Von Neumann, Feynman and Ulam

[Anonymous No.9195185]

I wonder what they are talking about

[Anonymous No.9195187]

Feynman is sexy af

[Anonymous No.9195190]

2 hungarians and an american

[Anonymous No.9195193]

>>9195190
*3 Jews

[Anonymous No.9195195]

>>9195193
but Von Neumann was a good jew, he was a hardline anti-communist

[Anonymous No.9195201]

>>9195195
There is literally nothing wrong with being Jewish

[Anonymous No.9195398]

>>9195201
this

[Anonymous No.9195461]

>>9195195
He certainly did associate with crypto-communists, but you're right. Quite many of his (jewish) colleagues were very sympathetic to the USSR, if not actual spies, and Oppenheimer didn't take these security risks seriously for some reason.
Also he converted to Catholicism on his deathbed which puts him a peg up in my book. How is it that the smartest man in history was not an atheist?
>>9195201
Although I agree, there's no denying that the Manhattan Project was a fundamentally Jewish project which may not have been justified.

[Anonymous No.9195486]

>>9195185
Making fun of Feynlet's IQ.

[Anonymous No.9195921]

>>9195185
man take a look at those phenotypes

[Anonymous No.9196105]

>>9195185
Build nukes.

[Anonymous No.9196114]

>>9195461
>How is it that the smartest man in history was not an atheist?
Have you ever seen an atheist in real life? They're literally angsty teenagers that can't go any deeper that "the bible isn't literally factually correct therefore god isn't real"

[Anonymous No.9196118]

>>9196114
This.

Atheism is a bad religion.

If you don't believe, just don't. Don't go around preaching.

[Anonymous No.9196355]

>>9196118
Atheists wouldn't need to be loudmouths if religious idiots didn't stick constantly try to stick their magical beliefs into the lives of people smart enough not to believe.
>>9195461
>How is it that the smartest man in history was not an atheist
Even the smartest man in history can be a coward that fears death. Smart people aren't super humans like some you autists believe. They're still badly evolved primates that are highly irrationa. Their overal nature doesn't change just because they're good at abstractions.
>>9196114
Yes. Ever been to a university? 90% of the professors will be atheists.
God damn some of you are smart but dumb.

[Anonymous No.9196385]

>>9195185
>I wonder what they are talking about

>hey, either of you stick your dicks in atom bomb parts?
>i wiped my balls on the instrumentation
><disgusted look>
>i shit in oppenheimers office chair
>i fucked the physics package

[Anonymous No.9196387]

>>9195201
There is literally nothing wrong with being a communist.

[Anonymous No.9196397]

>>9195921
Shit, you're right...

[Anonymous No.9196455]

>>9196387
Sure, as long as you stay in the closet, vote against communism, and never assert that you/society has a right to stuff that isn't yours.

[Anonymous No.9196496]

>>9196387
Except for being fucking stupid, sure

[Anonymous No.9196511]

>>9195185
PUA

[Anonymous No.9196825]

>>9196385
I lost.

[Anonymous No.9196832]

>>9195201
not sure if trolling

[Anonymous No.9196856]

>>9196355'
>magical beliefs
Your post only shows how little you understand of religion. If you can't go past le big wizard in the sky argument you should honestly just stay quiet because you're obviously not smart or knowledgeable enough.

[Anonymous No.9196859]

>>9196118
>atheism is a religion

[Anonymous No.9196862]

>>9196856
>s-stop arguing against me!
You rightcucks are disgusting because your political positions can't stand on their own merits so you feel the need to silence your opposition.

[Anonymous No.9196866]

>>9195185
All the pussy Feynman had slain.

[Anonymous No.9196873]

>>9196859

Religion: pursuit, interest, or movement, followed with great devotion.

Religion: Strict fidelity or faithfulness; conscientiousness; devotion to some principle

Oxford English Dictionary

[Anonymous No.9196875]

>>9196862

Saying things are "absurd" or "magical" is not an argument.

[Anonymous No.9196877]

>>9196873
Lol brainlets btfo by this definition. When will atheists accept that they are dogmatic?

[Anonymous No.9196878]

>>9196862
What does politics have to do with the post you're replying to?

[Anonymous No.9196886]

>>9196873
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/religion
>1. The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.
Nice cherrypicking you fucking faggot.

[Anonymous No.9196891]

>>9196886

> Thinking oxforddictionaries.com is the same as the OED
> Not realizing words can have more than 1 definition

[Anonymous No.9196898]

>>9196856
There are basically two ways to look at religion. As an early science or a social control mechanism. It's terrible at both attaining truth about the universe and at building prosperous modern civilizarions. We have superior methods now.

[Anonymous No.9196902]

>>9196891
You chose a bullshit secondary definition that isn't commonly used because it was convenient for your """"argument"""". You are a fraud.

[Anonymous No.9196903]

>>9196898
Include the grammatical errors, I'm fucking tired and phoneposting

[Anonymous No.9196907]

>>9196355
>>90% of the professors will be atheist
90% of statistics are made up on the spot

[Anonymous No.9196909]

>>9196903
Ignore*
Kek.

[Anonymous No.9196913]

>>9196907
http://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/

And that's on americunts who are more religious about muh jesus than advanced Europeans.

[4chan University No.9196916]

"Let me try, surely in vain, to set the record straight as there are so many subtle but horrifying myths that the Left has created about Nash to suit their purposes. (1) His name has entered science largely through his theory of balance in conflict — the Nash Equilibrium. The first movie to get this wrong had him as a reclusive professor whose computer, Joshua, arrived at the conclusion, “Don’t Play” to avert nuclear armageddon. In fact a stable Nash Equilibrium that averts a nuclear holocaust is attained via Mutually Assured Destruction — peace through strength. This idea was previously lampooned by the Hollywood Left’s caricature of Nash’s mentor, John von Neumann, the mad man with the autonomous glove in How I Learned to Love the Bomb."

[Anonymous No.9196928]

>>9196898
There are basically two ways to look at religion. As an early science or a social control mechanism.
Also the development of morality and consciousness.
>We have superior methods now.
What are they and what is the evidence of them being superior?

[Anonymous No.9196932]

>>9196913
So ~50% are atheist?
And this was evidence for muh 90%?
Try again

[Anonymous No.9196966]

Christcucks completely and utterly
BTFO
T
F
O

[Anonymous No.9196978]

>I wonder what they are talking about
incinerating Germany

[Anonymous No.9196982]

>>9196928
>Also the development of morality and consciousness.
That's linked directly with religion being a social control mechanism. What religions consider as morally 'good' are simply behaviours that were beneficial to the rulers of a bronze age society. You are severely blue pilled my friend.

[Anonymous No.9196987]

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/atheists-more-intelligent-than-religious-people-faith-instinct-cleverness-a7742766.html

Religitards btfo!