Affirmative Action and Scientific analysis

[Anonymous No.9144804]

Affirmative Action makes zero sense under any context.

1. Black Student
70% white genetics, 30% black genetics
2. Black Student
5% white genetics, 95% black genetics

Both are considered the same classification in Affirmative Action. All AA does is give huge advantages to people who kind of look hispanic/asian. There is no rational basis behind Affirmative action that makes sense under any type of intelligent analysis (120+ IQ). Rich 70% white/30% black students can get the same score boost as 90% black ghetto students.

AA makes zero sense. All it does is give highly white/asian people that can say they are black or hispanic a huge advantage. I am 100% sure that you will see huge standard deviation skews of "hispanics" and "blacks" in college/AA positions to being highly mixed with white or Asian.

[Anonymous No.9144813]

>>9144804
>Affirmative Action makes zero sense under any context.
wrong, it makes sense after enslaving and committing hundreds of racist atrocities towards the black community and then somehow expecting them to just be fine as soon as you a few laws say that they're equal

[Anonymous No.9144816]

>>9144804
meant kind of look black/hispanic instead of asian.


Corey Booker
*47% African
*45% European
*7% Native American

[Anonymous No.9144820]

>>9144804
It makes 0 sense even if they were fully black/white/whatever. If anything we should be promoting the demographics with lower %s of things such as drug use, even though it would be unfair with the people of the demographic that don't fall on the average.

[Anonymous No.9144821]

Just check Hispanic. They will never ask. If you really want to fuck them just tell them you're a tranny.

[Anonymous No.9144823]

>>9144813
You know, the Jews don't have this problem in Germany. I think the atrocities over there were kinda not so great either.

[Anonymous No.9144824]

>>9144813
You are assuming Affirmative Action works in practice how you imagine in idealization.

https://www.good.is/articles/ivy-league-fooled-how-america-s-top-colleges-avoid-real-diversity
The statistics are striking: Though African immigrants, many of them from Nigeria and Ghana, make up less than 1 percent of America's total population, first- and second-generation black immigrants comprise 41 percent of all black students at Ivy League schools, according to 2007 research from teams at Princeton and Penn. Another study, this one published in Sociology of Education in 2009, found that immigrant blacks attended select colleges at almost four times the rate of native-born African Americans. Outside of the Ivy League, almost 44 percent of African immigrants graduated from a four-year college, compared to just 18 percent of native blacks.

While America’s most elite colleges do in fact make it a point to promote ethnic diversity on their campuses, a lot of them do so by admitting hugely disproportionate numbers of wealthy immigrants and their children rather than black students with deep roots—and troubled histories—in the United States.

[Anonymous No.9144825]

>>9144804
AA only benefits wealthy blacks/Hispanics/women

But people will call you racist and sexist if you openly disagree with it.

t. Non white

[Anonymous No.9144831]

>>9144820
>>9144821
>>9144823
the point is that there is absolutely zero logical sense to AA.

Like it fails under any analysis.

If it is to help poor black americans then why would rich nigerian children take up the same slots and positions? Those rich nigerians are probably descendants of people selling slaves in the first place.

[Anonymous No.9144836]

>>9144821

This is what I do for scholarships. I also get female scholarships for being in STEM.

[Anonymous No.9144849]

>>9144836
W-Where are you from?
Do you look like Kurisu Makise? Would you bother cosplaying her?

[Anonymous No.9144852]

>>9144825
blacks is a spectrum of 20% african to 100% african
hispanic is a spectrum of basically everything from 100% white to 100% native

Within these spectrums AA selects for the most white or most asian %.

[Anonymous No.9144860]

>>9144852
I don't have to run the study but here are the results

Ivy league "black" students - very rich or very white/mixed.

[Anonymous No.9144876]

Functionally, current AA does a few things. Hurts Asians and makes people feel better through illusion.

Even if you support AA you would have to realize that current AA does not function the way you imagine. It has wide and unclear genetic boundaries with no accounting for mixed race or country of origin. It also currently harms a minority more than any other which is America born asians via competition from Asian Born Asians with huge wealth for slots that represent only American % population.

Affirmative action is completely flawed and stupid in it's current incarnation at many fundamental levels regardless of your political viewpoint or if you support or hate the intended function of AA.

Right now it is is a stupid joke.

[Anonymous No.9144886]

>>9144804
Where are you fucking statistics to back your shit up? You don't even have any data.

[Anonymous No.9144900]

>>9144849

I-I'm a guy...I put that I'm a hispanic tranny on my scholarship applications, when I'm a straight white male.

AA is pushing for females to go into STEM, so I apply for those as well and say I'm a girl (male).

[Anonymous No.9144908]

>>9144886
What data you fucking low IQ monkey? Dumb brain shitter.

Are you saying 70% white 30% black can't use black on their applications?

