[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 4 KB, 171x211, doubt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9031369 No.9031369 [Reply] [Original]

>some local environmental phenomenon happens
>this must be GLOBAL WARMING

I accept Global Warming as a real issue but I can't help but feel suspicious when some local effect happens and people claim that it's because of Global Warming. With how much certainty can a scientific community or research group contribute global warming to a local effect? Say erosion, changes in antarctic geography, icebergs, typhoons, or just an abnormally warm day in February?

>> No.9031371

>>9031369
Nice b8 m8

>> No.9031379

>>9031371
Not b8, I'm just curious. I think a lot of skeptics are just kind of frustrated with the politicization of the entire thing. I just want to know how an aggregate issue can be contributed in individual cases.

>> No.9031671

>>9031379
>""skeptics""

why does it seem like everyone who takes this label on lately only cares about skepticism when it comes to 9/11 and global warming

>> No.9031982
File: 76 KB, 1300x867, 23697798-man-is-looking-skeptical-Stock-Photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9031982

>damn it's hot today
>muh global warming

>> No.9032375

>>9031369
>erosion
more accurate the greater the scale of analysis. although other variables must be considered like other anthropogenic consequences like walking or development

>> No.9032391

>>9032375
this is the rest of this post i forgot about
yes those events can be blamed on global warming,. with serious research, which is where you should get your information. it is too easy for the subinformed to say this, ">>9031982" and when that happens the actual gravity of our existential crisis is shaded