[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 9 KB, 276x183, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9217617 No.9217617 [Reply] [Original]

Space shuttle > All of NASA's spacecrafts
Recognize Superiority
That's straight up fact

>> No.9217651

The space shuttle was a big fat mistake. It costed so many money and also some lives.
It's easily recognizable and a cultural icon, but from a technical point of view it's a piece of shit. It's the reddit of spacecrafts.

>> No.9217656

>>9217651
It looked cool though

>> No.9217659

>>9217651
>many money
you're a mistake you troglodyte

>> No.9217694

>>9217651
Rocketfags cant even write a sentence
go back to commi land

>> No.9218730
File: 619 KB, 1637x2295, Apollo%20Saturn%20V.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218730

>>9217617
WRONG
Shuttlefags can't compete

>> No.9218741
File: 1.46 MB, 4699x2118, 1503065445122.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218741

Has there ever been another spacecraft so A E S T H E T I C ?

>> No.9218749
File: 545 KB, 2369x1999, nasa launch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218749

>shuttlecucks think they can compete with the CHAD DICKET
laughable

>> No.9218767
File: 1.54 MB, 3000x2528, 631808main_1981-04-12_full.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218767

>>9218730
>>9218741
>>9218749
*blocks your path*

*gets reused*
*inspired children to become engineers*
*literally flies back from space instead of getting cucked by the atmosphere*

>> No.9218769
File: 301 KB, 1920x1080, mpv-shot0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9218769

>>9218767
>*gets reused*
whore
i like my spacecraft pure and untainted

>> No.9218896

>>9218767
>crashes and kills six astronauts plus one civilian
>crashes again and kills another seven astronauts

only spacecraft to go on a killing spree lol

>> No.9218900

>>9218769
Forgot I still had to watch this episode, thanks.
Glad they didn't fuck up Toga's voice actor.

>> No.9218906

>>9218896

I'm a shuttlefag but loled

Also went to Christa McAuliffe Elementary School so possibly biased.

>> No.9218936

>>9218900
my balls are too blue for season 3 to be QUITE fucking HONEST with you 先輩

>> No.9219011

>>9217617
The Shuttle was really shit.

It didn't even have a launch abort system. The first four flights had ejection seats for the commander and pilot only, and the ejection itself could have killed them. Most of the Challenger crew were alive up to the point where the cockpit hit the ocean.

>>9218767
Shuttle reuse was supposed to save money but it ended up costing almost as much as building a new one every turn around.

It was a monumental mistake which only saving grace was the Hubble. Being able to carry the Hubble into orbit and allowing the service of it.

>> No.9219018

>>9219011
Or should I say launch escape system?

They had launch abort profiles but those were for landing the Shuttle again. Basically if anything happened during launch which meant they wouldn't be able to land again they were fucked. And I'm talking about something more obvious than what happened with Columbia.

>> No.9219035
File: 1.26 MB, 3032x2070, iss015e12939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9219035

Crazy how big the Orbiter is for a space vehicle.

>> No.9219037
File: 1.54 MB, 3032x2064, 1412016530111.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9219037

They wasted all that mass putting WINGS into orbit
the absolute madmen

>> No.9219039
File: 1.29 MB, 3000x2400, 1397326627913.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9219039

STS failed in so many ways, but it was beautiful while it lasted

>> No.9219047

I get where OP is coming from but I feel like the SS is partially if not mostly responsible for the US completely losing interest in space. Like Icarus, we flew too close to the sun and when NASA started killing people it seemed that the American public thought maybe we should just stay on the ground and that sentiment held until recently.

>> No.9219514

>>9219037
wings and a cockpit.

>> No.9219520

You don't need anything flying in space if you have no intention of doing anything in space. That was it's problem, hence stuck in 70's tech and being essentially welfare for bureaucrats and few companies. Even the existing design could have been improved here and there, boosters being the most obvious example. But, why bother?

>> No.9220125

>>9219011
Saturn V could have put the Hubble into orbit 10x over in one launch lmao