[Anonymous No.9144911]

>>9144825
It benefits Jews too, since they take a large chunk of the quota given to whites.

[Anonymous No.9144914]

>>9144908
Because you are using two exceptional cases and compeltely disregarding their circumstances and how they were raised and what they identify. Also trying to do a whole "student B is lacker then student 1." even if that doesn't really make sense.

[Anonymous No.9144919]

>>9144911
Jews have flooded Ivy league schools once they were allowed in and perform better then other whites (who they area part of) so they get in first.

[Anonymous No.9144925]

>>9144914
so fucking dumb. Sorry but your brain is too shitty to continue with. If you look carefully at your post you might see why i find you too stupid to continue.

Particularly the part about disregarding circumstance.

[Anonymous No.9144926]

>>9144813
>complains about racism
>supports a racist policy

Amazing!

[Anonymous No.9144936]

>>9144926
The number of people accepted with AA (or acceptance polices that pick out small demographics) is pretty small.

[Anonymous No.9144937]

>>9144919
That's because Jews have the highest IQ in America. Jews are not white, and just as science and genetics back this up, historically in America Jews been treated as non-White.

[Anonymous No.9144939]

I'm latino (my parents are both immigrants from South America who came here for grad school) and hence benefit from affirmative action and I agree that it's a garbage system.

What ends up happening is that only rich latinos who already have advantages in life (like me and many of my friends from rich latino households) end up being the main beneficiaries. Also, it leads to lots of people from New Mexico who don't speak spanish who only have one latin grandparent playing up their Latinoness to get the affirmative action benefits. Now, I don't think I deserve affirmative action more than they do (neither of us should be given an unfair advantage) but it's just an example of the dishonesty this system promotes.

If we're going to do any sort of affirmative action, it should be strictly on the basis of economic struggles. I don't want people to assume that I'm disadvantaged just because of my race when actually my family is richer than most average American families.

[Anonymous No.9144941]

>>9144937
>historically in America Jews been treated as non-White.

They were treated as "low" whites like Italians and the Irish anon .

[Anonymous No.9144942]

>a system that puts people into large boxes of hispanic, asian, and black is surely nuanced and attuned to righting historic wrongs. Better ding poor thai people and compare them to rich chinese so we don't get too many asians. So fucking circumstantial and nuanced!

[Anonymous No.9144944]

>>9144939
It's all about Social Justice. Now let's find some rich Nigerians and get them to transfer their wealth to America while we fix the horrible wrongs of slavery in the process of brain draining

[Anonymous No.9144949]

>>9144939
But a lot, lot of poor folk benefit from AA anon (more so then the few rich that got helped by it).
Asians benefit from AA too as well..

[Anonymous No.9144950]

>>9144936
Actually the number accepted with AA is not small.

[Anonymous No.9144955]

>>9144949
>But a lot, lot of poor folk benefit from AA anon (more so then the few rich that got helped by it).
Then they should just ask every latino if they're rich or upper middle class, and if they are, then they should nullify any affirmative action benefits they might get.

But they won't do that because they prefer latinos who can pay their way through college than those who need financial aid.


>Asians benefit from AA too as well..

How? At least in the US, for the purpose of NIH diversity initiatives, they are not considered members of under-represented minorities.

[Anonymous No.9144956]

>>9144950
whites are 60% of the population, so there's millions of underperforming whites being allowed in every year over superior asians. ead.

[Anonymous No.9144958]

>>9144950
You kow they don't only loo kat race for aplciations. It's what you want to do, your background and what you plan to commit with your degree.

A white guy planning to stay in his podunk town would have a higher chance of getting in then an white guy who is gonna work at a LA hospital.

[Anonymous No.9144961]

>>9144804
If you elevate a black person from a poor neighborhood with a degree it will elevate his family for generations.

If you leave him where he is and expect him to get out on his own with all the cards stacked against him he and his community will continue to suffer.

So some white kid goes to his #2 university, big whoopity fucking do. His community won't suffer for it.

[Anonymous No.9144965]

>>9144949
evidence? Your last statement is obviously false so it's very hard to give you any cred on the first.

[Anonymous No.9144969]

>>9144961
You didn't address the fact that "black" is such a vague concept that it will not end up how you imagine. The more white mixed black will get that degree and slot.

[Anonymous No.9144971]

>>9144949
Actually you are wrong, when California ban Affirmative Action in 1996, admissions for Asian-american steadily increases over the years.

[Anonymous No.9144973]

>>9144955
Asians all flood the exact same top universities so their representation in top schools is horribly deceptive. In the South West they are many but outside of that they are pretty few in universities outside of that.

In particular in top Cali schools they all apply for the same schools so there jsut is way too much to even really pick from. AA abolished whites would drop ironically to the desires of the people who wanted it gone, Asians would gain a lot more and Blacks,Hispanics would heavily drop in numbers.

