[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 68 KB, 751x600, gods of earth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9006024 No.9006024 [Reply] [Original]

Why are Jewish people disproportionately represented among nobel prize recipients?

>> No.9006028

ashkenazi jews have the highest IQ of any ethnic group. Also, their group consists almost exclusively of high IQ members, bringing their average higher.

>> No.9006041

>>9006024
They're extremely well connected, so they get access to the best tutors, preparatory schools, and universities.

>inb4 hurr durr then y r u racist against black people
I'm not.

>> No.9006085

goy if only you knew

>> No.9006090

>>9006024
>Rich
>Very well connected
>Go to best schools
>Very smart

I actually believe they're chosen by God.

>> No.9006095

>posts pic of Boganoffs
>asks about Jews
y'all bakers toasting in a roll bread

>> No.9006119
File: 87 KB, 474x460, 1476610258467.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9006119

>>9006024 >>9006085 >>9006095
>posts pic of Boganoffs
>asks about Jews

Bogdanov twins are "Aliens" friendly toward other humans, unlike the Jewish "Alien" Reptilians.

>> No.9006121

>>9006024
They are God's chosen people.

>> No.9006148
File: 184 KB, 1004x816, The Rothschilds.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9006148

>>9006024
Nepotism.

>> No.9006178

Why are /pol/ posters disproportionately represented among /sci/ threads?

>> No.9007233

>>9006119
quick rundown on these two?

>> No.9007248
File: 3.22 MB, 300x300, surf's up.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9007248

>>9007233
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogdanov_affair
tldr: they got PhDs by publishing some weird new-agey stuff about the Big Bang and it's an open question as to whether there's any scientific merit to their work or whether it was a scam to fool people into giving them PhDs for work that almost nobody could make sense of.

>Participants in the discussions were particularly unconvinced by a statement in the "Topological origin of inertia" paper that "whatever the orientation, the plane of oscillation of Foucault's pendulum is necessarily aligned with the initial singularity marking the origin of physical space." In addition, the paper claimed, the Foucault pendulum experiment "cannot be explained satisfactorily in either classical or relativistic mechanics". The physicists commenting on Usenet found these claims and subsequent attempts at their explanation peculiar, since the trajectory of a Foucault pendulum—a standard museum piece—is accurately predicted by classical mechanics. The Bogdanovs explained that these claims would only be clear in the context of topological field theory. Baez and Russell Blackadar attempted to determine the meaning of the "plane of oscillation" statement; after the Bogdanovs issued some elaborations, Baez concluded that it was a complicated way of rephrasing the following:

>Since the big bang happened everywhere, no matter which way a pendulum swings, the plane in which it swings can be said to "intersect the big bang".

>However, Baez pointed out, this statement does not in fact concern the Big Bang, and is entirely equivalent to the following:

>No matter which way a pendulum swings, there is some point on the plane in which it swings.

>Yet this rephrasing is itself equivalent to the statement

>Any plane contains a point.

>If this was the essence of the statement, Baez noted, it cannot be very useful in "explaining the origin of inertia".

Kinda like Mochizuki but with less scientific rigor and with more plastic surgery.

>> No.9007301

>>9006028
incorrect. asians do (singapore, koreans, etc.)

>> No.9007305

>>9006041
not only are they extremely well connected, jews take good care after each other so the other "neptoism" post is sort of correct. (went to a prep school with jews, and virtually all of their dads were fund managers)

>> No.9007319

>>9007248
this sounds like it could explain kung-fu shit were the fighters are getting momentum in their punches that shouldn't actually be there.

Can someone find the article about the tops of clouds bending into 4th dimensional peaks? Which explained weird extra winds come out of nowhere in a storm? Sounds similar.

>> No.9007335

>>9007301
east asian IQ is ~0.3std higher than whites
ashkenazi IQ is ~1std higher than whites

>> No.9007340

>>9006024

Because increases in the number of right sided outliers are disproportionately connected to average IQ.

A group with 100 IQ will have right sided outliers but not at the same quantity nor quality as a group with a 115 IQ.

>> No.9007345

>>9007340

CONT

In simpler terms: The higher the average IQ of a group, the more members of that group you find on the right side and the higher IQ you'll find in those outliers.

Just be aware that Ashkenazis usually have a higher verbal than mechanical and/or visuo-spatial intelligence.

Which can explain why so much verbose bullshit comes from them. A mechanically inclined person, or a visuo-spatial one, can see the flaws in an edifice of thought almost immediately.

Parsing verbal descriptions into forms that show contradiction, or lack of sufficient premises, is a bit more time consuming. Bullshit travels faster than truth.