[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 3.87 MB, 2736x1822, IMG_0208.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9186650 No.9186650 [Reply] [Original]

Both are pop sci figures but none of them have any great achievements in their fields

>> No.9186651

Lol meant degrasse not degraded

>> No.9186671

>>9186650
>>9186651
Von Neumann is one of the most accomplished people of the 20th century. His every lecture spawned entirely new fields of research. Literally what are you talking about?

>> No.9186826

>>9186671
Neil probably has more knowledge than johnny now a days

>> No.9186830

>>9186826
von neumann probably did more research in a few weeks at his absolute peak than tyson has done in his entire career

>> No.9186845

I don't know much about Neil Tyson but people hype him up here, someone said he was the Einstein of this generation is this accurate?

>> No.9186876

>>9186845
>people hype him up here
actually 99.9% of people here criticise him most thoroughly

>> No.9186894

>>9186830
but theres more knowledge floating around nowa days also the internet so its safe to assume neil knows more than newman

>> No.9186904

>>9186894
by that logic you must be smarter than isaac newton because it's been 400 years

>> No.9186921

>>9186650
von Neumann contributed to and invented many branches of math/computer science/technology. More than that, Neumann was incredibly gifted at calculating and is by many regarded as the smartest person in modern history.

Neil DeGrasse Tyson sometimes show up on telly specials about black holes, spouting some shit that has been known since the 50s and acting like a smug cunt about it.

Weak bait but I still fell for it

>> No.9186955

>>9186826
no shit
Johnny is dead

>> No.9186967

>>9186904
yes, I know about relativity for example he argued against it

>> No.9186975

>>9186967
>newton
>argued against relativity
>400 years before relativity was theorized

wew lad, those are some top notch stupid pills you got there

>> No.9186979

>>9186975
he said E = 1/2mv2 + mgh which is in different to einsteins E = mc

>> No.9187054

>>9186979
One of those is an equation for total kinetic and potential energy, the other is Einsteins mass energy equivalence formula. They arent even describing the same thing. Please be trolling, it hurts to know there are people this stupid who are allowed to breed.

>> No.9187060

>>9187054
>>9186979
Also you missed the ^2, as in E=mc^2

>> No.9187070

>>9186975
We'll isn't relativity not that old a concept some people have argued that the ancient Egyptians had a understanding of general relativity before Einstein

>> No.9187090

>>9186975
(classical) relativity was theorized by Galilei. Also Eistein generalized Galilei's principle of relativity, called Einstein's principle of relativity.

>> No.9187092
File: 194 KB, 400x400, laughing-theoretical-physicist.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9187092

>>9186650
>posting on a von neuman architecture based computer
>he wasn't that smart, though

>> No.9187110
File: 308 KB, 550x368, Neil-DeGrasse-Tyson.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9187110

>>9186845
>someone said he was the Einstein of this generation is this accurate?
Comparing his intellect to that of Einstein is to compare Einstein's intellect to that of a flea.

>> No.9187297

>>9187110
Is this a troll

>> No.9187298

>>9187090
How could Galileo of understood relativity before non Euclidean geometry was invented?

>> No.9187321

>>9187298
This?

>> No.9187348

>>9187321
Not the person you're replying to, but galileo didnt understand relativity in the modern sense, but he studied the motion of different inertial systems (moving relative to each other)

>> No.9187478

>>9187070
WE

>> No.9187682

>>9187054
perhaps if newtton didnt put the 1/2 factor in his energy he would have noticed that the light needs to be veryfast i.e. c

>> No.9187737

>>9186650
Neil isn't an amazing astrophysicist, however he is a charismatic and interesting astrophysicist and because of this more people may gain interest in this field.

>> No.9188594

It's to crazy to think that Neil, because of modern information that he has a deeper understanding of physics than Einstein

>> No.9190049

>>9186967
Stop posting please

>> No.9190053

>>9186830
That's irrelevant. If you care about potential, then Amerindians are superior to europeans due to their superior development rate compared to europe populations.

>> No.9190095

>>9186650
pretty much, i don't get the von neumann worship, he was a hack.

>> No.9190098

>>9187478
WUZ

>> No.9190100

>>9190098
SCIENTISTS