[Anonymous No.9144976]

>>9144969
It's nota vague concept though. Black in America is pretty easy to define as suck and being mixed (most Blacks are mixed to various degrees) doesn't even make you not Black. The possibility to a mixed guy using it is not an issue compared to the help it gives those other people.

>>9144971
It helps Asiansoutside of the few schools they go too.

[Anonymous No.9144977]

>>9144973
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_209

[Anonymous No.9144981]

>>9144961
But the risk is high if medical school admission is based on color of skin and not merit.

[Anonymous No.9144985]

>>9144976
Compare Corey Booker and Barack Obama to average "black american".

Less or close to 50% black and they somehow rise to the top. Just coincidence despite majority being 70-80% black?

All it does is generally select for the most white/asian

[Anonymous No.9144988]

>>9144973

So you're saying that affirmative action helps Asians but only for the second-rate schools? But what if they want to get into first-rate schools? Why not do race-blind admission? For example they could not look at the name and just look at scores and essays (which shouldn't be about race) . As a Latino it seems ridiculous that my Asian friends (who have very similar backgrounds like hard-working immigrant parents who emphasize education) and half-Asian friends are considered differently from me.

[Anonymous No.9144994]

>>9144961
Why should the person in your example being aided based on the fact that he's black and not that he's poor? Why should a rich black person receive aid? Why shouldn't a poor white person from a poor white neighborhood receive aid?

[Anonymous No.9144996]

>>9144961
>AA criteria

Are you black? Yes or No.

That is all. The imaginary land of poor neighborhood mattering is false. That could be an additional criteria but it is not part of AA.

The company/entity/university can select all 50%+ non african genetics people from rich neighborhoods.

[Anonymous No.9145009]

>>9144994
Because rich blacks do not do well academically too.

[Anonymous No.9145020]

>>9145009
Well, that's their own fucking fault, isn't it?

[Anonymous No.9145024]

>>9145020
nah it's not their fault Africa didn't have good genetic migration or selective functions for intelligence.

[Anonymous No.9145056]

>>9145009

[Anonymous No.9145058]

>>9145024
>genetic migration
>selective functions for intelligence.
Nice use of random words to make yourself sound smart.

[Anonymous No.9145060]

>>9145056
low IQ

The further down the higher % white the blacks are or from a different novel entertainment category such as sports.

[Anonymous No.9145061]

>>9144804
>zero sense under any context
Not that I think AA is good, but there is in fact a context under which it makes sense.

The context that is a cycle of failure is in place, and AA proponents wish to break the cycle by any means necessary. They feel justified because the black quota used to be 0%, by law.

I'll never forget how I suggested some good childrens' books for this young black mother to read to her son and she laughed and said "sorry, we don't do books." Unless this son is a genius with an iron will with determination that springs out of nowhere, he will be another low achiever.

The same year, I actually had chinese parents asking me what are some good books for their kids to learn english (since they already had the books to teach them chinese). Their children will grow up bilingual, inculcated with discipline, education, and hard work as core values, even if they aren't that smart.

You guys understand how genetics work but interestingly enough you don't seem to understand how values get handed down from parent to child and that they have a much more profound effect on achievement.

[Anonymous No.9145063]

>>9145058
+ Malaria / Diseases

[Anonymous No.9145066]

>>9145061
False assumptions based on the idea of AA versus the way AA functions.

It's similar to saying a "Stop poverty" program is great when the functional portion of the program is a man throwing eggs at poor people's homes.

There is a difference between the intent and functional effect of a program

[Anonymous No.9145075]

>>9145066
>False assumptions
what false assumptions did I make?

[Anonymous No.9145079]

>>9145061
You say there is a context/intent behind AA.

That is insufficient to support a program.

The intent behind the "projects" programs was to help blacks. Yet they are now tearing them down because it just led to worse environment and worse outcomes.

The intent does not matter as I said.
>It's similar to saying a "Stop poverty" program is great when the functional portion of the program is a man throwing eggs at poor people's homes.

Your post only talks about intent and vague generalities of good parenting which everyone would agree with.

You are arguing things orthogonal to the topic or pointless to the topic.

[Anonymous No.9145087]

>>9144813
>completely ignoring the point
>goes on a different tangent
why?

[Anonymous No.9145090]

>>9144936
Doesn't matter. It's still racist.

If it's so insignificant, why have it all?

Checkmate atheist.

[Anonymous No.9145091]

>>9144988
>So you're saying that affirmative action helps Asians but only for the second-rate schools?

Not all those schools outside of Asians Americans hotspots are second-rate anon (don't know why you assumed it as such).

Also way too much Asian applying for the certain schools means not EVERY one is gonna get in . They also take in special considerations for background as well (holistic) anon so that is always factored in.

