[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 178 KB, 640x480, schw_992.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9063817 No.9063817 [Reply] [Original]

Reminder that 0=infinity and everything else is just autism.

>> No.9063819

>>9063817
Reminder that schizophrenia does not mean profundity.

>> No.9063831
File: 42 KB, 500x479, john-nash-20090802221337.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9063831

>> No.9063833

Infinites were a mistake.

>Cantor's diagonal argument
>Gödel's incompleteness theorem
>Zeno's paradox
>Galileo's paradox
>Ross–Littlewood problem

The list goes on and on. The so called "solutions" to these problems (the ones that have solutions) are hideous abortions tacked onto real math and logic. Most of modern math is only usable in a tiny subset of the problems it can be applied to. Finite length statements/equations that need to be decidable in a finite amount of time, e.g. all formal systems, cannot be expected to properly deal with infinites.

Thanks for reading, I know most of you are too indoctrinated to agree.

>> No.9063869

>>9063817
0 = infinitesimal, you fucking retard fucking jesus christ

>> No.9063899

0 is an o just slightly taller

>> No.9063950

0 is equal to infinity but infinity and zero are not the same thing.

>> No.9063989

>>9063833
How about giving some cogent arguments? All you did was affirm an opinion without actually defending it. Convince us by telling us why you're right.

>> No.9063998

>>9063989
I don't really care if you know I'm right. If you are wrong your whole life it won't affect me in the slightest. I just wanted to provoke some thought.

>> No.9064013

>>9063998
>I just wanted to provoke some thought.
Better luck next time. Hand waving tends not to achieve that goal.

>> No.9064018

>>9064013
Whatever you think, friend. It's fairly obvious that most paradoxes involve either infinity or self-reference, which amounts to the same thing. If you refuse to consider it there's nothing else I can do.

>> No.9064032

>>9064018
>If you refuse to consider it there's nothing else I can do.
You could give arguments. Do you expect me to take you at your word? You've been dismissing discussion, not me.

>> No.9064044

>>9064032
Like I said, I can't be bothered. I've pointed you in the right direction, and the rest is up to you.

>> No.9064054
File: 353 KB, 666x500, 1500976774333.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9064054

>>9064044
>larp more

>> No.9064092
File: 117 KB, 910x1048, Spock.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9064092

>>9063817
Quite logical.

>> No.9064101

hes right though

if you spin a circle fast enough it makes a sphere. same thing

>> No.9065040

>>9063833
>Zeno's paradox
resolved by the concept of a limit

Im unfamiliar with the other paradoxes