

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 13:28:06 2017 No.9249722 >>9249720 >dividing by zero

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 13:31:39 2017 No.9249727 >>9249722 That's an infinitesimal, not zero.

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 13:37:25 2017 No.9249735 1/0

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 13:52:13 2017 No.9249765 7

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 22 13:53:35 2017 No.9249767 >>9249682 This +1.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 06:50:32 2017 No.9251446 SSCG(3)

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 09:08:12 2017 No.9251567 The largest number that has been written will be written + 1 including any and all references to this number

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 09:15:06 2017 No.9251574 [math]x [/math] Where x is defined as the largest number.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 09:39:30 2017 No.9251597 BB(1000)

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 09:41:02 2017 No.9251600 >>9251574 x+1

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 09:42:03 2017 No.9251603 I assume everyone here have read the essay by Scott, right? https://www.scottaaronson.com/writings/bignumbers.html

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 11:17:36 2017 No.9251736 >>9251567 you cannot write +1 if you ran out of capacity largest number can be written if the capacity is defined, such as post character limit, or number of atoms in universe

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 11:18:45 2017 No.9251737 >>9251600 x = x + 1

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 11:30:45 2017 No.9251749 >>9243999 Let X be an arbitrarily large number. X.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 13:01:16 2017 No.9251918 This thread crashed my computer, I guess I'll have to upgrade it to run bigger numbers.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 14:32:55 2017 No.9252021 File: 46 KB, 275x184, images.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] INFINITE x 2 I WON, FUCK YOU ALL

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 17:18:52 2017 No.9252289 File: 35 KB, 408x450, 6355FC8F-F0A5-4FF2-9427-242F543053E6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] uhhhhhhhhh 7

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 19:45:02 2017 No.9252492 File: 167 KB, 1000x847, 1507422456284.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] The number of binary states in the universe, all set to 1. This is the largest possible number. t. wildberger

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 20:25:58 2017 No.9252562 >>9252492 zeno's laterally >>9252289 its the biggerest so far >>9245651

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 20:31:18 2017 No.9252574 The sum of all positive numbers represented in this thread (before and after this reply) + 1 Where's my medal

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 20:39:50 2017 No.9252584 File: 600 KB, 1440x1024, Sushi_Kokuu_Hen_ep7_p11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] http://googology.wikia.com/wiki/Fish_number_7

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 20:43:30 2017 No.9252587 >>9252021 Aleph-one

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 20:46:13 2017 No.9252593 >>9252574 you get the medal for being retarded because OP said you're not allowed to reference other anon numbers without redefining them

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 20:48:34 2017 No.9252596 -1/12

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 21:27:46 2017 No.9252669 -1/12 + -1/12

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 22:28:08 2017 No.9252744 While working in base <insert big number> 10.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 23:08:02 2017 No.9252823 File: 111 KB, 991x806, trolled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9243999 THE NUMBER OF TIMES I BANGED UR MOM LOL

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 23 23:10:15 2017 No.9252830 >>9244102 /thread

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 15:34:43 2017 No.9254094 >>9244009 that, but +1

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 15:42:15 2017 No.9254108 {\displaystyle \aleph _{0}} \aleph_0

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 17:56:21 2017 No.9254381 >>9248991 Ah, you posted before me. I was gonna say 1 as well. Congratz

>>	/psy/mon\|0-X's\|/sci/mon Tue Oct 24 18:46:27 2017 No.9254484 >>9243999 <Observer Interpretation/Translation> + 1 Physics + Math

Anonymous Tue Oct 24 18:55:28 2017 No.9254495

e^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)^TREE(3)

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 18:57:23 2017 No.9254502 TREE(3)↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑TREE(3)

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 18:59:46 2017 No.9254506 The length of my dick

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 19:04:18 2017 No.9254514 >>9254495 >>9254502 >I understand that TREE is an amazingly big function, but I will still mix it with other laughably small functions might as well write e^(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)...

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 19:10:52 2017 No.9254529 [eqn] \aleph_\aleph [/eqn]

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 19:18:37 2017 No.9254559 TREE_G(G), where G is Graham's number.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 19:35:32 2017 No.9254586 Take the largest number such that, given some arbitrarily large finite amount of time, the entire computing power of the planet can compute it in its entirety. Add 1 to that.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 19:39:31 2017 No.9254593 >>9254586 Lets call that number "B" B^B +1 mines bigger ;^)

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 19:39:48 2017 No.9254595 File: 18 KB, 554x400, 1497933376635[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] infinity

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 19:44:27 2017 No.9254605 TREE(-1/12) troled hard!