>>9144985
Those guys are the exception in appearance and Cory Booker despite his large white ancestery is Black and has huge ties to the black community growing up (Attended black church, religious upbringing) and Obama was pretty deep in his community as well.

Those two didn't need AA to get in but other folk may have

[Anonymous No.9145093]

>>9145091
Are you sure high white % is an exception to AA hires? Just wondering but do you believe it's proportional to the black population?

[Anonymous No.9145109]

>>9145063
Why don't you attempt to explain what data is in that picture, then I will be impressed.

[Anonymous No.9145114]

>>9145109
Below is an example of principle component analysis separating groups of humans from different regions based on many genetic markers. As you can see it is fairly easy for scientists to determine what ethnicity someone is from their genetics.

copypasta

[Anonymous No.9145115]

>>9145114
There are two axis, though. And PCA is just a method to analyze data, not the data itself. What is being analyzed by the PCA?

[Anonymous No.9145118]

>>9144804
Chink here. American universities who accept black students do it because they know black students are less qualified and want to sabotage America in favor of China. Now you know.

[Anonymous No.9145122]

>>9145115
all the Mongol and European invasions into Sub Sahara africa led to a ton of genetic mixture.

[Anonymous No.9145128]

>>9144937
The jews have high IQs in this country because they killed /destroyed the dumb people. Now they are a bunch of autistic scum. They can't be allowed to continue.

[Anonymous No.9145131]

>>9145128
>because they killed /destroyed the dumb people
So now the Jews are Nazis then? Why don't the Jews put people like you in the oven then? It seems like this is what you are asking for.

[Anonymous No.9145133]

>>9145131
Ashkenazim are basically European or at least majority European genetically.

>muh 2000 years of inbreeding with only other jews

Even for 23andme etc the ashkenazim matches to jewish populations of only 500 years ago not actual biblical jewish.

[Anonymous No.9145182]

No one can distinguish this girl from a high % african girl. Racism effects them all the same. Affirmative Action isn't retarded.

[Anonymous No.9145189]

>>9145128
>The jews have high IQs in this country because they killed /destroyed the dumb people.

That's bullshit though. Jews do good because they entered fields that in the future have good payoffs and were given a chance that all though prone to discrimination had much more opportunity compared to Eastern Europe.

[Anonymous No.9145209]

>>9145066
Poverty programs have worked very well since their inception. Unless your rubric of success is 'make poverty 0%'. Which is pretty moronic. Likewise affirmative action programs have also been a success.

http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/how-the-war-on-poverty-succeeded-in-four-charts
http://diversityweb.org/Digest/F98/farreaching.html

[Anonymous No.9145222]

>>9145209
Good thing we made no technological progress or other changes. It's nice to be able to isolate government programs and know their exact impact.

I think China rose up hundreds of millions from poverty using food stamps too.

[Anonymous No.9145226]

>>9144804
>be American
>have friend of the family
>he looks 100% white
>find out he's legitimately hispanic, got to tick "Hispanic" when applying to college
>tells me he's german on his dad's side
>his mom's side is from a group of germans who ended up in latin america
>mfw i remember about nazis fleeing to south america following world war 2 to escape justice
>mfw i realize there's a strong possibility my friend is descended from nazi escapees and was granted affirmative action for it

I swear that this sounds like such a fucking stretch joke that I made up for reposts on 4chan, but it's 100% true. I don't know whether he's actually from Nazis on his mom's side, but the part about him being pure German-blooded Hispanic who got college AA is completely true.

Topical song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylgOY5YF1HE

[Anonymous No.9145258]

>>9145222
China's difficulties are not remotely the same as ours. We are losing jobs to other nations, not lifting our nation into the industrial age.

[Anonymous No.9145274]

>>9145258
there are ages after the industrial age

[Anonymous No.9145289]

>>9145258
You gained jobs more like it but they just require more education which your educational system can't really output the workers that well due to issues at the federal, state and local level.

Many states just don't have the draw to bring in jobs or fail to keep them in for long (many states are basically the last step before a company moves manufacturing or w/e out of the states)

[Anonymous No.9145502]

>>9145128
Did they go back in time to carry out that plan? Jews have been winning Nobel Prizes disproportionately since before Einstein. I don't think we need an IQ test to figure out what that means. If anything, the Jews have been getting dumber in relation to everyone else.

nb4 (((they))) are pretending to be more dumb now to throw everyone off guard while they take over the world

[Anonymous No.9145519]

>>9144813
The first post is always sjw bullshit.ALSWAYS.

[Anonymous No.9145563]

>>9145519
The best part is it had nothing to do with the points brought up in the OP.

AKA the lack of a nuanced selection function for AA that makes some logical sense besides "Do you feel black Y/N?"

There is no gradient to the selection criteria or nuance to economic status while growing up. So it even does a poor job of picking the best from ghettos for the spots but instead picks from the best neighborhoods and foreign wealthy students.

