[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 48 KB, 220x285, 1925_kurt_gödel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9051585 No.9051585 [Reply] [Original]

>hurr durr if I map infinity onto stuff I can prove that you know nothing, checkmate atheists

Doesn't Gödel's assumption only work if you believe there to be an infinite amount of axioms?

>> No.9051597
File: 534 KB, 1920x1200, thinking.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9051597

If a set of axioms isn't enough for consistency, why not make a category of axioms?

>> No.9051607

>>9051597
Doesn't that still run into the problem of being able to add in an infinite amount of axioms?

>> No.9051663
File: 1.33 MB, 2000x1523, 1494340977360.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9051663

>infinite

found your problem

when will people stop the memes and realize the redpill is a youtube search away?

>> No.9051691

>>9051663
I only put the memes out thinking it would draw in more people to debate it.
t. spoonfeedmepls

>> No.9051693

>>9051663
[math]\mathbb{N} = \emptyset[/math]

>> No.9051697
File: 31 KB, 213x258, cooldog.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9051697

>>9051693
>[math] \mathbb{N} [/math]
No such thing.

>> No.9051703

>>9051697
Why would he want to get rid of [math]\mathbb{N}[/math]? Why would he also think abstract mathematical concepts need to be grounded in physics? I feel like Wildberger is trying to find a solution where there is no problem.

>> No.9051704

>>9051691
i've opened the door, only you can walk through it

>> No.9051708
File: 67 KB, 624x351, p03696p7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9051708

>>9051703
mathematics was born out of the physical world

>> No.9051715

>>9051703
> The Syracuse problem is not a problem

>> No.9051721

>>9051704
True enough anon. But, what you're claiming is that because we live in a finite world, it is stupid to assume that there COULD be an infinite amount of axioms? But doesn't also just say that Godel was wrong? Unless you count all possible primes part of the physical world.

>> No.9051723

>>9051708
So numbers exist in the physical world now?

>> No.9051726

>>9051723
you need to have passed high school to post here friend

>> No.9051732

>>9051726
I think you haven't considered the problem of what the ontology of numbers is. There's no obvious answer to whether or not numbers exist in the physical world.

>> No.9051745

>>9051726
Das ist kein Argument.

>> No.9051748

>>9051745
can't argue on a triple digit iq discussion with a two digit iq pleb

>> No.9051751

>>9051748
You're not helping your cause. It seems like you have no arguments to give.

>> No.9051758
File: 142 KB, 1038x576, Ferdinand-smug-1038x576.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9051758

>>9051751
i never had the intent. ta ta.

>> No.9051764

>>9051758
Class, here is a textbook case of the Dunning–Kruger effect.

>> No.9051775
File: 617 KB, 1920x1080, hot-gorilla-today-150625-tease_f85bf9d67d8f7fd4a3f4af0d8e69e109.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9051775

>>9051764
it's actually called the gorilla bait & cuck newfag, got you right on my hook

>> No.9051779

>>9051775
How will I ever recover?