/sci/ memes

[Anonymous No.9015863]

Post your best /sci/ence related memes

[Anonymous No.9015900]

[Anonymous No.9015934]

[Geometric Unity No.9016168]

[math]2\pi+\big(\Phi\pi\big)^3\approx137[/math]

[Anonymous No.9016218]

[Anonymous No.9016242]

>>9016218
I see this posted in every one of these threads, and it's terrible. No originality in it, off the top of my head it reminds me of the meme where differentiate is used against an \latex{e^x} pokemon and it "doesn't effect..."

This is an overused joke please stop.

I forgive you.

[Anonymous No.9016250]

[Anonymous No.9016406]

[Anonymous No.9016418]

[Anonymous No.9017029]

>>9016242
If you are going to complain about people posting bad jokes, you should put your money where your mouth is and post some jokes of your own or shut the fuck up.

[Anonymous No.9017053]

[Anonymous No.9017123]

>>9016242

[Anonymous No.9017136]

[Anonymous No.9017138]

[Anonymous No.9017169]

>>9015934
heh

[Anonymous No.9017503]

>>9015934
explain?

[Anonymous No.9017686]

>>9016418
>>9016418
this should really have something like infinity +1 or aleph null +1 somewhere to signify that the natural numbers include 0 and therefore create the same discussion in every thread about whether 0 should be in the naturals or not

[Anonymous No.9017693]

[Anonymous No.9017709]

>>9017138
underrated

[Anonymous No.9017711]

>>9016418
Thank you so much for posting this. I've been laughing like a retard all day

[Anonymous No.9017721]

[Anonymous No.9017734]

[Anonymous No.9017768]

>>9017709
I just dont get it.
How are there always people that havent seen these jokes? They are so fucking old. You see it all over the internet.

[Anonymous No.9017772]

>>9017734
That's wrong, it should be
sin(x)/x
= (sin(x))'/(x)' [L'Hopital]
= cos(x)/1
= cos(x)
Now we substitute
sin(x)/x = cos(x)
x = sin(x)/cos(x)
x = tan(x)
QED

[Anonymous No.9017774]

>>9016418
This is funny

[Anonymous No.9017837]

>>9017734
normie meme

[Anonymous No.9017836]

>>9015863

well that's obviously true but not what the Riemann hypothesis is about

[Anonymous No.9017841]

>>9015934
>cutting a surface into a single chart
>not using a partition of unity

[Anonymous No.9017843]

[Anonymous No.9017847]

>>9017843
>IQ

[Anonymous No.9017868]

[Anonymous No.9017869]

>>9017843
>X/Y chromosomes exclusively determine behaviour
>IQ as a rigorous measure of intelligence
>dividing human genepool into a discrete set of races
Pretty funny memes

[Anonymous No.9017881]

>>9017847
>>9017869
poor you

[Anonymous No.9017882]

>>9017772
Doesn't (sin(x)/(x)) differentiate to (xcos(x)-sin(x)/x^2 using the quotient rule

[Anonymous No.9017886]

>>9017882
>>9017772
nevermind im an idiot

[Anonymous No.9017891]

>>9017847
>>9017869

Stay mad.

[Anonymous No.9017896]

>>9015934
That from that black Hawaiian chick? Post more bub

[Anonymous No.9017901]

[Anonymous No.9017909]

>>9017136
shouldn't i += 2 be outside the if statement

[Anonymous No.9017911]

>>9017868
I think this is funny but I don't know why
Anyways your science memes are gay.. Haha nerds... Here's some grade A humour.
<---------- haha see. Its Bigfoots ass. Fucking hilarious

[Anonymous No.9017912]

>>9017909

Yes, and thats the only thing wrong with that program.

[Anonymous No.9017930]

>>9017912
kek

[Anonymous No.9017978]

>>9017843
>Tesla not being on the right side
Too pep

[Mr. Mr. No.9017991]

>>9017029
wew boi

[Anonymous No.9017993]

[Anonymous No.9017998]

>>9015900
Care to overexplain this one? I take it it's not just a redefinition of pi, because that would be boring as fuck.

