[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 168 KB, 623x547, 634346.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9072520 No.9072520 [Reply] [Original]

How does /sci/ feel about the Einstein of our generation Neil Degrasse Tyson?

>> No.9072524

>>9072520
He is really smart xddd
Look how many things he said i dont understan 1 word but lol so smart
also everyone in my class likes football :-( except me because i am smarter and mature for my age :^)

>> No.9072525

>>9072520
We already have a meme scientist thread here >>9065287

>> No.9072549
File: 43 KB, 613x481, dunning_kruger.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9072549

>>9072525
They're on different tiers. Dawkins actually has clear convictions, but Neil is just a slut for anything he thinks will direct more people's attention toward the sciences even if they have no business being there. Neil gets as many people as he can to Mount Stupid and just leaves them there.

>> No.9072577

>>9072520
I wonder if he even know what does momentum mean.

>> No.9073337

>>9072524
Omg me too!!!
I listen to Led zepp loll hes the best even though im a girl and 13 lol

>> No.9073653
File: 555 KB, 1044x550, Neil DeBlack Tysson.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9073653

>There are more stars in the night sky than atoms in the entire universe.
He literally said this. He is not /ourguy/.

>> No.9073668

>>9073653
bwaaahaaaa the jews are just as much dumb fucks as dumbo tyson chicken and wtermelon tyson. comparing einstein to tyson is alot more accurate than wanna be smarties could believe. they are both trash.

more stars than atoms! classic nig-sci

>> No.9073669
File: 52 KB, 960x763, 16427532_1841212876146747_2235974142328108309_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9073669

>>9073653
wot? is that real? let me check

>> No.9073672

>>9073653
The balls

>> No.9073696

>>9073653
I had to look that up.

Holy shit...

It's real

>> No.9073699

>>9073653
>>9073668
>>9073669
>>9073672

>There are more stars in the night sky than atoms in the entire universe.

The real quote is

>there are more stars in the known universe, than there are grains of sand on our earth

Tyson is annoying, but he's not completely retarded.

>> No.9073707

>>9072520
I still cant balieve he said
>Threres infinitely more rational numbers than integers
>Theres like, 5 levels of infinity in mathematics

>> No.9073710

>>9073707
Isn't he right though? I know there's a lot of kinds of infinity.. but he essentially still right... right?

>> No.9073734
File: 29 KB, 429x425, 429px-Diagonal_argument.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9073734

>>9073710
>Threres infinitely more rational numbers than integers
I don't know if Tyson really said this. but it's completely wrong.

>> No.9073741

>>9073734
Can you explain how it's wrong? Is there not an infinite amount of rational numbers between 0 and 1? Is the number of rational numbers not an uncountable infinity?

Infinity math fucks me up...

>> No.9073742
File: 56 KB, 600x600, 3434535.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9073742

>>9072520
This is the so called Black Science Man (BCM)?

>> No.9073746

>>9073699
So now he wants us to believe that there are more grains of sand on earth than atoms in the universe? Who does this guy think he is?

>> No.9073751

>>9073734
kys retard

>> No.9073753

>>9073742
>Black Science Man (BCM)
wouldn't it be BSM? fucking gorillaposter

>> No.9073754

>>9073741
>>9073734
NDT said (correctly) that there are more irrationals than natural numbers, but then he says that there are more transcendental numbers than there are irrationals, which is completely false.

>> No.9073785

>>9073751
Stop larping.

>> No.9073794

>>9073785
get a clue idiot

>> No.9073801

>>9073794
>Weak bait
>0/10
>Come see me.

>> No.9073805

>>9073801
fuck off gorillaposter

the concept of infinity is not as simple as you seem to think it is

>> No.9073814

>>9073805
There's a bijection between rational numbers and integers, prove me wrong you fucking pseud.

>> No.9073863

>>9073710
there are infinite number of infinities

>>9073741
>rational numbers not an uncountable infinity
no, its countable.

>>9073754
i cant remember

>> No.9073876

>>9073863
>there are infinite number of infinities
Eh, not really, the "number of infinities" exceeds that of any infinity, it's like a box containing all boxes type situation in a sense.

>> No.9073889

>>9073741
Can you please just fuck off from /sci/? All of your questions are easily answerable by reading 1-3 pages of any introductory mathematical logic textbook or even just by watching pop-sci videos you'd know this shit. It takes zero effort. So, are you a toddler or a retard?

>> No.9073975

>>9073710
There are as much rational numbers as integers. You can line them up and compare, both lines are the exact same size, and you can pair each item one by one. Sure it will take forever, but details.

Now, the real numbers on the other hand, for each single integer there exist more real numbers than the amount og integers there is.