[Anonymous No.9145578]

>>9145079
>Yet they are now tearing them down because it just led to worse environment and worse outcomes.
[citation needed]

[Anonymous No.9145580]

>>9144804
>All AA does is give huge advantages to people who kind of look hispanic/asian.
Can you explain how this works? I've never heard anything like this before.

[Anonymous No.9145586]

>>9145079
>That is insufficient to support a program. The intent behind the "projects" programs was to help blacks.
Do you really think they would have done it if they KNEW it was going to fail?

>>9145563
>There is no gradient to the selection criteria or nuance to economic status while growing up.
False actually. But for what it's worth, blacks from the "best neighborhoods" and "foreign wealthy students" also used to be banned from American schools without any thought for "gradients."

>>9145580
It's just an autistic mental gymnastics routine he developed while high on meth or weed. When he sobers up he'll look at his OP and realize that it makes zero sense.

[Anonymous No.9145592]

>>9145586
>>There is no gradient to the selection criteria or nuance to economic status while growing up.
>False actually. But for what it's worth, blacks from the "best neighborhoods" and "foreign wealthy students" also used to be banned from American schools without any thought for "gradients."

Funny thing is that when shitting on Blacks it's just so EASY to define who is and who isn't in snap but the minute, the minute it's something remotely good it's like "who is Black and who isn't? Man what is Black! Is Corey Booker a black, is Clarence Thomas, or Condalezza Rice?".

[Anonymous No.9145597]

>>9145563
>So it even does a poor job of picking the best from ghettos for the spots but instead picks from the best neighborhoods and foreign wealthy students.

It's the top university's who do that because picking low income students doesn't boost university rankings since they are rank whore's obviously so they pick good students who are relatively well off.

[Anonymous No.9145599]

>>9145578
The big building high rise projects
https://newsone.com/1555245/most-infamous-public-housing-projects/

[Anonymous No.9145607]

affirmative action is blatantly racist. They should just boost scores by income ffs

[Anonymous No.9145612]

>>9144961
then do it by income you fuckwit

[Anonymous No.9145624]

>>9144804
I say I'm a hispanic tranny and go to college for free. They want to be morons and put in such a retarded system, then I'll take advantage of their stupidity.

[Anonymous No.9145628]

The original point of AA was about the U.S. government making sure institutions didn't actively bar individuals from entering due to their race or sex.

The slot/quota movement within AA current structure came later and is a separate issue from the intent of AA's foundation.

But of course to know this would require actually studying the issue relatively in depth. The slot/quota system in modern history is of Russian origin to provide ethnic non-majorities to have a say in local/ state governments. This is also of course practice today in modern China too.

Why you chuckle fucks seem to confuse the intent of AA with it's current execution is beyond me.

[Anonymous No.9145633]

>>9145628
wait they didn't do genetic tests on the students back then?

[Anonymous No.9145644]

>>9145628
>this benign obscure thing morphed into an recognizable monster why are people criticizing the monster

[Anonymous No.9145674]

>There is no rational basis behind Affirmative action
This is nonsense

There is plenty of rational & evil reasons behind pushing it.

>>9145628
The point of AA, same as the point of all liberalism, is to disposses whites of their communists/institutions/jobs and eventually their country

You are delusional if you think the INTENT of AA was ever something good or noble.

[Anonymous No.9145675]

>>9145644
It was always a fucking monster
In the 50's the supreme court ruled that whites have no right to their own schools, that having nice white schools is "white supremacy"

Affirmative action started as an evil agenda to shove undeserving non-whites into places they were not welcome, and now the non-whites have taken over these institutions, it exists to keep whites out.

How can you argue against these things if you inherently approve of their supposed motives/intent?

[Anonymous No.9146008]

>>9145675
>In the 50's the supreme court ruled that having nice white schools is "white supremacy"
You might be a nigger yourself based on your inability to grok prepositional logic

[Anonymous No.9146206]

>>9145644

>this benign obscure thing morphed into an recognizable monster why are people criticizing the monster

It's not about it being obscure, it's about understanding the difference between intent and execution. The "monster" as you call it can be criticized but there should not be confusion over why it came to exist in the first place. That has already been well documented.

>The point of AA, same as the point of all liberalism, is to disposses whites of their communists/institutions/jobs and eventually their country
>You are delusional if you think the INTENT of AA was ever something good or noble

And you're delusional if you think AA was created as some conspiratorial movement to undermine Whites.

You wanna know what were events that did undermine Whites though?

Capitalism, Alantic Slave trade and WW2.

Capitalism is reason why western companies sought foreign workers in foreign nations, it's the reason why a lot of unions to protect worker rights no longer exist, it's also the reason countries like China have become an economic power house.