[Anonymous No.9018014]

>>9017998

Its a coincidence, and an exploitation of measurement error. They arent actually equal to pi, but they are pretty darn close, and if you were doing a scientific measurement, you would get an answer close enough that you could contribute the difference to error.

[Anonymous No.9018031]

[Anonymous No.9018050]

>>9017686
Google ordinal numbers.
Nothing of this has anything to do with 0 being a natural number or not.

[/mg/ - math general No.9018061]

>>9018050
its a friggin meme you dip

[Anonymous No.9018104]

[Anonymous No.9018120]

>>9017901
>someone somewhere believes this
I'm very angry
but then I remember I'm not the biggest fucking idiot on the planet and it makes me feel somewhat better

[Anonymous No.9018132]

>>9018104
but thats just c-(aspr)n

[Anonymous No.9018182]

[Anonymous No.9018247]

>>9017843
The title of the thread is /sci/ memes, not /pol/ memes

[Anonymous No.9018268]

[math]\sqrt[s]{\sqrt[h]{\sqrt[i]{\sqrt[t]{\sqrt[p]{\sqrt[o]{\sqrt[s]{\sqrt[t]{\sqrt[s]{\frac{\frac{are}{very}}{\frac{very}{fun}}}}}}}}}}}[/math]

[Anonymous No.9018273]

[eqn]
\sqrt[s]{\sqrt[h]{\sqrt[i]{\sqrt[t]{\sqrt[p]{\sqrt[o]{\sqrt[s]{\sqrt[t]{\sqrt[s]{\frac{\frac{are}{very}}{\frac{very}{fun}}}}}}}}}}}
[/eqn]

[Anonymous No.9018288]

>>9018132
it's those weird engineers who use j

[Anonymous No.9018364]

[Anonymous No.9018378]

>>9017901
I don't even get it.

I don't follow the meme infographic's logic

[Anonymous No.9018383]

>>9018378
I am not sure if I follow it 100% myself but I think this image is implying that the ONLY possible way to achieve escape velocity would be to accelerate to 25020 mph instantly, while touching the ground.

[Anonymous No.9018389]

>>9018132
>c-(aspr)n

-(aspr)n + c you pleb

[Anonymous No.9018401]

>>9018389
literally the same expression you retarded cunt

[Anonymous No.9018444]

>>9018031
how should I learn thermodynamics then?

[Anonymous No.9018538]

>>9016418
>not putting 10^200 at the bottom

[Anonymous No.9019388]

>>9015900
Is this actually true?

[Anonymous No.9019406]

>>9015863
>hurrddurr lets say some retarded shit and attribute it to someone famous
this isn't /sci/, it belongs on reddit

[Anonymous No.9019424]

>>9017836
>zero divisor
>true

[Anonymous No.9019429]

>>9017029
we get it, you just passed calc 1 and think it's funny that e^x is its own derivative

[Anonymous No.9019433]

>>9017138
What's sad is this is what normies think this is a semi-accurate depiction of how physicists came to the conclusion of dark matter / energy

[Anonymous No.9019438]

>>9017843
There's so much wrong with this it hurts, but I'm gonna bite the obvious bait

>Including procreation on the left when two of the pictured "examples" died virgins
>IQ on the left
>Thinking the cult of tesla is related to actual science
>thinking agnosticism isn't just the pussy's response to someone asking them if they're an atheist

[Anonymous No.9019918]

Are giants real yada yada ancient races yo? nobody mention pituitary tumours.

[Anonymous No.9020045]

>>9019388
no

[Anonymous No.9020046]

[Anonymous No.9020305]

[Anonymous No.9020377]

>>9019429
The joke is shit mate, you're just projecting.

[Anonymous No.9021385]