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 19:47:09 2017 No.9254614 File: 4 KB, 665x469, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] 7^5

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 20:13:38 2017 No.9254656 File: 116 KB, 900x900, photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] ж, where ж is defined to be the largest integer.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 23:38:13 2017 No.9254959 >>9254605 TREE(x) isn't defined for negative values of x, dummy. Also, -1/12 as a finite number isn't massive, it just happens to be the result of the infinite sum of all positive counting numbers.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 23:42:16 2017 No.9254962 52

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 23:51:55 2017 No.9254983 [math]n[/math]

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 23:57:07 2017 No.9254990 >>9254656 ж+1

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 24 23:58:50 2017 No.9254992 >>9254983 [eqn] \Pi_{n=1}^{n=100!} n!!!!!!!! [\eqn]

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 25 07:43:27 2017 No.9255453 File: 33 KB, 660x396, _62558092_15.thecountand8-richardtermine.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9243999 Infinity no wait

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 25 21:03:04 2017 No.9256700 File: 220 KB, 480x366, 12670610_210298282650853_7066191555450571886_n.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9246004 Why write 10 when you can write 99 instead?

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 25 21:13:03 2017 No.9256724 >>9254529 [math]\aleph_\aleph \uparrow \aleph_\aleph[/math]

Anonymous Wed Oct 25 23:45:21 2017 No.9257047

>>9243999
Define [math] S(n) [/math] to be the maximum number of shits made by any halting [math] n [/math]-state binary turing machine.

Define [math] \mathcal{S}(m,n) [/math] recursively:
[math] \mathcal{S}(0,n) = S(n) \\
\mathcal{S}(m,0) = \mathcal{S}(m-1,1) \\
\mathcal{S}(m,n) = \mathcal{S}(m-1,\mathcal{S}(m,n-1))\qquad\mathrm{if}~n,m\neq0 [/math]

My number is [math] \mathcal{S}(\mathrm{TREE}(3),\mathrm{TREE}(3)) [/math]

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 25 23:55:27 2017 No.9257056 >>9248222 Prove it.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 26 00:01:21 2017 No.9257062 a where a>a+1

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 26 08:53:20 2017 No.9257605 >>9244364 Its pussy

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 26 17:04:22 2017 No.9258314 >>9254992 10!!! is much less than 10!, look up multifactorials.

Anonymous Thu Oct 26 17:20:50 2017 No.9258339

>>9244009
>>9244051
[math]\text{Let }a \text{ be the number defined as such: } [/math]

[math]a:= \underbrace{\Gamma \circ \dots \circ\Gamma}_{G\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow G\text{ times}} \left({\prod_{n=1}^{10^{100}}n^n}\right)[/math]

[math]\text{Let }f_1\left( x\right) := x^a[/math]
[math]\text{Let } f_{n+1}(x) = f_n^{f_n(x)}(x)[/math]

[math]\text{Then /sci/'s biggest number can be written like the following:}[/math]

[math]f_a(G)[/math]

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 27 02:02:51 2017 No.9259112 File: 176 KB, 260x292, 1506673566576.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9243999 Everyone's number. PLUS ONE!

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 27 02:05:40 2017 No.9259117 >>9259112 dumb weeb

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 27 07:47:01 2017 No.9259454 File: 15 KB, 369x720, digital-39747_960_720.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9245651 8 uses all the spaces on a digital clock, so surely it is the biggest number

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 27 10:57:16 2017 No.9259641 >>9244029 What's this definition of a "big" complex number?

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 27 11:12:38 2017 No.9259652 >>9243999 PEPE(1) is the largest number

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 27 11:44:54 2017 No.9259681 Yall mind if i hit that ... ALEF_NULL

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 27 13:20:55 2017 No.9259784 >>9258339 [math]f_a(G) + 1 [/math]

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 27 13:41:33 2017 No.9259808 The sum of all the numbers in this thread excluding the numbers mentioned in this post.

Anonymous Fri Oct 27 15:32:09 2017 No.9259982

>>9254656
Let [math]u[/math] be the universe of discourse in which OPs post is based. Define [math] \ddot{\mathfrak{z\!z}} [/math] as the unique number satisfying "the biggest number", that is [math] x \leq \ddot{\mathfrak{z\!z}} [/math] for all [math] x\in u [/math].
Then for each [math] y > \ddot{\mathfrak{z\!z}} [/math] we have [math] y\not\in u [/math], meaning any such number cannot satisfy OPs post, especially yours

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 27 15:58:57 2017 No.9260037 >>9259982 >the unique number Prove its uniqueness.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 27 17:46:50 2017 No.9260231 Collective Multidimensional stupidity

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math