The Alantic Slave trade was created to avoid paying whites for work that they could have done. It also was the premiere event that introduce blacks (foreign immigrants in general) in mass exodus to white nations causing a breakdown in social cohesion.

WW2 is the reason +40 million white people died across America, Canada and European nations which crippled future population potential and was used to justify increase immigration to buffer birthrate numbers. It also allowed women to be introduced in the workforce in mass which showed companies that not only were the female sex capable of doing roughly the same work as men but could also be paid less too. This is why job competition became more crowded as both sexes instead of one joined the market.

These three events undermined Whites but are not born of liberalism. But again to know this would actually require studying the issue relatively in depth.

[Anonymous No.9146209]

>this benign obscure thing morphed into an recognizable monster why are people criticizing the monster

It's not about it being obscure, it's about understanding the difference between intent and execution. The "monster" as you call it can be criticized but there should not be confusion over why it came to exist in the first place. That has already been well documented.

>>9145674

>The point of AA, same as the point of all liberalism, is to disposses whites of their communists/institutions/jobs and eventually their country
>You are delusional if you think the INTENT of AA was ever something good or noble

And you're delusional if you think AA was created as some conspiratorial movement to undermine Whites.

You wanna know what were events that did undermine Whites though?

Capitalism, Alantic Slave trade and WW2.

Capitalism is reason why western companies sought foreign workers in foreign nations, it's the reason why a lot of unions to protect worker rights no longer exist, it's also the reason countries like China have become an economic power house.

The Alantic Slave trade was created to avoid paying whites for work that they could have done. It also was the premiere event that introduce blacks (foreign immigrants in general) in mass exodus to white nations causing a breakdown in social cohesion.

WW2 is the reason +40 million white people died across America, Canada and European nations which crippled future population potential and was used to justify increase immigration to buffer birthrate numbers. It also allowed women to be introduced in the workforce in mass which showed companies that not only were the female sex capable of doing roughly the same work as men but could also be paid less too. This is why job competition became more crowded as both sexes instead of one joined the market.

These three events undermined Whites but are not born of liberalism. But again to know this would actually require studying the issue relatively in depth.

[Anonymous No.9146218]

>>9145644

>this benign obscure thing morphed into an recognizable monster why are people criticizing the monster

It's not about it being obscure, it's about understanding the difference between intent and execution. The "monster" as you call it can be criticized but there should not be confusion over why it came to exist in the first place.

>>9145674 #

>The point of AA, same as the point of all liberalism, is to disposses whites of their communists/institutions/jobs and eventually their country
>You are delusional if you think the INTENT of AA was ever something good or noble

And you're delusional if you think AA was created as some conspiratorial movement to undermine Whites.

You wanna know what were events that did undermine Whites though?

Capitalism, Alantic Slave trade and WW2.

Capitalism is reason why western companies sought foreign workers in foreign nations, it's the reason why a lot of unions to protect worker rights no longer exist, it's also the reason countries like China have become an economic power house.

The Alantic Slave trade was created to avoid paying whites for work that they could have done. It also was the premiere event that introduce blacks (foreign immigrants in general) in mass exodus to white nations causing a breakdown in social cohesion.

WW2 is the reason +40 million white people died across America, Canada and European nations which crippled future population potential and was used to justify increase immigration to buffer birthrate numbers. It also allowed women to be introduced in the workforce in mass which showed companies that not only were the female sex capable of doing roughly the same work as men but could also be paid less too. This is why job competition became more crowded as both sexes instead of one joined the market.

These three events undermined Whites but are not born of liberalism. But again to know this would actually require studying the issue relatively in depth.

[Anonymous No.9146223]

>>9144824
Yep. This is the biggest issue with affirmative action. Garbage schools and low opportunities for poor urban folks and then on top of that colleges let in either atheletes or rich minorities. Hard to imagine a worse way to address the issues of education equality

[Carbon No.9146227]

>>9144804
You do realize how easy it is to identify as black/hispanic etc if you wanted to right?

Its not by percentages because these are discrete classes.

[Anonymous No.9146248]

>it's a brainlet spegs conflate social dynamics and rational thought episode
Humans are not rational, why would you think any system humans create and gravitate towards will be logical? If there was a system of law based on pure logic no one would follow it because 99% of people would get extremely asshurt as some of the conclusions that don't "feel" right.
The only winning move is to realize that laws and rules are not based upon reasoning. Reasoning is merely a tool to attempt to systematize emotions.

[Anonymous No.9146289]

>>9144813
You are not entitled to that which you did not suffer. It's a basic principle of Justice. Only the former the slaves themselves were entitled to reparations.

[Anonymous No.9146319]

>>9144824

that's really terrible. i disagree with AA/quotas, but that's even worse.

if anything, college admissions should heavily favor american students over foreigners.

[Anonymous No.9146323]

>>9146319

and i don't say that out of disdain for foreigners, but educating our local communities should be priority 1.

[Anonymous No.9146539]

>>9146319
You don't find it deliciously ironic the super liberal colleges and tech/etc companies just find ways to have "blacks" but cherrypicked to not represent african americans at all?

[Anonymous No.9146632]

>>9146539

the irony is not lost on me. i'd still prefer educated neighbors to educated foreign nationals. private ivy-league schools aside, isn't it our tax dollars funding most of our universities?

[Anonymous No.9146673]

>>9146632
Yeah I'm sure ivy leagues want lots of people from the black slum neighborhoods.

It's not a flaw, it's a feature. Point of AA is illusional and to feel better.

[Anonymous No.9146678]

>>9146673

which is why if AA must exist, it should do no more than slightly correct representation to more closely match the local populous.

[Anonymous No.9146840]

>>9144813
america is the least racist 1st world country in the world

[Anonymous No.9146940]

>>9146673
the student base is more diverse and many of those poor students do go to other decent universities or community colleges. Even then the top colleges often use a holisitic approach as well and pick out poor students of all types too.

[Anonymous No.9146955]

>>9146678
Because that involves fixing the mess that is the American schooling
system across 51 states+ all those schoolboards with different issues which is basically impossible.

[Anonymous No.9147056]

>>9146955
>system across 51 states+ all those schoolboards with different issues which is basically impossible.

It's genetics which is why the "fixing" of school systems doesn't ever work.

[Anonymous No.9147621]

>>9144937
Yet when considering jews make up only 3% of the US population, there is 5 white goys with just as high of an IQ for every high IQ ashcannazi.

[Anonymous No.9147826]

>>9144831
what the fuck are you saying? you just rehashed your previous point which anons already countered. AA is based off a moral obligation and the reasoning that if we artificially grant educational opportunities to groups that are currently lacking them it will lead to a natural equalization and eventual meritocracy.

The execution of it as you mention with wealthy foreigners doesnt invalidate the premise.

[Anonymous No.9147831]

>>9145079
just shut the fuck up already, aside from your reddit spacing every single one of your points is a conflation of PREMISE and EXECUTION of AA

[Anonymous No.9147832]

>>9147826
your brain doesn't work

How does the fact AA selects for rich foreigners and mixed race not invalidate the premise? If the premise is to give education opportunities to people lacking them then how does selecting from upper crust and mixed race kids do that?

It's not selecting from the people in ghettos and inner cities which is what I'd imagine you mean with lacking opportunities.

[Anonymous No.9147835]

>>9147826
The problem with your premise is that you imagine intent = function. Meaning that because AA has an intent you agree with that the function of AA achieves that intent effectively.

It doesn't. It straight up doesn't work how you imagine. I would recommend you look for actual statistical evidence to back up your points on AA being a success

Just fyi another "good intent" program of headstart programs under Obama have been proven to not work and be wastes of money.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2016/09/21/income-inequality-between-white-black-americans-is-worse-today-than-in-1979-infographic/#19f1fc9c3740

[Anonymous No.9147836]

is this an actual troll lmao? Its pretty simple, you take the exact system we have right now only you give all the slots you are currently giving to foreigners to nationals and it is suddenly successful and the premise hasnt changed. ergo your problem isnt with AA as an idea it with the application

[Anonymous No.9147838]

>>9147826
https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/08/03/report-scant-scientific-evidence-for-head-start-programs-effectiveness

Again, because a program sounds good and has good intent is not sufficient to support it.

[Anonymous No.9147841]

>>9147835
no where do i assume that intent = function, in fact I think AA is a shit show of retardation for exactly this reason. I simply pointed out that some anons in this thread are crying about how AA is shit with out being specific either intentionally or ignorantly that it is the execution and/or evolution of it they have a problem with.

[Anonymous No.9147843]

>>9147836
Who could logically be against such intent?

>If we do X it will effectively improve society

Of course everyone would be for it. The hard part is finding what X it is. Your logic is shit fuckface.

Under your logic we should all support communism because it has great intent despite not working in practice. Saying communism has good intent does not mean anything. Intent is meaningless. Society regularly selfish horrible intents to make the world a much better place.

[Anonymous No.9147844]

>>9147841
I was never invalidating the premise. I was always invalidating the function, execution, and results.

There have only been a few posts angry saying AA is racist and none have come from OP. I can't imagine how any of my posts could be interpreted as saying I hope races stay unequal and blacks stay poor.

[Anonymous No.9147872]

>>9146673
Irrelevant. Black people suffered a social selection of slavery filtering all rebelious and not assimilating the successful ones for centuries.

The entire black people history consists of their own country considering them the same as animals. The same people who lived in the same country as black people treated and considered them as inferior beings.

This will never EVER be forgotten.

[Anonymous No.9147899]

>>9147872
muh feels, dont forget sold by other blacks.

also your post is off topic.

[Anonymous No.9147906]

>>9147872
1890 slave in middle east
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_trade


Dont forget to learn all the history of black slavery. The arabs treated them far worse

Ibn Battuta who visited the ancient African kingdom of Mali in the mid-14th century recounts that the local inhabitants vie with each other in the number of slaves and servants they have, and was himself given a slave boy as a "hospitality gift."

Also many times more slaves taken to the middle east than to north america. Notice a lot of afro-arab communities? Wonder why not?

[Anonymous No.9147922]

>>9147906
Itrelevant. The consequences are there.
>>9147899
So you believe that history doesn't affect people?

[Anonymous No.9147926]

>>9147922
No it definitely does. USA is still suffering heavily for the mistake of slavery. Just look at crime rates and other problems the country still has to deal with because of the mistake.

[Anonymous No.9147931]

>>9147926
It's simple. White people has to suffer the same as african americans did.

Is it that hard to understand?

[Anonymous No.9147940]

>>9147931
going to get back at the arabs or africans who sold them too? Slavery was huge in Africa and Arab lands too. Got a lot of people's descendants to get back at.

[Anonymous No.9147946]

>>9147940
It's simple. The centuries of social selection, killing of rebels and assimilating the prosperous ones, would be the "payment". Don't you agree?

[Anonymous No.9148873]

>>9147931
In 2012, Obama did sign an executive order to make White people to suffer the same as african americans.

[Anonymous No.9148904]

>>9147832
Because the numbers in the ghettos applying is pretty low.

[Anonymous No.9148908]

>>9144831
Vast majority of Nigerians aren't rich at all anon.

[Anonymous No.9148953]

>>9148908
But those that make it to America are relatively rich and top 10% in Nigeria.

[Anonymous No.9149104]

>>9148873
You have to get mongrelized then extinct. Don't you agree?

[Anonymous No.9149113]

>>9145519
>OP is always /pol/ bullshit
>1st post is always something retarded that is most likely /pol/ falseflagging "to create discussion" (i.e. to keep shit threads from dying)
Really makes you think

[Anonymous No.9149123]

>>9148953
Lol that's bullshit. Most Nigerians are poor or middle class at best.

They aren't even the top 10% in many cases

[Anonymous No.9149127]

>>9149104
Funny because African Americans have more southern slave owner ancestor's genes in them than most whites. If you want to get back at the descendants of slave owners you'd also want to include African Americans. There was a lot of rape.

[Anonymous No.9149131]

>>9149123
The africans that do get into America usually have high education levels (for Africans). Doesn't translate that well to success in America but they do have relatively high education levels comparatively.

[Anonymous No.9149136]

>>9149127
It's simple. Black people have been under social selection as slaves and violent oppresion for centuries. Whiteys have to receive the same treatment. Right?

[Anonymous No.9149273]

>>9149136
Yes, but what about children who are murdered. All of us have ancestors who murdered children. I think we should get revenge for them first.

[Anonymous No.9149305]

>>9149273
When did it happen?

[Anonymous No.9149314]

>>9149305
You don't think any of your ancestors ever killed a kid?
A huge portion of Asia is related to Ghenghis Khan who killed an enormous number of people too.

We all have murderers in our ancestry, it's time for justice to be served.

[Anonymous No.9149318]

>>9149314
Irrelevant. Black people have been enslaved by white people. Now white people have to suffer the same fate black people lived. European extinction is near. Your replacement is imminent.

[Anonymous No.9149321]

>>9144804
>Both are considered the same classification in Affirmative Action.
AND they're both "considered the same classification" by racists (like your average /pol/ack).
They're still presumably facing the same prejudice AA is supposed to combat.

[Anonymous No.9149325]

>>9149314
>You don't think any of your ancestors ever killed a kid?
We've all killed children, whether you want to admit it or not.
If you've ever voted, or (worse yet) not voted, you've empowered the people that (At a county level) have to make budget decisions involving public safety (police, fore, etc), vs school band uniforms, etc.
If even one child dies because the people you empowered spent a single penny on something besides public safety, that blood is on your hands.
I know it sounds pedantic and absurd, but in reality everything is connected, and ANY decision you make is going to affect someone's survival at some point.

[Anonymous No.9149333]

>>9149318
>Now white people have to suffer the same fate black people lived
How absurd.
You might as well say "some woman killed a man once, so all women must be killed".
As long as you insist on associating some crime with the people you arbitrarily group them with, you're just going to perpetuate the same atrocities you clam to abhor.

[Anonymous No.9149350]

>>9149333
This is the thing. Blacks have been under a social selection system of slavery for centuries. If such slavery didn't affect the population nowadays consequences, then whiteys don't have anything to fear. Don't you agree?